Scinovex
article Open Access

Growth and yield of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) as influenced by nutrient management practices

International Journal of Research in Agronomy · 2025 · Vol. 8(8) · pp. 1042–1044

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at the Experimental Farm of Agronomy Section, College of Agriculture, Latur to study the effect of nutrient management practices on the growth and yield of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). The soil was clayey in texture, moderately alkaline, low in available phosphorus, moderate in nitrogen and high in potassium. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with eight treatments and replicated thrice. The treatments are T1- control, T2- 100% RDF, T3- 100% RDF with Micronutrient Gr-II @ 0.5% spray, T4-100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%, T5- 100% RDF with 2% DAP spray, T6- 75% RDF with micronutrient grade II 0.5% spray, T7- 75% RDF with 2% urea spray and T8 - 75% RDF with 2% DAP spray. Full dose of P & K and half dose of N as basal & remaining half dose of N as top dressing at 30 DAS were applied. The results showed that application of 100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2% (T3) recorded significantly higher growth attributes i.e., plant height (243.27 cm) plant-1, number of functional leaves plant-1 (14.10), leaf area plant-1 (71.00 dm2), stem girth plant-1 (8.37 cm), fresh weight per plant (1.187 kg) and yield attributes i.e., maximum green fodder yield (462 q ha-1), leaf: stem ratio (0.39) which was at par with 100% RDF with Micronutrient Gr-II @ 0.5% spray (T3).

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), known as the "king of millets" and the "camel crop," is an important kharif fodder cereal due to its resilience to drought, salinity, and waterlogging. It is a fast-growing C4 plant with high biomass potential and decent nutritive value, containing 6.1-7.4% crude protein and 35.8-36.9% ADF (Chaudhary et al., 2018) [1] . However, improper and uneven fertilizer application in Indian conditions limits its yield and quality. Effective nutrient management, especially involving both macro (N, P, K) and micronutrients (Zn, Fe, B, Mn, Cu, Mo), is critical to improving fodder yield and quality. Nitrogen and phosphorus are among the most limiting nutrients in Indian soils, essential for plant growth, photosynthesis, and metabolic functions (Guinn, 1984 and Munir et al., 2004) [2,3] . However, improper nutrient management often leads to reduced yield and forage quality. Sorghum is nutrient-intensive and particularly responsive to balanced application of macro-and micronutrients, especially nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and trace elements like Zn, Fe, and B (Yadav et al., 2010; Prajapati et al., 2023) [4,5] . Micronutrient deficiencies are increasingly common in intensively farmed Indian soils, affecting both yield and fodder quality. Moreover, method and timing of nutrient application especially foliar nutrition is increasingly seen as an efficient strategy to correct nutrient deficiencies quickly and minimize losses compared to soil application. This study explores the nutrient management practices to maximize yield in fodder sorghum.

Materials and Methods

The field investigation entitled "Effect of nutrient management practices on growth and yield of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) during kharif season." was conducted during kharif 2024 at Experimental Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Latur. The soil was clayey, moderately alkaline (pH 7.35), low in available phosphorus (9.65 kg ha⁻¹), moderate in nitrogen (137.98 kg ha⁻¹) and high in potassium (1045.60 kg ha⁻¹). The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with eight treatments and replicates thrice. The treatments are T 1 -control, T 2 -100% RDF, T 3 -100% RDF with Micronutrient Gr-II @ 0.5% spray, T 4 -100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%, T 5 -100% RDF with 2% DAP spray, T 6 -75% RDF with micronutrient grade II 0.5% spray, T 7 -75% RDF with 2% urea spray and T 8 -75% RDF with 2% DAP spray. Full dose of P & K and half dose of N as basal & remaining half dose of N as top dressing at 30 DAS were applied. The spacing between rows was maintained at 30 cm. The gross plot size was 5.4 meters by 4.5 meters, while the net plot size was 4.8 meters by 3.9 meters. The seed rate used was 40 kilograms per hectare. Sowing was done by dibbling method. The recommended cultural practices and plant protection measures were taken. Five plants were randomly selected and tagged from each net plot to record biometric observations at various growth stages. These same plants were later harvested individually for post-harvest analysis. The forage sorghum variety used for experimentation was CSV-40F. The data collected from various observations were organized into tables and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The statistical technique of analysis of variance was employed to analyze the recorded data (Panse and Sukhatme, 1967) [6] .

Results and Discussion

Growth attributes A perusal of data (Table 1) revealed that the growth attributing characters of fodder sorghum viz., plant height, number of functional leaves plant -1, leaf area plant -1 , stem girth and fresh weight plant -1 were influenced significantly by various treatments. Application of 100% RDF with urea spray @ 2% at 30 DAS (T 4 ) recorded highest plant height, number of functional leaves plant -1, leaf area plant -1 , stem girth and fresh weight plant - 1 which was at par with the application of 100% RDF + micronutrient grade II 0.5% (T 3 ) and found significantly superior over rest of the treatments. It might be due to foliar application of urea which increases availability of nutrients and uptake of nitrogen by crop which resulted in more vegetative growth and increase in protoplasmic constituents and increase in the process of cell division, expansion and differentiation, which results in luxuriant growth of the crop. The similar findings was also demonstrated by Tiwana et al. (2003) [7] , Singh et al. (2012) [8] , Bochare (2015) [9] , Somashekar et al. (2015) [10] and Prajapati et al. (2023) [4] .

Yield and yield attributes

Yield attributing character of fodder sorghum viz. leaf: stem ratio and green fodder yield were influenced significantly by various treatments (Table 1). Highest leaf: stem ratio (0.39) and green fodder yield (462 q ha -1 ) were recorded with the application of 100% RDF with urea spray @ 2% at 30 DAS (T 4 ) which was at par with the application of 100% RDF + micronutrient grade II 0.5% (T 3 ) and found significantly superior over rest of the treatments. This increase in yield can be attributed to significant improvements in various growth parameters and it is might be due to enhanced availability of nitrogen likely stimulated key physiological processes including cell division, cell elongation, and the synthesis of nucleotides and coenzymes, which in turn promoted meristematic activity and expanded the leaf surface area. This led to greater photosynthetic efficiency and accumulation of food reserves, ultimately contributing to higher biomass production. Similar positive effects of nitrogen application via foliar sprays alongside basal fertilization were reported by Singh et al. (2012) [8] , Bhoya et al. (2013) [11] , and Bochare (2015) [9] .

Conclusion

It can be concluded that, application of 100% RDF (80:40:40 kg ha -1 ) with urea spray @ 2% at 30 DAS was found beneficial for getting higher plant height, number of functional leaves, leaf area, stem girth, fresh plant weight, leaf: stem ratio, and total green fodder yield of fodder sorghum which was closely followed by application of 100% RDF + micronutrient grade II 0.5%.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementWe are grateful to College of Agriculture, Latur, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani for the financial assistance and infrastructure facilities provided for the conduct of the work.

References

  1. Chaudhary JD, Pavaya RP, Malav JK, Goradara D, Chaudhary N, Kuniya NK, et al. Effect of nitrogen and potassium on yield, nutrient content and uptake by forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) on loamy sand. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2018;6(2):761765.
  2. Guinn G. Potential for improving production efficiency with growth regulators. In: Proceedings of the belt wide cotton production Research Conference. 1984. p. 67-71.
  3. Munir I, Ranjha AM, Sarfraz M, Obaid-ur-Rehman SM, Mehdiand, Mehmood K. Effect of residual phosphorus on sorghum fodder in two different textured soils. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2004;6(6):967-969.
  4. Yadav PC, Sadhu AC, Swarnakar PK, Patel MR. Effect of integrated nitrogen management on forage yield of multicut sorghum, available nitrogen and microbial count in the soil. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science. 2010;58:303-308.
  5. Prajapati B, Shrivastava AK, Sarvade S, Agrawal SB, Solanki RS. Nutrient Management for Optimizing Fodder Production of Sorghum. International Journal of Bioresource and Stress Management. 2023;14(1):083-093.
  6. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for Agricultural Workers. 1st ed. ICAR; 1967.
  7. Tiwana US, Puri KP, Sukhpreet S. Fodder yield and quality of multicut pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) as influenced by N and P under Punjab conditions. Forage Research. 2003;28(4):190-193.
  8. Singh P, Sumeriya HK, Solanki NS, Murdia A. Productivity, economics and quality of fodder sorghum under varying levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 2012;14(2):127-129.
  9. Bochare AD. Effect of nutrient management on green forage yield of maize (cv. African tall) [Ph.D. Thesis]. MPKV; 2015.
  10. Somashekar KS, Shekara BG, Kalyanmurthy KN, Lohithaswa HC. Growth, yield and economics of multicut fodder sorghum (Sorghum sudanese L.) as influenced by different seed rates and nitrogen levels. Forage Research. 2015;40(4):247-250.
  11. Bhoya M, Chaudhari PP, Raval CH, Bhati PK. Effect of nitrogen and zinc on yield and quality of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) varieties. Forage Research. 2013;39(1):24-26.
Crop Yield and Soil FertilitySorghumFodderSorghum bicolorAgronomyNutrientNutrient management
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
31%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.