Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Horticulture and Food Science

Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from agricultural soils of Western Maharashtra: Isolation, characterization, and potential for sustainable phosphorus management

Kumbhar SCKarade VMLohate SRKashti PD

Volume 7(8) · Pages 112–113 · DOI: 10.33545/26631067.2025.v7.i8b.375 ↗

Research areasBanana Cultivation and ResearchWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalPhosphorus and nutrient management

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Phosphorus is a critical macronutrient for plant growth, yet much of it in soil exists in insoluble forms, rendering it unavailable to plants. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) are recognized as a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers, capable of mobilizing fixed soil phosphorus through acid production, enzymatic activity, and other biochemical processes. This study systematically collected 42 agricultural soil samples from Satara and Sangli districts of Western Maharashtra, representing diverse soil types and cropping patterns. Forty-two PSB isolates were screened qualitatively using Pikovskaya’s agar and quantitatively in Pikovskaya’s broth. Ten high-performing isolates were characterized for cultural, morphological, and biochemical traits, pH reduction, titrable acidity, and phosphatase enzyme activity. Among these, isolates Tas-1, Pal-1, and Pal-2 exhibited superior phosphate solubilization efficiency, with Tas-1 showing the highest solubilization index (4.08), phosphate solubilization efficiency (308.06%), and soluble phosphorus (180.5 mg/L). These isolates also demonstrated robust acid production (pH reduction to 3.7-3.9; titrable acidity up to 1.7%) and high phosphatase activity, highlighting their potential for biofertilizer development. The findings are consistent with earlier reports on Bacillus and Pseudomonas spp., and reinforce the promise of PSB for sustainable phosphorus management in agriculture.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Phosphorus is essential for plant growth, but it often remains trapped in the soil in insoluble forms that plants cannot use. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Phosphorus is essential for plant growth, but it often remains trapped in the soil in insoluble forms that plants cannot use.

      In the paper's own words

      “Phosphorus is a critical macronutrient for plant growth, yet much of it in soil exists in insoluble forms, rendering it unavailable to plants.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Chemical phosphate fertilizers are the standard way to address phosphorus deficiency, but they are expensive, inefficient due to soil fixation, and harm the environment. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Chemical phosphate fertilizers are the standard way to address phosphorus deficiency, but they are expensive, inefficient due to soil fixation, and harm the environment.

      In the paper's own words

      “Conventional management of phosphorus deficiency relies heavily on chemical phosphate fertilizers. While effective in the short term, such fertilizers are costly, often inefficient (due to fixation in the soil), and environmentally detrimental.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) offer a sustainable alternative by using acids and enzymes to make fixed soil phosphorus available to plants. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) offer a sustainable alternative by using acids and enzymes to make fixed soil phosphorus available to plants.

      In the paper's own words

      “Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) are recognized as a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers, capable of mobilizing fixed soil phosphorus through acid production, enzymatic activity, and other biochemical processes.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The researchers aimed to isolate and characterize PSB from the Satara and Sangli districts of Western Maharashtra to evaluate their potential as sustainable biofertilizers. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The researchers aimed to isolate and characterize PSB from the Satara and Sangli districts of Western Maharashtra to evaluate their potential as sustainable biofertilizers.

      In the paper's own words

      “This study aims to isolate, characterize, and evaluate PSB from Satara and Sangli districts, integrating findings with existing literature to assess their potential as sustainable biofertilizers.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The study collected 42 agricultural soil samples from various cropping patterns and soil types in the Satara and Sangli districts. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study collected 42 agricultural soil samples from various cropping patterns and soil types in the Satara and Sangli districts.

      In the paper's own words

      “This study systematically collected 42 agricultural soil samples from Satara and Sangli districts of Western Maharashtra, representing diverse soil types and cropping patterns.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Bacteria were isolated using Pikovskaya’s agar medium, and their ability to solubilize phosphate was identified by the appearance of halo zones around the colonies. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Bacteria were isolated using Pikovskaya’s agar medium, and their ability to solubilize phosphate was identified by the appearance of halo zones around the colonies.

      In the paper's own words

      “PSB isolation was performed on Pikovskaya’s agar medium, where phosphate solubilization was detected by halo zone formation around bacterial colonies.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Soil Sampling and Isolation of PSB

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Ten of the most effective isolates were further analyzed for their morphology, biochemical traits, acid production, and phosphatase enzyme activity. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Ten of the most effective isolates were further analyzed for their morphology, biochemical traits, acid production, and phosphatase enzyme activity.

      In the paper's own words

      “Ten high-performing isolates were characterized for cultural, morphological, and biochemical traits, pH reduction, titrable acidity, and phosphatase enzyme activity.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Soil Sampling and Isolation of PSB

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Isolate Tas-1 was the most effective, with a solubilization index of 4.08, a phosphate solubilization efficiency of 308.06%, and a halo zone of 19.1 mm. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Isolate Tas-1 was the most effective, with a solubilization index of 4.08, a phosphate solubilization efficiency of 308.06%, and a halo zone of 19.1 mm.

      In the paper's own words

      “The standout performer, Tas-1, achieved a solubilization index (SI) of 4.08 and phosphate solubilization efficiency (PSE) of 308.06%, producing a 19.1 mm halo zone.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Soil Sampling and Isolation of PSB

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • In quantitative tests, Tas-1 produced the most soluble phosphorus at 180.5 mg/L, followed by Pal-1 (174.6 mg/L) and Pal-2 (160.3 mg/L). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      In quantitative tests, Tas-1 produced the most soluble phosphorus at 180.5 mg/L, followed by Pal-1 (174.6 mg/L) and Pal-2 (160.3 mg/L).

      In the paper's own words

      “Quantitative estimation in Pikovskaya’s broth showed Tas-1 producing 180.5 mg/L soluble P, followed closely by Pal-1 (174.6 mg/L) and Pal-2 (160.3 mg/L).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Soil Sampling and Isolation of PSB

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The isolates were divided into Gram-positive and Gram-negative groups, suggesting they belong to the Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The isolates were divided into Gram-positive and Gram-negative groups, suggesting they belong to the Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera.

      In the paper's own words

      “Gram staining classified them into Gram-positive (Pal-1, Pal-2, Tas1, Is-1, Pat-2, Ane-1) and Gram-negative (Kde-1, Wa-2, Sat-1, Kr-1) groups, suggesting affiliations with Bacillus and Pseudomonas.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Morphological and Cultural Characterization

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • After 9 days, the broth pH dropped from 6.8 to between 3.7 and 3.9 for isolates Tas-1 and Pal-1, demonstrating their ability to acidify the medium. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      After 9 days, the broth pH dropped from 6.8 to between 3.7 and 3.9 for isolates Tas-1 and Pal-1, demonstrating their ability to acidify the medium.

      In the paper's own words

      “Initial broth pH (6.8) decreased significantly in most isolates after 9 days, with Tas-1 and Pal-1 reaching pH 3.7-3.9.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Mechanisms of Phosphate Solubilization Acidification of Growth Medium

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Tas-1 exhibited the highest titrable acidity at 1.7%, with Pal-1 following at 1.4%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Tas-1 exhibited the highest titrable acidity at 1.7%, with Pal-1 following at 1.4%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Tas-1 showed the highest titrable acidity (1.7%), followed by Pal-1 (1.4%).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Titrable Acidity

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Tas-1 showed high phosphatase activity, recording 12.76 µg PNP/ml/hr for acid and 17.87 µg PNP/ml/hr for alkaline phosphatase, allowing it to work in different soil pH levels. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Tas-1 showed high phosphatase activity, recording 12.76 µg PNP/ml/hr for acid and 17.87 µg PNP/ml/hr for alkaline phosphatase, allowing it to work in different soil pH levels.

      In the paper's own words

      “Tas-1 recorded 12.76 µg PNP/ml/hr. (acid) and 17.87 µg PNP/ml/hr (alkaline), indicating ability to mineralize organic phosphorus under varying soil pH”

      Page 2

      Found in: Phosphatase Enzyme Activity

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that Tas-1, Pal-1, and Pal-2 are promising strains for biofertilizer use due to their strong phosphate-solubilizing abilities and other beneficial traits. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that Tas-1, Pal-1, and Pal-2 are promising strains for biofertilizer use due to their strong phosphate-solubilizing abilities and other beneficial traits.

      In the paper's own words

      “The study identifies Tas-1, Pal-1, and Pal-2 as promising PSB strains from Western Maharashtra, with robust in vitro phosphate-solubilizing abilities supported by multiple plantbeneficial traits.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The authors state that future research is needed for molecular identification of the strains, creating large-scale formulations, and validating the results in the field. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors state that future research is needed for molecular identification of the strains, creating large-scale formulations, and validating the results in the field.

      In the paper's own words

      “Future work should focus on molecular identification, large-scale formulation, and field validation.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (soil particles, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, and plant roots). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Mechanisms of Phosphorus Solubilization
AI-generated conceptual illustration (soil particles, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, and plant roots). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (soil particles, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, and plant roots). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Mechanisms of Phosphorus Solubilization

AI-generated conceptual illustration (soil particles, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, and plant roots). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Phosphorus (P) is an essential element for plant growth, playing a vital role in energy transfer, photosynthesis, and signal transduction. However, in most soils, a substantial portion of phosphorus exists in insoluble mineral complexes bound with calcium, iron, or aluminum, making it inaccessible to plants. Conventional management of phosphorus deficiency relies heavily on chemical phosphate fertilizers. While effective in the short term, such fertilizers are costly, often inefficient (due to fixation in the soil), and environmentally detrimental. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) represent an eco-friendly alternative, mobilizing soil phosphorus through organic acid production, chelation, and enzymatic activity (Sharma et al., 2013; Alori et al., 2017) [10,1] . Several genera, particularly Bacillus and Pseudomonas, have been identified for their ability to improve phosphorus availability and contribute to overall soil health. In India, PSB-based biofertilizers have shown promise in increasing crop yield and reducing dependence on synthetic fertilizers (Kumar et al., 2014) [5] . Western Maharashtra, with its diverse agro-ecological zones and intensive agricultural practices, presents a unique opportunity for identifying efficient PSB strains adapted to local soils. This study aims to isolate, characterize, and evaluate PSB from Satara and Sangli districts, integrating findings with existing literature to assess their potential as sustainable biofertilizers.

Soil Sampling and Isolation of PSB

A total of 42 agricultural soil samples were collected from various cropping systems (sugarcane, wheat, gram, groundnut, jawar, etc.) across Satara and Sangli districts. Sampling covered both black and red soils, ensuring broad ecological representation.

Each sample was geo-tagged and coded. PSB isolation was performed on Pikovskaya's agar medium, where phosphate solubilization was detected by halo zone formation around bacterial colonies. This method remains a widely accepted preliminary screening tool due to its simplicity and correlation with actual solubilization potential (Karpagam & Nagalakshmi, 2014) [4] .

Qualitative and Quantitative Phosphate Solubilization Among the 42 isolates, 10 demonstrated exceptional phosphate-solubilizing abilities. The standout performer, Tas-1, achieved a solubilization index (SI) of 4.08 and phosphate solubilization efficiency (PSE) of 308.06%, producing a 19.1 mm halo zone. Pal-1 and Wa-2 also recorded high SI values (> 3.0) and PSE (> 200%). Quantitative estimation in Pikovskaya's broth showed Tas-1 producing 180.5 mg/L soluble P, followed closely by Pal-1 (174.6 mg/L) and Pal-2 (160.3 mg/L). This range is comparable to values reported by Panda et al. (2013) [7] , where high-efficiency PSB strains solubilized between 150-200 mg/L under in vitro conditions.

Morphological and Cultural Characterization

The 10 high-performing isolates exhibited diverse colony morphologies: sizes from 0.5-4.0 mm, shapes ranging from round to irregular, and colors including creamy white, dull white, white, and yellow. Gram staining classified them into Gram-positive (Pal-1, Pal-2, Tas1, Is-1, Pat-2, Ane-1) and Gram-negative (Kde-1, Wa-2, Sat-1, Kr-1) groups, suggesting affiliations with Bacillus and Pseudomonas. This aligns with earlier reports where these genera dominated PSB populations in agricultural soils (Jayamma et al., 2013) [3] .

Biochemical Characterization

All isolates tested positive for catalase, oxidase, and citrate utilization. Ammonia production a trait beneficial for plant nitrogen supply was observed in Tas-1, Is-1, Kr-1, Ane-1, and Kde-1. Motility was confirmed in eight isolates, enhancing their potential for rhizosphere colonization. Such traits contribute to their classification as plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), combining phosphorus solubilization with other growth benefits (Glick, 2012) [2] .

Mechanisms of Phosphate Solubilization Acidification of Growth Medium

Initial broth pH (6.8) decreased significantly in most isolates after 9 days, with Tas-1 and Pal-1 reaching pH 3.7-3.9. Organic acid production is a primary PSB mechanism, lowering pH and chelating cations bound to phosphate (Rodríguez & Fraga, 1999) [8] .

Titrable Acidity

Tas-1 showed the highest titrable acidity (1.7%), followed by Pal-1 (1.4%). High acid levels correlated with elevated phosphate solubilization, consistent with Sharma et al. (2021) [11] .

Phosphatase Enzyme Activity

Both acid and alkaline phosphatase activities were highest in Tas-1 and Pal-1. Tas-1 recorded 12.76 µg PNP/ml/hr. (acid) and 17.87 µg PNP/ml/hr (alkaline), indicating ability to mineralize organic phosphorus under varying soil pH conditions. This dual capability enhances versatility in different agricultural soils.

Conclusion

The study identifies Tas-1, Pal-1, and Pal-2 as promising PSB strains from Western Maharashtra, with robust in vitro phosphate-solubilizing abilities supported by multiple plantbeneficial traits. Their adaptability to local soils and potential for biofertilizer application could significantly enhance phosphorus use efficiency in agriculture. Future work should focus on molecular identification, large-scale formulation, and field validation.

References

11 in the original paper
  1. Alori ET, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:971.
  2. Glick BR. Plant growth promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica. 2012;2012:963401.
  3. Jayamma N, Sivakumar PK, Sreenivasulu K. Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria from different crop soils of Southern Telangana Zone, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2013;2(11):160-7.
  4. Karpagam T, Nagalakshmi PK. Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing microbes from agricultural soil. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2014;3(3):601-14.
  5. Kumar A, Maurya BR, Raghuwanshi R. Isolation and characterization of PGPR and their effect on growth, yield and nutrient content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2014;3(4):285-91.
  6. Sanchez-Gonzalez ME, et al. Organic acid production by phosphate solubilizing bacteria and its role in soil phosphorus availability. Soil Biol Biochem. 2023;179:108030.
  7. Panda SK, Samantaray DP, Rout GR. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria from mangrove soil and their growth-promoting activities on rice. J Plant Nutr. 2013;36(7):1001-14.
  8. Rodríguez H, Fraga R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv. 1999;17(4-5):319-339.
  9. Roy S, Arunachalam K, Dutta BK, Arunachalam A, Khan ML. Variations in microbial activity and soil properties under different land use systems in Northeast India. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2013;176:1-12.
  10. Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springer Plus. 2013;2(1):587.
  11. Sharma S, Kumar A, Thakur N, Sharma D. Mechanistic insights into phosphorus solubilization in soils: Role of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. Ecol Indic. 2021;121:106939.