Scinovex
article Open Access

Assessing cattle welfare issues in north Gujarat

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2025 · Vol. 9(9) · pp. 215–217
Sruthi CO✉S.P. PandyaVikramsinh Vashrambhai Solanki

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to identify and prioritize the major cattle welfare issues in North Gujarat. A total of 300 dairy farmers were randomly selected from Banaskantha and Mehsana districts through a multistage sampling procedure. The Garrett Ranking Technique was applied to rank the perceived constraints affecting cattle welfare. The findings revealed that lack of awareness about animal rights and welfare laws emerged as the most critical issue, followed by improper handling and transportation of cattle. Inadequate housing and shelter facilities ranked third, indicating infrastructural deficiencies that compromise animal comfort and productivity. Feeding management problems such as over nutrition and imbalanced rations, along with economic constraints, were also recognized as important barriers to maintaining welfare standards. Disease outbreaks, lack of veterinary services, unhygienic milking practices, shortage of skilled labour, harsh climatic conditions, and limited training opportunities were identified as additional but less prioritized challenges. These results highlight that both knowledge-related and resource-related issues play a central role in shaping the welfare of dairy cattle. The study emphasizes the need for awareness programs, farmer training, infrastructural support, and strengthened veterinary services to improve cattle welfare in the region. A systematic policy approach integrating education, economics, and extension services is crucial to address the multidimensional challenges faced by dairy farmers.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

Cattle, buffaloes, and goats constitute the predominant segments of dairy animals in India. According to the Twentieth Livestock Census (Government of India, 2019) [7] , the total population of cattle, buffaloes, and goats was reported to be 192.4 million, 109.85 million, and 148 million, respectively. Public pressure for increased protection and welfare of animals comes primarily from people in largely urbanized populations is inversely related to the proportion of population that is engaged in agriculture and is increasing in importance throughout the world (Appleby et al., 1992) [1] . Concern about the welfare of animals is contingent on people believing that animals, if improperly cared for or mistreated, can experience pain and suffering (Dawkins, 2003) [4] . The term "animal welfare" has been defined variously by different scholars with some of the definitions emphasizing on various elements of animal welfare which differ between cultures, individuals' background (Vapnek & Chapman, 2010; Carenzi and Verga, 2007) [3,11] and methodologies used to evaluate welfare (Weber and Zarate, 2005) [12] . Animal welfare is a state within the animal and a scientific perspective provides methodologies for evidence-based assessment of an animal welfare (Hemsworth et al., 2015) [8] . The association of man with animals is as ancient as civilization and remains inseparable despite a sea of changes in the attitude and behavioural patterns of human beings. Human society continues to derive enormous benefits from the animal kingdom in the form of food, labour, companionship, emotional support, and mental well-being. Among all animals, dairy cattle play a particularly important role in sustaining rural livelihoods and nutritional security. In India, where animal husbandry forms an integral part of agricultural practices, the well-being of dairy animals directly influences the economic stability of millions of farming households. Despite the existence of policies and guidelines promoting animal welfare, the actual implementation at the grassroots level often remains inadequate. In most cases, lack of awareness, traditional beliefs, economic constraints, and absence of proper training programs hinder the adoption of welfare practices. In this context, cattle welfare issues in the concerned region as noted by the dairy farmers become crucial determinants in ensuring that animal welfare standards are met in day-to-day farm operations.

Methodology

The present investigation was undertaken in two randomly selected districts from North Gujarat namely Banaskantha and Mehsana. From each selected district three talukas was randomly selected. Thus, total six talukas were selected. Among the twelve talukas of Banaskantha district, three talukas viz., Palanpur, Deesa and Dantiwada were selected randomly for the study. Similarly three talukas among ten talukas of Mehsana district viz., Kheralu, Visnagar and Unjha were selected randomly. From each selected taluka five villages were selected randomly. Thus, total thirty villages were selected for the study. From each of selected villages ten dairy farmers were selected randomly. Thus, total 300 dairy farmers were selected for the study. Selection criteria followed for the respondents was dairy farmers having at least two animals in milch.

These issues were then ranked by the respondents based on the severity and priority they perceive in their day-to-day dairy farming practices. To determine the relative importance of each issue, the Garrett Ranking Technique was employed. Respondents were asked to rank the listed cattle welfare issues according to their perceived seriousness. The ranks were then converted into scores using Garrett's formula and standard conversion table. The mean score for each issue was computed and issues were finally ranked in descending order of priority based on the average Garrett scores. This method enabled a systematic and quantitative prioritization of the most pressing welfare issues affecting dairy cattle in the North Gujarat region as perceived by the dairy farmers themselves.

Results and discussion

Cattle welfare issues in the concerned region

The study aimed to identify and rank the major cattle welfare issues faced by dairy farmers in the concerned region using the Garrett ranking method. The data displayed in Table shows the major welfare issues found in the concerned region, as reported by the dairy farmers. [2,5,6,9,10] .

Conclusion

The investigation clearly demonstrated that the most pressing cattle welfare issue in North Gujarat is the lack of awareness about animal rights and welfare laws. Improper handling and transportation, along with inadequate housing and shelter facilities, further contribute to poor welfare conditions. Feeding management deficiencies and economic limitations were also recognized as significant challenges, whereas issues such as disease outbreaks, unhygienic milking practices, and shortage of skilled labour received moderate attention. Heat stress and limited access to training were considered relatively less critical by farmers. The findings underline that cattle welfare in the region is primarily constrained by inadequate knowledge, infrastructural gaps, and financial limitations. Addressing these concerns through targeted capacity-building initiatives, strengthening veterinary services, and promoting cost-effective housing and feeding practices can substantially improve welfare standards. Policy-level interventions supported by awareness campaigns and extension services are essential to ensure that cattle welfare is integrated into sustainable dairy farming practices in North Gujarat.

References

  1. Appleby MC. The relationship between food prices and animal welfare. J Anim Sci. 2005;83(Suppl E):9-12.
  2. Burke J. Welfare benchmarking and herd health plans on organic dairy farms. Final report to Defra OSC Technical Report No. 7. 2006. p.32.
  3. Carenzi C, Verga M. Animal welfare: review of the scientific concept and definition. Ital J Anim Sci. 2007;8(1):21-30.
  4. Dawkins MS. Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare. Zoology. 2003;106:383-387.
  5. Deb D, Kalita G, Ranjana G, Abhishek P, Buragohain R, Das H. Welfare issues on dairy farms in Tripura, India, as identified through on-farm inspection. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2025;1-13.
  6. Dwivedi PK, Singh BP, Kumar V, Waila T. Socioeconomic profile of animal traders and their constraints in following animal welfare practices. Indian J Soc Res. 2011;52(4):449-454.
  7. Government of India. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying. Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, New Delhi; 2019.
  8. Hemsworth PJ, Mellor DJ, Cronin GM, Tilbrook AJ. Scientific assessment of animal welfare. N Z Vet J. 2015;63(1):24-30.
  9. Kumar V, Singh BP, Kumar R. Welfare practices in calf rearing: A comparative study in Madhubani district of Bihar. Indian J Field Vet. 2011;7(2):29-31.
  10. Rathore RS, Kachwaha RN. Studies on existing management practices followed by the buffalo owners in Jhunjhunu district of Rajasthan. Indian J Anim Prod Manag. 2009;25(1/2):8-12.
  11. Vapnek J, Chapman M. Legislative and regulatory options for animal welfare. FAO Legal Papers Online. 2010.
  12. Weber REF, Zarate AV. Welfare in farm animal husbandry -current definitions and concepts as basis for practical oriented research with focus on fattening pig husbandry. Arch Anim Breed. 2005;48(5):475-489.
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
34%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.