Scinovex

Research article · 2024 · Full text

International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry

Evaluation of toxic residues in cotton gin trash used as a roughage supplement by sheep farmers in Tamil Nadu

N Sri BalajiS. RamakrishnanJ MuralidharanDiwan SinghV. Sankar

Volume 9(6) · Pages 627–628 · DOI: 10.22271/veterinary.2024.v9.i6j.1948 ↗

Research areasRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementAgricultural Systems and PracticesLivestock Management and Performance Improvement

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

A cotton gin trash is a by-product generated when cotton fibres are separated from cotton seed in the gin. It is commonly used as a roughage supplement by sheep farmers in Karur and Tiruppur districts of Tamil Nadu without much scientific information on its toxic content and feeding value. Based on field study, six samples of each coarse (Kotta panju) and fine (Micro waste panju) cotton gin trash samples were collected and pesticides were screened by the Gas chromatography -Mass spectrometer and revealed that pesticides were not detected in both types of cotton gin trash samples. The heavy metals were quantified using inductively coupled plasma-Mass spectrometer. The arsenic level in coarse and fine were 0.43±0.04 ppm and 0.42±0.04 ppm. The cadmium level was 0.080±0.01 and 0.075±0.01 in coarse and fine samples respectively. The chromium content of the fine samples (3.50±0.12) was significantly (p

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Cotton gin trash is a byproduct created during the process of separating cotton fibers from the seeds. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Cotton gin trash is a byproduct created during the process of separating cotton fibers from the seeds.

      In the paper's own words

      “A cotton gin trash is a by-product generated when cotton fibres are separated from cotton seed in the gin.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • In the Karur and Tiruppur districts of Tamil Nadu, farmers often use cotton gin waste as a roughage supplement for Mecheri sheep, particularly during summer fodder shortages. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      In the Karur and Tiruppur districts of Tamil Nadu, farmers often use cotton gin waste as a roughage supplement for Mecheri sheep, particularly during summer fodder shortages.

      In the paper's own words

      “In the majority of areas in the districts of Karur and Tiruppur, farmers raise Mehceri sheep and use cotton gin waste as a roughage supplement feed for their animals, mostly during the summer months when there is a scarcity of fodder.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The abundance of textile firms in these areas makes cotton gin waste readily available, yet it is used extensively without scientific data regarding its toxic residues. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The abundance of textile firms in these areas makes cotton gin waste readily available, yet it is used extensively without scientific data regarding its toxic residues.

      In the paper's own words

      “Because there are more textile firms in the aforementioned locations, there is an abundance of cotton gin garbage, which sheep farmers are using extensively without any scientific proof on the toxic residues in the cotton gin trash.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to evaluate the presence of toxic residues in cotton gin trash used as sheep feed in Tamil Nadu. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to evaluate the presence of toxic residues in cotton gin trash used as sheep feed in Tamil Nadu.

      In the paper's own words

      “The current study was undertaken to assess the toxic residues in cotton gin trash which are being used in a great extent by the sheep farmers in Tamil Nadu.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers collected six samples each of coarse (Kotta panju) and fine (Micro waste panju) cotton gin trash. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers collected six samples each of coarse (Kotta panju) and fine (Micro waste panju) cotton gin trash.

      In the paper's own words

      “Based on field study, six samples of each coarse (Kotta panju) and fine (Micro waste panju) cotton gin trash samples were collected”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Heavy metals, specifically chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb), were quantified using inductively coupled plasma-Mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Heavy metals, specifically chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb), were quantified using inductively coupled plasma-Mass spectrometer (ICP-MS).

      In the paper's own words

      “The heavy metals such as Cr, As, Cd, Hg and Pb were quantified using inductively coupled plasma-Mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, iCAP Q, Thermo Scientific).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • No pesticides were detected in either the coarse or fine cotton gin trash samples. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      No pesticides were detected in either the coarse or fine cotton gin trash samples.

      In the paper's own words

      “pesticides were not detected in both types of cotton gin trash samples.”

      Page 1

      “The results revealed that none of the pesticides were detected in both coarse and fine cotton gin trash samples, which were collected from the field area.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Arsenic levels were 0.43±0.04 ppm in coarse and 0.42±0.04 ppm in fine samples, with no significant difference between the two. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Arsenic levels were 0.43±0.04 ppm in coarse and 0.42±0.04 ppm in fine samples, with no significant difference between the two.

      In the paper's own words

      “The arsenic level in coarse and fine were 0.43±0.04 ppm and 0.42±0.04 ppm.”

      Page 1

      “The arsenic and cadmium content of both coarse and fine cotton gin trash samples were not significantly different from each other.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Cadmium levels were 0.080±0.01 ppm in coarse and 0.075±0.01 ppm in fine samples, showing no significant difference. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Cadmium levels were 0.080±0.01 ppm in coarse and 0.075±0.01 ppm in fine samples, showing no significant difference.

      In the paper's own words

      “The cadmium level was 0.080±0.01 and 0.075±0.01 in coarse and fine samples respectively.”

      Page 1

      “The arsenic and cadmium content of both coarse and fine cotton gin trash samples were not significantly different from each other.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Chromium content was significantly higher (p<0.05) in fine samples (3.50±0.12 ppm) compared to coarse samples (3.36±0.11 ppm). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Chromium content was significantly higher (p<0.05) in fine samples (3.50±0.12 ppm) compared to coarse samples (3.36±0.11 ppm).

      In the paper's own words

      “The chromium content of the fine samples (3.50±0.12) was significantly (p<0.05) higher than the coarse cotton gin trash samples (3.36±0.11).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Mercury and lead were not detected in any of the analyzed samples. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Mercury and lead were not detected in any of the analyzed samples.

      In the paper's own words

      “Mercury and lead were not detected in any of the samples.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The levels of arsenic, cadmium, and chromium were all found to be within the normal acceptable levels recommended for ruminant diets. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The levels of arsenic, cadmium, and chromium were all found to be within the normal acceptable levels recommended for ruminant diets.

      In the paper's own words

      “Moreover, the level of arsenic and cadmium in the present study were within the normal acceptable level as recommended by NRC (2005) and AAFCO OP (2019). The level of chromium also was within the normal level as recommended in ruminant diet.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors concluded that cotton gin trash contains no toxic residues of pesticides or heavy metals and is suitable for use as a feed supplement for sheep. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors concluded that cotton gin trash contains no toxic residues of pesticides or heavy metals and is suitable for use as a feed supplement for sheep.

      In the paper's own words

      “The study confirmed that there were no toxic residues like pesticides and heavy metals found in the cotton gin trash and it could be used as a feed supplement in sheep.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Arsenic: Coarse type cotton gin... vs Fine type cotton gin...
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Arsenic: Coarse type cotton gin... vs Fine type cotton gin...

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Cadmium: Coarse type cotton gin... vs Fine type cotton gin...
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Cadmium: Coarse type cotton gin... vs Fine type cotton gin...

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Pesticides, heavy metals and gossypol residues (ppm) inTable 1Page 2
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Cotton ginning is a procedure that separates cotton fibers from cotton bolls and serves as a bridge between the cotton agricultural industry and the industrial sector, which produces textiles. While using the thumb and forefinger to extract the fiber from the seed is feasible, it is a difficult and time-consuming process that most likely sped up the development of the first cotton gin (Lakwete, 2003) [5] . Cottonseed, cottonseed meal, and cottonseed hulls are among the by-products produced during this procedure. When cotton fibers are extracted from cotton seed at the gin, one such by-product is cotton gin trash. Cotton gin waste was mostly disposed of by spreading it across the ground, composting it, feeding it to animals, disposing of it in a landfill, burning it, turning it into energy, creating pellets for heat stove fuel, construction materials, and insulation (Cohen and Lansford, 1992) [1] . Since cotton gin waste has been used in ruminant feeds for the majority of the world's history (Kennedy and Rankins, 2008) [2] , it has the potential to be incorporated into livestock diets as an alternative feed source of protein, fat, and fiber (Rogers et al., 2002) [6] . It is also being used to satisfy the energy and protein needs of sheep. According to Crossan and Kennedy (2008) [2] , cotton gin trash is a complex mixture of woody pieces of cotton bolls, stalks, mulched leaves, twisted cotton fiber leftovers, dirt, and dust particles. In the majority of areas in the districts of Karur and Tiruppur, farmers raise Mehceri sheep and use cotton gin waste as a roughage supplement feed for their animals, mostly during the summer months when there is a scarcity of fodder. Because there are more textile firms in the aforementioned locations, there is an abundance of cotton gin garbage, which sheep farmers are using extensively without any scientific proof on the toxic residues in the cotton gin trash. The current study was undertaken to assess the toxic residues in cotton gin trash which are being used in a great extent by the sheep farmers in Tamil Nadu.

Materials and Methods

The pesticides of organochlorine such as Alpha BHC, Beta BHC, Gamma BHC and Delta BHC, DDT, Endosulphan and Organophosphorus compounds like Malathion, Dichlorovos and Chlorpyriphos like carbofuran and pyrethroids like cypermethrin were screened by the Gas chromatography -Mass spectrometer (GC-MS Agilent 7890 GC and MS5975MS System). The pesticides were separated by multiresidue liquid extraction method and the concentrated samples were injected in GC-MS through autosampler. The chromatographic spectrums were examined with NIST library for pesticides. The heavy metals such as Cr, As, Cd, Hg and Pb were quantified using inductively coupled plasma-Mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, iCAP Q, Thermo Scientific). About 0.5 g of the sample was digested with high pure nitric acid, diluted and injected through auto sampler.

Results and Discussion

The mean (± SE) values of pesticides and heavy metals in coarse and fine cotton gin trash samples are furnished in the Table 1. The results revealed that none of the pesticides were detected in both coarse and fine cotton gin trash samples, which were collected from the field area. It is in accordance with Stewart et al. (1998) [7] who reported that chemical residues in cotton gin trash due to application of pesticides and defoliants throughout the growing season of cotton plant did not appear to be present at concentrations that cause a problem to the animal. It could be inferred that when cotton gin trash is stored for long time the possibility of pesticides presence is negligible. It concurred with Crossan and Kennedy (2008) [2] who reported that pesticide residues were measured in stockpiled cotton gin trash over a 2-year period and found fourteen pesticide residues from current agricultural practice including indoxacarb, profenofos, chlorpyrifos, propargite, bifenthrin, ethion and cyhalothrin and concluded that the complex pattern of pesticide residue decay over time because of the simultaneous decomposition of the cotton gin trash matrix. The arsenic and cadmium content of both coarse and fine cotton gin trash samples were not significantly different from each other. The arsenic level in coarse and fine were 0.43±0.04 ppm and 0.42±0.04 ppm. The cadmium level was 0.080±0.01 and 0.075±0.01 in coarse and fine samples respectively. The chromium content of the fine samples (3.50 ± 0.12) was significantly (p<0.05) higher than the coarse cotton gin trash samples (3.36±0.11). Mercury and lead were not detected in any of the samples. Similar findings were reported by Kim et al. (2004) [4] who found Arsenic 5 ppm, Lead 30 ppm, Chromium 28 ppm while other toxic heavy metals like Cadmium, Mercury and Selenium were not detected in semi-quantitative element analysis of cotton gin trash samples. On the contrary, they found that arsenic ranged from 4.5 to 8.8 ppm, Chromium ranged from 10 to 43.20 ppm and lead was not detected in the quantitative analysis of cotton gin trash samples. Moreover, the level of arsenic and cadmium in the present study were within the normal acceptable level as recommended by NRC (2005) and AAFCO OP (2019). The level of chromium also was within the normal level as recommended in ruminant diet.

Table 1. Pesticides, heavy metals and gossypol residues (ppm) in
ParticularsCoarse type cotton gin trash (Kotta Panju)Fine type cotton gin trash (Micro waste panju)P value
Pesticides
Alpha BHCNDND-
Beta BHCNDND-
Gamma BHCNDND-
Delta BHCNDND-
DDTNDND-
EndosulphanNDND-
MalathionNDND-
DichlorvosNDND-
ChlorpyriphosNDND-
CarbofuranNDND-
CypermethrinNDND-
Heavy metals (ppm)
Chromium3.36a±0.113.50b±0.120.023
Arsenic0.43±0.040.42±0.040.858
Cadmium0.080±0.010.075±0.010.811
MercuryNDNDND
LeadNDNDND

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Pesticides, heavy metals and gossypol residues (ppm) in↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Pesticides, heavy metals and gossypol residues (ppm) in

Pesticides, heavy metals and gossypol residues (ppm) in

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Conclusion

The study confirmed that there were no toxic residues like pesticides and heavy metals found in the cotton gin trash and it could be used as a feed supplement in sheep.

References

4 in the original paper
  1. Crossan AN, Kennedy IR. Calculation of pesticide degradation in decaying cotton gin trash. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;81:355-359.
  2. Kennedy JB, Rankins DL. Comparison of cotton gin trash and peanut hulls as low-cost roughage sources for growing beef cattle. Prof Anim Sci. 2008;24:40-46.
  3. Kim S, Park SK, Daugherty KE. Some physical characteristics and heavy metal analyses of cotton gin waste for potential use as an alternative fuel. Korean J Chem Eng. 2004;21:640-646.
  4. Rogers GM, Poore MH, Paschal JC. Feeding cotton products to cattle. Vet Clin Food Anim. 2002;18:267294.