Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

Assessing the Impact of Fertilizer Use, Irrigation, and Rainfall on Crop Productivity in India

Ronaldo José

Volume 7(10) · Pages 402–405 · DOI: 10.33545/2664844x.2025.v7.i10f.901 ↗

Research areasAgricultural Economics and Practices

↓ Read full-text PDF1 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Indian agricultural sector is facing multiple challenges because of rising competition for land resources and water access and changing climate patterns. This study examines the impact of fertilizer consumption, irrigation, and annual rainfall on crop productivity in India. The study is based on secondary data from 1981 to 2023. Trend analysis indicates that crop productivity increased at an average annual rate of 2.09%, fertilizer use at 3.88%, and irrigation coverage at 1.46%. Rainfall showed a negligible and statistically insignificant increase of 0.11% per year. The Auto Regressive Distributed Lag model establishes a long-run cointegrating relationship between crop productivity and its determinants. The error correction term was found significant and suggests that short-run deviations adjust toward long-run equilibrium, thereby confirming the stability of the model. The application of fertilizers consistently enhances productivity, whereas irrigation efficiency represents a critical area for enhancement. The findings highlight the necessity of balanced fertilizer application, effective water management, and climate-resilient strategies to promote sustainable agricultural development and ensure long-term food security in India.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • India's agricultural sector is vital to its economy, contributing 16-18% of the Gross Value Added (GVA) and employing nearly half of the workforce. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      India's agricultural sector is vital to its economy, contributing 16-18% of the Gross Value Added (GVA) and employing nearly half of the workforce.

      In the paper's own words

      “The agricultural sector in India holds significant importance. The agricultural sector generates 16-18% of GVA while employing nearly half of the total Indian workforce.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Indian soils are generally considered low in fertility due to significant deficiencies in nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and micronutrients like zinc, iron, and boron. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Indian soils are generally considered low in fertility due to significant deficiencies in nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and micronutrients like zinc, iron, and boron.

      In the paper's own words

      “Indian soils are typically regarded as low fertile soils because of significant deficiencies in micronutrients such as zinc, iron, and boron, as well as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Crop productivity in India has faced increasing pressure over recent decades due to population growth and climate change. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Crop productivity in India has faced increasing pressure over recent decades due to population growth and climate change.

      In the paper's own words

      “But climate change and increasing population growth during the last several decades have made pressures on India’s crop productivity.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. What they did

    • The research used secondary data from 1981 to 2023, sourcing fertilizer consumption, crop productivity, and irrigation area from FAOSTAT, and rainfall data from the India Meteorological Department. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The research used secondary data from 1981 to 2023, sourcing fertilizer consumption, crop productivity, and irrigation area from FAOSTAT, and rainfall data from the India Meteorological Department.

      In the paper's own words

      “The study is based on secondary data over the period from 1981 to 2023. Data on fertilizer consumption (kg/ha), Crop productivity (kg/ha) and land area equipped for irrigation (ha) is obtained from FAOSTAT. Data on annual all-India Rainfall is collected from India Meteorological Department (IMD).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methodology Data Sources:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • A log-linear regression model was employed to analyze the long-term trends of the variables between 1981 and 2023. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      A log-linear regression model was employed to analyze the long-term trends of the variables between 1981 and 2023.

      In the paper's own words

      “The long-term trends in crop productivity, fertilizer consumption, irrigation, and rainfall during the period 1981-2023 were studied using a log-linear regression model”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methodology Data Sources:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model was used to examine the short-run and long-run relationships between crop productivity and its determinants. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model was used to examine the short-run and long-run relationships between crop productivity and its determinants.

      In the paper's own words

      “The short run and long run relationship between variables was examined using ARDL model.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methodology Data Sources:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  3. What they found

    • Crop productivity increased at a statistically significant average annual rate of 2.09%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Crop productivity increased at a statistically significant average annual rate of 2.09%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Crop Productivity 0.02093 2.09 <0.001 0.968 Increasing”

      Page 2

      “Average annual growth of crop productivity is 2.09% and was statistically significant at 1% level.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methodology Data Sources:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Fertilizer consumption grew at a statistically significant average annual rate of 3.88%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Fertilizer consumption grew at a statistically significant average annual rate of 3.88%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Fertilizer Use 0.0387659 3.88 <0.001 0.940 Increasing”

      Page 2

      “Average annual growth of fertilizer consumption is 3.88%, and was statistically significant at 1% level.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methodology Data Sources:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Irrigation coverage showed a continuous increase at an average annual rate of 1.46%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Irrigation coverage showed a continuous increase at an average annual rate of 1.46%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Irrigation 0.0146091 1.46 <0.001 0.964 Increasing”

      Page 2

      “Irrigation coverage increased at an average rate of 1.46% per annum.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methodology Data Sources:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Annual rainfall showed a negligible increase of 0.11%, which was not statistically significant. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Annual rainfall showed a negligible increase of 0.11%, which was not statistically significant.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rainfall exhibited a negligible and statistically insignificant increase of 0.11% per annum.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methodology Data Sources:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study confirmed a long-run cointegrating relationship between crop productivity and its determinants, as the F-statistic (5.86) exceeded the upper bound critical value (3.67). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The study confirmed a long-run cointegrating relationship between crop productivity and its determinants, as the F-statistic (5.86) exceeded the upper bound critical value (3.67).

      In the paper's own words

      “As the computed F-statistic value (5.86) is larger than the upper bound critical value (3.67) at 5% significance level, we reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between levels. This proves the existence of a long-run cointegrating relationship between crop productivity and its determinants.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Regression Analysis ARDL Model Estimation

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • In the short run, fertilizer use was found to be a consistent positive determinant of crop productivity (p = 0.007). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      In the short run, fertilizer use was found to be a consistent positive determinant of crop productivity (p = 0.007).

      In the paper's own words

      “ln_fertilizer 0.202 0.069 2.910 0.007”

      Page 2

      “The results also reveal that fertilizer use is a consistent positive determinant of productivity.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The error correction term (-0.055, p < 0.01) indicates that approximately 5.5% of short-run deviations from the long-run equilibrium are corrected each year. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The error correction term (-0.055, p < 0.01) indicates that approximately 5.5% of short-run deviations from the long-run equilibrium are corrected each year.

      In the paper's own words

      “The presence of a stable long-term relationship was confirmed by the highly significant (p < 0.01) and negative (-0.055) error correction term. ... This suggests that about 5.5% of the short-run disequilibrium is corrected annually.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Short-Run Dynamics and Error Correction Model (ECM):

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  4. What it means

    • The authors conclude that productivity can be improved through policies promoting balanced fertilizer use and by focusing on enhancing water-use efficiency rather than just expanding irrigated areas. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that productivity can be improved through policies promoting balanced fertilizer use and by focusing on enhancing water-use efficiency rather than just expanding irrigated areas.

      In the paper's own words

      “Agricultural productivity can be greatly increased through the formulation of policies supporting balanced and economic fertilizer use. ... Although irrigation contributes to increased crop productivity, the results suggest that there is a need for enhancing water-use efficiency rather than merely increasing irrigated area.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Trends in Crop Productivity, Fertilizer Use, Irrigation,Table 1Page 2ARDL Estimated Short-Run ModelTable 2Page 2ARDL Bounds Test for CointegrationTable 3Page 3Diagnostic Test ResultsTable 6Page 3Long-Run CoefficientsTable 4Page 3Error Correction Model ResultsTable 5Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The agricultural sector in India holds significant importance. The agricultural sector generates 16-18% of GVA while employing nearly half of the total Indian workforce. It ensures food security, generates employment, and drives overall economic development. The agricultural sector shapes rural incomes and livelihoods, provides food and raw materials, and offers employment for a considerable portion of the population. India has been increasingly attaining self-sufficiency with impressive gains in agricultural production. But climate change and increasing population growth during the last several decades have made pressures on India's crop productivity. Some of the most important determinants of productivity are rainfall patterns, irrigation systems, and the use of fertilizers. To create sound policies for the agricultural sector, the government needs to understand the quantitative relationships between these determinants. Indian soils are typically regarded as low fertile soils because of significant deficiencies in micronutrients such as zinc, iron, and boron, as well as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The low amount of soil organic carbon (SOC) in Indian soils is a major contributing factor to the decreased fertilizer use efficiency. (Srinivasarao, 2021) [14] . India ranks second globally and first in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) region in terms of total fertilizer consumption. This highlights India's intensive input-based farming system and significant contribution to the global fertilizer demand. According to Rao et al. (2018), balanced fertilizer application greatly increases cereal yields, especially in irrigated areas. Chaudhary (2021) [1,12] promoted precision nutrient management by highlighting the possible yield and environmental constraints associated with excessive fertilizer use. Patra et al. (2016) [11] investigated how fertilizer use affected agricultural output in Hooghly district of West Bengal. They found that there is no significant relationship between increased chemical fertilizer use and increases in agricultural yield and production. Irrigation is essential for increasing agricultural output as it guarantees a consistent supply of water and lessens reliance on erratic monsoon rains.

Irrigation also improves food security and stabilizes farmers' incomes by facilitating multiple cropping and promoting high-yield crops. Higher irrigation coverage reduces rainfall variability and produces more consistent yields (Singh and Sharma, 2019) [13] . Rainfall variability limits fertilizer efficiency, underlining the significance of supplemental irrigation (Kumar et al., 2020) [6] . Narayanamoorthy, Bhattarai, and Jothi (2018) studied the economic effects of drip irrigation in the production of vegetables in Tamil Nadu. They found that drip irrigation boosts crop yield by 52 percent while lowering the need for other inputs, like fertilizers, by 31 percent. According to a study by Jin, Yu, Jansen, and Muraoka (2012) [4] on the effect of irrigation on crop productivity in India found that irrigation has a significant and strong influence on agricultural productivity. Most farming in India still depends on monsoon rains and rainfall has a direct and substantial impact on agricultural output. While irregular or insufficient rainfall can result in droughts, crop failures, and decreased agricultural output, adequate and well-distributed rainfall promotes crop growth, boosts yields, and permits timely sowing and harvesting. As a result, agricultural production and food security are all significantly affected by rainfall patterns. According to Onyeji & Fischer (1993) [10] , climate change has resulted in lower consumer incomes, higher food prices, and decreased crop yields. Compared industrial and service sectors, agricultural sector is more economically and physically vulnerable to climate change (Gbetibouo and Hassan, 2005) [2] . This study also found that agricultural production is severely impacted by climate change. According to Nandhini et al. (2006), low rainfall and input scarcity in Tamil Nadu, India, are causing a decline in arable land for rice cultivation. According to Kapur et al. (2009) [5] , by the middle of the twenty-first century, rainfall could reduce crop yields by thirty percent. This study also observed that a decrease in arable land might put additional strain on India's agricultural output. These studies show that a variety of interrelated factors affect crop productivity, necessitating a thorough empirical investigation. Numerous studies examine agricultural inputs independently. A more comprehensive understanding of the relationships and relative contributions of fertilizer use, irrigation, and rainfall to crop productivity can be obtained by evaluating these factors together.

Objectives

 to study the long-term trends in crop productivity, fertilizer use, irrigation and rainfall.  to examine the short run and long run relationship between crop productivity and its major determinants.

Methodology Data Sources:

The study is based on secondary data over the period from 1981 to 2023. Data on fertilizer consumption (kg/ha), Crop productivity (kg/ha) and land area equipped for irrigation (ha) is obtained from FAOSTAT. Data on annual all-India Rainfall is collected from India Meteorological Department (IMD). Analytical Tools: The long-term trends in crop productivity, fertilizer consumption, irrigation, and rainfall during the period 1981-2023 were studied using a log-linear regression model. The short run and long run relationship between variables was examined using ARDL model. Average annual growth of crop productivity is 2.09% and was statistically significant at 1% level. This suggests steady productivity gains over the last four decades. Average annual growth of fertilizer consumption is 3.88%, and was statistically significant at 1% level. This reflects the inputintensive nature of Indian agriculture during the study period. Irrigation coverage increased at an average rate of 1.46% per annum. This indicates gradual but continuous improvements in water resource infrastructure. Rainfall exhibited a negligible and statistically insignificant increase of 0.11% per annum. This shows absence of a consistent long-term trend in rainfall.

Results and Discussion

Results and Discussion

Regression Analysis ARDL Model Estimation

The short run and long run relationship between variables was examined using ARDL model. The dependent variable was crop productivity and the independent variables were fertilizer, irrigation and rainfall. All the variables were expressed in natural logarithms. Unit root tests were done to confirm that the variables satisfy the conditions for ARDL model. The optimal lag structure (4, 0, 0, 0) was decided based on Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). As the computed F-statistic value (5.86) is larger than the upper bound critical value (3.67) at 5% significance level, we reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between levels. This proves the existence of a long-run cointegrating relationship between crop productivity and its determinants.

Long-Run Relationship

The long-run coefficients derived from the levels equation is given below The long run coefficients were not found significant. Fertilizer use has a positive long-run effect on crop productivity. This suggests that continuous application of fertilizer boosts farm productivity. Both rainfall and irrigation have negative long-run coefficients. This might be due to poor irrigation technology, soil salinization, or too much reliance on unpredictable rainfall patterns. The presence of cointegration indicates that despite short-run fluctuations, the variables move together towards a long-run equilibrium path.

Short-Run Dynamics and Error Correction Model (ECM):

The short-run dynamics were studied using the Error Correction Representation of ARDL model. The presence of a stable long-term relationship was confirmed by the highly significant (p < 0.01) and negative (-0.055) error correction term. A relatively slow but steady adjustment toward long-run equilibrium is indicated by the magnitude of the error correction term (-0.055). This suggests that about 5.5% of the short-run disequilibrium is corrected annually. The coefficients of lagged ΔLN_crop_productivity terms were negative and significant which indicates yield adjustments in response to previous fluctuations, demonstrating persistence and partial adjustment in agricultural productivity.

Diagnostic Tests

Diagnostic tests were conducted to validate the model

Conclusion

Understanding the impacts of fertilizers, irrigation, and rainfall on agricultural productivity helps policymakers to design focused interventions. The results of ARDL analysis have several policy implications with regard to agricultural development. The error correction term is significant which indicates that short run deviations adjust toward their long run equilibrium. This suggests the stability and validity of the estimated model for policy inferences. The empirical results of the ARDL model indicate that crop productivity is cointegrated with fertilizer, irrigation and rainfall in the long run. The results also reveal that fertilizer use is a consistent positive determinant of productivity. The results also points out that there is some scope for efficiency enhancement in irrigation practices to increase yield performance. Agricultural productivity can be greatly increased through the formulation of policies supporting balanced and economic fertilizer use. This requires interventions such as farmer trainings on nutrient management, enhanced access to soil testing services and targeted subsidies for ecofriendly or crop-specific fertilizers. Although irrigation contributes to increased crop productivity, the results suggest that there is a need for enhancing water-use efficiency rather than merely increasing irrigated area. Policymakers need to invest in modern irrigation systems like drip and sprinkler, encourage conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater and externalize the costs for adopting water saving technologies. Importance of rainfall in affecting crop yield emphasizes how agriculture is exposed to climatic change. This will require enhancing climate adaptation strategies, including the development of

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Trends in Crop Productivity, Fertilizer Use, Irrigation,
Variable CoefficientGrowth Rate (% per annum)p-valueR²Trend Direction
Crop Productivity 0.020932.09<0.0010.968Increasing
Fertilizer Use 0.03876593.88<0.0010.940Increasing
Irrigation 0.01460911.46<0.0010.964Increasing
Rainfall 0.001089620.110.1600.063Slightly Increasing

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Trends in Crop Productivity, Fertilizer Use, Irrigation,↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Trends in Crop Productivity, Fertilizer Use, Irrigation,

Trends in Crop Productivity, Fertilizer Use, Irrigation,

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. ARDL Estimated Short-Run Model
ARDL Estimated Short-Run Model↗ Enlarge
Table 2
ARDL Estimated Short-Run Model

ARDL Estimated Short-Run Model

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 3. ARDL Bounds Test for Cointegration
Test StatisticValueSignificance(0)BoundI(1)BoundDecision
F-statistic5.85995%2.793.67Cointegration exists
k (regressors)3

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
ARDL Bounds Test for Cointegration↗ Enlarge
Table 3
ARDL Bounds Test for Cointegration

ARDL Bounds Test for Cointegration

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 6. Diagnostic Test Results
TestStatisticProb.Inference
Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM TestF = 0.1320.877No autocorrelation
Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey Heteroskedasticity TestF = 0.4720.847Homoskedastic residuals
Durbin-Watson Statistic2.06—No serial correlation
R² of ECM0.356—Moderate short- run fit

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Diagnostic Test Results↗ Enlarge
Table 6
Diagnostic Test Results

Diagnostic Test Results

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 4. Long-Run Coefficients
Long-Run Coefficients↗ Enlarge
Table 4
Long-Run Coefficients

Long-Run Coefficients

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 5. Error Correction Model Results
Error Correction Model Results↗ Enlarge
Table 5
Error Correction Model Results

Error Correction Model Results

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Chaudhary P. Sustainable nutrient management in Indian agriculture. J Soil Water Conserv. 2021;19(4):301-310.
  2. Gbetibouo GA, Hassan RM. Measuring the economic impact of climate change on major South African field crops: a Ricardian approach. Glob Planet Change. 2005;47:143-152.
  3. India Meteorological Department (IMD). Annual Rainfall Statistics of India. Pune, India; 2023.
  4. Jin S, Yu W, Jansen HGP, Muraoka R. The impact of irrigation on agricultural productivity: evidence from India. 2012. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.126868
  5. Kapur D, Khosla R, Mehta PB. Climate change: India's options. Econ Polit Wkly. 2009;36(31):34-42.
  6. Kumar S, Patel R, Mehta D. Rainfall variability and fertilizer efficiency in India. J Agrometeorol. 2020;22(1):45-56.
  7. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, Government of India. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. New Delhi; 2023.
  8. Nandhini US, Alagumani T, Shibi S. Economic analysis of agriculture in southern parts of coastal India. Agric Trop Subtrop. 2006;39(4):279-284.
  9. Narayanamoorthy A, Bhattarai M, Jothi P. An assessment of the economic impact of drip irrigation in vegetable production in India. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2018;31(1):105-112.
  10. Onyeji SC, Fischer G. An economic analysis of potential impacts of climate change in Egypt. IIASA Working Paper. 1993;93(12). Laxenburg.
  11. Patra S, Mishra P, Mahapatra SC, Mithun SK. Modelling impacts of chemical fertilizer on agricultural production: a case study on Hooghly district, West Bengal, India. Model Earth Syst Environ. 2016;2(4):111.
  12. Rao K, Singh P, Kumar R. Impact of fertilizer use on cereal crop yields in India. Indian J Agric Econ. 2018;73(2):123-138.
  13. Singh A, Sharma V. Irrigation and crop productivity: evidence from Indian states. Agric Water Manag. 2019;211:1-10.
  14. Srinivasarao CH. Programmes and policies for improving fertilizer use efficiency in agriculture. Indian J Fertil. 2021;17(3):226-254.

Cited by 1

From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex