Conflicts assessment and management among marine fishers in Ratnagiri district, Maharashtra

Abstract

The present study was carried out to study the conflicts between the marine fishers of Ratnagiri, Maharashtra. Three talukas were selected from the district and one hundred fifty-two fishers were selected randomly. Information was collected through a well-structured interview schedule. The study revealed that 70.2% of conflicts predominantly arise between native fishers whereas the remaining 29.8% arise between outsider fishers, with the main causes identified as non-compliance with regulations, ineffective government oversight, and competition for fishing grounds. Conflicts occur more frequently (64%) during the rainy season, and a significant proportion of disputes involve small-scale and large-scale fishers, especially concerning fishing practices and encroachment on territories. Conflicts are often resolved through negotiation, with governmental involvement being minimal. The study also highlights the inadequate existing conflict management mechanisms and calls for policy changes, including impartial fishing regulations, collaboration among fishers, and better enforcement. Recommendations for improving conflict resolution include enhanced monitoring, regulation of fishing practices, and a stronger government role in addressing disputes.