A study on socio economic aspects and constraints faced by hybrid paddy (Arize 6444 gold) cultivators in Kaushambi district of Uttar Pradesh

Introduction

Hybrid paddy cultivation had become an important innovation in modern agriculture, aimed at increasing productivity, improving grain quality, and ensuring greater resilience against biotic and abiotic stresses. Hybrid paddy varieties were developed through the cross-breeding of two genetically distinct parent lines to harness the benefits of heterosis or hybrid vigor, resulting in higher yields and better adaptability to varied agro-climatic conditions compared to traditional varieties. Among these, Arize 6444 Gold emerged as a prominent hybrid paddy variety that was widely preferred by farmers due to its exceptional yield potential, short to medium duration maturity, and superior grain quality. It demonstrated remarkable tolerance to major pests and diseases, including bacterial leaf blight and blast, which reduced the dependency on chemical inputs and production costs. The variety's strong stem structure and resistance to lodging ensured minimal post-maturity losses, while its uniform grain size, attractive appearance, and excellent cooking qualities increased its market demand and consumer acceptance. Arize 6444 Gold was also suitable for cultivation under both irrigated and rainfed conditions, enabling farmers in diverse regions to benefit from its performance. Its shorter maturity period allowed timely crop rotation and better utilization of land resources, enhancing overall farm profitability. By offering consistent yields even under challenging environmental conditions, this hybrid variety contributed significantly to food security, farmer income generation, and sustainable rice production systems.

Thus, the adoption of Arize 6444 Gold reflected the growing importance of hybrid paddy in transforming rice cultivation into a more efficient, profitable, and resilient agricultural practice.

Research Methodology

The research employed a purposive-cum-random sampling approach for selecting the district, block, villages, and respondents to ensure both relevance and representativeness. Kaushambi district was purposively chosen to minimize logistical challenges and save time for the investigator. Within the district, Manjhanpur block was selected owing to its higher concentration of farmers cultivating Hybrid paddy (Arize 6444 Gold). A list of villages in the selected block was prepared, and five percent of those with a significant number of such farmers were randomly chosen. From these villages, all Hybrid paddy farmers were listed and classified into five landholding categories: marginal (less than 1 ha), small (1-2 ha), semi-medium (2-4 ha), medium (4-10 ha), and large (more than 10 ha). Using proportionate random sampling, 120 farmers were selected, along with 5 wholesalers, 5 distributors, and 10 retailers to examine socio-economic attributes, marketing costs, margins, price spread, efficiency, and related constraints. Primary data was obtained through a pre-tested structured schedule via direct personal interviews, while secondary data was gathered from relevant literature, official records, and reports at district and block levels. The data, pertaining to the 2024-2025 agricultural year, was processed and interpreted using suitable statistical tools to derive precise and reliable findings.

Analytical Tools 1. Chi-Square: 𝜒2 = ∑(𝑂𝑖 -𝐸𝑖) 2 /𝐸𝑖 2. Arithmetic Mean: = ∑xi / N 3. Garrett Ranking: 100 (Rij-0.5) /Nj The data showed that the highest proportion of respondents (28%) had completed SSC, followed closely by those with HSC education (26%). Respondents educated below SSC formed 23%, indicating a considerable share with limited formal education. Graduates accounted for the smallest proportion at 13%, suggesting relatively fewer farmers pursued higher studies. Marginal farmers dominated across all educational categories, particularly among those with lower educational attainment. Higher education levels such as HSC and graduation showed a relatively balanced distribution among different farm sizes. The Chi-square value of 13.2069 indicated a moderate association between education level and farm size within the study area. Only 25% were in the high category, showing a relatively small proportion achieving higher outcomes. This distribution suggested that most farmers operated at a lower capacity, with fewer enjoying the benefits of high performance. The findings highlighted the potential need for targeted interventions to improve efficiency, productivity, and overall performance across the farming community.

Results and Discussion

Conclusion

The study concluded that farming in the study area was primarily dominated by middle-aged individuals, with the highest proportion of respondents belonging to the 35-45 years age group, followed by a considerable share of younger farmers aged 25-35 years, while participation declined among the youngest and oldest categories. In terms of education, the majority had completed SSC, with a notable share attaining HSC, whereas fewer farmers were graduates, reflecting limited higher educational attainment. Landholding patterns revealed a predominance of marginal farmers with less than one hectare, highlighting small-scale agriculture as a prevailing characteristic. Most respondents fell into the low category for the measured parameter, indicating limited productivity, resources, or technological adoption, with a smaller proportion achieving higher performance levels. Garrett's ranking analysis showed that price issues, availability, and certification problems were the most critical constraints, followed by transportation and quality concerns, while competition and communication gaps were relatively less significant. Overall, the findings suggested that small landholdings, moderate educational attainment, and operational challenges collectively influenced productivity and profitability. The results emphasized the need for targeted interventions in resource access, skill development, and infrastructure support to enhance farming efficiency, economic returns, and sustainability within the agricultural community.

References

1. Anand A, Mishra A. Study on marketing of hybrid paddy seeds in Gaya district of Bihar state. J Glob Econ. 2022;6(4):311-327.
2. Akter, Abhay. Factors determining profitability of rice farming in Bangladesh. Bihar J Agric Mark. 2020;4(4):407-416.
3. Bando, Ritwik. Inter-district variations in market performance in the trading of paddy/rice in West Bengal. Bihar J Agric Mark. 2017;2(1):43-53.
4. Chidambaram, Ajjan. Costs and returns of rice cultivation under different levels of mechanization in Cauvery delta zone of Tamil Nadu state. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2018;21(1):20-29.
5. Chowday. Economic analysis of production costs and prices of rice in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh. Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2020;25(4):431-436.
6. Mahendra, Rao. Agricultural price policy. Agric Mark. 2018;40(1):41-43.
7. Mark, Adward. Profitability of rice production in different production systems in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Indian J Agric Mark. 2021;8(2):239-245.
8. Lakra N, et al. Economic analysis of production, marketing and constraints of paddy in Dantewada district of Chhattisgarh. Coimbatore: Directorate of Publications, TNAU; 2017. p. 17.
9. Panchali, Deepali. Changes in rice production technology in Jorhat district of Assam. Raipur (IN): Indira Gandhi Agricultural University; 2019.
10. Paul, Sharma V. Socio-economic dynamics of farmers and economics of certified seed production of paddy in Karimnagar district, Telangana. 2021.
11. Kumar R, Kumar R. Marketing of hybrid paddy seeds in Saharsa district of Bihar. Indian J Agric Mark. 2023;22(2):323-328.
12. Sakia, Bora. Impact of price policy on paddy growers of Assam. Agro-Econ Res Cent JNKVV Proj Rep. 2015;3(2):56-58.