New plant breeding techniques to boost resilience and sustainability in crop production

Introduction 1.1 (Elaborated Version)

Agriculture today operates under unprecedented ecological and economic pressure. Rising temperatures, erratic rainfall, frequent heatwaves, soil salinization, pest outbreaks and depletion of soil organic matter have collectively destabilized crop productivity across continents. Global cereal yields are increasingly vulnerable to climate extremes, with heatrelated losses reported even in high-input production systems. Simultaneously, farmers confront rising fertilizer and pesticide costs, shrinking arable land and tightening environmental regulations aimed at reducing agrochemical dependence. Together, these constraints create an urgent need for crop varieties that are resilient, resource-efficient and capable of sustaining production under variable and stressful environments. Traditional breeding has served as the backbone of agricultural improvement for over a century. The systematic application of Mendelian genetics, hybrid breeding, heterosis exploitation and selection programs delivered significant gains in yield and adaptability. However, these conventional approaches depend on naturally occurring recombination and long generational intervals, making them inherently slow. Many adaptive traits-such as drought tolerance, heat resilience, nutrient-use efficiency and disease resistance-are complex, polygenic and influenced by thousands of small-effect loci. Improving such traits through classical breeding requires substantial time, large populations and extensive multilocation testing. Additionally, decades of intensive selection have narrowed genetic diversity in many major crops. Modern high-performing cultivars often share a limited genetic base, reducing their adaptive capacity under rapidly changing climatic conditions. This makes it difficult for traditional breeding systems to introduce novel variation at the pace required by emerging environmental challenges. New Plant Breeding Techniques (NPBTs) provide a transformative response to these limitations. Genome editing enables precise modification of key genes governing stress responses, growth patterns and metabolic pathways.

Pan-genomics opens access to a much broader range of natural variation present in wild relatives and landraces. Genomic selection allows prediction of complex traits before phenotyping, significantly accelerating genetic gain. Speed breeding shortens generation cycles, enabling faster fixation of beneficial traits. High-throughput phenotyping enhances measurement accuracy of stress responses and strengthens predictive models. By integrating these approaches, breeders can develop climate-resilient varieties far more rapidly and accurately than through traditional methods alone. NPBTs collectively improve stress tolerance, yield stability and input-use efficiency, positioning them at the center of future sustainable agriculture and global food security strategies.

Evolution of Plant Breeding and the Need for NPBTs (Elaborated Version)

Plant breeding has undergone several major technological transitions. Early domestication relied on phenotypic selection for traits such as grain size, shattering resistance and palatability. The rediscovery of Mendel's laws in the early 20th century initiated a scientific era of breeding based on controlled crosses, segregation analysis and heritable variation. Hybrid breeding and the Green Revolution further propelled productivity by exploiting heterosis, dwarfing genes and improved nutrient responses. Despite these achievements, classical breeding operates within biological constraints. Recombination events are limited, meaning that combining beneficial alleles into a single cultivar often requires many generations of crossing and selection. Breeding cycles for cereals, legumes and horticultural crops may take 8-12 years or more. This pace is increasingly incompatible with the speed at which climatic stresses are intensifying. Another major limitation is the narrow genetic base of modern cultivars. Many elite varieties are derived from a small set of shared ancestors, leading to genetic bottlenecks. This uniformity increases vulnerability to both abiotic stresses-such as heat, drought and salinity-and biotic threats including evolving pathogens and insect pests. Although traditional introgression from wild relatives can introduce new variation, it is often hindered by linkage drag, sterility barriers and long backcrossing periods. Furthermore, phenotyping-the evaluation of plant traitshas historically been a slow and labor-intensive process. Many resilience-related traits, such as water-use efficiency, canopy temperature, root architecture or early stress responses, are difficult to measure accurately using traditional tools, slowing down selection efficiency. NPBTs directly address each of these limitations. Genome editing allows precise alteration of target alleles without the need for repeated crossing. Pan-genomic resources enable breeders to identify stress-adaptive genes absent from elite varieties. Genomic selection accelerates breeding by using genome-wide markers to predict performance, making phenotyping more strategic rather than exhaustive. Speed breeding drastically reduces generation time, while highthroughput phenotyping provides detailed trait measurements at scale. Together, these innovations redefine breeding from a largely empirical discipline to a predictive, data-driven field capable of responding to rapid ecological changes. NPBTs therefore represent not just an enhancement of traditional methods but a necessary shift toward modern, climate-resilient crop improvement.

Genome Editing Technologies

CRISPR-Cas systems allow targeted modifications such as base editing, promoter editing and multiplex editing. Applications include improving:  Disease resistance (SWEET gene editing in rice),  Stress tolerance (editing drought and salinity regulators),  Plant architecture (yield-related genes),  Nutrient-use efficiency. [44]

Genomic Selection and Predictive Breeding

Genomic selection (GS) predicts breeding values using genome-wide markers, accelerating improvement of complex polygenic traits. GS allows early selection, reduces breeding cycle time and supports multi-trait improvement.

Integration with speed breeding and phenotyping increases predictive accuracy. [8] Chickpea Heat/drought haplotypes Climate resilience Ruperao et al. (2021) [30] 7. High-Throughput Phenotyping and Digital Breeding Drone-based, sensor-driven and automated greenhouse platforms capture multi-dimensional traits such as canopy temperature, spectral reflectance, root architecture and stress kinetics. HTP strengthens genomic selection and accelerates stress-resilience screening.

Applications of NPBTs for Resilience

New Plant Breeding Techniques (NPBTs) are particularly powerful when applied to improve resilience traits-those that determine a crop's ability to survive, adapt and yield under diverse environmental constraints. Resilience encompasses tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought, heat, salinity and flooding, as well as resistance to pathogens and pests, nutrient-use efficiency and yield stability in fluctuating conditions. These traits are often complex and polygenic, making them difficult to enhance through conventional breeding alone. NPBTs enable breeders to precisely manipulate stressresponsive genes, assemble favorable allele combinations and rapidly fix these traits using accelerated breeding cycles. Genomic insights supported by pan-genomic resources and high-throughput phenotyping further refine the selection of superior genotypes. Together, NPBTs represent a multidimensional toolkit for developing climateready cultivars suited for sustainable agriculture.

Abiotic Stress Tolerance

Abiotic stresses-especially drought, heat and salinity-are among the most severe constraints on global crop productivity. These stresses often occur simultaneously, intensifying their impact on plant physiology, water relations and metabolic processes. NPBTs offer diverse strategies to enhance tolerance by modifying specific genes, regulatory pathways and physiological mechanisms. NPBT-based resistance strategies significantly reduce dependence on chemical pesticides, lowering production costs and minimizing environmental impacts.

Nutrient-Use Efficiency

Increasing nutrient-use efficiency (NUE) is essential to reduce fertilizer dependency, lower input costs and limit nutrient pollution in agricultural systems. NPBTs provide multiple avenues to enhance the uptake, transport and assimilation of key nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K). Genome editing enables precise modification of nutrient transporter genes. For nitrogen, altering ammonium (AMT) or nitrate transporter (NRT) genes improves uptake efficiency and enhances nitrogen assimilation pathways. Editing regulators involved in nitrogen metabolism can finetune signaling networks to enhance efficiency under lowinput conditions. Phosphorus-use efficiency is improved by modifying PHT1 and other phosphate transporter genes, as well as root architecture regulators that enhance soil exploration and mycorrhizal associations. Pan-genomics helps identify rare alleles associated with efficient phosphorus acquisition from landraces and wild relatives. Genomic selection accelerates the improvement of complex NUE-related traits such as root system architecture, nutrient remobilization and biomass allocation. High-throughput phenotyping technologies-such as spectral imaging and root imaging systems-allow breeders to quantify nutrientresponse traits more accurately and at scale. Improved NUE not only enhances yield under nutrientlimiting conditions but also contributes to sustainable agriculture by lowering fertilizer consumption and reducing emissions from nutrient loss.

Yield Stability

Yield stability is a fundamental trait for ensuring food security, particularly in regions with fluctuating climates. It reflects a plant's ability to maintain consistent productivity across varied environments and under multiple stress combinations.

NPBTs offer several pathways to improve yield stability. Editing genes regulating flowering time, photoperiod sensitivity and developmental plasticity helps synchronize crop growth with local environmental conditions. Modifying architecture-related genes influences traits such as tillering, root depth and canopy structure-traits that affect water-use efficiency, lodging resistance and resource allocation.

Stress-related regulatory genes can be modified to enhance the plant's ability to cope with drought, heat and nutrient stress simultaneously. Multi-gene editing strategies allow simultaneous improvement of traits controlling biomass partitioning, reproduction and stress resilience, leading to stable yields even in unpredictable environments.

Genomic selection enhances yield stability by enabling breeders to predict performance across diverse environments using multi-environment trial (MET) data. Integration with HTP strengthens selection for stability indices, resilience trajectories and stress-adaptive growth patterns. Speed breeding further accelerates the development of stable-yielding varieties by allowing repeated testing and selection across environments within shorter timeframes. Together, NPBTs enable breeders to design cultivars with strong yield consistency, reduced sensitivity to climatic variation and improved resilience to environmental shocks. Overall, the regulatory, ethical and socio-economic landscape surrounding NPBTs is complex but manageable. Clear, science-based policies combined with inclusive innovation strategies will be critical to ensure that these technologies contribute equitably to sustainable and climateresilient agriculture.

Case Studies

Integrated Discussion

NPBTs work best when integrated. Pan-genomics identifies target alleles; CRISPR installs them; GS predicts polygenic gains; speed breeding accelerates fixation; HTP validates stress responses. Together, they form a rapid, adaptive breeding ecosystem essential for climate-smart agriculture.

Conclusion

NPBTs provide the precision, speed and genetic diversity necessary to develop resilient, sustainable crop varieties. Their synergy offers a transformative breeding framework capable of meeting climate challenges and securing global food production. As regulatory frameworks evolve and technological access expands, NPBTs will become foundational tools in climate-smart agriculture.

References

1. Areche-Mansilla DY, Ortega-Torres M, López-Carvajal L, Herrera D, Salazar M, Torres F. New plant breeding techniques to boost resilience of food systems. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2025;57(2):445-460.
2. Biswas S, Tian J, Li R, Chen M. Targeted genome editing in sorghum and millets using CRISPR. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(5):1120-1135.
3. Chen J, Xu R, Wang Y. Engineering root system architecture for improving phosphorus use efficiency in crops. Plant Physiol. 2021;187(1):220-234.
4. Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang H, Gao C. CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding. Plant Physiol. 2019;179(4):122-135.
5. Crossa J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Cuevas J, MontesinosLópez OA, Jarquín D, de los Campos G, et al. Genomic selection in plant breeding: Methods, models and perspectives. Theor Appl Genet. 2017;130(1):1-26.
6. Dangl JL, Horvath DM, Staskawicz BJ. The plant immune system. Science. 2013;341(6147):746-751.
7. Gao C. Genome engineering for crop improvement and de novo domestication. Nat Food. 2021;2(11):734-746.
8. Gao L, Gonda I, Sun H, Ma Q, Bao K, Tieman D, et al. The tomato pan-genome uncovers new genes for disease resistance and quality. Nat Genet. 2019;51(7):1082-1088.
9. Gonal B, Gopalkrishna T, Sharath K, Kumar P, Kulkarni V. Exploring the future of plant breeding: Advancements and challenges. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35:45-59.
10. Gosa SC, Lupo Y, Moshelion M. Quantifying plant stress responses using phenotyping approaches. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(9):2401-2411.
11. Hawkesford MJ. Improving nitrogen use efficiency in cereals. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(1):145-158.
12. Hickey LT, Hafeez A, Robinson H, Jackson H, Martin A, Singh M. Breeding crops to feed 10 billion people. Trends Genet. 2019;35(6):567-569.
13. Huang X, Han B. Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65(1):531-551.
14. Ishii T, Araki M. Consumer acceptance and governance of genome-edited crops. Plant Cell Rep. 2017;36(9):1447-1457.
15. Jaganathan D, Ramasamy K, Sellamuthu G, Jayabalan S, Venkataraman G. CRISPR for plant genome editing: Towards sustainable agriculture. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23(7):637-650.
16. Lemmon ZH, Reem NT, Dalrymple J, Soyk S, Swartwood KE, Rodriguez-Leal D, et al. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nat Plants. 2018;4(10):766-770.
17. Lesk C, Rowhani P, Ramankutty N. Influence of extreme heat on crop yields globally. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(35):664-673.
18. Li B, Zhao C, Liu P. CRISPR-mediated domestication of wild rice relatives for climate-resilient agriculture. Plant Biotechnol J. 2023;21(1):110-123.
19. Li X, Zhou Y, He Z. CRISPR/Cas applications for engineering disease resistance in crops. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:883016. p.1-14.
20. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157(4):1819-1829.
21. Menz J, Modrzejewski D, Hartung F, Wilhelm R, Sprink T. Genome editing in crop plants: Present challenges and future opportunities in relation to the UN SDGs. Crop Sci. 2020;60(2):441-452.
22. Montenegro JD, Golicz AA, Bayer PE, Hurgobin B, Lee H, Chan CKK, et al. The maize haplotype map 3.0: An updated panel of genome-wide variation to study trait architecture. Nat Genet. 2017;49(3):476-480.
23. Oliva R, Ji C, Atienza-Grande G, Huguet-Tapia JC, Perez-Quintero A, Li T, et al. Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(11):1344-1350.
24. Parlange M, Meile L, Zbinden H, Keller B. CRISPRCas mediated control of fungal diseases in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(10):2201-2212.
25. Prado K. Building climate-resilient crops: Genetic and physiological approaches. J Exp Bot. 2025;76(2):357375.
26. Prasad PVV, Bheemanahalli R, Jagadish SVK. Field crops and the changing climate: Impacts and adaptation strategies. Agric For Meteorol. 2017;239:314-323.
27. Qaim M. Role of new genomic tools in sustainable agriculture. Annu Rev Resour Econ. 2020;12(1):237256.
28. Ray DK, Gerber JS, MacDonald GK, West PC. Climate extremes and global yield variability. Nat Clim Change. 2019;9(12):838-845.
29. Razzaq A, Kaur P, Akhtar N, Wani SH, Dar ZA. Nextgeneration plant breeding strategies for climate-smart agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:620420. p.1-12.
30. Ruperao P, Thirunavukkarasu N, Gandham P, Bodanapu R, Samineni S, Jaganathan D, et al. A chickpea haplotype map and pan-genome reveal functional gene presence-absence variation linked to agronomic traits. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19(3):648660.
31. Scheben A, Edwards D. Genome editors take on crops. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):185. p. 1-6.
32. Smyth SJ. Regulatory and economic aspects of genome edited crops. Agric Food Secur. 2020;9(1):17. p. 1-9.
33. Sun L. Modern plant breeding techniques in crop improvement. Plants. 2024;13(19):2676. p.1-15.
34. Van Bueren ETL, Østergård H, Myers JR, Dawson JC. Ecological and evolutionary plant breeding for climate resilience. Renew Agric Food Syst. 2018;33(3):199214.
35. Venegas D, Ortega-Pérez R, Solís S. Genomics of phosphorus use efficiency in crops: Advances and prospects. Trends Plant Sci. 2022;27(4):350-364.
36. Watson A, Ghosh S, Williams MJ, Cuddy WS, Simmonds J, Rey MD, et al. Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nat Plants. 2018;4(1):23-29.
37. Wang F, Wang C, Liu P, Lei C, Hao W, Xia Y, et al. Enhanced fungal resistance in wheat via CRISPRinduced knock-out of susceptibility genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(43):27528-27535.
38. Wolt JD, Wolf C. Policy considerations for gene-edited crops. GM Crops Food. 2018;9(2):89-94.
39. Yang Y, Guo M, Sun S, Zou Y. CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of OsRR22 enhances salt tolerance in rice. Plant Cell. 2021;33(6):2135-2150.
40. Yu H, Xie W, Wang J. Genome-wide association studies for abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Rice. 2021;14(1):43. p.1-10.
41. Zhang H, Zhang J, Wei P, Zhang B, Gou F, Feng Z, et al. Challenges and opportunities for CRISPR/Cas applications in crop breeding. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020;62(3):258-273.
42. Zhang Y, Zhao C, Wang C. Integrating phenomics and genomic prediction to improve climate resilience in crops. Plant Commun. 2021;2(3):100146. p.1-14.
43. Zhou Y, Zou X, Song W, Wang G. A large-scale rice pan-genome reveals extensive genomic diversity shaping environmental adaptation. Nature. 2020;579(7799):539-543.
44. Zsögön A, Cermak T, Naves ER, de Almeida JF, de Lima LR, Pinheiro DG, et al. De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(12):1211-1216.