Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Geography Geology and Environment

Soil erosion estimation in G-K watershed using geospatial techniques and universal soil loss equation (USLE)

Arpit

Volume 7(3) · Pages 46–48 · DOI: 10.22271/27067483.2025.v7.i3a.364 ↗

Research areasSoil erosion and sediment transportGroundwater and Watershed AnalysisSoil and Land Suitability Analysis

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Soil erosion is arncritical environmental problem that significantly affects agricultural productivity,rnwater quality and ecosystem sustainability. The G-K (Ghaggar-Karnal) Watershed,rnsituated in the semi-arid zones of Haryana and Punjab, is particularlyrnvulnerable to soil erosion due to high-intensity rainfall events, anthropogenicrnland-use changes and poor conservation practices. This study estimates thernaverage annual soil loss in the G-K Watershed using the Universal Soil LossrnEquation (USLE) integrated with Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic InformationrnSystem (GIS) techniques. Various thematic layers, such as rainfall erosivityrn(R), soil erodibility (K), slope length and steepness (LS), land cover (C) andrnconservation practice (P) were generated using satellite imagery, digitalrnelevation models (DEM) and field data. The results reveal spatial variation inrnerosion, with critical areas showing erosion rates above 40 tons/ha/year. Thesernfindings emphasize the need for immediate soil and water conservationrninterventions in high-risk sub-watersheds. Soil erosion posesrna major threat to land productivity, hydrological balance and environmentalrnsustainability in watershed regions across India. The G-K (Ghaggar-Karnal)rnWatershed, covering parts of Haryana and Punjab, is highly susceptible to soilrndegradation due to intensive agriculture, deforestation, erratic rainfall andrnimproper land management practices. Soil erosion not only reduces soilrnfertility but also contributes to siltation in reservoirs and degradation ofrnwater quality downstream. Accurate estimation and spatial assessment of soilrnerosion rates are essential for implementing effective soil conservationrnstrategies. This study aims to estimate soil erosion in the G-K Watershed usingrnthe Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) integrated with Geographic InformationrnSystem (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) techniques.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Soil erosion is a major environmental issue that negatively impacts ecosystem sustainability, water quality, and the productivity of agriculture. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Soil erosion is a major environmental issue that negatively impacts ecosystem sustainability, water quality, and the productivity of agriculture.

      In the paper's own words

      “Soil erosion is a critical environmental problem that significantly affects agricultural productivity, water quality and ecosystem sustainability.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The G-K (Ghaggar-Karnal) Watershed in Haryana and Punjab is highly susceptible to erosion because of poor conservation, human-driven land-use changes, and high-intensity rain. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The G-K (Ghaggar-Karnal) Watershed in Haryana and Punjab is highly susceptible to erosion because of poor conservation, human-driven land-use changes, and high-intensity rain.

      In the paper's own words

      “The G-K (Ghaggar-Karnal) Watershed, situated in the semi-arid zones of Haryana and Punjab, is particularly vulnerable to soil erosion due to high-intensity rainfall events, anthropogenic land-use changes and poor conservation practices.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Study Area Description

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Beyond reducing fertility, soil erosion leads to the degradation of downstream water quality and the siltation of reservoirs. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Beyond reducing fertility, soil erosion leads to the degradation of downstream water quality and the siltation of reservoirs.

      In the paper's own words

      “Soil erosion not only reduces soil fertility but also contributes to siltation in reservoirs and degradation of water quality downstream.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to estimate soil erosion within the G-K Watershed by integrating the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) with Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to estimate soil erosion within the G-K Watershed by integrating the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) with Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques.

      In the paper's own words

      “This study aims to estimate soil erosion in the G-K Watershed using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) integrated with Geographic Information System (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) techniques.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Review of Literature

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The study area is the G-K watershed in northwestern India (Fatehabad, Sirsa, and Karnal districts), covering approximately 3,000 km². View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study area is the G-K watershed in northwestern India (Fatehabad, Sirsa, and Karnal districts), covering approximately 3,000 km².

      In the paper's own words

      “The G-K watershed is located in northwestern India, encompassing parts of Fatehabad, Sirsa and Karnal districts. It lies between 29°30'N to 30°20'N latitude and 75°30'E to 76°50'E longitude, covering approximately 3,000 km².”

      Page 2

      Found in: Study Area Description

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Data sources included IMD rainfall data (2001-2020), NBSS&LUP soil texture, 30m resolution SRTM DEM, and 2023 Landsat-8 OLI land cover data. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Data sources included IMD rainfall data (2001-2020), NBSS&LUP soil texture, 30m resolution SRTM DEM, and 2023 Landsat-8 OLI land cover data.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rainfall Data (R) India Meteorological Department (IMD), 2001-2020”

      Page 2

      “Soil Texture (K) NBSS&LUP, Bhuvan Soil Atlas”

      Page 2

      “DEM (30m resolution) Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM)”

      Page 2

      “Land Use/Land Cover Landsat-8 OLI (2023)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The final soil erosion map was generated by performing raster multiplication of the five USLE factors using ArcGIS 10.8 and QGIS 3.24. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The final soil erosion map was generated by performing raster multiplication of the five USLE factors using ArcGIS 10.8 and QGIS 3.24.

      In the paper's own words

      “All thematic layers were prepared using ArcGIS 10.8 and QGIS 3.24. Raster multiplication of R, K, LS, C and P factors yielded the final soil erosion map.”

      Page 3

      Found in: P-Factor

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Estimated soil erosion in the G-K watershed ranged from 0.1 to 60 tons/ha/year, with an average loss of approximately 15 tons/ha/year. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Estimated soil erosion in the G-K watershed ranged from 0.1 to 60 tons/ha/year, with an average loss of approximately 15 tons/ha/year.

      In the paper's own words

      “The estimated soil erosion in the G-K watershed ranges from 0.1 to 60 tons/ha/year, with the mean value around 15 tons/ha/year.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Estimated Soil Loss

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The watershed area was categorized by erosion rate: 28% was very low (< 5 tons/ha/yr), 22% low (5-10), 25% moderate (10-20), 17% high (20-40), and 8% very high (> 40 tons/ha/yr). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The watershed area was categorized by erosion rate: 28% was very low (< 5 tons/ha/yr), 22% low (5-10), 25% moderate (10-20), 17% high (20-40), and 8% very high (> 40 tons/ha/yr).

      In the paper's own words

      “Very Low | < 5 | 28% Low | 5-10 | 22% Moderate | 10-20 | 25% High | 20-40 | 17% Very High | > 40 | 8%”

      Page 3

      Found in: Critical Sub-Watersheds

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • High erosion was primarily concentrated in the western and southern regions, particularly where vegetation was sparse and slopes were steep. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      High erosion was primarily concentrated in the western and southern regions, particularly where vegetation was sparse and slopes were steep.

      In the paper's own words

      “High erosion zones were concentrated in the southern and western parts of the watershed, especially in areas with steep slopes and sparse vegetation.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Study Area Description

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that identifying erosion-prone sub-watersheds allows for targeted interventions, including sustainable farming, bunding, and afforestation. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that identifying erosion-prone sub-watersheds allows for targeted interventions, including sustainable farming, bunding, and afforestation.

      In the paper's own words

      “The identification of erosion-prone sub-watersheds offers valuable insights for targeted interventions such as afforestation, bunding and sustainable farming practices.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The authors note a research gap in integrating watershed science with social and educational impact analysis, suggesting that future studies use interdisciplinary approaches. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors note a research gap in integrating watershed science with social and educational impact analysis, suggesting that future studies use interdisciplinary approaches.

      In the paper's own words

      “There is a clear research gap in the integration of watershed science with educational and social impact analysis. Future studies must adopt interdisciplinary approaches, combining hydrological modeling, field surveys and socio-educational assessments to offer holistic watershed development strategies.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Review of Literature

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

Replotted from source data
Replotted from a table (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Area (%): Very Low vs Low vs Moderate vs High vs Very High
Replotted from a table (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from a table (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Area (%): Very Low vs Low vs Moderate vs High vs Very High

Replotted from a table (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Soil erosion is a globally recognized issue with severe consequences for food security, water supply and land sustainability. In India, watersheds across northwestern states like Haryana and Punjab are under constant threat due to intensive agriculture and rainfall variability. The G-K watershed, drained by the seasonal Ghaggar River, supports dense rural populations that depend on agriculture for their livelihoods. Estimating soil erosion rates is essential for watershed management, land-use planning and conservation policy formulation. The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), developed by Wischmeier and Smith (1978) [1] , remains one of the most reliable models for predicting soil loss at watershed scales. Recent advances in geospatial technologies such as satellite-based land cover analysis and DEM-based topographical assessments allow the integration of USLE with GIS, enabling spatially explicit erosion mapping. This paper aims to estimate soil erosion across the G-K watershed using a GIS-based USLE approach, identify erosion hotspots and suggest land management practices to mitigate degradation. The widespread soil erosion issues have an impact on both emerging and wealthy nations. The effects of soil erosion, sometimes known as "soil cancer," are extensive, having negative effects on the economy, politics, society and environment. They also pose a growing threat to human existence on Earth (Pandey et al., 2007) [2] . According to estimates, considerable soil erosion affects more than 50% and 80% of the world's forest and agricultural land, respectively.

India is the second-most populous nation in the world despite having only 2.4% of the planet's total land area. About 5,334 metric tonnes of soil are eroded annually by various erosion processes throughout about 53% of the entire land area. One of the most important and precious resources on earth, soil is crucial for the health of ecosystems and is a key natural resource for sustaining life. The complicated and dynamic process of soil erosion results in the separation, transportation and deposit of surface soil to a distant location, ultimately exposing and degrading rich soils and causing sedimentation in reservoirs. early 20th century saw the introduction of the phrase "soil erosion". Background soil erosion is a natural process where soil is eroded by the action of various forces such as water or wind. The earth itself is as old as natural soil erosion. In the case of natural soil erosion, the rate of soil creation equals the rate of soil loss. However, where the rate of soil loss is far higher than its creation, rapid soil erosion has been recognised as a serious issue. Human actions that are illconsidered and unplanned frequently promote soil erosion.

Review of Literature

Numerous studies have highlighted the application of the Universal Soil Loss Equation (Wischmeier & Smith, 1978) and its variants (RUSLE, MUSLE) for erosion modeling in India. Jain et al. (2001) [2] successfully applied USLE-GIS in the Himalayan region for prioritizing sub-watersheds. Similarly, Yadav and Mathur (2017) [3] demonstrated effective mapping of erosion-prone zones using remote sensing and GIS in Rajasthan. These studies underscore the usefulness of GIS-based modeling in providing spatially distributed erosion estimates for sustainable watershed management. However, limited research exists for the G-K watershed, particularly integrating field-verified parameters with GIS models. This study will bridge that gap. The literature reveals a multi-faceted relationship between the Ghaggar River watershed and the lives of local communities. While the river remains an essential resource for agriculture and domestic use, its seasonal and polluted nature has become a source of vulnerability especially for children's education and well-being. There is a clear research gap in the integration of watershed science with educational and social impact analysis. Future studies must adopt interdisciplinary approaches, combining hydrological modeling, field surveys and socio-educational assessments to offer holistic watershed development strategies.

Study Area Description

The G-K watershed is located in northwestern India, encompassing parts of Fatehabad, Sirsa and Karnal districts. It lies between 29°30'N to 30°20'N latitude and 75°30'E to 76°50'E longitude, covering approximately 3,000 km². The region exhibits a semi-arid climate with an average annual rainfall of 500-800 mm, most of which occurs during the monsoon season. Topography ranges from flat plains to gently undulating terrain, with elevations between 200-300 meters above sea level. Land use is dominated by agriculture, primarily wheat, cotton and mustard crops, along with patches of fallow land and sparse vegetation. Soil types include sandy loam, loamy sand and alluvial soils prone to erosion, especially under intensive cultivation and poor conservation practices  Watershed Name: G-K (Ghaggar-Karnal) Watershed

P-Factor

Assigned values based on land use practices (e.g., agriculture with no bunding = 1.0; terraced land = 0.5). 4.3 GIS Integration All thematic layers were prepared using ArcGIS 10.8 and QGIS 3.24. Raster multiplication of R, K, LS, C and P factors yielded the final soil erosion map.

Results and Discussion

Results and Discussion

Estimated Soil Loss

The estimated soil erosion in the G-K watershed ranges from 0.1 to 60 tons/ha/year, with the mean value around 15 tons/ha/year. The area was classified into five categories: and grasslands near the Ghaggar floodplains.

Critical Sub-Watersheds

Based on erosion values and slope characteristics, three subwatersheds were prioritized for conservation:  SW1: Erosion > 45 t/ha/yr; requires check dams and afforestation.  SW3: Erosion 30-40 t/ha/yr; suitable for contour bunding.  SW5: Moderate erosion; recommend vegetative hedgerows and crop rotation.

Conclusion

This study provides scientific insights into soil degradation patterns in the G-K watershed and aid policy makers, agricultural planners and local communities in implementing effective erosion control measures. It also showcases the applicability of modern geospatial tools in regional land degradation assessment. The integration of USLE with GIS and RS techniques provided a comprehensive estimate of soil erosion in the G-K watershed. The findings show significant spatial variability in erosion rates, influenced by land use, slope and conservation practices. The identification of erosion-prone sub-watersheds offers valuable insights for targeted interventions such as afforestation, bunding and sustainable farming practices. This study contributes to effective watershed management and soil conservation planning in vulnerable regions of India.

Recommendations

 Implement soil and water conservation structures in high-risk zones.  Promote agroforestry and cover crops in erosion-prone farmlands.  Encourage capacity-building programs for farmers on soil health.  Regular monitoring of erosion trends using updated satellite data.

References

10 in the original paper
  1. Wischmeier WH, Smith DD. Predicting rainfall erosion losses. USDA Handbook No. 537. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture; 1978. p. 1-58.
  2. Jain MK, Das D, Sharma SK, Dabral PP, Pandey A, Nangia V, et al. Soil erosion assessment using GIS. J Soil Water Conserv. 2001;56(5):324-328.
  3. Yadav S, Mathur A. Soil erosion risk mapping using USLE in arid region of India. Remote Sens Appl. 2017;7:53-62.
  4. Sharma MK. Agricultural soil and sustainability: challenges and opportunities. Int J Agric Food Sci. 2024;6(1):101-106.
  5. Ali AA, Al-Abbadi AM, Jabbar FK, Alzahrani H, Hamad S, Ahmed HJ, et al. Predicting soil erosion rate at transboundary sub-watersheds in Ali Al-Gharbi, Southern Iraq, using RUSLE-based GIS model. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):1776-1794.
  6. Kheir RB, Abdallah C, Khawlie M. Assessing soil erosion in Mediterranean karst landscapes of Lebanon using remote sensing and GIS. Eng Geol. 2008;99(34):239-254.
  7. Kundu S. Heavy metal pollution of Ghaggar river in upper reaches. Bull Environ Pharmacol Life Sci. 2012;1(2):7-10.
  8. Pareek RK, Khan AS, Srivastva P, Roy S. Assessment of physicochemical properties of Ghaggar river. J Biol Chem Chron. 2018;4(1):19-25.
  9. Shrestha S, Kazama F. Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environ Model Softw. 2007;22(4):464-475.
  10. Venkatesharaju K, Somashekar RK, Prakash KL. Study of seasonal and spatial variation in surface water quality of Cauvery river stretch in Karnataka. J Ecol Nat Environ. 2010;2(1):1-9.