Scinovex
article Open Access

Association analysis studies in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under timely sown irrigated condition

International Journal of Research in Agronomy · 2025 · Vol. 8(9) · pp. 1066–1070
Shailja Keshri✉Roshan PariharDJ SharmaDinesh PandeyNK ChaureMahima Yadav

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted on twenty-six wheat genotypes during the rabi season of 2024 at BTC College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), to assess genetic variability, correlation, and path coefficient analysis. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences among genotypes for most of the studied traits, including days to maturity, plant height (cm), effective tillers per plant, spike length (cm), spike weight (g), total spikelet’s per spike, peduncle length (cm), biological yield per plot (kg), grain yield per plot (kg), harvest index (%), and 1000-grain weight (g). Genetic parameters indicated low to moderate GCV and PCV values for grain yield, biological yield, and spike length, reflecting environmental influence on these traits. However, high heritability coupled with high genetic advance as a percentage of mean for biological yield and grain yield suggested predominance of additive gene action and minimal environmental effects, making these traits suitable for selection. Correlation analysis revealed a strong, positive, and significant association of grain yield with days to heading, effective tillers per plant, spike length, total spikelet’s per spike, biological yield, harvest index, and 1000-grain weight. Path analysis further highlighted that biological yield, harvest index, plant height, and spike weight exerted positive direct effects on grain yield, supported by indirect contributions through other characters. Based on mean performance, genotypes HI8853(d), MACS4146(d), and HI8854(d) outperformed the checks HI8713(d), GW322, HI8737(d), and MACS6768 in grain yield and associated traits. These superior genotypes should be advanced for further screening trials.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a hexaploid (2n = 6x = 42; AABBDD genomes), annual, selfpollinated, cool-season rabi cereal belonging to the tribe Triticeae of the family Poaceae. The earliest cultivated forms included diploid einkorn (AA) and tetraploid emmer (AABB) wheat, which originated in the south-eastern region of Turkey, as revealed by genetic relationships. In India, wheat production during 2023-24 was estimated at 110.55 million metric tons, contributing nearly 14% of global production (Anonymous, 2024). Globally, wheat ranks second after rice and provides approximately 21% of total food calories and 20% of dietary protein to more than 4.5 billion people across 94 developing countries (Braun et al., 2010) [4] . Due to its extensive cultivation, high productivity, and crucial role in international food grain trade, wheat is often referred to as the "king of cereals." When consumed as whole grain, it is also a valuable source of minerals, dietary fibre, and micronutrients such as iron, zinc, and copper (Shewry & Hey, 2015) [14] . Nutritionally, wheat is rich in gluten protein, which governs dough strength and determines its suitability for a wide range of products. Hard wheat, with higher gluten content, is used for chapatti, roti, naan, and maida, while soft wheat is better suited for biscuits and bakery products. Given its global importance, understanding genetic variability, heritability, correlation, and path analysis in wheat genotypes is essential. Such studies provide insights into yield-attributing traits, identify promising lines for direct selection, and assist in choosing suitable parents for hybridization, thereby accelerating breeding programs aimed at developing improved cultivars.

Materials and Methods

The present investigation was carried out during rabi season of 2024, at BTC college of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Twenty-six wheat genotypes with four checks viz, GW322 (C), HI8737(d) (C), HI8713(d) (C) and MACS6768 (C) were used. Experimental material were planted in randomized block design (RBD) with four replications. Each genotype was grown in a plot size of 8 m 2 for each entry in each replication. The observations were recorded on five randomly selected plants from each plot in all the four replications of all the twelve characters viz, days to heading, days to maturity, plant height (cm), number of effective tillers/plant, spike length (cm), spike weight (g), total number of spikelet's/spike, peduncle length (cm), biological yield/plot (kg), grain yield/plot (kg), harvest index (%) and 1000 grains weight (g)

Results and Discussion

Analysis of variance

The analysis of variance showed the presence of significant difference among the genotypes for the characters studied viz. days to maturity, plant height (cm), number of effective tillers/plant, spike length (cm), spike weight (g), total number of spikelet's/spike, peduncle length (cm), biological yield/plot (kg), grain yield/plot (kg), harvest index (%) and 1000 grains weight (g). The results indicated a significant level of variability among the genotypes. This offers wheat breeders the potential to enhance these traits through selection and hybridization in order to improve the desired characteristics. Similar results were observed by Hassani et al., (2022) [6] , Sohail et al. (2018) [15] , Sharma et al., (2018) [13] and Chawla et al., (2018) [5] .

Genetic Parameters

From the study of variability parameters, moderate estimates of GCV and PCV were observed for grain yield/plot (kg) followed by biological yield/plot (kg), spike length (cm), low to moderate estimates of PCV and GCV were observed for number of effective tillers/plant and spike weight (g), low estimates of GCV and PCV were observed for 1000 grains weight (g), peduncle length (cm), total number of spikelet's/spike, days to heading, days to maturity and plant height (cm). The moderate magnitude of genotypic coefficient of variation revealed the presence of high amount of genetic variability for the characters studied in the population and thus offers scope for genetic improvement through selection for these traits. High heritability coupled with high genetic advance as% of mean was observed for biological yield/plot (kg) and grain yield/plot (kg) indicates that there in presence of additive gene action and less influenced by environmental effect suggesting that selection of these traits accumulate more additive genes leading to further improvement in their performance. Similar results were observed by Bayisa and Letta., (2020) [3] , Yadav et al., (2020) [16] , Malbhage et al., (2020) [10] , Kaur et al., (2019) [7] and Kumar et al., (2019) [9] .

Correlation coefficient analysis

The correlation study revealed that grain yield/plot (kg) has positive association with days to heading, number of effective tillers/plant, spike length (cm), total number of spikelet's/spike, biological yield/plot (kg), harvest index (%) and 1000 grains weight (g). The study suggested that wheat grain yield can be enhanced by selecting genotypes that exhibit superior performance in the mentioned traits under timely sown irrigated conditions. Similar result were observed by Devesh et al., (2021), Kumar et al., (2022) [8] and Phougat et al., (2017) observed grain yield/plot (kg) showed a significant positive correlation with the biological yield/plot (kg), plant height (cm), harvest index (%) and 1000 grains weight (g).

Path coefficient analysis

The path coefficient analysis between grain yield/plot (kg) and its related traits revealed biological yield/plot (kg), harvest index (%), plant height (cm), and spike weight (g) showed positive direct effect. From the correlation and path coefficient analysis it is investigated that biological yield/plot (kg), number of effective tillers/plant, spike length (cm), days to heading, 1000 grains weight (g), total number of spikelet's/spike were most important traits which should be given proper emphasis during selection programmes for the improvement of grain yield in wheat genotypes under timely sown irrigated condition. Similar results were observed by Kumar et al., (2022) [8] , Milkessa (2022) [11] , Sahu et al., (2021) [12] and Abdulhamed et al., (2021) [1] .

References

  1. Abdulhamed ZA, Abood NM, Noaman AH. Genetic path analysis and correlation studies of yield and its components of some bread wheat varieties. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;761(1):012140.
  2. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. Production: Country data. 2024. Available from: https://fas.usda.gov/data/production/country/in
  3. Bayisa T, Tefera H, Letta T. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance among bread wheat genotypes at Southeastern Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2020;9(4):128-133.
  4. Braun HJ, Atlin G, Payne T. Multi-location testing as a tool to identify plant response to global climate change. In: Reynolds MP, editor. Climate change and crop production. Wallingford: CAB International; 2010. p. 115-138.
  5. Chawla V, Singh V, Yadav S. Path coefficient and correlation studies of yield and yield associated traits in diverse genotypes of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2018;6(3):73-76.
  6. Hassani I, Nimbal S, Singh V, Noori A. Genetic variability analysis and correlation studies of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics. 2022;8(2):139-145.
  7. Kaur S, Avinashe HA, Dubey N, Kalubarme S, Kumar M. Assessment of genetic variability and association analysis for yield and yield attributing traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Archives. 2019;19(1):1261-1267.
  8. Kumar V, Shukla RS, Chatterjee A, Singh SK, Biswal M, Singh M. Genetic association analysis for morphological traits in F1 generation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Biological Forum - An International Journal. 2022;14(1):755-761.
  9. Kumar S, Singh B, Verma SP, Pathak VN, Jee C, Singh JP. Studies on genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, correlation and path analysis for grain yield and its contributing traits in indigenous wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019;8(8):1408-1416.
  10. Malbhage AB, Talpada MM, Shekhawat VS, Mehta DR. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in durum wheat (Triticum durum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2020;9(4):3233-3236.
  11. Milkessa TO. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under drought stress conditions. American Journal of Plant Biology. 2022;7(3):120-126.
  12. Sahu RK, Tarkeshwar, Gaur SC, Yadav M, Yadav PK, Kumar K. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell). Frontiers in Crop Improvement. 2021;9(6):2710-2714.
  13. Sharma P, Kamboj MC, Singh N, Chand M, Yadava RK. Path coefficient and correlation studies of yield and yield associated traits in advanced homozygous lines of bread wheat germplasm. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7(2):51-63.
  14. Shewry PR, Hey SJ. Review: The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food & Energy Security. 2015;4(3):178-202.
  15. Sohail A, Hidayatur R, Farhat U, Syed MA, Shah TB, Shahzad A. Evaluation of F4 bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance and correlation studies. Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2018;6(3):53-62.
  16. Yadav SK, Singh AK, Singh S, Baghel MJ. Assessment of genetic variability and diversity for yield and its contributing traits among CIMMYT based wheat germplasm. Journal of Wheat Research. 2020;6(2):154-156.
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
74%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.