Scinovex
article Open Access

Yield gap and resource use efficiency of okra cultivation in Tapi district of Gujarat

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2025 · Vol. 9(7) · pp. 1100–1103

Abstract

This study delves into the resource use efficiency and yield gap in okra cultivation within Tapi district, Gujarat, employing a multistage random sampling method. Cobb-Douglas production functions were utilized to analyze resource use efficiency, revealing significant findings on fertilizer application and labor utilization. The study highlights under-application of Nitrogen and Potash, suggesting potential for enhanced fertilizer usage. Additionally, the yield gap analysis underscores substantial disparities between best and average farmers, emphasizing the importance of adopting best practices for maximizing yields. The findings suggest avenues for optimizing input usage and improving economic efficiency in okra cultivation.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

The cultivation of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) in Tapi district, Gujarat, stands as a cornerstone of agricultural activity, with its presence extending across various locales within the region. As a high-value crop, okra holds considerable promise for augmenting farmers' incomes and bolstering the economic landscape of the area. However, the efficient utilization of resources in okra cultivation remains a crucial aspect deserving thorough investigation to ensure sustainable productivity and profitability. Against this backdrop, this research endeavors to comprehensively examine the resource use efficiency and yield gap prevalent in okra cultivation within Tapi district, Gujarat. The primary objective is to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of resource allocation in okra farming, discerning the inputs contributing significantly to productivity. By meticulously measuring resource use efficiency, the study aims to pinpoint areas for enhancement and formulate strategies to optimize resource allocation in okra cultivation. Additionally, the research seeks to assess the yield gap existing in okra production within the Tapi district. Through a comparative analysis of actual yields against potential yields achievable under optimal conditions, the study endeavors to quantify the extent of productivity shortfall. Such an assessment not only illuminates the prevailing inefficiencies within okra cultivation but also serves as a foundation for devising interventions aimed at narrowing the yield gap and enhancing overall agricultural performance. By addressing these critical aspects, this research aspires to contribute significantly to the understanding of okra cultivation dynamics in the Tapi district. Through actionable insights derived from the pursuit of its objectives, the study aims to support sustainable agricultural development and foster economic prosperity in the region.

Methodology

For the present investigation, primary data were collected using multistage random sampling method from Tapi district of South Gujarat. Out of the 7 talukas of Tapi District, 3 talukas were selected. Then 3 villages per taluka were selected. Thus total 9 villages were selected. Then 20 farmers were randomly selected per village. Total 180 okra growers were selected for the present study.

Resource use efficiency

The use of different inputs in production of Okra crops on sample farms was studied.

To analyse the resource use efficiency in Okra, Cobb-Douglas production functions was used. The production function used as under: Y = a.X 1 b1 .X 2 b2 .X 3 b3 ……………X n bn .Ui Different variables were used in the production function as under:

Where, Y = Output in quintals per hectare X 1 = Quantity of seed (kgs) per hectare X 2 = Quantity of F.Y.M. (in quintals) per hectare. X 3 = Quantity of Nitrogen (in kgs) per hectare X 4 =Quantity of Phosphorus (in kgs) per hectare X 5 = Quantity of Potash (in kgs) per hectare X 6 = Human labour (man-days) used per hectare X 7 = Number of irrigations per hectare X 8 = Number of sprays (PP chemicals) per hectare a = Constant b1, b2………b8 = Regression coefficients/elasticities of production Ui = Error term.

Yield Gap

To estimate farm level yield gaps of the study area, sample farmers were classified into two categories, viz., best and average farmers according to their yield levels of the okra. The top five farmers on the basis of the yield obtained by them were considered as best farmers and the remaining farmers were categorized as average farmers. The difference between the mean yield of the best farmers and the average farmers was studied.

Results and Discussion

To full fill the objectives of the study, three talukas from Tapi district viz. Vyara, Valod and Dolvan were selected. A list of villages was prepared from the selected talukas from the revenue records of the office of TDO. Three villages from every selected talukas were selected. Thus total nine villages were selected randomly from each selected taluka. The lists of villages are presented in Table -1 The lists of respondents were prepared from each village at the third stage. From this list, 20 farmers were selected from each village and finally 180 respondents were selected by random sampling technique. Data were collected using pretested and well-structured interview schedule.

Input utilization

Per hectare quantities of different input /resources are given in table 2. Overall irrigation given was 12.91 and it was highest by small farmers followed by medium and large farmers. In case of plant protection chemicals spray, at overall level it was 11.07 spray. The highest spray was done by big farmers followed by medium and small farmers.

Resource use efficiency

The resource productivity of input used in the cultivation of okra in the study area is given in Table 3. This table indicated that the application of fertilizer viz., Nitrogen, Potash and human labour were statistically significant. The application of Nitrogen had an elasticity of 0.061, indicating that one percent increase in the application of Nitrogen would bring 0.061 percent increase in the production. The application Potash and human labour in the cultivation had significant positive elasticity coefficients of 0.056 and 0.222, indicating that at current level these resources were under-applied. The seed had a depressing influence on the yield as indicated by the negative coefficient (-0.090), though it was statistically non-significant. The elasticity coefficients for used of Phosphorus, pesticides spary and bullock labour for the okra cultivation were found negative, but it was statistically non-significant, indicating that a marginal increase in the amount of these input would not raise the total value of output realized. The elasticity coefficients of other inputs like FYM and irrigation were statistically non-significant, indicating that at the current level they were applied at the physically optimum level. In order to study the resource use efficiency, the marginal value product (MVP) of each input was computed and compared to the marginal factor cost (MFC) and allocative efficiency is estimated as a ratio of MVP/MFC. The allocative efficiency in okra cultivation is reported in Table 4. The allocative efficiency indicated the price response of the farmers. The allocative efficiency of 1 indicated that the farmers were price efficient in allocating that particular resource in okra cultivation. The allocative efficiency of more than 1 indicated the under-utilization of that particular resource and scope in increase in its application till the ratio reached 1. The results indicated that the MVP/MFC ratio was highest in the case of application of Potash (15.476) followed by Nitrogen application (10.117), irrigation (2.976) and human labour (1.736). This indicated that application of more fertilizers composing of Nitrogen and Potash would enhance the return of 10 to 15 percent. This showed that the fertilizer application could be enhanced in the okra cultivation in the area to reach higher benefits. The irrigation application had an MVP/MFC ratio of 2.97, indicating that farmer would gain Rs1.97 if they applied an additional irrigation worthing Rs 1. The production function analysis gave statistically nonsignificant value to the amount of seed applied, but the allocative efficiency ratio indicated that an additional expenditure of one rupee on this account would reduce the revenue by Rs.0.86. Hence, to be economically efficient, the farmers had to reduce the amount of seed used. Similarly, the Pesticide spray also gave a negative ratio (-2.023), indicating that an increase of one-rupee in the PP chemicals applied at the current price level would reduce the return by Re 2.023. The negative return for the Phosphorus was contrary to the expectation. This could be explained taking into account the management of the fertility status.

Yield gap

As described in methodology, the present analysis has been attempted to estimate only farm level yield gap for Okra in the study area. For this the sample growers were classified into two categories viz., best and average farmer accordingly to the level of their Okra productivity. The highest yield of crop obtained by the best five sample farmers was considered as the potential yield of the Okra in the area. This was treated as a farm level potential yield which can be realized through proper input use and management. This farm level potential yield was then compared with the average yield obtained by remaining farmers (average farmers). Therefore, the yield gap in the present study was calculated between the best and the average sample farmer.

The result pertaining to yield levels and yield gap is presented in Table 5. It was observed from the table-6 that best farmers used less seed rate (9.10 kg/ha) than average farmers (11.57 kg/ha). So we can say that best farmers maintain proper sowing distance. It was also revealed that use of organics and chemical fertilizers were used higher by the best farmers as compared to average farmers, which may be responsible for getting higher yield. Particularly Nitrogen was used in very less amount (59.62 kg/ha) by average farmers as compared to best farmers (98.06 kg/ha).

Conclusion

The per hectare input use for okra cultivation showed tendency to increase with increase in size of holding. The analysis indicated that, the fertilizer application specially, Nitrogen and Potash could be enhanced for the okra cultivation in the area to getting more benefits. To be economically efficient, the farmers had to reduce the amount of seed use.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementThe authors extend their gratitude to Navsari Agricultural University for providing the platform to conduct this research.

References

  1. Gangwar AC, Chikara OP. Cost and return of vegetable crops in the hinterland of Hissar city. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences. 1973;2(3-4):141-144.
  2. Godambe RB, Tarane SR, Kshirsagar PJ, Talathi JM. Resource use efficiencies of okra in Thane district of Maharashtra. Asian Journal of Horticulture. 2015;10(1):153-157.
  3. Kumar N, Singh SP, Sharma M, Sharma PK. An economic analysis of okra cultivation in Jammu district of J. & K. state, India. Ecology, Environment and Conservation. 2016;21(1):297-299.
  4. Pandey NK, Kumar NR, Dahiya PS, Srinivas K. Economic analysis of potato cultivation in Shimla district (Himachal Pradesh). Potato Journal. 2004;31(34):171-175.
  5. Rajur BC, Patil BL, Basavaraj H. Economics of chilli production in Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2008;21(2):237-240.
  6. Sharma AK, Oberoi RC, Moorti TV. Resource use efficiency and profitability of vegetable farming in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1992;47(3):505-508.
  7. Srivastava AK, Chand N. A risk on input-output structure and production efficiency in lady's finger in city and suburb of Kanpur. World Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Abstracts. 1977;19(4):244-247.
  8. Verma AR. Economics of production, resource use efficiency, marketing and constraints of potato in Indore district of Madhya Pradesh. Agricultural Marketing. 2007;50(4):21-23.
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
13%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.