Scinovex

Research article · 2026 · Full text

International Journal of Biology Sciences

Detection of Raillietina spp. in Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus): A case report

SM KolangathSV UpadhyeRP KolheVM DhootBK BhadanePK BhangaleChandrashekaran Bala NSJ Patwa

Volume 8(1) · Pages 09–11 · DOI: 10.33545/26649926.2026.v8.i1a.536 ↗

Research areasCoccidia and coccidiosis researchHelminth infection and controlParasite Biology and Host Interactions

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The case report deals with the detection of Raillietina spp. in Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus). The tapeworm was identified during a necropsy of a peafowl presented to the Wildlife Research & Training Centre, Gorewada, Nagpur. The intestinal contents were subjected to the saturated salt flotation technique, leading to the detection of coccidian oocysts and Raillietinan eggs. The tapeworm was studied by microscopy and identified. The finding has value in captive and free-range management of birds.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • The Indian peafowl is ecologically important in India, contributing to pest control by eating insects, reptiles, and small animals. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The Indian peafowl is ecologically important in India, contributing to pest control by eating insects, reptiles, and small animals.

      In the paper's own words

      “In India, the peafowl is a symbol of grace, pride and beauty. Ecologically, it contributes significantly to pest control by feeding on a variety of insects, reptiles and small animals.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Due to its cultural and ecological value, the Indian peafowl is granted the highest legal protection under Schedule I of the Wildlife Protection Act 1972. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Due to its cultural and ecological value, the Indian peafowl is granted the highest legal protection under Schedule I of the Wildlife Protection Act 1972.

      In the paper's own words

      “As per the Wildlife Protection Act 1972, the species is included in Schedule I, according it the highest legal protection due to its ecological and cultural significance.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Raillietina spp. is a cestode parasite common in birds that can cause malnutrition, gastrointestinal distress, and death, especially in immunocompromised hosts. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Raillietina spp. is a cestode parasite common in birds that can cause malnutrition, gastrointestinal distress, and death, especially in immunocompromised hosts.

      In the paper's own words

      “One such significant parasite is Raillietina spp. a cestode of family Davaineidae, is frequently encountered in avian hosts and can lead to gastrointestinal distress, malnutrition and death particularly in stressed or immunocompromised individuals (Soulsby, 1982) [3].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to document a case of Raillietina infection in a free-ranging Indian Peafowl to understand its diagnostic approach and implications for conservation. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to document a case of Raillietina infection in a free-ranging Indian Peafowl to understand its diagnostic approach and implications for conservation.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this context, the following case report documents the detection of Raillietina infection in a free-ranging Indian Peafowl, presenting insights into its pathological implications, diagnostic approach, and relevance for conservation.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The study was conducted on a single adult Indian Peafowl carcass submitted for postmortem examination in early 2025 at the Wildlife Research and Training Centre in Nagpur. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study was conducted on a single adult Indian Peafowl carcass submitted for postmortem examination in early 2025 at the Wildlife Research and Training Centre in Nagpur.

      In the paper's own words

      “In early 2025, an adult Indian Peafowl carcass was submitted for postmortem examination to the Wildlife Research and Training Centre (WRTC), Gorewada, Nagpur.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Case Report

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Standard necropsy procedures were used, including external examination and internal inspection of the intestinal tract. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Standard necropsy procedures were used, including external examination and internal inspection of the intestinal tract.

      In the paper's own words

      “Standard necropsy procedures were followed, beginning with a detailed external examination... Upon internal examination, the intestinal tract appeared congested and moderately distended.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Case Report

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Parasitological examination involved homogenizing 2 grams of intestinal content in 10 ml of distilled water, filtering it, and centrifuging it at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Parasitological examination involved homogenizing 2 grams of intestinal content in 10 ml of distilled water, filtering it, and centrifuging it at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes.

      In the paper's own words

      “Approximately 2 grams of intestinal content were homogenized in 10 ml of distilled water and filtered through muslin cloth. The filtrate was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Case Report

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Microscopic analysis was performed at 10× and 40× magnification to identify parasite eggs. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Microscopic analysis was performed at 10× and 40× magnification to identify parasite eggs.

      In the paper's own words

      “Microscopic examination at 10× and 40× magnification revealed the presence of oval eggs with distinct three pairs of hooks, consistent with those of Raillietina spp.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Case Report

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • External examination of the peafowl revealed dull plumage, mild emaciation, and a slightly prominent keel bone. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      External examination of the peafowl revealed dull plumage, mild emaciation, and a slightly prominent keel bone.

      In the paper's own words

      “Standard necropsy procedures were followed, beginning with a detailed external examination that revealed mild emaciation, dull plumage, and a slightly prominent keel bone.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Case Report

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Dissection of the small intestine showed multiple segmented, flattened parasites attached to the mucosa. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Dissection of the small intestine showed multiple segmented, flattened parasites attached to the mucosa.

      In the paper's own words

      “Careful dissection of the small intestine revealed multiple flattened, segmented parasites attached to the mucosa.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Case Report

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The recovered worms were several centimeters long and possessed a scolex with suckers and rostellum, identifying them as Raillietina spp. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The recovered worms were several centimeters long and possessed a scolex with suckers and rostellum, identifying them as Raillietina spp.

      In the paper's own words

      “These worms, measuring several centimeters in length, displayed a scolex with suckers and rostellum, followed by multiple proglottids, characteristic of the genus Raillietina (Figure 1 to 3).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Case Report

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Microscopy confirmed the presence of Raillietina spp. through the detection of oval eggs featuring three pairs of distinct hooks. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Microscopy confirmed the presence of Raillietina spp. through the detection of oval eggs featuring three pairs of distinct hooks.

      In the paper's own words

      “Microscopic examination at 10× and 40× magnification revealed the presence of oval eggs with distinct three pairs of hooks, consistent with those of Raillietina spp.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Case Report

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The examination also detected both sporulated and unsporulated oocysts of coccidian spp. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The examination also detected both sporulated and unsporulated oocysts of coccidian spp.

      In the paper's own words

      “Unsporulated and sporulated oocysts of coccidian spp. were also observed (Figure 4 to 6).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Case Report

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that the combination of tapeworms and poor body condition in the bird suggests chronic parasitism. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that the combination of tapeworms and poor body condition in the bird suggests chronic parasitism.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this case, the tapeworms and associated poor body condition suggest chronic parasitism.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The authors recommend regular monitoring, targeted deworming, and ecological control of intermediate hosts for protected peafowl in rescue centers and biodiversity parks. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend regular monitoring, targeted deworming, and ecological control of intermediate hosts for protected peafowl in rescue centers and biodiversity parks.

      In the paper's own words

      “For protected species like the Indian Peafowl, regular monitoring, targeted deworming, and ecological control of intermediate hosts are crucial, especially in biodiversity parks and rescue centers.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) and Raillietina tapeworms). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Life Cycle and Identification of Raillietina spp.
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) and Raillietina tapeworms). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) and Raillietina tapeworms). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Life Cycle and Identification of Raillietina spp.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) and Raillietina tapeworms). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Mouth part of the Raillietina spp. tapewormFigure 1Page 2Segment of Raillietina spp. tapeworm (10X)Figure 2Page 2Recovered Raillietina spp. tapewormFigure 3Page 2Egg of Raillietina spp. tapeworm showing distictFigure 4Page 2Unsporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.Figure 5Page 2Sporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.Figure 6Page 2
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

In India, the peafowl is a symbol of grace, pride and beauty. Ecologically, it contributes significantly to pest control by feeding on a variety of insects, reptiles and small animals. It also provides services like seed dispersal and soil aeration which are critical for maintaining the ecosystem. As per the IUCN list, the species has been categorized into the Least Concern category. However, as per the Wildlife Protection Act 1972, the species is included in Schedule I, according it the highest legal protection due to its ecological and cultural significance. In recent years, habitat loss, hunting and wildlife-human conflict have led to localized population declines (Daszak et al., 2000) [1] . Diseases have been an important concern for the free-ranging population of birds in India. Important viral diseases like Newcastle disease and even influenza have led to local population declines in many parts of India. Parasitic infections are often under-reported yet significantly impactful. Internal parasites, including nematodes, cestodes, trematodes and protozoa compromise the bird's physiological functioning, immune response and overall fitness. In captive and semi-captive conditions such infections can proliferate rapidly especially under poor sanitation and limited access to veterinary intervention. One such significant parasite is Raillietina spp. a cestode of family Davaineidae, is frequently encountered in avian hosts and can lead to gastrointestinal distress, malnutrition and death particularly in stressed or immunocompromised individuals (Soulsby, 1982) [3] . In this context, the following case report documents the detection of Raillietina infection in a free-ranging Indian Peafowl, presenting insights into its pathological implications, diagnostic approach, and relevance for conservation.

Case Report

In early 2025, an adult Indian Peafowl carcass was submitted for postmortem examination to the Wildlife Research and Training Centre (WRTC), Gorewada, Nagpur. The bird was recovered by the Range Forest Officer, Gorewada Project, within the Gorewada Biodiversity Park. The bird was reportedly found dead without preceding signs of trauma or predation. Standard necropsy procedures were followed, beginning with a detailed external examination that revealed mild emaciation, dull plumage, and a slightly prominent keel bone. No visible injuries were found. Upon internal examination, the intestinal tract appeared congested and moderately distended. Careful dissection of the small intestine revealed multiple flattened, segmented parasites attached to the mucosa. These worms, measuring several centimeters in length, displayed a scolex with suckers and rostellum, followed by multiple proglottids, characteristic of the genus Raillietina (Figure 1 to 3). Specimens were collected and preserved in 10% buffered formalin for morphological identification. Further, intestinal content was processed for parasitological examination using standard flotation techniques. Approximately 2 grams of intestinal content were homogenized in 10 ml of distilled water and filtered through muslin cloth. The filtrate was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and replaced with saturated sodium chloride solution and, in a parallel setup, zinc sulfate solution (specific gravity 1.18), (Soulsby, 1982) [3] . After gentle mixing, the tubes were centrifuged again, and a coverslip was placed on the meniscus. Following 10 minutes of flotation, the coverslip was transferred to a microscope slide for observation. Microscopic examination at 10× and 40× magnification revealed the presence of oval eggs with distinct three pairs of hooks, consistent with those of Raillietina spp. Unsporulated and sporulated oocysts of coccidian spp. were also observed (Figure 4 to 6).

Figure 4. Egg of Raillietina spp. tapeworm showing distict
Egg of Raillietina spp. tapeworm showing distict↗ Enlarge
Figure 4
Egg of Raillietina spp. tapeworm showing distict

Egg of Raillietina spp. tapeworm showing distict

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Mouth part of the Raillietina spp. tapeworm
Mouth part of the Raillietina spp. tapeworm↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Mouth part of the Raillietina spp. tapeworm

Mouth part of the Raillietina spp. tapeworm

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Discussion

The detection of Raillietina spp. in Peafowl is noteworthy, particularly given its protected status under Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. These cestode parasites are typically acquired by ingesting intermediate hosts such as ants and beetles, which carry the infective cysticercoid stage. Such arthropods are common in semi-natural enclosures rich in leaf litter and organic matter. After ingestion, the larvae mature into adult tapeworms in the intestine, absorbing nutrients and causing mucosal irritation (Permin & Hansen, 1998) [2] . While mild infections may be asymptomatic, heavy burdens can lead to clinical signs like diarrhoea, weight loss, poor plumage, and even intestinal blockage or death (Soulsby, 1982) [3] . In poultry, Raillietina infections have been linked to reduced productivity, while in wild birds, detection is usually post-mortem unless symptoms are overt. In this case, the tapeworms and associated poor body condition suggest chronic parasitism. The naturalistic setting of the enclosure likely facilitated exposure to intermediate hosts, underscoring the need for routine parasitological monitoring in such environments (Soulsby, 1982) [3] . Parasitism is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in wildlife conservation. Health surveillance including parasite screening serves as a key indicator of ecosystem health and informs disease mitigation strategies. For protected species like the Indian Peafowl, regular monitoring, targeted deworming, and ecological control of intermediate hosts are crucial, especially in biodiversity parks and rescue centers. This case reaffirms the importance of integrated wildlife health programs, blending veterinary diagnostics, ecological management, and conservation awareness. Early detection and preventive measures can play a pivotal role in preserving the health of India's national bird.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgmentThe authors acknowledge the kind approval of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Wildlife) & Chief Wildlife Warden, Maharashtra State, for carrying out the research work. Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd., Nagpur and Office of the Divisional Manager, Gorewada Project, Nagpur, for the facilities provided for the research. Director, Wildlife Research & Training Centre to facilitate the research work at WRTC, Gorewada, Nagpur.

Figures and tables from the paper

Figure 2. Segment of Raillietina spp. tapeworm (10X)
Segment of Raillietina spp. tapeworm (10X)↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Segment of Raillietina spp. tapeworm (10X)

Segment of Raillietina spp. tapeworm (10X)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 3. Recovered Raillietina spp. tapeworm
Recovered Raillietina spp. tapeworm↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
Recovered Raillietina spp. tapeworm

Recovered Raillietina spp. tapeworm

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 5. Unsporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.
Unsporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.↗ Enlarge
Figure 5
Unsporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.

Unsporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 6. Sporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.
Sporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.↗ Enlarge
Figure 6
Sporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.

Sporulated oocyst of Coccidia spp.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

References

5 in the original paper
  1. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife threats to biodiversity and human health. Science. 2000;287(5452):443-449.
  2. Permin A, Hansen JW. Epidemiology, diagnosis and control of poultry parasites. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1998.
  3. Soulsby EJL. Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals. 7 th Ed. London: Baillière Tindall; 1982.
  4. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2023. New Delhi: Government of India; 2023.
  5. Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis of fruits and vegetable products. 2 nd Ed. New Delhi: Tata McGrawHill; 1991.