Concurrent parasitic infection with Amoebotaenia sp., Heterakis gallinarum and Eimeria tenella in a desi chicken flock
Abstract
The current study investigated a desi chicken farm in Tamil Nadu, with 40 numbers of six-month-old chickens. The birds were lethargic, off-feeding with diarrhoea, and their mortality rate was 37.5%. Necropsy examination revealed that the lumen had many tiny tapeworms and that the duodenal mucosa was haemorrhagic. The caecal lumen contained haemorrhagic contents with small roundworms. The intestinal contents were examined using sedimentation and flotation methods, and a histopathological examination was performed on the caecum. Nematode eggs and coccidial oocysts were discovered in the birds on necropsy examination. The tapeworms from the duodenum were identified as Amoebotaenia sp., while the caecal contents contained thick, smooth-shelled eggs and adult worms of Heterakis gallinarum, confirmed through microscopic examination. Additionally, unsporulated coccidial oocysts were detected in the caecal contents. The presence of haemorrhagic caecal contents, typical lesions and micrometric measurements of the oocysts indicated caecal coccidiosis caused by Eimeria tenella. Histopathological examination of the caecum revealed various developmental stages of E. tenella, including schizonts and oocysts, within the epithelial and subepithelial layers. This study confirmed the current infection of Amoebotaenia sp., H. gallinarum and E. tenella parasites, which caused mortality in desi chickens. The flock was treated with 0.2% sulphadimidine in drinking water for three days to address endoparasites and coccidiosis and to deworm using 30 mg/kg body weight of mebendazole to reduce the mortality.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
Desi chicken plays a significant role in the rural economy of India, particularly in enhancing the livelihoods of resource-poor and marginalized communities. This indigenous poultry farming is a low-investment, high-return enterprise that provides a steady income, nutritional security, and employment opportunities, especially for women and landless families. The adaptability of desi chicken to local environment and their minimal infrastructure requirements make them an ideal choice for rural households [1] . It supports poverty reduction and enhances food security by providing a regular supply of eggs and meat, which are rich in protein [2,3] . Efforts to improve the production performance of desi chickens through better husbandry, feeding, and genetic enhancements can further boost their economic impact [4] . Innovations in poultry science hold promise for enhancing the productivity and sustainability of backyard poultry systems [2] . The impact of infectious diseases on desi chicken farming is significant, leading to economic losses and reduced productivity. Various viral and parasitic diseases, such as Newcastle disease, Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD), and coccidiosis, pose serious threats to the health of desi chickens. These diseases not only increase mortality rates but also hinder the growth of the poultry sector, particularly in rural areas where desi chickens are commonly raised [5,6,7] . Among endoparasites, the impact of ascariasis, cestodiasis, and coccidiosis on desi chicken farming is significant, leading to reduced productivity and economic losses. These parasitic infections affect the health of chickens, resulting in symptoms such as weight loss, decreased egg production, and increased mortality rates. Ascaridia galli is the most common gastrointestinal helminth in chickens, with infection rates reaching up to 51.6% in various studies [8] . Common cestodes include Raillietina spp., which were found in 21.6% of examined chickens [9] . Cestodiasis can lead to poor weight gain and digestive issues, further compounding the economic burden on farmers [10] . Coccidiosis is highly prevalent, affecting over 81% of poultry farms, with Eimeria spp. being the most common [10] . Concurrent parasitic infections are extremely common in desi chickens, especially those raised in backyard or free-range systems. This is primarily due to their scavenging behavior and constant exposure to contaminated environments, including soil, litter, and intermediate hosts [11] . poultry management methods have led to a decrease in the prevalence of parasitic illnesses. However, the prevalence of intermediate hosts, such as beetles, ants, and houseflies, which thrive on chicken litter, facilitates the transmission of various helminths as they frequent poultry pens for foraging or feeding. This study reports a concurrent infection of Amoebotaenia sp., H. gallinarum, and Eimeria spp. in desi chickens from Tamil Nadu.
Materials and Methods
The current study was conducted on a desi chicken farm containing 40 six-month-old desi chickens, maintained in a backyard system in Amyagaram village, Kallakurichi district, Tamil Nadu. The history included lethargy, anorexia, diarrhoea in some birds and mortality of fifteen birds over a span of ten days. The carcasses were produced for necropsy examination to the Department of Veterinary Pathology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Salem. A detailed necropsy examination was conducted, and the findings were documented. Cestodes and nematodes that were retrieved during necropsy, preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol, and identified using standard morphological keys [12] . The intestinal contents were analysed using sedimentation and flotation techniques according to Bowman and Lynn [13] for helminth eggs and coccidian oocysts. Additionally, segments of the caecum were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological analysis [14] .
Results and Discussion
In the present study, necropsy findings revealed emaciated poultry carcasses, with haemorrhagic mucosa in the duodenum (Fig. 1) and caecum. The duodenal lumen contained haemorrhagic contents with minute white-coloured flakes. The caecal lumen contained haemorrhagic contents along with small roundworms measuring less than 0.7 to 1.3 cm in length. The duodenal worms were identified as Amoebotaenia sp. (Fig. 2), as the worm was flattened, segmented, roughly triangular, and on average measured 712.35 µm x 270.68 µm long, the rostellum was armed, had single set of genitalia with regularly alternating genital pores as described by Soulsby [12] . Microscopic examination of the caecal contents revealed eggs with thick, smooth shells that measured 66.5 µm x 37.54 µm that were confirmed to be the eggs of H. gallinarum (Fig. 3), as described by Soulsby [12] . The investigation of caecal scrapings confirmed the presence of unsporulated oocysts of coccidian parasites (Fig. 3). The oocysts were ovoid in shape with smooth walls measuring 20.40 µm by 18.94 µm which lacked a micropyle. The presence of lesions in the caecum, haemorrhagic contents, and micrometric measures of oocysts indicate the presence of caecal coccidiosis attributed to E. tenella, as specified by Soulsby. The histopathological examination of the caecum revealed various developing stages of E. tenella, including schizonts and oocysts inside the epithelium and subepithelium of the caecum (Fig. 4). The current study reports a mortality rate of 37.5% and identified the presence of Amoebotaenia sp., H. gallinarum, and E. tenella infections in desi chicken. Annapurna et al. [15] documented a prevalence of 39.87% for Eimeria spp. and 14.79% for roundworms, including Ascaridia galli, H. gallinarum, and Capillaria sp., in desi birds from Andhra Pradesh. A study from Kashmir Valley indicated that the frequency of Amoebotaenia sphenoides in free-ranging hens was 6.69%, accompanied by notable histological abnormalities such as mucosal disintegration and mononuclear cell infiltration [16] . Nayebzadeh et al. [17] observed that 42% of local hens were infected with H. gallinarum, showing a significant prevalence of this nematode in the surrounding region. Chickens infected with H. gallinarum exhibited significant caecal inflammation, characterised by wall degradation and the presence of diminutive white nematodes. The infection may result in significant health complications, including mortality, especially in juvenile birds, with documented fatality rates as high as 7.62% in some areas [18,19] . High morbidity and moderate mortality (7.5%) from intestinal coccidiosis caused by E. necatrix in 12-week-old desi chickens raised in a deep litter system in Perambalur district, Tamil Nadu, has been documented by Saravanajayam et al. [5] . Tongkamsai et al. [20] documented the prevalence of Eimeria spp. in Thailand, with E. tenella and E. praecox being the most widespread species at 40%, followed by E. acervulina, E. brunetti, and E. mitis at 20%. Mixed-species infections were identified in 50% of the samples. In this study, the higher mortality percentage recorded could be attributed to the concurrent infection of Amoebotaenia sp., H. gallinarum, and E. tenella in desi chickens.
Preventive measures for endoparasite infection and coccidiosis in desi chickens include adherence to hygiene, pharmacotherapy and management protocols. To lower the mortality rate, the birds were treated with 0.2% sulphadimidine in drinking water for three days and advised to deworm with mebendazole at the dose rate of 30 mg/kg body weight [21] . Chicken raised in deep litter and semiintensive systems is more susceptible to coccidian illnesses due to high humidity and warmth during the rainy season and the presence of infective parasite stages on the ground, making birds more vulnerable to parasitic infections. It is essential to regularly clean and disinfect farms to stop the spread of Eimeria spp. This involves the elimination of waste and the use of disinfectants that specifically target oocysts.
Conclusion
This study documented a combined infection of Amoebotaenia sp., H. gallinarum, and E. tenella in native chickens raised in a backyard system. Therefore, it can be inferred that the regular administration of anti-coccidial drugs (coccidiostats) and deworming is crucial for hens raised in a backyard system, in conjunction with maintaining cleanliness on the farm grounds.
References
- Sarma M, Saharia J, Boro P, Brahma J, Islam R. Comparative assessment of performances of Vanaraja, Kamrupa and Desi chicken reared by tribal community of lower Brahmaputra valley zone of Assam. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(8):2422-2428.
- Singh S, Chakraborty D, Altaf S, Taggar RK, Kumar N, Kumar D. Backyard poultry system: A boon to rural livelihood. Int J Fauna Biol Stud. 2018;5(1):231-236.
- Balaji NS, Ravi P, Jayanthi D. Empowerment of tribal women through desi chicken enterprise in Ayodhyapattinam block of Salem district in Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(5).
- Padhi MK. Importance of indigenous breeds of chicken for rural economy and their improvements for higher production performance. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:2604685.
- Saravanajayam M, Balasubramaniam A, Rani N. Incidence of intestinal coccidiosis in Desi chickens. J Anim Res. 2016;6(6):1061.
- Arthanari Eswaran M, Mekala P, Vadivoo VS, Sukumar K. Incidence of Newcastle disease in Desi chicken and its control through ethno veterinary medicines. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7(6):1418-1419.
- Kapoor S, Kaur H, Ur Rehman A, Kumar V, Gupta AK. Infectious bursal disease: Overview. J Med Pharm Allied Sci. 2022;11(2):4661-4665.
- Singh R, Gupta I, Patil RD. Ascariasis in poultry: A comprehensive review. Pharma Innov. 2023;SP12(11):699-704.
- Kumar S, Garg R, Ram H, Maurya PS, Banerjee PS. Gastrointestinal parasitic infections in chickens of upper Gangetic plains of India with special reference to poultry coccidiosis. J Parasit Dis. 2015;39(1):22-26.
- Satish S, Priti M. Gastrointestinal helminth parasites of local chickens sampled from tribal areas of Madhya Pradesh. Int J Life Sci. 2013;1(4):284-287.
- Puttalakshmamma GC, Ananda KJ, Prathiush PR, Mamatha GS, Rao G. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of poultry in and around Bangalore. Vet World. 2008;1(7):201-202.
- Soulsby EJL. Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals. 7th ed. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1982. p. 809.
- Bowman DD, Lynn RC. Georgis' Parasitology for Veterinarians. 6th ed. Sydney: W.B. Saunders; 1995. p. 440.
- Suvarna K, Layton C, Bancroft JD. Bancroft's Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 8th ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019. p. 584.
- Annapurna P, Jeyabal L, Jyothisree C, Rama Devi V, Sreedevi C. Seasonal prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in Desi fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus) in and around Gannavaram, Andhra Pradesh. J Parasit Dis. 2016;40:656-661.
- Salam ST, Khan A, Mir MS. Prevalence and pathology of Amoebotaenia sphenoides in free-ranging chicken of Kashmir Valley. Internet J Parasit Dis. 2008;4(1).
- Nayebzadeh H, Ahmadi Dezaki A, Ebrahimi M. Gastrointestinal helminthic infections of local chickens kept under the traditional system in the Isfahan region, Center of Iran. Istanbul Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2014;40(2):237-242.
- Omelchenko O, Yevstafieva V. Epizootological monitoring studies of chicken heterakosis spreading on the territory of Poltava region. Sci Prog Innov. 2023;26(3):87-91.
- Morales-Barrera JE, Rocha-Gonzáles A, Fuentes-Cruz BM, Guillermo TI, Awad AS. Heterakis gallinarum and Histomonas meleagridis in laying hens reared in cage system: A case report. Ger J Vet Res. 2025;5(1):1-7.
- Tongkamsai S, Boobphahom S, Apphaicha R, Chansiripornchai N. Prevalence and anticoccidial drug sensitivity of Eimeria tenella isolated from commercial broiler farms in Thailand. Vet World. 2025;18(6):15611570.
- Latchumikanthan A, Thirumavalavan R, Ilayabarathi D, Vengadabady N, Vijayasarathi MK, Meenakshisundaram A. Concurrent infection of intestinal coccidiosis and Ascaridia galli in native Aseel chickens (Gallus domesticus) from Villupuram district, Tamil Nadu, India. Explor Anim Med Res. 2021;11(1):127-130.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
