Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

Diversity and abundance of insect fauna in agricultural and riparian ecosystems of Oney Village, Nashik district, Maharashtra

Avhad PSNB GhodgeYS ShaniwareYS PatilOS Avhad

Volume 7(9) · Pages 593–597 · DOI: 10.33545/2664844x.2025.v7.i9h.796 ↗

Research areasGeochemistry and Geologic MappingGeological Modeling and AnalysisElectrical and Electromagnetic Research

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The study conducted over two years (2022-2024) in Oney village, Nashik district, revealed significant insect biodiversity across various habitats, including agricultural fields, markets, gardens, and riverine areas. A total of 36 species across 11 insect orders were identified, with 626 individual insects sampled. The dominant orders were Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Hymenoptera, accounting for over half of the total insect population. Diptera had the highest abundance with 130 individuals, including economically important pests like melon fly Bactrocera cucurbitae and mango fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis, alongside forensic importance species such as blowflies. Lepidoptera, including pests like Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura, posed a considerable threat to crops. Hymenoptera, responsible for pollination and natural pest control, included species like Apis dorsata and Oecophylla ants. Other orders, such as Coleoptera, Orthoptera, and Thysanoptera, added to the ecological balance. The observed insect-host plant relationships highlight the specificity and complexity in this region’s agroecosystem. This baseline data establishes the foundation for future detailed studies incorporating statistical diversity analysis and environmental factors, aiding the design of sustainable integrated pest management and conservation strategies in the area.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Insects are the most ecologically dominant animal group and significantly impact human health, natural resources, and agriculture. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Insects are the most ecologically dominant animal group and significantly impact human health, natural resources, and agriculture.

      In the paper's own words

      “Insects are the largest, most diverse, successful, and ecologically dominant group of animals on earth. They contribute significantly to ecosystem functioning and have profound impacts on agriculture, human health, and natural resources.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Insect survival is currently threatened by climate change, habitat fragmentation, and human-driven pressures. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Insect survival is currently threatened by climate change, habitat fragmentation, and human-driven pressures.

      In the paper's own words

      “Increasing anthropogenic pressures, habitat fragmentation, and climate change have posed challenges to insect survival”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The mosaic of agricultural fields and the Godavari River in the study region makes it a valuable site for researching insect biodiversity. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The mosaic of agricultural fields and the Godavari River in the study region makes it a valuable site for researching insect biodiversity.

      In the paper's own words

      “Godavari River, along with surrounding agricultural fields, creates a mosaic of habitats that support rich insect biodiversity. This makes the area a valuable site for entomological research.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to document and reveal insect biodiversity across riverine areas, fruit orchards, and agricultural fields in Oney village, Maharashtra. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to document and reveal insect biodiversity across riverine areas, fruit orchards, and agricultural fields in Oney village, Maharashtra.

      In the paper's own words

      “The study conducted over two years (2022-2024) in Oney village, Nashik district of Maharashtra state - 422302, revealed significant insect biodiversity across various habitats, including agricultural fields, fruit orchards and riverine areas.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • Sampling took place from January to December between 2022 and 2024, specifically during morning (08:00–10:00) and evening (15:00–17:00) hours. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Sampling took place from January to December between 2022 and 2024, specifically during morning (08:00–10:00) and evening (15:00–17:00) hours.

      In the paper's own words

      “Sampling was conducted throughout the year 2022-2024, from January to December, during morning hours (08:00–10:00) and evening hours (15:00–17:00)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Researchers used standard entomological techniques, including beating, shaking, and hand picking, to collect live insects. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Researchers used standard entomological techniques, including beating, shaking, and hand picking, to collect live insects.

      In the paper's own words

      “Insects were collected live from the sampling sites using standard entomological methods such as hand picking, shaking, and beating.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Hemiptera were collected using sweeping nets, aerial nets, and by beating shrubs over a cloth. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Hemiptera were collected using sweeping nets, aerial nets, and by beating shrubs over a cloth.

      In the paper's own words

      “Hemiptera were sampled using aerial nets (for insects in flight), sweeping nets (for low vegetation), and beating of shrubs with a long stick while placing a cloth on the ground to collect the falling insects.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Sampling Procedures

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Adult butterflies (Lepidoptera) were captured with butterfly nets from overripe fruits and flowers. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Adult butterflies (Lepidoptera) were captured with butterfly nets from overripe fruits and flowers.

      In the paper's own words

      “Lepidoptera (adult butterflies) were captured using butterfly nets from multiple microhabitats, including flowers and overripe fruits.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Sampling Procedures

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The study identified 626 individual insects belonging to 36 species across 12 different orders. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The study identified 626 individual insects belonging to 36 species across 12 different orders.

      In the paper's own words

      “Sampling from various habitats including agricultural farms, fruit orchards, riverine areas, and adjacent agricultural fields led to the collection of insects belonging to 12 different orders, encompassing a total of 36 species-level taxa (Table 1). The total number of individuals recorded was 626”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Hymenoptera were the most abundant and rich orders, making up nearly 55% of all collected individuals. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Hymenoptera were the most abundant and rich orders, making up nearly 55% of all collected individuals.

      In the paper's own words

      “Among the insect orders recorded, the highest species richness and abundance were noted in the orders Diptera (flies), Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), and Hymenoptera (Bees, Ants, Wasps), which collectively accounted for nearly 55% of the total individuals collected.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Diptera was the most abundant order with 130 individuals, including the blowfly and fruit flies (Melon and Mango). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Diptera was the most abundant order with 130 individuals, including the blowfly and fruit flies (Melon and Mango).

      In the paper's own words

      “Diptera was the most abundant order with 130 individuals, including economically important pests such as Bactrocera cucurbitae (Melon fly), Bactrocera dorsalis (Mango fruit fly), and forensic importance species like Chrysomya megacephala (Blowfly).”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Lepidoptera consisted of 129 individuals, dominated by the tobacco caterpillar and the gram pod/tomato fruit borer. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Lepidoptera consisted of 129 individuals, dominated by the tobacco caterpillar and the gram pod/tomato fruit borer.

      In the paper's own words

      “Lepidoptera contributed 129 individuals, with species such as Helicoverpa armigera (Gram pod borer/Tomato fruit borer) and Spodoptera litura (Tobacco caterpillar) dominating the collection.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Hymenoptera, which included the giant honeybee and weaver ant, accounted for 91 individuals. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Hymenoptera, which included the giant honeybee and weaver ant, accounted for 91 individuals.

      In the paper's own words

      “Hymenoptera, comprising mostly pollinators and natural enemies like Apis dorsata (Giant honeybee), Oecophylla smaragdina (Weaver ant), and Monomorium pharaonis (Pharaoh ant), accounted for 91 individuals.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Other recorded abundances included 80 Coleoptera, 50 Thysanoptera, and 29 Orthoptera. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Other recorded abundances included 80 Coleoptera, 50 Thysanoptera, and 29 Orthoptera.

      In the paper's own words

      “Other notable orders included Coleoptera (Beetles) with 80 individuals, Thysanoptera (Thrips) with 50 individuals, and Orthoptera (Grasshoppers, Crickets) with 29 individuals.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Many insect species showed specialized affiliations with economic crops, including mango, grape, soybean, sugarcane, groundnut, and tomato. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Many insect species showed specialized affiliations with economic crops, including mango, grape, soybean, sugarcane, groundnut, and tomato.

      In the paper's own words

      “The abundance data suggest specialized host-plant affiliations with many species linked to economically important crops such as tomato, sugarcane, soybean, grape, groundnut, and mango”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that this study provides a foundational understanding of the insect community necessary for ecological and agricultural planning in the region. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that this study provides a foundational understanding of the insect community necessary for ecological and agricultural planning in the region.

      In the paper's own words

      “This work establishes a foundational understanding of the insect community essential for effective agricultural and ecological planning in the region”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The authors state that future research should integrate environmental factors and statistical diversity measures to improve sustainable pest management. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors state that future research should integrate environmental factors and statistical diversity measures to improve sustainable pest management.

      In the paper's own words

      “While the study offers valuable baseline data, integrating statistical diversity measures and environmental factors in future research will enhance understanding and aid sustainable pest management.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Insects in a landscape featuring a river, a fruit orchard, and an agricultural field). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Study Site and Biodiversity Overview
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Insects in a landscape featuring a river, a fruit orchard, and an agricultural field). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Insects in a landscape featuring a river, a fruit orchard, and an agricultural field). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Study Site and Biodiversity Overview

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Insects in a landscape featuring a river, a fruit orchard, and an agricultural field). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Occurrence: Lepidoptera vs Coleoptera vs Orthoptera vs Diptera vs Dermaptera
Replotted from Table 1 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Occurrence: Lepidoptera vs Coleoptera vs Orthoptera vs Diptera vs Dermaptera

Replotted from Table 1 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Stretching of specimen for showcasingFigure 1Page 2Occurrence of different insect diversity with their hostTable 1Page 3Pining of insects from different orders.Figure 2Page 4
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Insects are the largest, most diverse, successful, and ecologically dominant group of animals on earth. They contribute significantly to ecosystem functioning and have profound impacts on agriculture, human health, and natural resources. Biodiversity, in its broadest sense, includes genetic, species, and ecosystem-level variation (Smith, 1996) [13]. Globally, it is estimated that around 5.5 million insect species exist, of which approximately 1 million species have been formally described (Basset et al. 2012) [1] . This makes insects the most species-rich taxon, accounting for more than half of all described eukaryotes. India is recognized as one of the mega diverse countries. Approximately 66,741 insect species are known from India, which represents about 6.5% of the world's insect fauna, and nearly onethird of these species are endemic (Zoological Survey of India, 2021) [16] . Such high richness highlights their ecological importance and the need for systematic biodiversity assessments. The ecological success of insects can be attributed to several features, including small body size, the presence of a chitinous exoskeleton, high fecundity, varied feeding strategies, aerial respiration, and adaptability across habitats. Their ability to fly enhances dispersal and predator avoidance (Fursov, 2004) [4] . In addition, a highly specialized nervous system enables them to see, hear, taste, smell, and sense their surroundings, making them extremely adaptive across ecosystems (Humphrey et al. 1999) [5]. Insects exhibit remarkable diversity and are classified into various groups depending on their morphology and habits: Coleoptera (Beetles): Forewings modified into hard elytra protecting hind wings; the largest order with 386,500 described species (Thakare et al. 2013) [15] . Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths): Possess large, often colorful wings (Muhammad, 2009) [9] . Diptera (Flies): Characterized by a single pair of wings.

Hymenoptera (Ants, Bees, Wasps): Mostly eusocial species, often with stingers; key pollinators and parasitoids. Hemiptera (True Bugs): Equipped with piercing-sucking mouthparts. Orthoptera (Grasshoppers, Crickets): Strong hind legs adapted for jumping; herbivorous (Paulraj et al. 2009) [12] . Odonata (Dragonflies, Damselflies): Predatory insects controlling populations of smaller insects. Together, the top five orders Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Hemiptera account for nearly 90% of all described insect species worldwide (Stork, 2018) [14] . Biodiversity studies generally emphasize three levels: genetic, species, and ecosystem diversity (Smith, 1996) [13] . The insect community structure of a habitat strongly influences species survival, community composition, and distribution patterns (Dubey, 2004 [3] ; Johri and Johri, 2010) [6] Increasing anthropogenic pressures, habitat fragmentation, and climate change have posed challenges to insect survival (Beeson, 1941) [2] . Conservation strategies must therefore focus not only on individual species but also on the protection of communities and habitats (Kocatas, 2004) [7] . According to Magurran (2004) [8] , biodiversity should be assessed at the level of specific geographic areas, with studies comparing species richness and abundance across habitats. This approach is crucial in regions such as Oney village coordinates (Elevation): 560 meters above sea level. The selected study site is Oney village, Niphad taluka, Nashik district, Maharashtra, situated at Latitude: 20.0776° N Longitude: 74.0023° E Altitude with an average altitude of about 560 meters above mean sea level (MSL). The presence of the Banganga River, which is a tributary of the Godavari River, along with surrounding agricultural fields, creates a mosaic of habitats that support rich insect biodiversity. This makes the area a valuable site for entomological research.

Materials and Methods

The present investigation was carried out in diverse habitats such as agricultural farms, fruit orchards and other nearby localities of Oney village, Niphad taluka, Nashik district, Maharashtra -422302. This site is surrounded by agricultural fields, fruit orchards and riverine ecosystems, providing rural ecological conditions favorable for insect diversity. In addition, specimens were also collected from the surrounding Banganga River basin and adjoining local agricultural fields. Sampling was conducted throughout the year 2022-2024, from January to December, during morning hours (08:00-10:00) and evening hours (15:00-17:00), to comprehensively document the insect diversity of the study area. Insects were collected live from the sampling sites using standard entomological methods such as hand picking, shaking, and beating. The collection equipment included hair brushes, forceps, sticks, hand nets, and killing bottles. Following collection, specimens were transferred into killing bottles prepared from cylindrical glass jars. The sacrificed insects were temporarily stored in insect boxes and subsequently pinned with steel entomological pins for proper drying. To prevent fungal infestation and preserve the specimens, naphthalene balls were placed inside the insect storage boxes. (Prakhar et al. 2021) [12]

Sampling Procedures

Different insect orders were collected using standardized entomological techniques suited to their habits and habitats. Hemiptera were sampled using aerial nets (for insects in flight), sweeping nets (for low vegetation), and beating of shrubs with a long stick while placing a cloth on the ground to collect the falling insects. Sweeping or beating was performed 5-6 times per plant. Specimens obtained were preserved in 70% alcohol for identification. Orthoptera were collected using aerial nets, butterfly nets, and hand-picking with the aid of large forceps. Hymenoptera and Coleoptera were sampled by both beating and sweeping techniques. Plant parts were struck with a stick using downward strokes to dislodge insects, performed 4-5 times per plant. Larger flying hymenopterans were additionally trapped using sweep nets. Collected specimens were either stored in vials with 70% alcohol or killed in killing bottles. Lepidoptera (adult butterflies) were captured using butterfly nets from multiple microhabitats, including flowers and overripe fruits. (Prakhar et al. 2021) [12]

Results

The present study conducted in Oney village, Niphad Taluka, Nashik district, Maharashtra-422302, documented a rich and diverse insect fauna over the period from 2022 to 2024. Sampling from various habitats including agricultural farms, fruit orchards, riverine areas, and adjacent agricultural fields led to the collection of insects belonging to 12 different orders, encompassing a total of 36 specieslevel taxa (Table 1). The total number of individuals recorded was 626, indicating a considerable abundance and diversity of insect fauna in this semi-urban ecosystem characterized by a mosaic of agricultural and natural habitats. Among the insect orders recorded, the highest species richness and abundance were noted in the orders Diptera (flies), Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), and Hymenoptera (Bees, Ants, Wasps), which collectively accounted for nearly 55% of the total individuals collected. Diptera was the most abundant order with 130 individuals, including economically important pests such as Bactrocera cucurbitae (Melon fly), Bactrocera dorsalis (Mango fruit fly), and forensic importance species like Chrysomya megacephala (Blowfly). Lepidoptera contributed 129 individuals, with species such as Helicoverpa armigera (Gram pod borer/Tomato fruit borer) and Spodoptera litura (Tobacco caterpillar) dominating the collection. Hymenoptera, comprising mostly pollinators and natural enemies like Apis dorsata (Giant honeybee), Oecophylla smaragdina (Weaver ant), and Monomorium pharaonis (Pharaoh ant), accounted for 91 individuals. Other notable orders included Coleoptera (Beetles) with 80 individuals, Thysanoptera (Thrips) with 50 individuals, and Orthoptera (Grasshoppers, Crickets) with 29 individuals. Lower abundances were recorded for Dermaptera (Earwigs), Isoptera (Termites), Ephemeroptera (Mayflies), and Odonata (Dragonflies). The total species and individual counts reflect the varied habitat types and ecological niches present in and around Oney village. The abundance data suggest specialized host-plant affiliations with many species linked to economically important crops such as tomato, sugarcane, soybean, grape, groundnut, and mango have long been recognized as major threats to crops across India and the world. Their significant presence in Oney village suggests that these pests remain persistent and require integrated pest management (IPM) strategies to mitigate crop losses. The observed richness and diversity of insect fauna in Oney village align well with previous studies conducted in similar agro-ecosystems. The dominance of key orders such as Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Hymenoptera in terms of species richness and abundance corroborates findings from several researchers. For instance, Painkra, G. and Thakare, V. G. and Zade, V. S. and Hegde, V. D. documented a comparable diversity pattern in Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), emphasizing the ecological importance of Coleopteran species in agricultural landscapes. Similarly, Haldar, P. Bhandar, K.P. and Nath's observations on Indian grasshoppers, Acrida exaltata (Orthoptera: Acrididae), parallel the current study's findings regarding Orthopteran diversity and host plant specificity. Furthermore, Parandham, D.'s investigations into butterfly diversity across various habitats reinforce the extensive presence of Lepidopteran species reported here. Research by Muhammad, A., on moth fauna diversity, species richness, and evenness, also supports the current results, highlighting the prevalence of Lepidoptera as both economically significant pests and critical components of biodiversity. Notably, the outcomes of this study are consistent with the detailed assessments presented by Painkra, and Painkra (2018) [11] , who explored similar diversity indices, thereby offering robust external validation. Collectively, these parallels underscore the reliability of the present findings and accentuate the ecological significance of the identified insect groups in the sustainable management of agroecosystems in the region.

Table 1. Occurrence of different insect diversity with their host
S.NOrderFamily/S. FamilyScientific nameCommon nameHostsOccurrence
1LepidopteraNoctuidaeSpodoptera lituraTobacco caterpillarTomato25
2LepidopteraNoctuidaeHelicoverpa armigeraGram pod borer/ Tomato fruit borerTomato, Gram, Maize39
3LepidopteraGelechiidaeTuta absolutaSouth American tomato pinwormTomato20
4LepidopteraArctidaeSpilosoma obliquaBihar hairy caterpillarSoybean15
5LepidopteraNoctuidaeAnomis flavaOkra caterpillar, SemilooperOkra10
6LepidopteraSphingidaeDaphnis neriiOleander hawk-mothPeriwinkle2
7LepidopteraCrambidaeChilo infuscatellusEarly shoot borerSugarcane7
8LepidopteraCrambidaeScirpophaga excerptalisTop shoot borerSugarcane6
9LepidopteraGelechiidaeAproaerema modicella.Groundnut leaf miner.Groundnut5
10ColeopteraCoccinellidaeCoccinella septempunctataSeven-spotted lady bird/beetleObserved on tomato, sugarcane, grape, while feeding on aphids and other soft –bodied pests.16
11ColeopteraCoccinellidaeCheilomenes sexmaculataSix-spotted zigzag lady bird/beetleObserved on wheat, while feeding on aphids and soft –bodied pests.20
12ColeopteraMeloidaeMylabris pustulataBlister beetle, Hycleus beetlePigeon pea, Maize5
13ColeopteraScarabaeidaeHolotrichia serrataWhite grubSugarcane, Groundnut24
14ColeopteraCerambycidaeObereopsis brevisGirdle beetleSoybean7
15ColeopteraCerambycidaeBatocera rufomaculataMango stem borerMango5
16ColeopteraScarabaeidaeOryctes rhinocerosRhinoceros beetleCoconut3
17OrthopteraTettigoniidaeSathrophyllia spp.Spear grass katydid.Curryleaf,6
18OrthopteraGryllotalpidaeGryllotalpa africanaAfrican mole cricket.Green plants8
19OrthopteraAcrididaeSchistocerca gregariaMigratory locust/Desert locustMaize15
20DipteraCulicidaeCuliceta longiareolataMosquitoOn host animals13
21DipteraMuscidaeMusca domesticaHousefly/ Mouche domestique.Poultry and Dairy14
22DipteraTephritidaeBactrocera cucurbitaeMelon flyCucumber33
23DipteraTephritidaeBactrocera dorsalisMango fruit flyMango25
24DipteraAgromyzidaeLiriomyza trifoliiSerpentine leaf minerTomato12
25DipteraCalliphoridaeChrysomya megacephalaBlowflyNear fresh carrion33
26DermapteraLabiduridaeLabidura ripariaStriped earwigSoil34
27IsopteraTermitidaeOdontotermes obesusTermiteWheat and other host plants.23
28Ephemeropter aLeptophlebiidaeIndialis rossiMayflyAround river.4
29OdonataLibellulidaeRhyothemis variegataDragonflyNear river, Pond6
30HymenopteraApidaeApis dorsataHoneybeeFloral plants22
31HymenopteraFormicidaeOecophylla smaragdinaWeaver ant, Green tree antFloral plants35
32HymenopteraFormicidaeMonomorium pharaonisPharaoh antNear sweet substance34
33MantodeaMantidaeMantis religiosaPraying mantisLeaves of different crops.25
34ThysanopteraThripidaeScirtothrips dorsalisChilli thripsOnion, Grape23
35ThysanopteraThripidaeThrips parvispinusTobacco thripsChilli27
36HemipteraPseudococcidaeMaconellicoccus hirsutusGrape mealybugGrape25
Total1236626

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Occurrence of different insect diversity with their host↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Occurrence of different insect diversity with their host

Occurrence of different insect diversity with their host

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Conclusion

The study conducted in Oney village, Nashik district of Maharashtra state reveals a rich insect diversity spanning 12 orders and 36 species, with a total of 626 individuals recorded. Dominant orders included Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Hymenoptera, collectively accounting for over half the total insect population. Diptera, with 130 individuals, featured significant pest species like melon and mango fruit flies and forensic importance species such as blowflies. Lepidoptera included key pests like Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura, posing challenges to crop health. Hymenoptera, important for pollination and pest control, comprised species like Apis dorsata and Oecophylla ants. The strong association of insects with specific host plants indicates focused pest pressures and ecological roles. While the study offers valuable baseline data, integrating statistical diversity measures and environmental factors in future research will enhance understanding and aid sustainable pest management. This work establishes a foundational understanding of the insect community essential for effective agricultural and ecological planning in the region

Figures and tables from the paper

Figure 1. Stretching of specimen for showcasing
Stretching of specimen for showcasing↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Stretching of specimen for showcasing

Stretching of specimen for showcasing

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Pining of insects from different orders.
Pining of insects from different orders.↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Pining of insects from different orders.

Pining of insects from different orders.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Basset Y, Cizek L, Cuenoud P, Didham RK, Guilhaumon F, Missa P, et al. Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science. 2012;338(6113):1481-1484.
  2. Dubey V. Ecology of jungle rice (Echinochloa colonum), a weed of the rice agroecosystem: a case study in Bilaspur (Chhattishgarh). International Rice Research Notes. 2004;29(2):1.
  3. Fursov VN. New data on the biology and distribution of the LathromeroideasilvarumNowicki, 1937 (Chalcidoidea: Trichogrammatidae)-an egg parasitoid of water beetles (Hydrophilidae and Dytiscidae).
  4. Russian Entomological Journal. 2004;13(3):165-169.
  5. Humphrey JW, Hawes C, Peace AJ, Ferris-Kaan R, Jukes MR. Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 1999;113(1):11-21.
  6. Johri PK, Johri R. Application of Dyar's Law in Indian Predaceous Earwig, Labidurariparia (Pallas) form bengalensis (Dohrn)(Dermaptera: Labiduridae). Indian Journal of Entomology. 2010;72(2):111-113.
  7. Muhammad A. Diversity, Species Richness and Evenness of Moth Fauna of Peshawar. Pakistan Entomological. 2009;31:2.
  8. Painkra GP, Painkra KL. Biodiversity of insects in Ambikapur of Chhattisgarh. Int. J. of Scientific Res. in Sci. & Tech. 2018;4(5):451-455.
  9. Paulraj MG, Anbalagan V, Ignacimuthu S. Distribution of Grasshoppers (Insecta: Orthoptera) among different host plants and habitats in two districts of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 2009;1(4):230-233.
  10. Prakhar P, Singh M, Agrawal RK. A Study of Insect Diversity in Different Habitats Found in Nearby Locality of Raipur, Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology (IJSRST). 2021;8(5):467-468.
  11. Smith NJH, Srivastava JP, Forno DA, editors. Biodiversity and agricultural intensification: Partners for development and conservation. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1996.
  12. Stork NE. How many species of insects and other terrestrial arthropods are there on earth? Annual Review of Entomology. 2018;63:31-45.
  13. Thakare VG, Zade VS, Hegde VD. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of Melghat Tiger Reserve, Central India. New Biological Reports. 2013;2(2):173176.
  14. Zoological Survey of India. Animal discoveries 2021: New species and new records. Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India;c2021.