Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

Morphological footprints of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam) in Konkan belt of Maharashtra: A comparative study

Sunnavi N SangleShedge MSKulkarni MMMali PCJaya H Wagh

Volume 7(8) · Pages 1187–1191 · DOI: 10.33545/2664844x.2025.v7.i8k.692 ↗

Research areasGeochemistry and Geologic MappingGeological Modeling and AnalysisElectrical and Electromagnetic Research

↓ Read full-text PDF1 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The present investigation focused on the morphological evaluation of five distinct jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) genotypes, namely Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type, with the aim of identifying their unique vegetative characteristics. Detailed observations were recorded on crown architecture, leaf dimensions, leaf blade and apex shapes, base form, orientation, posture, and surface texture. Tree crown shape varied from broadly pyramidal in Joshi Kapa and Palur-1 to elliptical in Konkan Prolific and Kerala Type, while Kadrekar Kapa showed a distinct pyramidal form. Leaf blade length ranged from short in Kadrekar Kapa (93 mm) and Joshi Kapa (97 mm) to medium in the other genotypes (105-110 mm), with widths spanning narrow (50 mm in Joshi Kapa) to broad (77 mm in Kerala Type). Leaf blade shape was predominantly obovate or oblong, except in Konkan Prolific, which exhibited an elliptical form. Apex shape was consistently acuminate across genotypes, while the base showed variation between oblique and rounded forms. Orientation differed, with horizontal positioning in Kadrekar Kapa and Joshi Kapa, and erect leaves in the remaining types. Posture was mostly flattened, except for Palur-1 (revolute) and Konkan Prolific (conduplicate). Regardless of variation in other traits, all genotypes shared a smooth upper leaf surface.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Jackfruit is a highly productive evergreen tree native to India's Western Ghats and grown in tropical and subtropical areas. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Jackfruit is a highly productive evergreen tree native to India's Western Ghats and grown in tropical and subtropical areas.

      In the paper's own words

      “Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.), a member of the Moraceae family, is a highly productive evergreen tree native to the Western Ghats of India and widely cultivated across tropical and subtropical regions.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The crop's heterozygous and cross-pollinated nature leads to significant morphological variability, which presents a challenge for cultivation. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The crop's heterozygous and cross-pollinated nature leads to significant morphological variability, which presents a challenge for cultivation.

      In the paper's own words

      “One of the major challenges in jackfruit cultivation is its highly heterozygous and cross-pollinated nature, which results in wide morphological variability in traits such as fruit size, shape, rind texture, bulb type, color, and maturity period.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Systematic morphological characterization is necessary to identify elite types and establish a basis for future breeding programs. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Systematic morphological characterization is necessary to identify elite types and establish a basis for future breeding programs.

      In the paper's own words

      “Therefore, systematic morphological characterization is essential for identifying and conserving elite types, standardizing descriptors, and laying the foundation for future breeding programs.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to identify the unique vegetative characteristics of five jackfruit genotypes: Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to identify the unique vegetative characteristics of five jackfruit genotypes: Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type.

      In the paper's own words

      “The present investigation focused on the morphological evaluation of five distinct jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) genotypes, namely Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type, with the aim of identifying their unique vegetative characteristics.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Material and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • Researchers recorded detailed observations on crown architecture, leaf dimensions, shapes (blade and apex), base form, orientation, posture, and surface texture. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Researchers recorded detailed observations on crown architecture, leaf dimensions, shapes (blade and apex), base form, orientation, posture, and surface texture.

      In the paper's own words

      “Detailed observations were recorded on crown architecture, leaf dimensions, leaf blade and apex shapes, base form, orientation, posture, and surface texture.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Leaf blade shape

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • To ensure consistency in growth and fruiting, the study selected trees between 10 and 20 years of age. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      To ensure consistency in growth and fruiting, the study selected trees between 10 and 20 years of age.

      In the paper's own words

      “Trees aged between 10 to 20 years were chosen to maintain consistency in growth and fruiting stage.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study was conducted during the 2024-2025 academic year at the Colleges of Horticulture in Dapoli and Mulde, Maharashtra. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study was conducted during the 2024-2025 academic year at the Colleges of Horticulture in Dapoli and Mulde, Maharashtra.

      In the paper's own words

      “A research study titled “Morphological footprints of Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam) in twin terrains of the Konkan belt of Maharashtra: A Comparative Study” was undertaken during the academic year 2024-2025 at two prominent research centres of Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth (DBSKKV), namely the College of Horticulture, Dapoli (Ratnagiri) and the College of Horticulture, Mulde, Kudal (Sindhudurg), Maharashtra.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Material and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Joshi Kapa and Palur-1 had broadly pyramidal crowns (spreading habit), while Kadrekar Kapa, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type had elliptical shapes (upright/compact canopy). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Joshi Kapa and Palur-1 had broadly pyramidal crowns (spreading habit), while Kadrekar Kapa, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type had elliptical shapes (upright/compact canopy).

      In the paper's own words

      “The observations revealed that the Joshi Kapa and Palur-1 genotypes exhibited a broadly pyramidal crown shape, indicating a more spreading growth habit. In contrast, the Kadrekar Kapa, Konkan Prolific and Kerala Type varieties were characterized by an elliptical tree shape, suggesting a relatively upright and compact canopy structure.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Tree crown shape

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Leaf blade length varied from short in Kadrekar Kapa (93 mm) and Joshi Kapa (97 mm) to medium in Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type (105-110 mm). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Leaf blade length varied from short in Kadrekar Kapa (93 mm) and Joshi Kapa (97 mm) to medium in Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type (105-110 mm).

      In the paper's own words

      “Kadrekar Kapa and Joshi Kapa recorded short leaf blades, measuring 93 mm and 97 mm respectively. In contrast, Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type showed medium-length leaf blades, ranging from 105 mm to 110 mm”

      Page 2

      Found in: Leaf blade length

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Leaf blade width ranged from the narrowest in Joshi Kapa (50 mm) to the broadest in Kerala Type (77 mm), with others falling in the medium range (55-70 mm). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Leaf blade width ranged from the narrowest in Joshi Kapa (50 mm) to the broadest in Kerala Type (77 mm), with others falling in the medium range (55-70 mm).

      In the paper's own words

      “Joshi kapa recorded the narrowest leaf blade at 50 mm, whereas Kerala type showed the broadest blade measuring 77 mm. Kadrekar kapa (60 mm), Palur-1 (70 mm), and Konkan Prolific (55 mm) were categorized as having medium width leaves”

      Page 2

      Found in: Leaf blade width

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Leaf blade shapes differed by genotype: Kadrekar Kapa, Palur-1, and Kerala Type were obovate, Joshi Kapa was oblong, and Konkan Prolific was elliptical. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Leaf blade shapes differed by genotype: Kadrekar Kapa, Palur-1, and Kerala Type were obovate, Joshi Kapa was oblong, and Konkan Prolific was elliptical.

      In the paper's own words

      “Obovate leaf shapes were observed in Kadrekar Kapa, Palur-1, and Kerala Type, characterized by a wider tip than base. whereas, Joshi Kapa exhibited an oblong leaf form, and Konkan Prolific showed an elliptical blade shape”

      Page 2

      Found in: Leaf blade shape

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Most genotypes (Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Palur-1, and Konkan Prolific) had oblique leaf bases, while the Kerala Type had a rounded base. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Most genotypes (Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Palur-1, and Konkan Prolific) had oblique leaf bases, while the Kerala Type had a rounded base.

      In the paper's own words

      “Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Palur-1, and Konkan Prolific exhibited an oblique leaf base, indicating an asymmetrical attachment to the petiole. In contrast, the Kerala Type genotype was characterized by a rounded leaf base”

      Page 3

      Found in: Tree crown shape

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Leaf orientation was horizontal for Kadrekar Kapa and Joshi Kapa, and erect for Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Leaf orientation was horizontal for Kadrekar Kapa and Joshi Kapa, and erect for Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type.

      In the paper's own words

      “Kadrekar Kapa and Joshi Kapa exhibited a horizontal leaf orientation, while Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type found an erect leaf orientation.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Leaf blade width

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Leaf posture varied from flattened (Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Kerala Type) to revolute (Palur-1) or conduplicate (Konkan Prolific). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Leaf posture varied from flattened (Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Kerala Type) to revolute (Palur-1) or conduplicate (Konkan Prolific).

      In the paper's own words

      “Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, and Kerala Type exhibited a flattened leaf posture, indicating a smooth and open leaf surface. In contrast, Palur-1 showed a revolute posture, with leaf margins rolled backward, while Konkan Prolific displayed a conduplicate posture, where the leaf was folded lengthwise along the midrib”

      Page 3

      Found in: Leaf blade length

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Joshi Kapa was the only genotype with an inflated stalk attachment; the other four genotypes had flattened attachments. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Joshi Kapa was the only genotype with an inflated stalk attachment; the other four genotypes had flattened attachments.

      In the paper's own words

      “Joshi Kapa exhibited an inflated stalk attachment, forming a swollen base where the stalk connects to the fruit. In contrast, the remaining four genotypes — Kadrekar Kapa, Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type — showed a flattened stalk attachment”

      Page 3

      Found in: Leaf blade shape

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • All five genotypes shared three common traits: acuminate leaf apexes, smooth upper leaf surfaces, and a cluster bearing habit. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      All five genotypes shared three common traits: acuminate leaf apexes, smooth upper leaf surfaces, and a cluster bearing habit.

      In the paper's own words

      “All five jackfruit genotypes exhibited an acuminate leaf apex shape, characterized by a gradually tapering tip.”

      Page 3

      “All five jackfruit genotypes exhibited a smooth upper leaf surface, showing no noticeable roughness or pubescence.”

      Page 3

      “All five jackfruit genotypes exhibited a cluster bearing habit, with multiple fruits developing in close proximity on the same node or branch.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Leaf blade shape

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors concluded that there is substantial variability in both vegetative and reproductive traits among the five studied jackfruit genotypes. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors concluded that there is substantial variability in both vegetative and reproductive traits among the five studied jackfruit genotypes.

      In the paper's own words

      “The present study on morphological characterization of five jackfruit genotypes revealed substantial variability in both vegetative and reproductive traits.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗
    • The authors state that differences in crown shape, leaf architecture, and fruiting position reflect adaptive strategies and offer potential for selection based on structural traits. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors state that differences in crown shape, leaf architecture, and fruiting position reflect adaptive strategies and offer potential for selection based on structural traits.

      In the paper's own words

      “differences in fruiting position, leaf architecture, and crown shape reflect adaptive strategies and potential for selection based on structural characteristics.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Jackfruit trees (Artocarpus heterophyllus)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Morphological Diversity Overview
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Jackfruit trees (Artocarpus heterophyllus)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Jackfruit trees (Artocarpus heterophyllus)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Morphological Diversity Overview

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Jackfruit trees (Artocarpus heterophyllus)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
List of jackfruit genotypes and their geographical originalsTable 1Page 2Morphological evaluation of jackfruit genotypesTable 2Page 2Crown shapeFigure 1Page 3Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surfaceFigure 2Page 3Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surfaceFigure 2Page 3Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surfaceFigure 2Page 3Leaf apex shapeFigure 3Page 4Leaf base shapeFigure 4Page 4Leaf blade lengthFigure 5Page 4Leaf Blade widthFigure 6Page 4Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruitFigure 7Page 4Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruitFigure 7Page 4Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruitFigure 7Page 4Leaf orientation and leaf postureFigure 8Page 5
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.), a member of the Moraceae family, is a highly productive evergreen tree native to the Western Ghats of India and widely cultivated across tropical and subtropical regions. It is renowned for producing the largest edible fruit in the plant kingdom, with individual fruits weighing up to 35 kg, and for yielding more prolifically than most other tree crops. Owing to its adaptability to diverse agro-climatic conditions and minimal input requirements, jackfruit holds great promise in traditional agroforestry systems as well as commercial cultivation. Despite its growing economic and nutritional importance, jackfruit remains largely underutilized and under-researched, particularly in terms of varietal improvement. One of the major challenges in jackfruit cultivation is its highly heterozygous and cross-pollinated nature, which results in wide morphological variability in traits such as fruit size, shape, rind texture, bulb type, color, and maturity period. This genetic diversity, though complex, offers immense potential for crop improvement and selection of superior genotypes suited for specific end-uses. Therefore, systematic morphological characterization is essential for identifying and conserving elite types, standardizing descriptors, and laying the foundation for future breeding programs.

Material and Methods

A research study titled "Morphological footprints of Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam) in twin terrains of the Konkan belt of Maharashtra: A Comparative Study" was undertaken during the academic year 2024-2025 at two prominent research centres of Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth (DBSKKV), namely the College of Horticulture, Dapoli (Ratnagiri) and the College of Horticulture, Mulde, Kudal (Sindhudurg), Maharashtra. The investigation focused on five distinct jackfruit genotypes namely Kadrekar Kapa, Joshi Kapa, Palur-1, Konkan Prolific and Kerala type, meticulously evaluating a wide range of morphometric parameters. This comparative assessment aimed to explore the inherent genetic diversity and identify promising genotypes based on their physical and qualitative attributes. The research was carried out at two research centres under Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth (DBSKKV), in the Konkan region of Maharashtra. The first location, the College of Horticulture, Dapoli (17.76° N latitude, 73.18° E longitude; 244 m above mean sea level), is situated in a moderately elevated zone and receives an average annual rainfall of approximately 2,700 mm, predominantly during the monsoon months from June to October, spanning nearly 100 rainy days. The relative humidity in this region averages around 80%, contributing to a moist subtropical climate. The second site, the College of Horticulture, Mulde, located in Kudal, Sindhudurg district (16.02° N, 73.42° E; elevation 18 m AMSL), falls within the coastal lowland zone of southern Konkan. This location is characterized by higher rainfall, with annual precipitation ranging from 3,000 mm to 3,200 mm, and maintains a consistently high relative humidity of about 86% to 90% during the southwest monsoon period. The genotypes were selected and tagged at both experimental sites. Trees aged between 10 to 20 years were chosen to maintain consistency in growth and fruiting stage. Morphological observations were recorded systematically to evaluate variation among the genotypes.

Result and discussion

In the present investigation, an attempt was made to identify superior genotypes of jackfruit collected from the Konkan region of Maharashtra. The evaluation was based on key morphological features and fruit quality parameters. The results obtained from the study are analysed and discussed in this section under relevant subheadings.

Tree crown shape

The observations revealed that the Joshi Kapa and Palur-1 genotypes exhibited a broadly pyramidal crown shape, indicating a more spreading growth habit. In contrast, the Kadrekar Kapa, Konkan Prolific and Kerala Type varieties were characterized by an elliptical tree shape, suggesting a relatively upright and compact canopy structure. Similar variation was observed by Gwokyalya et al. (2024) [2] and Singh et al. (2023) [4] .

Leaf blade length

Variation in leaf blade length was observed across the five jackfruit genotypes. Kadrekar Kapa and Joshi Kapa recorded short leaf blades, measuring 93 mm and 97 mm respectively. In contrast, Palur-1, Konkan Prolific, and Kerala Type showed medium-length leaf blades, ranging from 105 mm to 110 mm, indicating noticeable morphological differences among the genotypes.

Leaf blade width

The genotypes exhibited noticeable variation in leaf blade width. Joshi kapa recorded the narrowest leaf blade at 50 mm, whereas Kerala type showed the broadest blade measuring 77 mm. Kadrekar kapa (60 mm), Palur-1 (70 mm), and Konkan Prolific (55 mm) were categorized as having medium width leaves, indicating moderate variation among the genotypes in terms of leaf breadth.

Leaf blade shape

Distinct differences in leaf blade shape were recorded among the evaluated jackfruit genotypes. Obovate leaf shapes were observed in Kadrekar Kapa, Palur-1, and Kerala Type, characterized by a wider tip than base. whereas, Joshi Kapa exhibited an oblong leaf form, and Konkan Prolific showed an elliptical blade shape, highlighting the morphological diversity among the varieties. Similar variation was seen by Kisepa et al. (2024) [3]

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementsSincere gratitude is extended to Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli for providing the facilities and constant support that made this work possible. The cooperation and encouragement of co-workers have been invaluable, along with the timely help and guidance received from staff members, both working and non-working. Appreciation is also due to the field assistants whose dedicated efforts ensured the smooth execution of the research. Heartfelt thanks are offered to all who contributed, directly or indirectly, to the successful completion of this work.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. List of jackfruit genotypes and their geographical originals
Sr. no.GenotypesSourceState
1Kadrekar KapaRatnagiriMaharashtra
2Joshi KapaRatnagiriMaharashtra
3Palur-1RatnagiriMaharashtra
4Konkan ProlificRatnagiriMaharashtra
5Kerala TypeRatnagiriMaharashtra

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
List of jackfruit genotypes and their geographical originals↗ Enlarge
Table 1
List of jackfruit genotypes and their geographical originals

List of jackfruit genotypes and their geographical originals

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. Morphological evaluation of jackfruit genotypes
Varieties \ CharacterKadrekar KapaJoshi KapaPalur-1Konkan ProlificKerala Type
Tree crown shapeEllipticalBroadly pyramidalBroadly pyramidalEllipticalElliptical
Leaf blade: lengthShort (93mm)Short (97mm)Medium (110 mm)Medium (110 mm)Medium (105 mm)
Leaf blade: widthMedium (60 mm)Narrow (50 mm)Medium (70 mm)Medium (55 mm)Broad (77 mm)
Leaf blade shapeObovateOblongObovateEllipticalObovate
Leaf apex shapeAcuminateAcuminateAcuminateAcuminateAcuminate
Leaf base shapeObliqueObliqueObliqueObliqueRounded
Leaf orientationHorizontalHorizontalErectErectErect
Leaf postureFlattenedFlattenedRevoluteConduplicateFlattened
Upper leaf surfaceSmoothSmoothSmoothSmoothSmooth
Fruit clustering habitClustersClustersClustersClustersClusters
Stalk attachment to fruitflattenedInflatedFlattenedFlattenedFlattened

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Morphological evaluation of jackfruit genotypes↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Morphological evaluation of jackfruit genotypes

Morphological evaluation of jackfruit genotypes

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Crown shape
Crown shape↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Crown shape

Crown shape

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 2. Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface
Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface

Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 2. Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface
Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface

Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 2. Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface
Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface

Leaf blade shape and upper leaf surface

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 3. Leaf apex shape
Leaf apex shape↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
Leaf apex shape

Leaf apex shape

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 4. Leaf base shape
Leaf base shape↗ Enlarge
Figure 4
Leaf base shape

Leaf base shape

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 5. Leaf blade length
Leaf blade length↗ Enlarge
Figure 5
Leaf blade length

Leaf blade length

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 6. Leaf Blade width
Leaf Blade width↗ Enlarge
Figure 6
Leaf Blade width

Leaf Blade width

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 7. Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit
Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit↗ Enlarge
Figure 7
Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit

Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 7. Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit
Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit↗ Enlarge
Figure 7
Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit

Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 7. Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit
Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit↗ Enlarge
Figure 7
Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit

Cluster bearing habit and stalk attachment to fruit

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 8. Leaf orientation and leaf posture
Leaf orientation and leaf posture↗ Enlarge
Figure 8
Leaf orientation and leaf posture

Leaf orientation and leaf posture

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗

References

4 in the original paper
  1. Gladis B, B Ramesh Babu, Ashok P, Harsha Vardhan A, DR Salomi Suneetha. Morphological characterization of surveyed jackfruit genotypes in Godavari zone of Andhra Pradesh. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(8):513-518.
  2. Gwokyalya R, Ann Nanteza WH, Kayondo SI, Kazigaba D, Nakabonge G. Morphological and genetic characterization of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) in the Kayunga and Luwero districts of Uganda. BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24:355. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05064-x.
  3. Kisepa MM, Zharare EG, Zimudzi C, Akweni AL. Morphological diversity and fruit production of wild Salacia kraussii (Celastraceae) on the Northern Coast of KwaZuluNatal, South Africa. Heliyon. 2024; e25332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25332.
  4. Singh P, Pandey SK, Pandey CS, Rai RK, Parmar M. Evaluation of Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Genotypes for Tree Morphology and Fruit characteristics. Biol Forum. 2023;15(10):548-553.

Cited by 1

From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex