Scinovex
article Open Access

Agronomic strategies for improving rice protein quality through integrated nitrogen and water management under SRI

International Journal of Research in Agronomy · 2025 · Vol. 8(6) · pp. 11–13

Abstract

Rice is a staple food for more than half of the global population, yet its protein quality remains a nutritional concern due to its limited lysine content and overall low protein concentration. Agronomic practices, particularly nitrogen (N) fertilization and irrigation management, play a pivotal role in determining not only rice yield but also its nutritional quality. This study investigates the impact of different irrigation regimes and nitrogen levels on the protein content and amino acid profile of rice grains under field conditions. Results indicate that moderate to high nitrogen application significantly enhances total grain protein content, in grain (7.89 and 7.92%) and straw (4.04 and 4.12%) was recorded with scheduling of irrigation at two days after disappearance of ponded water as compared to rest of the irrigation scheduling during both the years Similarly, application of 100% RND + BGA recorded the maximum protein content and protein harvest over the other treatment but remained at par with 100% RDN + Sesbania aculeata co-culture in respect of protein content but significantly higher than 100% RDN alone treatment during both the years of study The findings suggest that water and nitrogen management strategies can be optimized to improve both yield and protein quality of rice, contributing to nutritional security and sustainable rice cultivation. This study underscores the importance of agronomic interventions in enhancing the functional quality of rice grains beyond mere yield optimization.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) production is a key to world food security. As it is the staple food in most parts of India and there is a need to increase production of rice and productivity of land under rice cultivation. India ought to add 1.7 million tonnes of additional rice every year to ensure national food security (Dass and Chandra, 2013) [2] . Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the staple food for more than half of the world's population, particularly in Asia, where it constitutes a major component of daily caloric intake. While the emphasis in rice cultivation has historically been placed on maximizing yield, recent years have witnessed growing concern over the nutritional quality of rice, particularly its protein content and quality. From an agronomic standpoint, nitrogen (N) and irrigation management are among the most influential factors affecting rice growth, yield, and grain quality. Nitrogen is a fundamental nutrient directly involved in amino acid synthesis, protein accumulation, and overall grain development. However, the form, timing, and rate of nitrogen application, as well as its interaction with irrigation practices, significantly influence not just the protein concentration in rice grains but also the balance between yield and quality. Irrigation, a key input in rice production, plays a vital role in regulating soil moisture regimes and nutrient availability. Water management strategies, such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD), continuous flooding, and saturated soil culture, can modify root-zone oxygenation, soil microbial activity, and nutrient dynamics-particularly nitrogen transformation and uptake efficiency. These factors collectively affect protein biosynthesis and partitioning in rice grain.

Materials and Methods

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2014-15 and 2015 16 at Agricultural Research Farm of Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (25°18' N, 83°03' E, 75.7 m above the mean sea-level) situated in the Northern-Gangetic alluvial plains having characteris tics of sub-tropical climate. Soil of the experimental field was sandy-clay loam (typic Ustochrepts) with 0.39 and 0.41% organic carbon, 210.1 and 212.0 kg/ha available nitrogen, 24.30 and 26.2 kg/ha available phosphorus and 214.3 and 209.6 kg/ha available potassium during the re spective years. The treatments consisted 3 irrigation scheduling in the main-plots (irrigation at 2 DADPW, 5 DADPW and 8 DADPW) and 5 nitrogen-management practices in the sub-plots [Recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN), RDN + Sesbania aculeata as co-culture with rice, 75% RDN + Sesbania aculeata as co-culture with rice, RDN+BGA and 75% RDN+ BGA] were tested in a split plot design with 3 replications.

Results and Discussion

Perusal of the data manifested significant effect of irrigation scheduling on protein content in grain as well as in straw. The protein content in grain (7.89 and 7.92%) and straw (4.0 and 4.12% during the two consecutive years) was significantly higher when scheduling of irrigation at two days after disappearance of ponded water, as compared to the other irrigation scheduling during both the years. However, scheduling of irrigation at two days after disappearance of ponded water being at par with five days after disappearance of ponded water in respect of protein content in grain and straw during both the years except protein content in grain during the second year. Significantly higher protein content in grain (7.89 and 7.92%) and straw (4.04 and 4.12%) was recorded with scheduling of irrigation at two days after disappearance of ponded water as compared to rest of the irrigation scheduling during both the years. Similarly, protein harvest by grain, straw and total harvest was also higher with scheduling of irrigation at two days after disappearance of ponded water than scheduling of irrigation at five days after disappearance of ponded water and scheduling of irrigation at eight two days after disappearance of ponded water. The per cent protein content in grain was significantly decreased with delay in irrigation scheduling of rice from scheduling of irrigation at two days after disappearance of ponded water to scheduling of irrigation at eight days after disappearance of ponded water by 7.89 and 7.48% in grain and 4.04% and 3.83% in straw during the first and second year, respectively which might be due to optimum soil moisture result more nitrogen absorption by the roots of the plant ultimately increase the protein content, because of nitrogen is primary constituent of protein. Similar findings have also been reported by Singh et al. (1997) [1] . Perusal of the data manifested significant effect of irrigation scheduling on protein harvest by grain, straw as well as total harvest. The total protein harvest was significantly higher with scheduling of irrigation at two days after disappearance of ponded water, which was 854 kg ha -1 and 892 kg ha -1 in grain and straw during the respective years, while it was at par with scheduling of irrigation at five days after disappearance of ponded water, however scheduling of irrigation at eight days after disappearance of ponded water, produced the lowest total protein harvest during both the years. It was observed in the protein content in grain and straw of hybrid rice. It significantly increased with the application of 100% RDN+BGA followed by 100% RDN + Sesbania aculeata co-culture, but 100% RDN + Sesbania aculeata co-culture, remained at par with 75% RDN+ Sesbania aculeata as coculture and 75% RDN +BGA during the both years. The application of 100% RDN exhibited the minimum protein content in grain and straw as compared to other nitrogen management practices during both the years. Application of integrated nitrogen management significantly influenced the protein content and protein harvest during both the years of study. Application of 100% RND + BGA recorded the maximum protein content and protein harvest over the other treatment but remained at par with 100% RDN + Sesbania aculeata co-culture in respect of protein content but significantly higher than 100% RDN alone treatment during both the years of study. This may be due to the increased concentration of N in the grains, which might have modified the proportion of grain constitutions. These results are in close conformity with the findings of Tripathi and Verma (2008) [5] ; Hossain et al. (2009) [3] . Amongst nitrogen management options, application of 100% RDN + BGA proved significantly superior over rest of the nitrogen management treatment during both the years in respect of protein harvest by grain and straw and total protein harvest. The minimum protein harvest by grain and straw and total protein harvest were observed with application of 100% RDN alone. However, application of 100% RDN + Sesbania aculeata co-culture, proved superior to other nitrogen management practices but remained at par with 75% RDN+ Sesbania aculeata as co-culture and 75% RDN +BGA during both years of experiment

References

  1. Barik AK, Raj A, Saha RK. Yield performance, economics and soil fertility by Singh et al. (1997) through organic sources of nitrogen as substitute to chemical fertilizers in wet season rice. Crop Res. 2006;36(1-3):4-7.
  2. Dass A, Chandra S. Effect of different components of SRI on yield, quality, nutrient accumulation and economics of rice in tarai belt of northern India. Indian J Agron. 2012;57(3):250-254.
  3. Hossain MF, Bhuiya MSU, Ahmed M, Mian MH. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on the milling and physiochemical properties of aromatic rice. Thai J Agric Sci. 2009;42(4):213-218.
  4. Singh K, Tripathi HR. Effect of nitrogen and weed control practices on performance of irrigated direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agron. 2007;52(3):231-234.
  5. Tripathi N, Verma RS. Assessment of grain quality attributes of basmati rice produced by organic system. Pantnagar J Res. 2008;6(2):192-195.
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
2
Percentile
9%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.