Scinovex

Research article · 2023 · Full text

International Journal of Horticulture and Food Science

Standardization of micro-propagation protocol for mass multiplication of banana through tissue culture techniques

Ashwini A

Volume 5(1) · Pages 139–143 · DOI: 10.33545/26631067.2023.v5.i1b.469 ↗

Research areasPlant tissue culture and regenerationBanana Cultivation and ResearchPlant Disease Management Techniques

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Tissue culture-based micropropagation offers efficient means for rapid multiplication of disease-free banana planting material essential for sustainable production. This research standardized protocols for mass multiplication of banana (Musa spp.) cultivar Grand Naine through optimization of culture media composition, growth regulator concentrations, and subculture parameters. Shoot tip explants were established on Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with various concentrations of benzylaminopurine (BAP), thidiazuron (TDZ), and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Multiplication rates, shoot quality, rooting response, and hardening success were evaluated across treatment combinations. Results demonstrated that BAP at 4 mg/L produced optimal multiplication rate of 8.4 shoots per explant per subculture, significantly exceeding rates achieved with lower BAP concentrations or alternative cytokinins. Addition of IAA at 0.5 mg/L improved shoot quality without reducing multiplication. TDZ at 1 mg/L achieved highest multiplication rate of 9.6 shoots per explant but produced compact shoots requiring extended elongation treatment before rooting. Root induction on half-strength MS medium supplemented with IBA at 1 mg/L achieved 96.4% rooting with average 5.8 roots per plantlet. Hardening in cocopeat-based substrate under shade net conditions achieved 92.6% survival rate at 30 days post-transfer. Genetic stability assessed by morphological evaluation of field-grown plants showed no observable variation from mother plant characteristics. Complete protocol from explant initiation to field-ready plant required 16-18 weeks with potential annual output exceeding 50,000 plants from single mother plant selection. Cost analysis indicated 35% reduction compared to conventional sucker multiplication while ensuring disease-free status. These findings establish commercially viable micropropagation protocols supporting large-scale production of quality banana planting material.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Banana is a critical fruit crop globally, serving as a primary source of nutrition and income for millions in tropical and subtropical areas. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Banana is a critical fruit crop globally, serving as a primary source of nutrition and income for millions in tropical and subtropical areas.

      In the paper's own words

      “Banana ranks among the world's most important fruit crops, providing essential nutrition and income for millions of people in tropical and subtropical regions”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Traditional propagation using suckers is inefficient because it limits the rate of multiplication and allows diseases to persist. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Traditional propagation using suckers is inefficient because it limits the rate of multiplication and allows diseases to persist.

      In the paper's own words

      “Conventional propagation through suckers limits multiplication rates, perpetuates disease cycles, and constrains genetic improvement programs.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Tissue culture micropropagation can overcome traditional limits by rapidly producing disease-free, genetically uniform plants. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Tissue culture micropropagation can overcome traditional limits by rapidly producing disease-free, genetically uniform plants.

      In the paper's own words

      “Micropropagation through tissue culture techniques offers solutions to these constraints by enabling rapid multiplication of genetically uniform, disease-free planting material from selected superior genotypes”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to create a standardized, efficient micropropagation protocol for the Grand Naine banana cultivar to maximize plantlet quality. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to create a standardized, efficient micropropagation protocol for the Grand Naine banana cultivar to maximize plantlet quality.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research aimed to standardize micropropagation protocols for banana cultivar Grand Naine, the dominant export variety, optimizing each production stage for maximum efficiency and plantlet quality”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers used 15-20 cm sword suckers from disease-free Grand Naine mother plants sourced from a certified nuclear stock facility. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers used 15-20 cm sword suckers from disease-free Grand Naine mother plants sourced from a certified nuclear stock facility.

      In the paper's own words

      “Sword suckers approximately 15-20 cm height were collected from disease-free mother plants of banana cultivar Grand Naine maintained at a certified nuclear stock facility”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The basal culture medium consisted of Murashige and Skoog salts with 30 g/L sucrose, 100 mg/L myo-inositol, and 7 g/L agar. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The basal culture medium consisted of Murashige and Skoog salts with 30 g/L sucrose, 100 mg/L myo-inositol, and 7 g/L agar.

      In the paper's own words

      “Culture media was prepared using Murashige and Skoog basal salts supplemented with sucrose at 30 g/L, myo-inositol at 100 mg/L, and gelled with agar at 7 g/L.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Multiplication was tested using a randomized design with BAP (2, 4, 6 mg/L) alone or with 0.5 mg/L IAA, and TDZ (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mg/L) as an alternative. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Multiplication was tested using a randomized design with BAP (2, 4, 6 mg/L) alone or with 0.5 mg/L IAA, and TDZ (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mg/L) as an alternative.

      In the paper's own words

      “Multiplication experiments followed completely randomized design testing BAP at 2, 4, and 6 mg/L concentrations alone and in combination with IAA at 0.5 mg/L. Separate experiments evaluated TDZ at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/L as alternative cytokinin source.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Root induction was tested using half-strength MS medium supplemented with IBA at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/L. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Root induction was tested using half-strength MS medium supplemented with IBA at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/L.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rooting was induced by transfer to half-strength MS medium supplemented with IBA at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/L.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Plantlets were hardened in a cocopeat-sand mixture under a shade net that reduced light by 50%. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Plantlets were hardened in a cocopeat-sand mixture under a shade net that reduced light by 50%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rooted plantlets were hardened in plastic pots containing cocopeat-sand mixture under shade net providing 50% light reduction”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • BAP at 4 mg/L provided the best balance of quality and quantity, yielding 8.4 shoots per explant. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      BAP at 4 mg/L provided the best balance of quality and quantity, yielding 8.4 shoots per explant.

      In the paper's own words

      “BAP at 4 mg/L achieved optimal balance between multiplication rate and shoot quality, producing 8.4 shoots per explant”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • While TDZ at 1 mg/L produced the highest multiplication rate (9.6 shoots per explant), the shoots were too compact and needed extra elongation before rooting. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      While TDZ at 1 mg/L produced the highest multiplication rate (9.6 shoots per explant), the shoots were too compact and needed extra elongation before rooting.

      In the paper's own words

      “TDZ at 1 mg/L achieved highest multiplication rate of 9.6 shoots per explant but produced compact shoots requiring extended elongation treatment before rooting.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The highest rooting success (96.4%) and an average of 5.8 roots per plantlet were achieved using half-strength MS medium with 1 mg/L IBA. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The highest rooting success (96.4%) and an average of 5.8 roots per plantlet were achieved using half-strength MS medium with 1 mg/L IBA.

      In the paper's own words

      “Root induction on half-strength MS medium supplemented with IBA at 1 mg/L achieved 96.4% rooting with average 5.8 roots per plantlet.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The hardening process in cocopeat under shade nets resulted in a 92.6% survival rate after 30 days. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The hardening process in cocopeat under shade nets resulted in a 92.6% survival rate after 30 days.

      In the paper's own words

      “Hardening in cocopeat-based substrate under shade net conditions achieved 92.6% survival rate at 30 days post-transfer.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The micropropagation method reduced costs by 35% compared to conventional sucker multiplication while providing disease-free plants. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The micropropagation method reduced costs by 35% compared to conventional sucker multiplication while providing disease-free plants.

      In the paper's own words

      “Cost analysis indicated 35% reduction compared to conventional sucker multiplication while ensuring disease-free status.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The full process takes 16-18 weeks and can potentially produce over 50,000 plants per year from one mother plant. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The full process takes 16-18 weeks and can potentially produce over 50,000 plants per year from one mother plant.

      In the paper's own words

      “Complete protocol from explant initiation to field-ready plant required 16-18 weeks with potential annual output exceeding 50,000 plants from single mother plant selection.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that using 4 mg/L BAP for multiplication and 1 mg/L IBA for rooting is a reliable protocol for producing quality banana planting material. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that using 4 mg/L BAP for multiplication and 1 mg/L IBA for rooting is a reliable protocol for producing quality banana planting material.

      In the paper's own words

      “optimized protocol utilizing BAP at 4 mg/L for multiplication and IBA at 1 mg/L for rooting provides reliable production of quality planting material.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The protocol was only optimized for one cultivar and might need adjustments for other banana varieties. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The protocol was only optimized for one cultivar and might need adjustments for other banana varieties.

      In the paper's own words

      “This protocol was optimized for a single cultivar and may require modification for other banana varieties with different growth regulator sensitivities.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The study did not comprehensively assess the long-term genetic stability of the plants over many subculture cycles. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The study did not comprehensively assess the long-term genetic stability of the plants over many subculture cycles.

      In the paper's own words

      “Long-term genetic stability across multiple subculture cycles was not comprehensively assessed.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Grand Naine banana plants). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Banana Micropropagation Workflow
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Grand Naine banana plants). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Grand Naine banana plants). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Banana Micropropagation Workflow

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Grand Naine banana plants). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Shoots/Explant: MS Basal (Control) vs BAP 2 mg/L vs BAP 4 mg/L vs BAP 6 mg/L vs BAP 4 mg/L + IAA 0.5
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Shoots/Explant: MS Basal (Control) vs BAP 2 mg/L vs BAP 4 mg/L vs BAP 6 mg/L vs BAP 4 mg/L + IAA 0.5

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
½ MS + IBA 0.5: Rooting (%) vs Roots/Plantlet
Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

½ MS + IBA 0.5: Rooting (%) vs Roots/Plantlet

Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Effect of cytokinin type and concentration on shoot multiplication in bananaTable 1Page 2Shoot multiplication rates under different culture media compositions in banana micropropagationFigure 1Page 2Root induction and hardening performance under different treatmentsTable 2Page 3Radar plot comparing standard and optimized protocol performance across multiple parametersFigure 2Page 3Shoot height progression through initiation, multiplication, and rooting phases of banana micropropagationFigure 3Page 3Schematic overview of standardized banana micropropagation protocol from explant selection to field transferFigure 4Page 4
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Banana ranks among the world's most important fruit crops, providing essential nutrition and income for millions of people in tropical and subtropical regions [1] . Conventional propagation through suckers limits multiplication rates, perpetuates disease cycles, and constrains genetic improvement programs. The accumulation of viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens in vegetatively propagated material progressively reduces productivity in affected plantations [2] . Micropropagation through tissue culture techniques offers solutions to these constraints by enabling rapid multiplication of genetically uniform, disease-free planting material from selected superior genotypes [3] . The theoretical multiplication potential of tissue culture exceeds millions of plants annually from single explant sources, compared to 10-20 suckers achievable through conventional methods. Additionally, controlled laboratory environments permit year-round production independent of seasonal limitations [4] . Successful banana micropropagation requires optimization of multiple parameters including explant selection and sterilization, culture media composition, growth regulator types and concentrations, environmental conditions during culture, and hardening protocols for transfer to field conditions [5] . Each parameter influences multiplication rate, plantlet quality, and ultimate field performance. Protocol standardization for specific cultivars ensures consistent production of high-quality planting material [6] . This research aimed to standardize micropropagation protocols for banana cultivar Grand Naine, the dominant export variety, optimizing each production stage for maximum efficiency and plantlet quality [7] . The established protocol would support commercial tissue culture laboratories seeking to expand production capacity for this economically important cultivar.

Material and Methods

Material and Methods

Material

Sword suckers approximately 15-20 cm height were collected from disease-free mother plants of banana cultivar Grand Naine maintained at a certified nuclear stock facility [8] . Suckers were trimmed to remove outer leaf sheaths, washed thoroughly, and shoot tips of 1-2 cm size excised under aseptic conditions. Culture media was prepared using Murashige and Skoog basal salts supplemented with sucrose at 30 g/L, myo-inositol at 100 mg/L, and gelled with agar at 7 g/L. Media pH was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving.

Methods

Surface sterilization employed sequential treatment with 70% ethanol for 1 minute followed by 0.1% mercuric chloride for 10 minutes with continuous agitation, then three rinses in sterile distilled water [9] . Multiplication experiments followed completely randomized design testing BAP at 2, 4, and 6 mg/L concentrations alone and in combination with IAA at 0.5 mg/L. Separate experiments evaluated TDZ at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/L as alternative cytokinin source. Cultures were incubated at 25±2°C under 16-hour photoperiod with 2000 lux light intensity. Multiplication rate was recorded as number of shoots produced per explant at 4-week subculture intervals. Rooting was induced by transfer to half-strength MS medium supplemented with IBA at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/L. Rooted plantlets were hardened in plastic pots containing cocopeat-sand mixture under shade net providing 50% light reduction [10] . Survival percentage was recorded at 30 days after transfer. Data were subjected to analysis of variance with treatment separation by Duncan's multiple range test at 5% probability.

Culture Environment

The tissue culture laboratory maintained temperature at 25±2°C through air conditioning with backup systems ensuring continuity during power fluctuations. Photoperiod was controlled by fluorescent lights on automatic timers. Relative humidity ranged from 60-70% within the culture room. Laminar flow hoods provided sterile working environment for all transfer operations [11] . These controlled conditions supported consistent culture responses essential for protocol standardization.

Results

Results

Discussion

The multiplication rates achieved in this research compare favorably with published reports for banana tissue culture, confirming protocol effectiveness for commercial-scale production [3] . The superiority of BAP over TDZ for producing quality shoots suitable for direct rooting reflects the more balanced hormonal stimulus provided by this cytokinin. While TDZ produces higher multiplication rates, the resulting compact shoots require additional subculture on elongation medium before successful rooting [4] . High rooting success on half-strength MS medium with IBA at 1 mg/L demonstrates that plantlet quality from the multiplication stage adequately supports root initiation without prolonged auxin exposure. The reduced salt concentration apparently favors root development over continued shoot growth, directing metabolic resources appropriately [5] . The strong correlation between rooting quality and hardening survival emphasizes importance of this transitional stage.

Hardening success exceeding 92% provides confidence for commercial operations where plantlet losses during this stage significantly impact production economics. The cocopeat-based substrate provided appropriate moisture retention and aeration for root establishment [6] . Gradual acclimatization under shade net conditions apparently protected plantlets from transplant shock while permitting sufficient light for photosynthetic competence development.

Limitations

This protocol was optimized for a single cultivar and may require modification for other banana varieties with different growth regulator sensitivities. Long-term genetic stability across multiple subculture cycles was not comprehensively assessed. Production cost analysis did not include all infrastructure amortization factors. Field performance comparison with conventionally propagated plants was limited to morphological observation.

Conclusion

This research establishes standardized micropropagation protocols for commercial banana production achieving multiplication rates of 8.4 shoots per explant, rooting success of 96.4%, and hardening survival of 92.6%. The optimized protocol utilizing BAP at 4 mg/L for multiplication and IBA at 1 mg/L for rooting provides reliable production of quality planting material. The complete cycle from explant initiation to field-ready plant requiring 16-18 weeks enables year-round production planning aligned with planting season demands. Theoretical multiplication potential exceeding 50,000 plants annually from single mother plant selection supports large-scale commercial operations and germplasm conservation programs.

Commercial tissue culture laboratories can adopt these protocols with confidence for producing disease-free banana planting material meeting quality standards for domestic and export markets.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Effect of cytokinin type and concentration on shoot multiplication in banana
TreatmentShoots/ExplantShoot Length (cm)Days to Multiply
MS Basal (Control)2.43.832
BAP 2 mg/L6.83.228
BAP 4 mg/L8.42.826
BAP 6 mg/L7.62.224
BAP 4 mg/L + IAA 0.57.23.426
TDZ 1 mg/L9.61.828
SEm(±)0.380.141.2
CD (p=0.05)1.160.423.6

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Effect of cytokinin type and concentration on shoot multiplication in banana↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Effect of cytokinin type and concentration on shoot multiplication in banana

Effect of cytokinin type and concentration on shoot multiplication in banana

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Shoot multiplication rates under different culture media compositions in banana micropropagation
Shoot multiplication rates under different culture media compositions in banana micropropagation↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Shoot multiplication rates under different culture media compositions in banana micropropagation

Shoot multiplication rates under different culture media compositions in banana micropropagation

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. Root induction and hardening performance under different treatments
Rooting MediumRooting (%)Roots/PlantletRoot Length (cm)Hardening Survival (%)
½ MS Basal68.43.22.476.8
½ MS + IBA 0.584.64.63.686.4
½ MS + IBA 1.096.45.84.892.6
½ MS + IBA 1.592.86.44.288.2
SEm(±)2.860.340.222.42
CD (p=0.05)8.821.050.687.46

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Root induction and hardening performance under different treatments↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Root induction and hardening performance under different treatments

Root induction and hardening performance under different treatments

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 2. Radar plot comparing standard and optimized protocol performance across multiple parameters
Radar plot comparing standard and optimized protocol performance across multiple parameters↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Radar plot comparing standard and optimized protocol performance across multiple parameters

Radar plot comparing standard and optimized protocol performance across multiple parameters

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 3. Shoot height progression through initiation, multiplication, and rooting phases of banana micropropagation
Shoot height progression through initiation, multiplication, and rooting phases of banana micropropagation↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
Shoot height progression through initiation, multiplication, and rooting phases of banana micropropagation

Shoot height progression through initiation, multiplication, and rooting phases of banana micropropagation

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 4. Schematic overview of standardized banana micropropagation protocol from explant selection to field transfer
Schematic overview of standardized banana micropropagation protocol from explant selection to field transfer↗ Enlarge
Figure 4
Schematic overview of standardized banana micropropagation protocol from explant selection to field transfer

Schematic overview of standardized banana micropropagation protocol from explant selection to field transfer

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Robinson JC, Sauco VG. Bananas and plantains. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2010. p. 1-311.
  2. Tripathi L, Tripathi JN. Tissue culture studies of banana improvement. Acta Hortic. 2009;897:473-481.
  3. Israeli Y, Reuveni O, Lahav E. Qualitative aspects of somaclonal variations in banana. Sci Hortic. 1991;48(12):71-88.
  4. Vuylsteke D, De Langhe E. Feasibility of in vitro propagation of bananas. Trop Agric. 1985;62(4):323328.
  5. Cronauer SS, Krikorian AD. Multiplication of Musa from excised stem tips. Ann Bot. 1984;53(3):321-328.
  6. Ganapathi TR, Suprasanna P, Bapat VA. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from male flower buds of Musa. Curr Sci. 1999;76(9):1228-1231.
  7. Kulkarni VM, Ganapathi TR, Bapat VA. Establishment of cell suspension cultures in banana (Musa spp.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2004;40(5):491-495.
  8. Strosse H, Domergue R, Panis B. Banana and plantain embryogenic cell suspensions. INIBAP technical guidelines no. 8. Montpellier: INIBAP; 2003. p. 1-36.
  9. Dhed'a D, Dumortier F, Panis B. Plant regeneration in cell suspension cultures of banana (Musa spp.). Fruits. 1991;46(2):125-135.
  10. Mendes BMJ, Mendes FJ, Tulmann Neto A. Efficacy of banana plantlet production. Sci Agric. 1996;53(23):282-286.
  11. Gubbuk H, Pekmezci M. In vitro propagation of some new banana types. Turk J Agric For. 2004;28(5):355361.
  12. Jain SM, Swennen R. Banana improvement: cellular, molecular biology, and induced mutations. Enfield: Science Publishers; 2004. p. 1-382.
  13. Uma S, Lakshmi S, Saraswathi MS. Embryo rescue and plant regeneration in banana (Musa spp.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011;105(1):105-111.
  14. Bairu MW, Fennell CW, van Staden J. The effect of plant growth regulators on somaclonal variation. Plant Growth Regul. 2006;47(2-3):269-282.