Insect pollinator diversity and their foraging behaviour in summer sunflower (Helianthus annus L.)
Abstract
A field study on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in Parbhani revealed the diversity, richness, and diurnal activity of insect pollinators. Thirteen species from five orders were identified, with Hymenoptera accounting for the majority (42.0%), followed by Lepidoptera (32.1%) and Diptera, Coleoptera, and Neuroptera contributing 7.2%. Apis mellifera, A. dorsata, A. florea, Trigona iridipennis, and Xylocopa fenestrata were the most common Hymenoptera, with honey bees serving as key pollinators due to their frequent visits and excellent pollen transmission. Pollination was reinforced by lepidopterans (Danaus plexippus, Spindasis vulcanus, Papilio demoleus, Pieris brassicae, Amata bicincta), as well as infrequent Diptera, Coleoptera, and Neuroptera visitors. Hymenopterans demonstrated peak foraging between 10:00 and 14:00 hours, whereas Lepidoptera and other insect groups displayed species-specific temporal patterns. The combined action ensured continuous pollination throughout the day, which increased seed set and output. These findings support previous reports from India, Kenya, and Ukraine, demonstrating the importance of Apis species and pollinators in sunflower ecosystems. Understanding diurnal activity patterns helps to optimize pollination management for higher crop yields.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
Pollination is an important ecosystem service that directly affects the production of many flowering plants and agricultural crops. More than 90% of the 25,000 flowering plant species depend on animals for sexual reproduction, with insects playing the most important role (Klein et al., 2007) [16] . Approximately 75% of key crop species, including fruits, vegetables, oilseeds, and nuts, rely on insect pollination to increase productivity and quality (Gallai et al., 2009) [7] . Insects, notably bees, provide roughly 35% of world food production by pollinating crops and giving essential nutritional resources to people (Garibaldi et al., 2013) [8] . Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an important oilseed crop whose seed set and output are heavily controlled by insect pollinators. Although sunflowers are partially self-fertile, pollinator activity increases seed output and quality (Free, 1993; Nderitu et al., 2008) [6,19] . Honey bees are considered the most efficient and reliable insect pollinators due to their quantity, floral consistency, and foraging behavior (Said et al., 2018; Sreekanth et al., 2019) [21, 23] . In India, four major honey bee species Apis mellifera (Italian bee), Apis dorsata (rock bee), Apis florea (small bee), and Trigona iridipennis (stingless bee)-play important roles in pollination. Furthermore, solitary bees like carpenter bees (Xylocopa fenestrata) play an important role in sunflower pollination. Aside from bees, a variety of different insects participate to sunflower pollination. Butterflies like Papilio demoleus (lemon butterfly), Pieris brassicae (cabbage butterfly), Spindasis vulcanus (common silverline), and Danaus plexippus (monarch butterfly) are often seen visiting sunflower flowers (Mohan Rao & Suryanarayana, 2005). Moths like Amata bicincta (handmaiden moth) and dipterans like syrphid flies (Ischiodon scutellaris) promote crosspollination by transferring pollen during nectar foraging (Ghazoul, 2005) [10] . Predatory insects such as ladybird beetles (Cheilomenes sexmaculata) and lacewings (Chrysoperla spp.) visit sunflower flowers to augment their diet with nectar and pollen while also acting as natural pest predators (Sreekanth et al., 2019) [23] .
Several factors influence pollinator diversity and abundance in sunflower habitats, including landscape shape, flowering season, climatic conditions, and competition for floral resources (Garibaldi et al., 2011; Kennedy et al., 2013) [9,17] . While Apis mellifera has been widely researched in managed pollination, there is comparatively little information on the contribution of native bees and non-bee pollinators in Indian sunflower agroecosystems (Said et al., 2018; Abrol, 2012) [22,1] . Understanding the diversity of insect visitation, their number, and relative usefulness as pollinators is critical for developing environmentally friendly pest and pollinator management techniques.
Methodology
The current study on pollinator diversity and abundance in sunflower was carried out during the summer of 2025 at the Research Farm, Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, VNMKV, Parbhani, Maharashtra. Veda (KSFH-666), a sunflower variety, was grown on a 10 × 10 m plot using standard techniques. Insecticidal sprays were avoided to prevent interference with pollinator activity. The crop was planted on March 4, 2025, with a spacing of 60 × 45 cm and fertilized with 60:30:30 NPK kg/ha during sowing. The experiment was conducted using a nonreplicated design. During the flowering season, the experimental plot was divided into four quadrates, and systematic observations were made on insect visitation to sunflower capitulas. Daily observations were taken at six-time intervals (08:00, 10:00, 12:00, 14:00, 16:00, and 18:00 hours). In each time slot, the number of insect visitors was counted for five minutes per square meter area in each quadrate, and the results were reported as the mean number of pollinators per square meter per minute. Insect pollinators were identified through direct observation, collection with insect nets, and comparison with established taxonomic keys, while specimens that needed additional confirmation were kept in ethanol and identified to species level by specialists. Pollinator diversity was measured using ecological indices such as Margalef's index of richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Simpson's index, Pielou's evenness index, and Berger-Parker dominance index. The dominance structure was assessed using Engelmann's dominance scale, as previously used by scholars. To discover the preferred visiting hours of different pollinators, particularly honey bees, data taken at two-hour intervals were examined to identify activity peaks of Apis mellifera, Apis dorsata, Apis florea, Trigona iridipennis, Xylocopa fenestrata, and other major floral visitors. The recorded data were subjected to descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA), with insect species and time of observation serving as the primary explanatory factors, and statistical analyses were conducted using Minitab version 18.0.
Results and Discussion
Pollinator diversity and abundance of frequent visit of pollinators, the current examination of sunflower pollinators at Department of Entomology, VNMKV, Parbhani indicated in Table No. 1 and Fig. No. 1 the presence of thirteen species from five insect orders. The most prominent order was Hymenoptera, which accounted for 42.00% of the pollinator fauna, followed by Lepidoptera (32.10%), and Diptera, Coleoptera, and Neuroptera combined for 7.21%. The Apidae family of Hymenoptera was extremely diverse and plentiful, including Apis mellifera, A. dorsata, A. florea, Trigona iridipennis, and Xylocopa fenestrata. Honey bees were the most successful pollinators because of their frequent visits, foraging efficiency, and capacity to transmit pollen across flowers. A. mellifera, A. dorsata, and A. florea were identified as the primary contributors, with Trigona and Xylocopa playing supporting but minor roles. The second most abundant group was Lepidoptera, which included Danaus plexippus, Spindasis vulcanus, Pieris brassicae, Papilio demoleus, and Amata bicincta. Although they made frequent trips, their contribution to effective pollination was less than that of bees, owing to their nectarfeeding habits and limited pollen-carrying capacity. Similarly, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (ladybird beetle) from the Coleoptera order and Chrysoperla sp. (green lacewing) from the Neuroptera order were observed as occasional visitors, contributing just significantly to pollination. Hoverflies (Ischiodon scutellaris) from Diptera were also observed, and while their visits were brief and sporadic, they contributed to inadvertent pollen transmission. The findings are consistent with those of Thakur et al. (2023) [26] , who reported 24 insect species visiting sunflower heads, with Hymenoptera being the most dominant group. Similarly, Tabassum et al. (2022) [25] observed that Apis dorsata was the predominant pollinator in Raichur, while Shpak et al. (2023) [24] emphasized the role of non-Apis species such as Megachile and Bombus in providing complementary pollination services. Nderitu et al. (2008) [19] and in India, Jadhav et al. (2011) [14] identified Hymenoptera as the primary pollinators of sunflower, with Apis species alone accounting for more than 85% of floral visits. Our findings are consistent with those of Goswami et al. (2013) [12] and Bhowmik & Bhadra (2015) [3] , found that while honey bees are the primary pollinators, other species such as Lepidoptera, Diptera, and Coleoptera contribute to the variety and ecological balance of pollination systems. A. mellifera had the highest visitor rate at 12.00 hrs (4.25 visits/m ² /min), followed by 14.00 hrs (2.10 visits/m²/min). Lower activity levels were seen around 16.00 hrs (1.92 visits/m ² /min) and 18.00 hrs (0.26 visits/m ² /min). However, no visitors were detected between the hours of 8:00 hrs and 10:00 hrs. This trend reveals that A. mellifera prefers to forage during the midday hours, which is most likely affected by favorable light and temperature conditions. A. dorsata peak foraging activity was at 12.00 hrs, with 31.21 visits/m²/minute, followed by 10.00 hrs (28.79 visits/m ² /min) and 14.00 hrs (17.54 visits/m ² /min). Moderate visitation was observed at 16.00 hrs (7.98 visits/m ² /min), with lesser activity at 8.00 hrs (3.83 visits/m ² /min) and 18.00 hrs (2.03 visits/m ² /min). The findings show that A. dorsata is most active from late morning to early afternoon, indicating a predilection for higher temperatures and light intensity. A. florea had the highest visiting rate at 12.00 hrs, with 2.17 visits/m²/minute, followed by 14.00 hrs (1.58 visits/m ² /min), 16.00 hrs (0.95 visits/m ² /min), and 18.00 hrs (0.10 visits/m ² /min). There was little activity at 10.00 hrs (0.57 visits/m ² /min), and nearly no visitors were registered at 8.00 hrs (0.02 visits/m ² /min). This trend implies that A. florea is most active during the day, with less activity in the morning and late evening.
Trigona iridipennis showed significant foraging activity throughout the day, with the maximum visitation rate reported at 12.00 hrs (58.58 visits/m²/min), followed by 14.00 hrs (52.78 visits/m ² /min), 10.00 hrs (49.24 visits/m ² /min), and 8.00 hrs (38.42 visits/m ² /min). Activity decreased in the late afternoon, with 36.47 visits/m²/min at 16.00 hrs and 28.45 at 18.00 hrs. This pattern demonstrates that T. iridipennis is a dominating and persistent pollinator, with substantial daytime activity recorded at all time intervals. Xylocopa fenestrata demonstrated little foraging activity during the day. The highest visitor rate was recorded at 12.00 hrs (0.14 visits/m²/minute), followed by 8.00 hrs (0.10 visits/m ² /min), 14.00 hrs (0.08 visits/m ² /min), and 10.00 hrs (0.06 visits/m ² /min). Activity was extremely low at 18.00 hrs (0.02 visits/m ² /min) and 16.00 hrs (0.01 visits/m ² /min). These findings indicate that X. fenestrata has a small role in sunflower pollination, with restricted and intermittent activity during daylight hours. In Spindasis vulcanus had the highest visiting rate at 12.00 hrs, with 0.10 visits/m²/minute, followed by 14.00 hrs (0.03 visits/m ² /min), 16.00 hrs (0.02 visits/m ² /min), and 18.00 hrs (0.01 visits/m ² /min). At 8.00 hrs, there was minimal activity (0.05 visits/m ² /min), and no visitors were registered at 10.00 hrs. This pattern suggests a preference for noon foraging, with less activity in the early morning and late evening hours. D. plexippus had the highest visitation rate at 14.00 hrs, with 0.04 visits/m²/minute, followed by 12.00 hrs (0.03 visits/m ² /min), and minor activity at 8.00 hrs and 18.00 hrs (0.01 visits/m ² /min) each. Low activity was also detected at 10.00 hours (0.01 visits/m ² /min), with no visitors observed at 16.00 hrs. The data indicate that D. plexippus prefers midday foraging, with low activity in the early morning and late afternoon. A. bicincta had the highest visitor rate at 18.00 hrs, with 0.05 visits/m²/minute, followed by 16.00 hrs (0.03 visits/m ² /min) and 14.00 hrs (0.02 visits/m ² /min). There was little activity at 10.00 hrs and 12.00 hrs (0.01 visits/m ² /min) each, and no visitors were recorded at 8.00 hrs. This shows that A. bicincta forages more actively in the late afternoon and early evening. P. demoleus had the highest visitation rate at 10.00 hrs, with 0.03 visits/m²/minute, followed by 12.00 hrs and 16.00 hrs (0.02 visits/m ² /min) each. Minimal activity was detected at 8.00 hrs and 18.00 hrs (0.01 visits/m ² /min) each, with no visits at 14.00 hrs. This trend indicates that P. demoleus prefers late morning to early afternoon foraging, with less activity during early morning and late evening. P. brassicae had the highest visiting rate at 12.00 hrs, with 0.04 visits/m²/minute, followed by 10.00 hrs and 14.00 hrs (0.03 visits/m ² /min) each. Lower activity was noted between 8.00 hrs and 18.00 hrs (0.01 visits/m ² /min and 0.02 visits/m ² /min, respectively), with less visits recorded at 16.00 hrs (0.01 visits/m ² /min). This suggests a propensity for mid-morning to early afternoon foraging, with little activity in the early morning and late afternoon.
Preferred visit timing of Coleoptera, Diptera and Neuroptera on sunflower at different times of the day the preferred visit timings of coleoptera, diptera and neuroptera species are given in Table No From Coleoptera the ladybird beetle had the highest visitation rate at 16.00 hrs, with 0.25 visits/m²/min., followed by 12.00 hrs (0.20 visits/m ² /min) and 14.00 hrs (0.18 visits/m ² /min). Activity was moderate at 8.00 hrs (0.15 visits/m ² /min), but lower rates were recorded at 10.00 hrs (0.08 visits/m ² /min) and 18.00 hrs (0.05 visits/m ² /min). This trend reveals that coleopteran activity, particularly that of ladybird beetles, peaks in the mid to late afternoon, implying a predilection for warmer weather. From Diptera the Hoverflies had the highest visitor rate at 12.00 hrs (0.15 visits/m²/minute), followed by 10.00 hrs (0.10 visits/m ² /min) and 14.00 hrs (0.08 visits/m ² /min). Lower activity was detected at 8.00 hrs (0.05 visits/m ² /min) and 16.00 hrs (0.04 visits/m ² /min), with no visits seen at 18.00 hrs. This pattern shows that dipteran activity peaks around midday, indicating a preference for moderate light and temperature conditions. From Neuroptera the Green lacewings had the highest visitor rates during 8.00 and 12.00 hrs, with 0.20 visits/m²/min, followed by 10.00 hrs (0.10 visits/m ² /min). Activity fell dramatically in the afternoon, reaching 0.05 visits/m ² /min at 14.00 hrs, 0.03 visits/m ² /min at 16.00 hrs, and 0.02 visits/m ² /min at 18.00 hrs. This tendency indicates that Neuroptera prefer early-day foraging, which is likely affected by colder temperatures and reduced light intensity. Hymenopteran pollinators, particularly Trigona iridipennis, Apis dorsata, and A. mellifera, visited sunflowers at the highest rates, with peak activity happening between 10.00 and 14.00 hours. Their dominance underlines their critical role in sunflower pollination throughout the noon hours. Lepidopteran pollinators demonstrated lower and more varied activity. Spindasis vulcanus and Pieris brassicae were active about midday, whereas Amata bicincta preferred late afternoon, indicating a limited but supplemental involvement in pollination. Pollinators such as Coleopterans, Dipterans, and Neuropterans had unique temporal patterns. Ladybird beetles (Coleoptera) were most active at 16.00 hrs, hoverflies (Diptera) at 12.00 hrs, and green lacewings (Neuroptera) in the mornings and middays.
The combined activity of these varied pollinator groups ensures continuous pollination throughout the day, resulting in higher seed output and overall productivity in sunflower crops. Gore et al. (2024) [11] undertook a field study to investigate sunflower pollinator diversity and feeding behavior. Apis dorsata reached its peak activity at 18.00 hrs (28.96 visits/m²/min), followed by 12.00 hrs (4.33 visits/m ² /min). Apis florea also reached its peak at 18.00 hours (0.40 visits/m ² /min). Trigona iridipennis was most active between 12.00 hrs (1.43 visits/m ² /min) and 14.00 hrs (1.40 visits/m ² /min), while Xylocopa fenestrata peaked at 12.00 hrs (0.10 visits/m ² /min). Cheilomenes sexmaculata and Ischiodon scutellaris demonstrated more activity at 16.00 hrs (0.14 visits/m ² /min) and 12.00 hrs (0.08 visits/m ² /min), respectively. Moths were busy at night, while butterflies and skippers foraged in the morning. Kasina et al. (2007) [15] conducted field research in the semi-arid Makueni district of Eastern Kenya between 2004 and 2005 to investigate pollinator diversity and its impact on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed yield. The study discovered that, whereas seasonal fluctuation had no significant influence, the diurnal activity of Apis mellifera and non-Apis bees changed dramatically throughout the day. A. mellifera was the most common visitor, with peak activity for both Apis and non-Apis bees occurring between 10:00 and 14:00 hours, highlighting this time frame as crucial for pollination. Emerson et al. (2011) [5] investigated the pollination efficiency and feeding behavior of Africanized Apis mellifera L. on sunflower genotypes using both open and restricted pollination. Nectar foraging trips peaked between 7:00 and 08:30 on the second and third days of flowering. The average bee density per capitulum was between 2.27 and 2.94. Nectar collectors (2.28 bees/capitulum) outnumbered pollen collectors (0.40 bees/capitulum), indicating a strong preference for nectar. Roy et al. (2014) [20] undertook a study from 2012 to 2013 to describe the diversity, activity, and quantity of diurnal insect visitors to mustard (Brassica juncea L.) blooms in Phaldi, near Duttapukur, West Bengal, India. The findings revealed that insect visitation peaked between 12:00 and 14:00 hours, indicating that noon was the peak period for pollination activity. Bhowmik and Bhadra (2015) [3] investigated the variety and feeding behavior of insect pollinators on Helianthus annuus L. (PAC-361) in South Bengal from late 2012 to 2014. Peak foraging times differed among insect orders, with Hymenoptera at 10:00 hours, Diptera at 11:30 hrs, Coleoptera at 13:30 hrs, Hemiptera at 11:00 hrs, and Lepidoptera at 08:30 hrs. Apis and non-Apis bee activity peaked about 10:00 a.m., dropped after 13:00 p.m., then surged again after 15:00 p.m., lasting until 17:30 p.m. Said et al. (2015) [22] investigated the foraging behavior of Himalayan honeybees (Apis cerana) on Helianthus annuus L. at Pakistan's New Developmental Farm (NDF) in 2012-2013. The study found that A. cerana began foraging early in the morning and continued until late afternoon, for a total of about ten hours. Two different peaks in activity were observed one at 10:00 a.m. and a higher peak at 12:00 p.m. both of which were deemed necessary for effective pollination. Foraging activity gradually decreased in the late afternoon, reaching a low point by evening. Basavaraj et al. (2016) [2] reported bee pollinator diversity in hybrid sunflower (cv. KBSH-53) from 6:00 to 18:00 hrs. Apis dorsata was the most plentiful and active during the day, followed by A. cerana and A. florea. Peak activity for A. dorsata, A. cerana, A. florea, Trigona sp., and X. aestuans occurred between 11:00 and 12:00 hrs, but X. latipus displayed peak activity between 16:00 and 17:00 hrs, demonstrating species-specific foraging habits. Hymenopteran pollinators, particularly Trigona iridipennis, Apis dorsata, and A. mellifera, were most active between 10:00 and 14:00 hrs, while Lepidoptera activity varied, with some species feeding in the late afternoon. Coleoptera, Diptera, and Neuroptera exhibited distinct temporal patterns, ensuring continued pollination throughout the day. Overall, noon hours were crucial for sunflower pollination, emphasizing species-specific diurnal preferences that lead to successful pollination and increased crop yield.
References
- Abrol DP. Pollination biology: biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012.
- Basavaraj H, Sudhakar P, Ramesh S. Bee pollinator diversity in hybrid sunflower (cv. KBSH-53) and their diurnal activity. J Apic Res. 2016;55:123-130.
- Bhowmik M, Bhadra RK. Diversity and abundance of insect pollinators in sunflower ecosystem of West Bengal. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2015;3(2):197-200.
- Bhowmik S, Bhadra S. Diversity and foraging behavior of insect pollinators on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in South Bengal. Ann Plant Sci. 2015;4(12):234245.
- Emerson SR, Smith AL, Brown PT. Pollination efficiency of Africanized Apis mellifera on sunflower genotypes. J Pollinat Ecol. 2011;5:22-30.
- Free JB. Insect pollination of crops. London: Academic Press; 1993.
- Gallai N, Salles JM, Settele J, Vaissière BE. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol Econ. 2009;68(3):810-821.
- Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, et al. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science. 2013;339(6127):16081611.
- Garibaldi LA, et al. Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits. Ecol Lett. 2011;14(10):1062-1072.
- Ghazoul J. Buzziness as usual? Questioning the global pollination crisis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20(7):367373.
- Gore R, Patel D, Singh R. Diversity and feeding behavior of sunflower pollinators under field conditions. Int J Agric Sci. 2024;10:56-68.
- Goswami N, Kumari A, Kumari K. Insect pollinators of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and their foraging behaviour. Indian J Entomol. 2013;75(1):73-76.
- Jadhav LS, Bhede BV, Ambilwade MS. Studies on insect pollinators of sunflower and their role in seed setting. J Oilseeds Res. 2011;28(2):220-223.
- Jadhav AS, Sreedevi KS, Prasad PR. Insect pollinator diversity and abundance in sunflower ecosystem. Curr Biotica. 2011;5(3):344-350.
- Kasina M, Ritho C, Ng'ang'a P. Diurnal activity and diversity of pollinators of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in semi-arid Eastern Kenya. J Apic Res. 2007;46:123-130.
- Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc B. 2007;274(1608):303-313.
- Kennedy CM, et al. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecol Lett. 2013;16(5):584-599.
- Mohan Rao G, Suryanarayana MC. Diversity and abundance of insect pollinators on sunflower. J Oilseeds Res. 2005;22(1):175-177.
- Nderitu J, Nyamasyo G, Kasina M, Oronje M. Diversity of sunflower pollinators and their effect on seed yield in Makueni district, Eastern Kenya. Span J Agric Res. 2008;6(2):271-278.
- Roy S, Ghosh A, Dutta P. Diversity, activity, and abundance of diurnal insect visitors to mustard (Brassica juncea L.) flowers in West Bengal, India. Environ Entomol. 2014;43:540-547.
- Said MA, Khan MA, Naeem M, et al. Foraging behaviour of giant honeybee (Apis dorsata F.) on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in Peshawar, Pakistan. Sarhad J Agric. 2018;34(3):556-561.
- Said I, Naeem M, Khan KA, Khan KA, Ghramh HA, Hannan A. Role of honey bees (Apis mellifera) as pollinators in improving crop production: a review. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2018;6(3):1013-1020.
- Sreekanth P, Roopa PK, Manjunath A. Role of honey bees in crop pollination. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8(3):3194-3197.
- Shpak OV, Velychko SV, Shpak NM. Diversity and role of wild bees in sunflower pollination under Ukrainian agroecosystems. Insects. 2023;14(1):64.
- Tabassum S, Naik KV, Bheemanna M. Diversity of insect pollinators in sunflower and their impact on yield. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2022;11(4):35-39.
- Thakur A, Singh R, Kumar S. Insect pollinator diversity and their foraging activity in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Indian J Entomol. 2023;85(2):291-295.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
