Enhancement of post-harvest life of litchi: A review on application of packaging material and chemicals

Introduction

Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) is a highly perishable subtropical fruit known for its unique flavor, attractive red peel, and high nutritional value. Its appeal to consumers is largely attributed to its visual appearance and sensory qualities, which degrade rapidly after harvest due to physiological and biochemical changes. Post-harvest losses in litchi can be as high as 30-40%, making it essential to extend its shelf life and preserve its quality during storage and transportation. The primary causes of post-harvest deterioration in litchi include browning of the pericarp, desiccation, microbial decay, and loss of flavor, which significantly reduce its marketability (Menzel et al. 1989) [1] . The short shelf life of litchi is a major limitation in its commercial distribution, especially to distant markets. Upon exposure to ambient conditions, the delicate red color of the pericarp turns brown due to the enzymatic oxidation of phenolic compounds, while water loss accelerates desiccation and shriveling. Various techniques, including refrigeration, modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), and chemical treatments, have been explored to mitigate these issues. Packaging materials and chemical applications have emerged as two critical areas of intervention to maintain the quality and freshness of litchi post-harvest. Advancements in packaging technologies, such as active packaging, edible coatings, and the use of modified atmosphere packaging, have shown promise in reducing moisture loss, delaying browning, and minimizing microbial growth. Active packaging incorporates components that release or absorb substances to extend the shelf life of the product, while edible coatings, made from biodegradable materials, form a protective barrier around the fruit to reduce respiration rates and delay senescence. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) creates an optimal gaseous environment within the package, slowing down oxidative reactions and enzymatic activity, thus extending the fruit's shelf life (Pongener and Mahajan, 2016) [3] . Chemical treatments, including the application of anti-browning agents, fungicides, and other preservatives, have also been extensively studied to enhance the post-harvest life of litchi. Sulfur dioxide (SO₂) fumigation, ascorbic acid dips, and the use of other antioxidants have been employed to prevent pericarp browning and control microbial growth. However, concerns over the safety and consumer acceptance of chemical treatments have driven the need for alternatives that are safe, environmentally friendly, and acceptable to both consumers and regulators (Singh et al. 2012) [4] . This review aims to explore the recent advancements in packaging materials and chemical applications for enhancing the post-harvest life of litchi. By examining the efficacy of different approaches, this review provides insights into the potential of combining innovative packaging solutions with safe chemical treatments to minimize post-harvest losses and extend the marketability of litchi. Emphasis is placed on the sustainability and consumer safety aspects of these technologies, along with their practical applications in the supply chain (Underhill and Critchley, 1995) [5,6] .

Post-Harvest Challenges in Litchi Preservation

Litchi (Litchi chinensis) is highly perishable due to its delicate skin and sensitivity to temperature, making postharvest preservation a significant challenge. The fruit's rapid deterioration is primarily driven by water loss, resulting in skin browning, weight reduction, and texture degradation. Additionally, the high susceptibility to microbial decay, especially fungal infections, further limits its shelf life. Temperature fluctuations during transport and storage exacerbate these issues, causing enzymatic reactions that affect the fruit's flavor and nutritional value (Huang and Xhu, 1983) [7] . One of the key challenges is maintaining the litchi's vibrant red skin color, which tends to turn brown shortly after harvest due to polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity. This browning is accelerated by exposure to oxygen, humidity, and inappropriate storage conditions. Moreover, litchi's high-water content makes it prone to moisture loss, affecting both visual appeal and consumer acceptance (Joubert, 1986) [8] . Another challenge lies in developing packaging and chemical applications that can delay spoilage without compromising the fruit's sensory and nutritional qualities. Traditional packaging materials may not provide adequate protection against mechanical damage, while improper chemical treatments may lead to residual toxicity concerns (Li et al. 2001) [9] . Efforts to extend litchi's post-harvest life have focused on optimizing storage environments, using modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), and applying chemical treatments such as sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), but balancing safety, effectiveness, and market requirements remains difficult. Sustainable and consumer-friendly solutions, such as bio-based packaging and natural preservatives, are gaining attention, but their scalability and cost-effectiveness still pose obstacles. Post-harvest preservation of litchi is challenged by environmental sensitivities and the limitations of current technologies, necessitating innovative approaches in packaging materials and chemical applications (Sivakumar and Korstern, 2004) [10] .

Physiological and Biochemical Changes in Litchi during Storage

Litchi (Litchi chinensis) is a highly perishable fruit, with its post-harvest life limited by rapid physiological and biochemical changes that affect its quality. These changes primarily result in the deterioration of its attractive red peel, loss of flavor, and textural degradation, leading to significant economic losses during storage (Boyette et al. 1996) [11] .

Respiration and Ethylene Production

Litchi is a non-climacteric fruit, meaning it does not exhibit a significant rise in respiration or ethylene production after harvest. However, even at low levels, respiration continues during storage, contributing to nutrient depletion and oxidative stress. Ethylene, albeit produced in small quantities, triggers ripening processes that accelerate senescence, leading to browning and decay (Robertson, 2006) [12] .

Pericarp Browning

One of the most significant physiological changes during storage is the browning of the pericarp (peel). This occurs due to the oxidation of polyphenols by polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) enzymes in the presence of oxygen. The degradation of anthocyanins, which give litchi its characteristic red color, also plays a key role in browning. Browning diminishes the fruit's visual appeal and marketability, a major concern in litchi post-harvest management (Vanderroost et al. 2014) [13] .

Moisture Loss

Litchi is highly susceptible to moisture loss due to its thin skin and high water content, resulting in shriveling and desiccation during storage. This physiological change leads to a reduction in turgor pressure, impacting the fruit's texture and contributing to an undesirable wrinkled appearance (Freedman and Connors, 2011) [14] .

Enzymatic Activity

Enzyme activity, particularly that of PPO, POD, and pectinases, accelerates during storage. Pectinase enzymes degrade pectin, a structural polysaccharide in the cell wall, leading to fruit softening. This enzymatic degradation reduces the overall firmness and texture quality of the litchi pulp (Nath and Purbey, 2015) [15] .

Sugar and Acid Metabolism

Litchi undergoes changes in sugar and acid composition during storage, affecting its flavor profile. The fruit experiences a decline in ascorbic acid (vitamin C) content, which reduces its antioxidant potential. Additionally, fluctuations in sugar levels, particularly glucose and fructose, contribute to the loss of sweetness and overall sensory quality (Bryant, 2004) [16] .

Microbial Growth

The physiological and biochemical changes in litchi create favorable conditions for microbial growth, especially molds and yeasts. Microbial spoilage accelerates the breakdown of tissues, further shortening the fruit's post-harvest life. Understanding these physiological and biochemical changes is critical for devising effective strategies to extend the postharvest life of litchi. Packaging materials and chemical applications must be designed to mitigate these processes, enhancing the preservation of quality during storage (Chen and Hong, 1992) [17] .

Pericarp Browning and Water Loss: Key Factors of Deterioration

Pericarp browning and water loss are critical factors that significantly affect the post-harvest life of litchi (Litchi chinensis), leading to rapid quality deterioration. Pericarp browning is primarily driven by oxidative reactions involving polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) enzymes, which are accelerated by environmental factors like high temperature, low humidity, and mechanical damage. The vibrant red color of the litchi pericarp quickly fades to brown, reducing its market appeal. Simultaneously, water loss through transpiration exacerbates browning, shriveling the fruit, and causing a decline in freshness, texture, and overall weight (Kumar et al. 2016) [18] . These two factors are intricately linked, as water loss compromises the fruit's structural integrity, creating conditions favorable for browning. Furthermore, desiccation enhances the enzymatic activities responsible for pigmentation changes. Effective packaging and chemical treatments are essential for minimizing both browning and water loss, with modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), edible coatings, and anti-browning agents such as SO₂ being commonly employed. These interventions help maintain the fruit's moisture levels and delay oxidative processes, thereby extending the shelf life of litchi. Addressing pericarp browning and water loss remains crucial in enhancing the fruit's post-harvest longevity and quality retention, particularly for international markets (Alam et al. 2014) [19] .

Role of Packaging in Extending Shelf Life of Litchi

Packaging plays a crucial role in extending the post-harvest life of litchi, a highly perishable fruit susceptible to rapid deterioration due to its delicate skin and sensitivity to environmental factors. Litchi fruit experiences rapid moisture loss, browning, and microbial growth, leading to significant post-harvest losses. Effective packaging helps mitigate these issues by creating a controlled microenvironment that reduces exposure to oxygen, light, and excessive humidity, thereby slowing down the physiological and biochemical changes (Purbey et al. 2018) [20] . Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) and controlled atmosphere packaging (CAP) have been widely explored for litchi storage. These techniques adjust the concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide within the packaging, delaying enzymatic browning and reducing respiration rates. Additionally, the use of edible coatings, such as chitosan, enhances the fruit's natural barrier, preventing moisture loss and microbial spoilage (Li, 1999) [21] . Advancements in active packaging materials, which incorporate antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds, further contribute to extending litchi's shelf life. These materials not only maintain the fruit's sensory attributes, such as texture and flavor, but also inhibit the growth of spoilage organisms. Furthermore, innovative nanomaterials used in packaging offer promising potential in prolonging freshness by providing enhanced barrier properties (Pandey and Lal, 2015) [22] . Packaging innovations play a pivotal role in litchi preservation, significantly extending its marketable life while ensuring safety and quality. Future research should focus on optimizing packaging technologies to enhance efficiency, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness in commercial litchi production (Thompson, 2015) [23] .

Innovative Packaging Materials: Active and Edible Coatings

Innovative packaging materials, such as active and edible coatings, offer promising solutions for enhancing the post-harvest life of litchi by maintaining its quality and extending shelf life. Active packaging involves incorporating functional agents like antioxidants, antimicrobial substances, and ethylene absorbers directly into the packaging materials. These agents can actively interact with the fruit's microenvironment, controlling moisture, oxygen levels, and microbial growth, thus preserving freshness and reducing spoilage. For litchi, active packaging has been particularly beneficial in mitigating post-harvest browning and microbial deterioration, common challenges in litchi preservation (Purbey, 2014) [24] . Edible coatings, typically composed of biopolymers like chitosan, starch, or alginate, form a protective barrier directly on the fruit's surface. These coatings reduce water loss, gas exchange, and oxidative reactions while being safe for consumption. Additionally, they can be enhanced with bioactive compounds such as essential oils or natural extracts, which further boost the fruit's resistance to spoilage. In litchi, edible coatings have shown potential in delaying pericarp browning, maintaining texture, and improving post-harvest quality (Zagory and Kader, 1988) [25] . By combining active and edible packaging technologies, the post-harvest management of litchi can be significantly improved, reducing post-harvest losses and promoting sustainable preservation practices (Brug and Brug, 1967) [26] .

Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) for Litchi Storage

Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) is an advanced post-harvest technology that plays a crucial role in extending the shelf life of litchi, a fruit known for its rapid post-harvest deterioration due to its delicate skin and high susceptibility to browning and microbial decay. MAP involves altering the composition of gases, primarily reducing oxygen (O₂) and increasing carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels within the packaging environment. This creates conditions that slow down respiration rates, reduce ethylene production, and inhibit the growth of spoilage microorganisms, effectively delaying physiological and biochemical changes in litchi (Abeles et al. 1992) [27] . For litchi storage, MAP has proven beneficial in maintaining the fruit's vibrant red pericarp color, reducing moisture loss, and preserving flavor and texture. Various combinations of gas mixtures, such as low O₂ (1-5%) and high CO₂ (5-10%), are commonly used to optimize storage conditions. However, the effectiveness of MAP can vary depending on factors like litchi cultivar, temperature, and packaging material. To enhance MAP efficiency, integrating it with other preservation methods like refrigeration and chemical treatments (e.g., sulfur dioxide or ascorbic acid) can further extend the storage period while maintaining fruit quality. MAP offers significant potential in enhancing the post-harvest life of litchi, contributing to reduced wastage and improved marketability (Zheng and Tian, 2006) [28] .

Chemical Treatments for Browning and Microbial Control

Litchi (Litchi chinensis) is a highly perishable fruit, susceptible to post-harvest browning and microbial spoilage, which significantly reduces its market value and shelf life. Browning, primarily caused by oxidation of phenolic compounds due to polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity, is a major challenge that affects the fruit's visual appeal. To mitigate this, various chemical treatments have been employed to extend the post-harvest life of litchi by controlling both browning and microbial growth (Kumari et al. 2015) [29] . Sulfur dioxide (SO₂) fumigation is one of the most widely used chemical treatments to prevent browning. It inhibits PPO activity and preserves the red pericarp color of litchi, while also exhibiting strong antimicrobial properties, thus reducing fungal infections. However, its use is restricted due to potential health risks and the development of off-flavors. To overcome these issues, alternative chemicals such as ascorbic acid and citric acid are applied as dipping solutions. Ascorbic acid acts as an antioxidant, preventing oxidative browning, while citric acid lowers the pH, inhibiting PPO activity and microbial growth (Kumar et al. 2012) [30] Another promising approach involves the use of chitosan coatings, which not only reduce browning by forming a barrier to oxygen but also possess natural antimicrobial properties. Chitosan has been shown to inhibit the growth of spoilage organisms, thereby enhancing the microbiological safety of stored litchis. Additionally, calcium chloride treatments are known to strengthen cell walls, reducing microbial penetration and delaying senescence. Overall, integrating chemical treatments such as SO₂, ascorbic acid, and chitosan can effectively reduce browning and microbial spoilage in litchi, providing an economically viable means to extend its post-harvest life and ensure fruit quality during storage and transportation (Liguori et al. 2015) [31] .

Safety and Regulatory Concerns in Chemical Applications

The post-harvest treatment of litchi (Litchi chinensis) often involves the application of various chemicals to extend shelf life and maintain quality. However, the use of these substances raises significant safety and regulatory concerns. The application of chemical preservatives, such as fungicides and ripening agents, must be carefully managed to ensure that they do not pose health risks to consumers or adversely affect the environment (Sivakumar and Korsten, 2006) [32] . Regulatory frameworks, such as those established by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), set maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural chemicals. Compliance with these regulations is essential to protect consumer health and maintain market access for litchi products. The presence of pesticide residues beyond permissible levels can result in product recalls, loss of consumer trust, and significant economic losses for producers (De Reuck et al. 2009) [33] . Moreover, the potential for chemical interactions during packaging and storage further complicates safety assessments. For instance, certain packaging materials may react with chemical treatments, leading to the formation of harmful by-products. Thus, thorough evaluations of packaging materials are crucial to ensure compatibility with chemical applications and to prevent contamination (Vermeiren et al. 1999) [34] . Consumer awareness of food safety is increasing, and there is a growing demand for transparency regarding chemical use in agriculture. As a result, it is imperative for litchi producers to adopt safer alternatives, such as organic or biodegradable treatments, which align with sustainability goals while minimizing chemical residues (Scannell et al. 2000) [35] . Addressing safety and regulatory concerns in the chemical applications for enhancing the post-harvest life of litchi is vital. Adhering to established guidelines, ensuring compatibility of treatments with packaging materials, and exploring safer alternatives will contribute to consumer safety and the long-term viability of the litchi industry (Lee et al. 2008) [36] .

Synergistic Approaches: Combining Packaging and Chemical Interventions

Enhancing the post-harvest life of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) requires innovative strategies that integrate both packaging materials and chemical interventions. The inherent sensitivity of litchi to mechanical injury, moisture loss, and microbial spoilage necessitates a multifaceted approach to maintain its quality and extend its shelf life (Todorovic et al. 2014) [37] . Recent research emphasizes the synergistic effects of using advanced packaging techniques alongside suitable chemical treatments. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) has proven effective in reducing respiration rates and delaying senescence by altering the gas composition around the fruit. When combined with edible coatings, which often include natural preservatives like chitosan or alginate, the synergistic effect can enhance barrier properties against moisture loss and provide an additional antimicrobial layer (Adetunji et al. 2014) [38] . Chemical interventions, such as the application of postharvest fungicides and antioxidants, can further improve litchi preservation. For instance, treatments with ascorbic acid or citric acid can inhibit enzymatic browning and prolong fruit freshness. When integrated with appropriate packaging solutions, these chemical treatments can significantly mitigate decay and maintain sensory attributes, such as texture and flavor (Allegra et al. 2016) [39] . Moreover, the combination of active packaging, which incorporates bioactive compounds or antimicrobial agents within the packaging material itself, has shown promise. Such packaging not only protects litchi from external contaminants but also releases bioactive agents that can suppress microbial growth (Baldwin et al. 1999) [40] . Adopting synergistic approaches that combine innovative packaging technologies with effective chemical treatments holds great potential for enhancing the post-harvest life of litchi. This integrated strategy not only addresses the fruit's specific vulnerabilities but also aligns with current trends toward sustainable and environmentally friendly postharvest practices. Future research should continue to explore optimal combinations of these interventions to establish best practices for litchi preservation in commercial settings (Bhowmick et al. 2015) [41] .

Future Directions: Sustainable and Consumer-Friendly Technologies

As the global demand for litchi continues to rise, enhancing its post-harvest life through sustainable and consumerfriendly technologies is crucial. Future directions in this area should focus on developing packaging materials that not only extend shelf life but also minimize environmental impact. Innovations in biodegradable and compostable packaging made from natural polymers-such as starch, chitosan, and cellulose-offer promising alternatives to conventional plastic. These materials can effectively reduce carbon footprints while maintaining the quality of litchi during storage and transportation (Burton, 1985) [42] . Moreover, incorporating active packaging technologies that release natural preservatives or absorb excess moisture and ethylene can significantly enhance the freshness of litchi. Research into edible coatings, derived from natural sources like whey protein or alginate, can also create a barrier against microbial growth and moisture loss without compromising consumer acceptance (Gupta and Mehta, 1987) [43] . In parallel, the application of environmentally friendly chemicals, such as natural antioxidants and antifungal agents derived from plant extracts, should be explored. These alternatives can provide effective preservation while aligning with consumer preferences for clean-label products, thus enhancing marketability. Consumer education is another critical area for development. Raising awareness about sustainable practices and the benefits of innovative packaging and preservation technologies can drive consumer acceptance and demand for products with longer shelf life (Jiang et al. 2006) [44] . Integrating these sustainable approaches with advanced supply chain management systems, such as IoT and blockchain technologies, can enhance traceability and ensure optimal conditions throughout the distribution process. Overall, the future of litchi post-harvest management should prioritize eco-friendly solutions that cater to both sustainability goals and consumer preferences, ensuring a holistic approach to enhancing the fruit's market viability (Kumar, 2010) [45] .

Conclusion

Enhancing the post-harvest life of litchi is crucial for maintaining its quality and extending its marketability. This review highlights the significant impact of various packaging materials and chemical applications in reducing post-harvest losses and preserving the fruit's sensory attributes. Biodegradable packaging options, such as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) and natural fibers, have shown promise in mitigating respiration rates and delaying ripening, while also addressing environmental concerns. Additionally, the application of natural preservatives, including essential oils and edible coatings, has demonstrated efficacy in inhibiting microbial growth and reducing oxidation, further contributing to the longevity of litchi. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, particularly concerning the scalability of these methods and the need for standardization in commercial practices. Future research should focus on optimizing combinations of packaging materials and chemical treatments tailored to specific storage conditions and market requirements. By implementing innovative strategies and technologies, the litchi industry can significantly enhance post-harvest management, ultimately leading to improved fruit quality, reduced waste, and greater economic viability for producers. Thus, the integration of effective packaging and preservation techniques represents a vital step towards sustainable litchi production and consumption.

References

1. Menzel C, Simpson DR. The lychee nutrition story. Proceedings of the Second National Lychee Seminar, Cairns, Australia. 1989;49-58.
2. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Safe Food: Global initiative on food loss and waste reduction. Rome, Italy; 2024. Available: www.fao.org/safe-food.
3. Pongener A, Mahajan BVC. Advances in packaging of fresh fruits and vegetables. In: Siddiqui MW, Ali A, editors. Postharvest management of horticultural crops: Practices for quality preservation. Apple Academic Publishers, CRC Press. 2016;231-264.
4. Singh G, Nath V, Purbey SK, Singh SK, Pal RK. Post harvest handling and valorizations of litchi fruits. FAO Bulletin, National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 2012;1-30.
5. Underhill SJR, Critchley C. Cellular localisation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase activity in Litchi chinensis Sonn pericarp. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 1995;22:627-632.
6. Underhill SJR, Critchley C. Anthocyanin decolourization and its role in lychee pericarp browning. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 1994;34:115-122.
7. Huang HB, Zhu JK. The development patterns of fruits and their correlative postharvest relationships in Litchi chinensis Sonn. Scientia Horticulturae. 1983;19:335342.
8. Joubert AJ. Litchi. In: Monelise SP, editor. Handbook of fruit set and development. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 1986;233-246.
9. Li JG, Huang HB, Gao FF, Huang XM, Wang HC. An overview of litchi fruit cracking. Acta Horticulturae. 2001;558:205-208.
10. Sivakumar D, Korsten LA. Preliminary study on the changes of the epicuticular wax layer of litchi (cv. Mauritius) with respect to commercial packing line operations. South African Litchi Growers' Association Yearbook. 2004;16:31-33.
11. Boyette M, Sanders DC, Ruttedgel GA. Packaging requirements of fruits and vegetables. NC State Extension Publication, USA; 1996.
12. Robertson GL. Food packaging principles and practices. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2006.
13. Vanderroost M, Ragaert P, Devlieghere F, De Meulenaer B. Intelligent food packaging: The next generation. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2014;39:47-62.
14. Freedman MR, Connors R. Point-of-purchase nutrition information influences food purchasing behaviours of college students: A pilot study. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2011;111:S42-S46.
15. Nath V, Purbey SK. Litchi. In: Chadha KL, Pal RK, editors. Managing postharvest quality and losses in horticultural crops. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi. 2015;441-460.
16. Bryant P. Optimizing the postharvest management of lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.): A study of mechanical injury and desiccation. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Sydney. 2004;24.
17. Chen WJ, Hong QZ. A study on the senescence and browning in the pericarp of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) during storage. Acta Horticulturae Sinica. 1992;19:227-232.
18. Kumar V, Purbey SK, Anal AKD. Losses in litchi at various stages of supply chain and changes in fruit quality parameters. Crop Protection. 2016;79:97-104.
19. Alam MA, Singh JP, Yadav SK, Siddique MW. Screening packaging and biologically active cushioning materials for postharvest storage of litchi. Journal of Postharvest Technology. 2014;2(4):195-207.
20. Purbey SK, Pongener A, Kumar V, Nath V. Effect of time of harvest and packaging on quality and shelf life of litchi fruit. Acta Horticulturae. 2018;1211:65-70.
21. Li XM. Preservative technology of litchi by truck transportation -foam plastic box with ice added. South China Fruit. 1999;28:21.
22. Pandey C, Lal RL. Effect of different packaging materials on shelf life of litchi fruits (Litchi chinensis). Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences. 2015;7(2):139-143.
23. Thompson AK. Fruit and vegetables: harvesting, handling and storage. 3rd ed. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. ISBN 978-1-118-65404-0.
24. Purbey SK. Supply chain management in litchi. In: Sivaramane N, Reddy GP, editors. Supply chain management in agriculture. NAARM, Hyderabad, Telangana. 2014;39-52.
25. Zagory D, Kader AA. Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce. Food Technology. 1988;42(9):70-77.
26. Burg SP, Burg EA. Molecular requirements for the biological activity of ethylene. Plant Physiology. 1967;42:114-152.
27. Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME. Ethylene in plant biology. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1992.
28. Zheng X, Tian S. Effect of oxalic acid on control of postharvest browning of litchi fruit. Food Chemistry. 2006;96(4):519-523.
29. Kumari P, Barman K, Patel VB, Siddiqui MW, Kole B. Reducing postharvest pericarp browning and preserving health-promoting compounds of litchi fruit by combination treatment of salicylic acid and chitosan. Scientia Horticulturae. 2015;197:555-563.
30. Kumar S, Mishra BB, Saxena S, Bandyopadhyay N, More V, Wadhawan S, et al. Inhibition of pericarp browning and shelf life extension of litchi by combination dip treatment and radiation processing. Food Chemistry. 2012;131:1223-1232.
31. Liguori G, D'Aquino S, Sortino G, De Pasquale C, Inglese P. Effects of passive and active modified atmosphere packaging conditions on quality parameters of minimally processed table grapes during cold storage. J Berry Res. 2015;5(3):131-143.
32. Sivakumar D, Korsten LA. Influence of modified atmosphere packaging and postharvest treatments on quality retention of litchi cv. Mauritius. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2006;41(2):135-142.
33. De Reuck K, Sivakumar D, Korsten L. Integrated application of 1-methylcyclopropene and modified atmosphere packaging to improve quality retention of litchi cultivars during storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2009;52(1):71-77.
34. Vermeiren L, Devlieghere F, van Beest M, de Kruijf N, Debevere J. Developments in the active packaging of foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. 1999;10:77-86.
35. Scannell AGM, Hill C, Ross RP, Marx S, Hartmeier W, Arendt EK. Development of bioactive food packaging materials using immobilized bacteriocins lacticin 3147 and nisaplin. Int J Food Microbiol. 2000;60:241-249.
36. Lee JW, Son SM, Hong SI. Characterization of proteincoated polypropylene films as a novel composite structure for active food packaging application. J Food Eng. 2008;86:484-493.
37. Todorovic V, Neag M, Lazarevic M. On the usage of RFID tags for tracking and monitoring of shipped perishable goods. Procedia Eng. 2014;69:1345-1349.
38. Adetunji CO, Ogundare MO, Ogunkunle ATJ, Kolawole OM, Adetunji JB. Effects of edible coatings from xanthum gum produced from Xanthomonas campestris pammel on the shelf life of Carica papaya Linn fruits. Asian J Agric Biol. 2014;2(1):8-13.
39. Allegra A, Inglese P, Sortino G, Settanni L, Todaro A, Liguori G. The influence of Opuntia ficus-indica mucilage edible coating on the quality of 'Hayward' kiwifruit slices. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2016;120:4551.
40. Baldwin EA, Burns JK, Kazokas W, Brecht JK, Hagenmaier RD, Bender RJ, et al. Effect of edible coatings with different permeability characteristics on mango (Mangifera indica L.) ripening during storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 1999;17(3):215-226.
41. Bhowmick N, Ghosh A, Dutta P, Dey K. Efficacy of edible coatings on the shelf life of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) fruits at ambient condition. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2015;8(3):601-608.
42. Burton WG. Postharvest physiology of food crops. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, USA; 1985.
43. Gupta OP, Metha N. Effect of post-harvest application of fungicides chemicals and pre 100 ling treatments on the shelf life of Galaber fruits. Hrayang Agric Univ. 1987:561-580.
44. Jiang YM, Wang Y, Song L, Liu H, Lichter A, Kerdchoechuen O, et al. Postharvest characteristics and handling of litchi fruit: an overview. Aust J Exp Agric. 2006;46:1541-1556.
45. Kumar D. Effect of iso-ascorbic acid, N-acetyl cysteine, and salicylic acid on control of postharvest decay and pericarp browning of litchi fruit during ambient storage [thesis]. Pantnagar: G.B. Pant Univ Agric Technol; 2010. p. 131.
46. Maftoonazad N, Ramaswamy HS, Marcotte M. Shelflife extension of peaches through sodium alginate and methyl cellulose edible coatings. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2008;43:951-957.
47. Mahajan BC, Tandon R, Kapoor S, Sidhu MK. Natural coatings for shelf-life enhancement and quality maintenance of fresh fruits and vegetables: a review. Int J Postharvest Technol Innov. 2018;6:12-26.
48. Nagar PK. Physiological and biochemical studies during fruit ripening in litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Postharvest Biol Technol. 1994;4:225-234.
49. National Horticulture Board. Indian horticulture database: area and production of horticulture crops. Gurgaon, Haryana: NHB; 2018. Retrieved 2019 Feb 20 from: http://nhb.gov.in/statistics/State_Level/area_prod20171
50. 50. Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruits and vegetable products. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing; 1986.
51. Rani A. Effect of organic manures on yield, quality, and post-harvest life of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Rose Scented [thesis]. Pantnagar: G.B. Pant Univ Agric Technol; 2010. p. 153.
52. Ruelas-Chacón X, Contreras-Esquivel JC, Montañez J, et al. Water vapor permeability, mechanical, optical, and sensorial properties of plasticized guar gum edible films. In: Mohan CO, Carvajal-Millan E, Ravishankar CN, editors. Research methodology in food science: integrated theory and practice. Apple Academic Press, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017.
53. Singh A. Fruit growth pattern and post-harvest studies in litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) [thesis]. Pantnagar: G.B. Pant Univ Agric Technol; 2011. p. 169.
54. Sivakumar D, Terry LA, Korsten LA. An overview on litchi fruit quality and alternative postharvest treatments to replace sulfur dioxide fumigation. Food Rev Int. 2010;26(2):162-188.
55. Sivakumar S, Korsten LA. Fruit quality and physiological responses of litchi cultivar McLean's Red to 1-methylcyclopropene pre-treatment and controlled atmosphere storage conditions. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2010;43:942-948.
56. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing; 1987.
57. Tannnerbaum SR, Young VR, Archer MC. Vitamins and minerals. In: Fennema OR, editor. Food chemistry. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1985. p. 478-543.
58. Zhang D, Xu X, Zhang Z, Jiang G, Feng L, Duan X, et al. 6-Benzylaminopurine improves the quality of harvested litchi fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2018;143:137-142.
59. De Reuck K, Sivakumar D, Korsten L. Integrated application of 1-methylcyclopropene and modified atmosphere packaging to improve quality retention of litchi cultivars during storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2009;52:71-77.
60. Duan X, Jiang Y, Su X, Liu H, Li Y, et al. Role of pure oxygen treatment in browning of litchi fruit after harvest. Plant Sci. 2004;167:665-668.
61. Flores FB, Martìnez-Madrid MC, Amor MB, Pech JC, Latché A, Romojaro F. Modified atmosphere packaging confers additional chilling tolerance on ethyleneinhibited cantaloupe Charentais melon fruit. European Food Research and Technology. 2004;219:431-435.
62. Fuchs Y, Zauberman G, Ronen R, Rot I, Weksler A, Akerman M. The physiological basis of litchi fruit pericarp colour retention. Acta Horticulturae. 1993;269:29-33.
63. Holcroft DM, Mitcham E. Postharvest physiology and handling of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Postharvest Biology and Technology. 1996;9:265-281.
64. Ilangantileke SG, Noomhorn A, Upadhyay IP, Srinivas Rao M. Effect of irradiation and storage temperature on the shelf life and quality of Thai lychee. In: Champ BR, Highley E, Johnson GI, editors. Postharvest handling of tropical fruits. ACIAR, Australia. 1993;50:352-354.
65. Jacobi KK, Wong LS, Giles JE. Lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) fruit quality following vapour heat treatment and cold storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 1993;3:111-119.
66. Jiang YM, Yao L, Lichter A, Li J. Postharvest biology and technology of litchi fruit. Food Agriculture & Environment. 2003;2:76-81.
67. Jiang YM, Fu JR. Biochemical and physiological changes involved in browning of litchi fruit caused by water loss. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 1999;74:43-45.
68. Kaser C, Levin J, Wolstenholme BN. Vapour, heat and low pH dips improve litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) pericarp colour retention. Journal of the South African Society of Horticultural Science. 1995;4:6-12.
69. Lal N, Sahu N. Screening of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) genotypes against sunburn. Bangladesh Journal of Botany. 2022;51(1):37-43.
70. Lal N, Pandey SK, Nath V, Agrawal V, Gontia AS, Sharma HL. Total phenol and flavonoids in by-product of Indian litchi: Difference among genotypes. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018;7(3):2891-2894.
71. Lal N, Gupta AK, Nath V. Fruit retention in different litchi germplasm influenced by temperature. International Journal of Current Microbiology & Applied Science. 2017;6(12):1189-1194.
72. Lal N, Kumar A, Pandey SD, Nath V. Screening of litchi genotypes for fruit cracking and the relationship of cracking to fruit and leaf traits. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 2023;65:479-485.
73. Lal N, Pandey SK, Nath V, Gontia AS, Sharma HL. Evaluation of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) genotypes for fruit quality attributes. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2018;6(3):2556-2560.
74. Lal N, Pongener A, Kumar A, Pandey SD. Studies on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) fruit cultivars under field conditions. National Academy of Science Letters. 2023;46(1):7-10.
75. Lal N, Sahu N, Kumar A, Pandey SD. Effect of rainfall and temperature on sunburn and fruit cracking in litchi. Journal of Agrometeorology. 2022;24(2):169-171.
76. Lin ZF, Li SS, Zhang DL, Lin GZ, Li YB, et al. The changes of pigments, phenolic content and activities of polyphenol oxidase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase in pericarp of postharvest litchi fruit. Acta Botany Sin. 1998;30:40-45.
77. Malakou A, Nanos GD. A combination of hot water treatment and modified atmosphere packaging maintains quality of advanced maturity "Caldesi 2000" nectarines and "Royal Glory" peaches. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2005;38:106-114.
78. Nath V, Lal N, Singh SK, Pandey S, Prakash K. Seventy-five years of research and development in litchi. International Journal of Innovative Horticulture. 2022;11(1):47-61.
79. Purbey SK, Pongener A, Marboh ES, Lal N. Advances in packaging of litchi fruit to maintain the quality. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2019;38(1):1-11.
80. Romanazzi G, Mlikota Gabler F, Smilanick JL. Chitosan treatment to control postharvest gray mold of table grapes. Phytopathology. 2005;95:590-592.
81. Sivakumar D, Regnier T, Demoz B, Korsten L. Effect of different post-harvest treatments on overall quality retention in litchi fruit during low-temperature storage. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 2005;80:32-38.
82. Tongdee SC. Sulfur dioxide fumigation in postharvest handling of fresh longan and lychee for export. In: Champ BR, Highley E, Johnson GI, editors. Postharvest handling of tropical fruits. ACIAR, Australia. 1993;50:186-195.
83. Wong LS, Jacobi KK, Giles JE. The influence of hot benomyl dips on the appearance of cool stored lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Scientia Horticulturae. 1991;46:245-251.
84. Zauberman G, Ronen R, Akerman M, Fuchs Y. Low pH treatment protects litchi fruit colour. Acta Horticulturae. 1990;269:309-314.
85. Zhang DL, Quantick PC. Effects of chitosan coating on enzymatic browning and decay during postharvest storage of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 1997;12:195-202.