Strategies for mitigating the effects of climate change

Introduction

The primary driver of climate change is the emission of greenhouse gases, which significantly alter climate patterns. Key contributors to these emissions are deforestation, transportation, and energy use in buildings. Global warming occurs as greenhouse gases trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere, with both human and natural activities contributing. Natural sources of emissions include forests, earthquakes, oceans, permafrost, wetlands, mud volcanoes, and volcanic activity [1] . One the other hand, human-induced emissions largely stem from energy production, industry, forestry, and land-use changes [2] . Human activities have already caused a rise in global temperatures by about 1.0°C above preindustrial levels. If emissions continue unabated, the temperature increase is projected to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052. In 2018, there were 315 natural disasters globally, most of which were climate-related, impacting approximately 68.5 million people and leading to $131.7 billion in economic losses. Climate indicators like temperature, precipitation, sea level rise, ocean acidification, and extreme weather events have changed, according to the United Nations Climate Change Secretariat (UNCCS). Storms, hunger, wildfires, and droughts accounted for about 93% of these costs [3] . Documented climate hazards include droughts, floods, hurricanes, strong storms, heatwaves, wildfires, cold spells, and landslides [4] . Climate change is also likely to accelerate erosion rates, potentially decreasing agricultural production by 10 to 20% or more in extreme situations. Sectors such as infrastructure, food, health, and human habitats are particularly vulnerable to climate change impacts. In many countries, climate risks intensify vulnerabilities across various sectors due to factors such as temperature fluctuations, precipitation variability, changes in seasonal patterns, shifts in disease distribution, desertification, ocean effects, and soil and coastal degradation [5] .

A firm's strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions is known as a "climate change mitigation strategy" [6] . The proposed framework for mitigating climate change consists of 19 carbonrelated activities and five methods to achieve three strategic objectives. Developing countries, particularly those in the BRIC group (Brazil, Russia, India, and China), will play a crucial role in shaping future emissions trends and climate negotiations. The success of climate policies will depend on progress toward sustainable development goals. Technological advancements and socioeconomic development plans will be vital in the ability to adapt to and mitigate climate change [7] . The literature identifies three main strategies for mitigating climate change. First, decarbonization technologies and techniques are used in conventional mitigation efforts to lower CO 2 emissions. According to several studies [8,9,10,11,12] . A second path consists of a fresh set of freshly suggested technologies and techniques [13,14,15,16.17,18,19,20,21,22] . Lastly, a third approach centers on the idea of controlling solar and terrestrial radiation to change the earth's radiation balances [23,24] . In addition to other factors like pressure and humidity levels in the surrounding environment, long-haul temperature and precipitation trends are used to characterize climate change. Prior to the industrial revolution, greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O, and H 2 O were thought to have originated from natural sources such as volcanoes, forest fires, and seismic activity [25,26,27,28,29] . The two most important things to address the reaction to CC are adaptation and mitigation [30] . Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions can reduce or moderate them to some extent, and this makes the issue crucial from an economic and environmental standpoint [31,32,33,34,35] . The primary industries for policy adaptation and mitigation are forestry, land use, transportation, industry, and agriculture [36,37] .

Climate change status

The term "climate change" refers to a change in climate patterns that is mostly brought about by greenhouse gas emissions. Global warming is primarily caused by greenhouse gas emissions, which cause heat to be trapped by the earth's atmosphere. According to [38] , natural systems include forest fires, earthquakes, seas, permafrost, wetlands, mud volcanoes, and volcanoes. Although the majority of human activity is focused on the generation of energy, industrial activity, forestry, land usage, and land-use change [39] . Groundwater is a crucial part of the climate system [40] but because the climate system is complicated and is made up of a web of intricate interactions and feedback, many possible effects of climate change are still completely unknown [41] .

Causes of climate change

Climate change is one of the world's most urgent issues today, characterized by significant alterations in temperature, precipitation, snowfall, or wind patterns over several decades. Throughout Earth's history, its climate has undergone numerous changes. This serious issue is already affecting people and the environment globally. The speed and intensity of climate change are altering the suitable habitats for living organisms in freshwater, marine, and terrestrial environments. Significant changes on Earth include rising sea levels, extensive melting of snow and ice, and increasing air and ocean temperatures [42] . Most contemporary climate change is driven by human activities. Since the pre-industrial era, anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have increased, largely due to population growth and economic expansion.

Numerous artificial and natural factors contribute to climate change. With references, here are some major contributors to climate change: Greenhouse gas emissions: by burning of fossil fuels, coal, oil & natural gas for energy and transportation is the main source of greenhouse gas emissions. Important greenhouse gases are methane (CH 4 ), Nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) [43] .

Deforestation: when forest are destroyed by fire or other natural means, they stored carbon is released back into atmosphere. Therefore, the planet's ability to absorb CO 2 from the atmosphere is diminished by deforestation [44] .

Industrial processes: CO 2 and other greenhouse gases are released during industrial operation. This includes cement production, chemical manufacturing and metal smelting [45] .

Agriculture: Methane emissions from rice cultivation and cattle digestion, along with nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized soils, are major contributors to climate change in agriculture [46] . Land Use Changes: Earth's capacity to absorb carbon dioxide is reduced and greenhouse gas emissions can rise due to land use changes like urbanization and agricultural conversion, which go beyond deforestation [47] .

Natural factors: volcanic eruptions, fluctuations in solar radiation, and natural climate variability all play a role over longer time scales, even if human activities are the main cause of current climate change [48] .

Climate change and agriculture

Global agriculture is the industry most responsible for 30-40% of greenhouse gas emissions, making it both a major contributor to and a major target of climate change [49,50,51] . Apart from all of these, the threat that climate change poses to Indian agriculture in general and food security in particular has given a new dimension to the difficulties already present [52] . The Indian summer monsoon, the main supply of water for the country's agricultural sector-has weakened since the latter part of the 20 th century [53] . Farmers will bear the brunt of food security impacts, even though changes in the environment and agricultural production systems will have an impact [54] . Crop loss has a ripple effect on the economy, causing farmer hardship, inflation, and other issues. As of right now, the yearly average agricultural losses brought on by extreme weather events alone are projected to be worth 0.25 per cent of India's GDP [55] . Since 1750, there has been a 150% increase in the concentration of greenhouse gases such as methane (CH 4 ), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O), respectively [56] . Crop fertilization increases when atmospheric CO2 levels rise, and warmer temperatures result in lower energy needs for crop growth. Climate change will become a serious issue in the twenty-first century, with detrimental externalities affecting both developed and developing nations [57] . Many crops will probably yield less as a result of their shorter growing seasons due to temperature rise [58] . A 2 °C increase in temperature in both the temperate and tropical zones is predicted to result in a drop in the combined production of wheat, rice, and maize [59] .

Climate change risks and effects

The risks of climate change are immense, endangering the lives and livelihoods of millions, if not billions, of people. Climate change poses various risks like rising temperature and heatwaves, melting of ice and sea level rise, impact on agriculture and food security, human health impacts, water scarcity etc. There is compelling evidence that the rising concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere pose significant risks and impacts, affecting nearly every aspect of human life and the environment, with the potential to be devastating [60] Weather patterns and climate have a wide range of effects on human physiology, health, and survival. Certain health effects, such as those from intense exposures like heat waves, are immediate. Climate change impacts differ in terms of where and when they occur. The Arctic has warmed more quickly than most other locations thus far as a result of feedback from climate change [61] . Intense heat waves are the result of surface air temperatures rising over land at a rate that is almost twice as fast as it is over the ocean. In addition, deoxygenation, ocean stratification, marine heatwaves, and modifications to ocean currents are consequences of ocean warming [62] . As carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is absorbed by the ocean, it is also becoming more acidic [63] . Extreme weather events provide the greatest health concerns; these include heatwaves, storms, cyclones, fires, and floods. Hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, and heavy rainfall are among the extreme weather phenomena that are becoming more common and severe due to climate change. These occurrences have the potential to seriously harm ecosystems, infrastructure, and public health [64] . This makes sea level rise a particularly serious long-term issue. In addition, deoxygenation, ocean stratification, marine heatwaves, and modifications to ocean currents are consequences of ocean warming [65] . As carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is absorbed by the ocean, it is also becoming more acidic [66] .

Promoting reforestation and afforestation

Reforestation affects the climate biophysically, and depending on how much and in which direction it does so, it may help mitigate climate change. The process of establishing new forests by putting seeds or seedlings where there was previously no forest is known as afforestation. Reforestation and afforestation might increase the size of the world's forests by over one billion hectares, from 3.5 to 4.4 billion hectares, providing a significant new opportunity for atmospheric carbon sequestration [67] . Even while forests are being planted and restored in many places of the world, and new plantations can efficiently absorb carbon [68] , creating new forests on a large scale could swiftly clash with other [69,70,71] . Numerous negative effects of climate change have been linked, such as the spread of infectious diseases, decreased availability and quality of drinkable water, loss of biodiversity, infrastructure deterioration, and stress on public health [72] . As a result, many consider it to be among the most important problems facing the contemporary world. Policymakers and the scientific community have been focusing more on nature-based solutions in recent years as efforts to develop policies and strategies for reducing and adapting to climate change have intensified. These solutions represent a comprehensive framework of integrated ecosystem-based approaches designed to take into account social, economic, and environmental factors and interconnections while solving environmental and societal concerns. The conservation, rehabilitation, and sustainable management of natural ecosystems such as grasslands, wetlands, forests, and coastal areas-are all part of nature-based solutions [73] International research indicates that restoring damaged forest ecosystems could significantly reduce CO 2 emissions brought on by deforestation and forest degradation brought on by manmade or natural disturbances [74,75,76,77] . However, to guarantee that afforestation/reforestation is a fruitful nature-based solution (NBS), its effects on other domains, such as economic enhancement and biodiversity conservation/enhancement, must also be evaluated. For instance, the afforestation of wetlands, savannahs, grasslands, and peatlands helps remove carbon from the atmosphere, but it can also have disastrous effects on the biodiversity of the area [78] . Additionally, by combining afforestation and reforestation with industrial carbon removal technologies like bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), the benefits of these initiatives for mitigating climate change can be significantly increased. For lowering greenhouse gas emissions, BECCS is seen as one of the most promising technologies [79,80] .

Conclusion

It is vitally important to establish workable mitigation and adaptation measures as soon as possible given the current state of climate emergency. A change in climate patterns that is mostly brought about by greenhouse gas emissions from both natural systems and human activity is known as climate change. Future climate change is expected to have an impact on livelihoods, biodiversity, water availability, and food production. There are various causes of climate changes like greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, agriculture, natural factors and land use changes. Climate change causes various affects to agriculture like crop loss has a ripple effect on the economy, causing farmer hardship, inflation, and other issues. Many crops will probably yield less as a result of their shorter growing seasons due to temperature rise. Risks and effects of climate change endangering the lives and livelihoods of millions, of people. Like rising temperature and heatwaves, melting of ice and sea level rise, impact on agriculture and food security, human health impacts, water scarcity etc, are the various effects. But to mitigate the climate change there are various strategies also like conservation of forests, affortestation & reforestation, develop low carbon technologies. As a result, the issues associated with development align with attempts to mitigate climate change.

References

1. Yue X-L, Gao Q-X. Contributions of natural systems and human activity to greenhouse gas emissions. Adv Clim Change Res. 2018;9:243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.003.
2. Edenhofer ORP-M, Sokona Y, Kadner S, Minx JC, Brunner S, Agrawala S, et al. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA; 2014. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ ar5_technical-summary.pdf.
3. Fawzy S, Osman AI, Doran J, Rooney DW. Strategies for mitigation of climate change: A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2020;18(6):2069-2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-02001059-w.
4. UNCCS. Climate action and support trends, United Nations Climate Change Secretariat; 2019. Available from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Climate_Action _Support_Trends_2019.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2019.
5. UNCCS. Climate action and support trends, United Nations Climate Change Secretariat; 2019. Available from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Climate_Action _Support_Trends_2019.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2019.
6. Weinhofer G, Hoffmann VH. Mitigating climate change: How do corporate strategies differ? Bus Strategy Environ. 2010;19:77-89.
7. Nasir M, Rao ND. Life cycle impacts of carbon mitigation strategies on the sustainable development goals. Environ Res Lett. 2020;15(3):034035. https://doi.org/10.1088/17489326/ab739f.
8. Ricke KL, et al. Constraints on global temperature target overshoot. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14743. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9.
9. Victor N, et al. The U.S. power sector decarbonization: Investigating technology options with MARKAL nineregion model. Energy Econ. 2018;73:410-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.021.
10. Bataille C, et al. A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energyintensive industry production consistent with the Paris Agreement. J Clean Prod. 2018;187:960-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.107.
11. Mathy S, et al. After the Paris Agreement: Measuring the global decarbonization wedges from national energy scenarios. Ecol Econ. 2018;150:273-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.012.
12. Bustreo C, et al. How fusion power can contribute to a fully decarbonized European power mix after 2050. Fusion Eng Des. 2019;146:2189-2193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.150.
13. Lawrence MG, et al. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3.
14. Palmer C. Mitigating climate change will depend on negative emissions technologies. Engineering. 2019;5:982984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.10.006.
15. McLaren D. A comparative global assessment of potential negative emissions technologies. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2012;90:489-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2012.10.005.
16. Yan J, et al. Negative emission technologies NETs. Appl Energy. 2019;255:113749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113749.
17. McGlashan N, et al. High-level techno-economic assessment of negative emissions technologies. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2012;90:501-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2012.10.004.
18. Goglio P, et al. Advances and challenges of life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas removal technologies to fight climate change. J Clean Prod. 2020;244:118896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118896.
19. Lin A. Carbon dioxide removal after Paris. Ecol Law Q. 2019;45:533. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z386M3340F.
20. Pires JCM. Negative emissions technologies: A complementary solution for climate change mitigation. Sci Total Environ. 2019;672:502-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.004.
21. Royal Society. Greenhouse gas removal; 2018. Available from: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/greenhousegas-removal/royal-society-greenhouse-gas-removal-report2018.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2020.
22. Lenzi D. The ethics of negative emissions. Glob Sustain. 2018;1:e7. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2018.5.
23. Lawrence MG, et al. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3.
24. Lockley A, et al. Geoengineering and the blockchain: Coordinating carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation management to tackle future emissions. Front Eng Manag. 2019;6:38-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0010-y.
25. Murshed M, Nurmakhanova M, Elheddad M, Ahmed R. Value addition in the services sector and its heterogeneous impacts on CO2 emissions: Revisiting the EKC hypothesis for the OPEC using panel spatial estimation techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27(31):38951-38973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09593-4.
26. Hussain M, Butt AR, Uzma F, Ahmed R, Irshad S, Rehman A, Yousaf B. A comprehensive review of climate change impacts, adaptation, and mitigation on environmental and natural calamities in Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess. 2020;192(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-79564.
27. Sovacool BK, Griffiths S, Kim J, Bazilian M. Climate change and industrial F-gases: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options for reducing synthetic greenhouse gas emissions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;141:110759.
28. Usman M, Balsalobre-Lorente D. Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? Ene Policy. 2022;162:112780.
29. Murshed M. Pathways to clean cooking fuel transition in low and middle-income Sub-Saharan African countries: The relevance of improving energy use efficiency. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2022;30:396-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.016.
30. Jahanzad E, Holtz BA, Zuber CA, Doll D, Brewer KM, Hogan S, et al. Orchard recycling improves climate change adaptation and mitigation potential of almond production systems. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0229588.
31. Botzen W, Duijndam S, van Beukering P. Lessons for climate policy from behavioral biases towards COVID-19 and climate change risks. World Dev. 2021;137:105214.
32. Jahanzad E, Holtz BA, Zuber CA, Doll D, Brewer KM, Hogan S, et al. Orchard recycling improves climate change adaptation and mitigation potential of almond production systems. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0229588.
33. Kongsager R. Linking climate change adaptation and mitigation: a review with evidence from the land-use sectors. Land. 2018;7(4):158.
34. Vale MM, Arias PA, Ortega G, Cardoso M, Oliveira BF, Loyola R, Scarano FR. Climate change and biodiversity in the Atlantic Forest: best climatic models, predicted changes and impacts, and adaptation options. In: The Atlantic Forest. Springer; 2021. p. 253-267.
35. Usman M, Makhdum MSA. What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area, and financial development. Renew Energy. 2021;179:12-28.
36. Kärkkäinen L, Lehtonen H, Helin J, Lintunen J, PeltonenSainio P, Regina K, Packalen T. Evaluation of policy instruments for supporting greenhouse gas mitigation efforts in agricultural and urban land use. Land Use Policy. 2020;99:104991.
37. Waheed A, Fischer TB, Khan MI. Climate Change Policy Coherence across Policies, Plans, and Strategies in Pakistan-implications for the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Plan. Environ Manage. 2021;67(5):793-810.
38. Yue X-L, Gao Q-X. Contributions of natural systems and human activity to greenhouse gas emissions. Adv Clim Change Res. 2018;9:243-252. doi: 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.003.
39. Edenhofer ORP-M, Sokona Y, Kadner S, Minx JC, Brunner S, Agrawala S, et al. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ ar5_technical-summary.pdf
40. Liesch T, Wunsch A. Aquifer responses to long-term climatic periodicities. J Hydrol. 2019;572:226-242.
41. Munday PL, Donelson JM, Domingos JA. Potential for adaptation to climate change in a coral reef fish. Global Change Biol. 2017;23(1):307-317.
42. National Research Council. America's climate choices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17226/12781
43. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Climate change indicators in the United States: 2010 report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2010. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators
44. National Research Council (NRC). Climate Stabilization Targets: Emissions, Concentrations, and Impacts over Decades to Millennia. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. doi: 10.17226/12877.
45. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch
46. World Resources Institute. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture: Opportunities and solutions for crop and livestock production. World Resources Institute; 2020.
47. NASA. Climate Change: How Do We Know? NASA; 2021. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/globalwarming/
48. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Science of Climate Change Explained: Facts, Evidence, and Proof. UNFCCC; 2020. Available from: https://unfccc.int
49. Mishra A, Bruno E, Zilberman D. Compound natural and human disasters: Managing drought and COVID-19 to sustain global agriculture and food sectors. Sci Total Environ. 2021;754:142210.
50. Ortiz AMD, Outhwaite CL, Dalin C, Newbold T. A review of the interactions between biodiversity, agriculture, climate change, and international trade: research and policy priorities. One Earth. 2021;4(1):88-101.
51. Thornton PK, Lipper L. How does climate change alter agricultural strategies to support food security? Intl Food Policy Res Inst; 2014. Vol. 1340.
52. Rao CR, Raju BMK, Rao AS, Rao KV, Rao VUM, Ramachandran K, et al. A district level assessment of vulnerability of Indian agriculture to climate change. Curr Sci. 2016;110:1939-1946.
53. Saha A, Ghosh S, Sahana AS, Rao EP. Failure of CMIP5 climate models in simulating post-1950 decreasing trend of Indian monsoon. Geophys Res Lett. 2014;41(20):73237330.
54. Soubry B, Sherren K, Thornton TF. Are we taking farmers seriously? A review of the literature on farmer perceptions and climate change, 2007-2018. J Rural Stud. 2020;74:210222.
55. Singh C, Rio CRD, Soundarajan V, Nath N, Shivaranjani V. Assessing India's mounting climate losses to Financial Institutions. 2020.
56. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Pachauri RK, Meyer LA, editors. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC; 2014. 151 p.
57. Tol RSJ. The economic impact of climate change in the 20th and 21st centuries. Clim Chang. 2013;117:795-808.
58. Mahato A. Climate change and its impact on agriculture. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2014;4:1-6.
59. Challinor AJ, Watson J, Lobell DB, Howden SM, Smith DR, Chhetri N. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat Clim Chang. 2014;4:287-291.
60. Dellink R, Lanzi E, Chateau J. The sectoral and regional economic consequences of climate change to 2060. Environ Resour Econ. 2019;72:309-363.
61. Lindsey R, Dahlman L. Climate Change: Global Temperature. Climate.gov. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived from the original on 17 September 2022. Available from: https://climate.gov
62. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), editor. Summary for Policymakers. In: The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 3-36. doi:10.1017/9781009157964.001
63. Doney SC, Busch DS, Cooley SR, Kroeker KJ. The Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Ecosystems and Reliant Human Communities. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2020;45(1):83-112. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320083019.
64. UNCCS. Climate action and support trends. United Nations Climate Change Secretariat; 2019. Available from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Climate_Action _Support_Trends_2019.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2019.
65. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), editor. Summary for Policymakers. In: The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 3-36. doi:10.1017/9781009157964.001.
66. Doney SC, Busch DS, Cooley SR, Kroeker KJ. The Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Ecosystems and Reliant Human Communities. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2020;45(1):83-112. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320083019.
67. Bastin JF, Finegold Y, Garcia C, Mollicone D, Rezende M, Routh D, et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science. 2019;365(6448):76-79.
68. Forster EJ, Healey JR, Dymond C, Styles D. Commercial afforestation can deliver effective climate change mitigation under multiple decarbonisation pathways. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3831. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24084-x.
69. Song XP, Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV, Tyukavina A, Vermote EF, et al. Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature. 2018;560(7720):639-643.
70. Delzeit R, Pongratz J, Schneider JM, Schuenemann F, Mauser W, Zabel F. Forest restoration: Expanding agriculture. Science. 2019;366(6463):316-317.
71. Doelman JC, Stehfest E, van Vuuren DP, Tabeau A, Hof AF, Braakhekke MC, et al. Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs. Global Change Biol. 2020;26(3):1576-1591.
72. Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Younis I. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29:42539-42559.
73. Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CAJ, Smith A, Turner B. Understanding the value and limits of naturebased solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2020;375:20190120.
74. Lorenz K, Lal R. Carbon Sequestration in Forest Ecosystems. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
75. Hoover K, Riddle AA. Forest carbon primer. Washington, DC, USA: Congressional Research Service; 2020.
76. Friedlingstein P, O'Sullivan M, Jones MW, Andrew RM, Gregor L, Hauck J, Le Quéré C, Luijkx IT, Olsen A, Peters GP, et al. Global carbon budget 2022. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2022;14:4811-4900.
77. Pugh TAM, Arneth A, Kautz M, Poulter B, Smith B. Important role of forest disturbances in the global biomass turnover and carbon sinks. Nat Geosci. 2019;12:730-735.
78. Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CAJ, Smith A, Turner B. Understanding the value and limits of naturebased solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2020;375:20190120.
79. Chiquier S, Patrizio P, Bui M, Sunny N, Mac Dowell N. A comparative analysis of the efficiency, timing, and permanence of CO2 removal pathways. Energy Environ Sci. 2022;15:4389-4403.
80. Mayer M, Prescott CE, Abaker WEA, Augusto L, Cécillon L, Ferreira GW, et al. Tamm Review: Influence of forest management activities on soil organic carbon stocks: A knowledge synthesis. For Ecol Manag. 2020;466:118127.