Scinovex
article Open Access

The decomposition of farm wastes through microorganisms

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2025 · Vol. 9(12S) · pp. 205–210
Gaurav K Jambhulkar✉Tini S PillaiVandana S MadkeSapana B BaviskarAkhilesh S WagadreShrushti R MahureVinod S KakadJyoti D ShindeAkhil G Dhawane

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Plant Pathology Section, College of Agriculture, Nagpur during 2024-2025. A eight main treatment i.e. Paddy straw+ soybean straw (1:1), Paddy straw+ soybean straw (2:1), Wheat straw+ soybean straw (1:1), Wheat straw+ soybean straw (2:1), Paddy straw+ Tur straw (1:1), Paddy straw+ Tur straw (2:1), Wheat straw+ Tur straw (1:1) and Wheat straw+ Tur straw (2:1). The enrichment of biofertilizers i.e. Azotobacter chroococcum, PSB (Bacillus subtilis) and Trichoderma viride was procure from Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Nagpur. and it was to investigate their greatest loss of weight in the sub-treatment Aw1B2 [i.e. Paddy + soybean straw (1:1)× PSB (Bacillus subtilis)] recorded maximum loss of weight at 30 days 20.91%, 125.45g and 60 days 52.02%, 312.11g and weight of straw at(30 and 60 days) 474.55g and 287.89g followed by sub-treatment Aw5B1 (i.e. Paddy + Tur straw (1:1)×Azotobacter chroococcum] at 30 days 20.73%, 122.31g and 60 days 51.00%, 300.90g and weight of straw at(30 and 60 days) 467.69g and 289.10g respectively.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

India possesses significant potential in terms of both agricultural and industrial waste utilization. The primary agricultural sources include animal and human excreta, crop residues, tree litter, aquatic vegetation, green manures, waste from urban and rural areas, and tank silt. With the advent of high-yielding crop varieties and the adoption of intensive farming practices, large volumes of agricultural residues such as straw, leaves, twigs, stubble, and an abundance of grasses and weeds are readily accessible on farmlands. The burning of crop residues has offered a temporary solution for clearing agricultural fields; however, it has had severe long-term consequences, including the degradation of soil health, a decline in soil fertility, shortages of key nutrients (such as carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium), reduced crop productivity and yield, and an increase in land becoming unsuitable for cultivation. Earlier research has highlighted the negative impacts of crop residue burning, particularly its contribution to air pollution through the release of harmful and toxic gases (Gadde et al., 2009; Sahu et al., 2015; Andini et al., 2018) [14,4] .

Materials and Methods

During the present investigation, experiments were carried out on "Decomposition of Farm Wastes Through Microorganisms'' Materials used and methods adopted are described in this chapter. The present investigation was carried out during 2024-25 at Plant Pathology Section, College of Agriculture, Nagpur. The experiment was undertaken in CRD (Completely Randomized Design) with treatments and three replications and FCRD (Factorial Completely Randomized Design) with treatments and three replications. In this experiment carried out in polythene bag. Farm wastes materials taken in ratio i.e. main treatments Aw 1 -Paddy straw+ soybean straw (1:1), Aw 2 -Paddy straw+ soybean straw (2:1), Aw 3 -Wheat straw+ soybean straw (1:1), Aw 4 -Wheat straw+ soybean straw (2:1), Aw 5 -Paddy straw+ Tur straw (1:1), Aw 6 -Paddy straw+ Tur straw (2:1), Aw 7 -Wheat straw+ Tur straw (1:1) and Aw 8 -Wheat straw+ Tur straw (2:1). was cut into pieces up to 1-2 inches and sterilized with autoclave. At first this substrate was added into Nagpur bio-decomposer, and after two months decomposition then enrichment of biofertilizer i.e. subtreatments B1 -Azotobacter chroococcum, B2 -Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (Bacillus subtilis) and B3 -Trichoderma viride.

Percent loss in weight of substrates

The loss in weight of the organic material in the polythene bag was used to estimate the extent of decomposition. The weight loss was determined by subtracting the final weight from the initial weight. [5] , measured a weight loss 29%, and Gautam et al. (2010) [18] observed weight loss over a 45 days period. These results confirm the finding of Somani et al., (1982) [27] reported maximum loss in weight of cotton, mung and arhar substrates by inoculation of Coprinus lagopus and Memnoiella echinata. Bhasme et al. (2006) [7] here we have to reported that weight loss of substrate at 15,30, 45 and 60 days during decomposition i.e. 24.13%, 36.50%, 46.14% and 56.52% Gade et al. (2010) [15] also reported that percent weight loss of agriculture waste material by the use of microorganisms during all three years maximum percent loss of weight of substrates was in Trichoderma + Trichurus + Cellulomonas is 57.00, 60.14 and 52.4 [8] his observed that the bacterial cultures were applied on agriculture waste material comparising Soyabean straw, Pigeonpea straw, Wheat straw and cotton straw among all the cultures CDB 19 shown highest weight loss of the substrate (99.99%). It was also observed that maximum weight loss of cotton straw (99.99%) Osama et al., here reported that loss of weight in cotton straw + chicken manure + Azatobacter chroococcum is 36.65%. Rupela et al., (2003) [24] his also observed that weight loss in rice straw at 30 days in bacterial inoculation is 38%.

Results and Discussion

References

  1. Anonymous. Crop residues and their nutrient potential. Research Bulletin on Organic Recycling for Sustainable Crop Production. Dept. of Agri. Chemistry and Soil Sci., Dr. PDKV, Akola. 2005;99(2).
  2. Anonymous. Preparation of compost from different organic wastes. Annual Progress Report, Univ. Dept. of Agro., Dr. PDKV, Akola; 2007. p. 56-60.
  3. Anonymous. Decomposition of agricultural farm waste. Annual Report of Plant Pathology, Dr. PDKV, Akola; 2007. p. 12-13.
  4. Andini A, Bonnet S, Rousset P, Hasanudin U. Impact of open burning of crop residues on air pollution and climate change in Indonesia. Current Science. 2018;115:2259-2266.
  5. Andrea C, Salvia S, Gianni Z. Efficiency of backward composting. BioCycle Journal. 1998;39:76-78.
  6. Bhardwaj KK, Gaur AC. Recycling of organic wastes. New Delhi: ICAR; 1985. p. 5.
  7. Bhasme SP, Thakur KD, Nair R, Sahare V, Bhagat P. Decomposition of agricultural wastes by effective microorganisms. Journal of Plant Disease Science. 2006;1(2):219-220.
  8. Bahatkar B, Gahukar S, Akhare A, Ingle Y, Rathod D, Charpe A. Decomposition of agriculture farm wastes by cellulolytic bacteria. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 2023;13:411-421.
  9. Borah N, Deka NC, Deka BJ, Nath IC, Medhi BK. Enrichment of compost through microbial inoculation - effect on quality. International Journal of Current Research. 2014;6(8):8026-8031.
  10. Dey R, Pal KK, Chauhan SM, Bhatt DM, Mishra JB. Groundnut shell decomposition potential of some cellulolytic microorganisms. Indian Journal of Microbiology. 2002;42(2):165-167.
  11. Deepashree G. Performance of different Trichoderma spp. against some wilt/root rotting pathogens [M.Sc. thesis]. Akola: Dr. PDKV; 2004.
  12. Deepali WL. Studies on fungi responsible for decomposition of vegetable market wastes [M.Sc. thesis]. Akola: Dr. PDKV; 2005.
  13. Dhapate SS, Dilpak SA, Pawar RK. Studies on effect of cellulolytic fungi on decomposition of sugarcane trash. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018;SP1:2975-2977.
  14. Gadde B, Bonnet S, Menke C, Garivait S. Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines. Environmental Pollution. 2009;157(5):1554-1558.
  15. Gade RM, Mane SS, Thakur KD. Decomposition of farm wastes by cellulolytic organisms. Journal of Plant Disease. 2010;5(1):154-157.
  16. Gawade SB. Studies on cellulolytic fungi in decomposition and enrichment of agricultural wastes [M.Sc. thesis]. Akola: Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth; 2001.
  17. Kakad G. Studies on decomposition of soybean stover and wheat straw by lignocellulolytic fungi [M.Sc. thesis]. Akola: Dr. PDKV; 2005.
  18. Gautam SP, Bundela PS, Pandey AK, Awasthi MK, Sarsaiya S. Composting of municipal solid waste of Jabalpur city. Global Journal of Environmental Research. 2010;4:43-46.
  19. Gupta SB, Tamrakar DK, Thakur MP, Tedia K, Tomar MA, Keshry PK. Effect of crop beneficial microbes on decomposition rate of different crop residues. Journal of Soils and Crops. 2004;14(1):1-4.
  20. Hoshino Y, Satou N, Higa T. Remediation and preservation of natural ecosystems through application of effective microorganisms (EM). In: Seventh International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming; 2003; Christchurch, New Zealand. p. 129-137.
  21. Jondhale PS, Gaibhiye BR, Gourkhede PH. Study of microbial decomposers on bacterial population during decomposition of crop residues. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 2015;33(4).
  22. Seoudi OAT. Enhancement of cotton stalks composting with certain microbial inoculations. Journal of Advanced Laboratory Research in Biology. 2013; eISSN 0976-7614.
  23. Potdhuke SR. Use of cellulolytic fungi in degradation of agricultural wastes [PhD thesis]. Akola: Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth; 1990. p. 1100.
  24. Rupela OP, Gopalakrishnan S, Sindhu BS, Beri V. Composting rice straw in semi-arid condition. International Crops Research Institute for the SemiArid Tropics. Patancheru, India; 2003.
  25. Sudrik DA. Role of cellulolytic fungi in decomposition of agricultural crop wastes [M.Sc. thesis]. Akola: Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth; 2004.
  26. Sahu A, Bhattacharjya S, Manna MC, Patra AK. Crop residue management: a potential source for plant nutrients. JNKVV Research Journal. 2015;49:301-311.
  27. Somani RB, Dhore RN, Balsubramannium RH, Wangikar DD. Role of fungi in disposal of agricultural wastes. PKV Research Journal. 1982;6(2):36-41.
  28. Sarker TC, Mannan MA, Mondol PC, Kabir AH, Parvez SM, Alam MF. Physico-chemical profile and microbial diversity during bioconversion of sugarcane press mud using bacterial suspension. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 2013;5(3):346-353.
  29. Talashikar SC. Effect of microbial culture (Azotobacter chroococcum) on humification and enrichment of mechanized compost. Indian Journal of Agricultural Chemistry. 1987;20(1):198.
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
62%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.