Scinovex

Research article · 2024 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development

Adoption of improved cotton cultivation practices by the farmers in Rayagada district of Odisha

Debasish PujariSyed H. Mazhar

Volume 7(8) · Pages 610–613 · DOI: 10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i8i.995 ↗

Research areasAgricultural Economics and PracticesLivestock Management and Performance ImprovementAgricultural Innovations and Practices

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

This study examines the socio-economic characteristics and adoption levels of improved cotton cultivation practices among farmers in Rayagada District, Odisha. The analysis of socio-economic data reveals that the majority of respondents are middle-aged males engaged primarily in agriculture combined with other occupations, and most live in joint families in semi-cemented houses. Landholding sizes are predominantly low, and information sources, scientific orientation, and risk orientation are mostly at medium levels. The adoption of various improved practices, including field preparation, improved varieties, and irrigation, shows significant variation. While practices like improved variety and line sowing have relatively higher adoption rates, others such as seed treatment and plant spacing have lower adoption levels. The overall distribution of respondents by adoption level indicates a concentration in the medium category, with lower and higher categories also represented. Correlation analysis identifies strong positive relationships between adoption levels and factors such as progressiveness, mass media exposure, and source of information. Significant correlations are also observed with scientific orientation, risk orientation, and economic orientation. Conversely, age, gender, and land holding exhibit varying degrees of influence, with age showing the strongest correlation. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address barriers to adoption and enhance the effectiveness of extension services and information dissemination in promoting improved cotton cultivation practices.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Modernizing cotton cultivation practices is essential for increasing productivity, sustainability, and economic viability in farming. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Modernizing cotton cultivation practices is essential for increasing productivity, sustainability, and economic viability in farming.

      In the paper's own words

      “The adoption of improved cotton cultivation practices represents a significant shift towards modernizing agricultural methods to enhance productivity, sustainability, and economic viability in cotton farming.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • In the Rayagada District of Odisha, cotton is vital to the local economy, but traditional farming suffers from low productivity and pest issues. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      In the Rayagada District of Odisha, cotton is vital to the local economy, but traditional farming suffers from low productivity and pest issues.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rayagada District in Odisha, India, is a key agricultural area where cotton cultivation plays a vital role in the local economy. Despite its importance, traditional cotton farming in this region is plagued by issues such as low productivity, pest problems, and environmental concerns.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Transitioning to improved methods can help Rayagada farmers increase yields and reduce costs, supporting regional economic stability. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Transitioning to improved methods can help Rayagada farmers increase yields and reduce costs, supporting regional economic stability.

      In the paper's own words

      “By transitioning to these enhanced methods, cotton farmers in Rayagada can potentially boost their yields, reduce costs, and promote sustainable farming, thus addressing current constraints and supporting economic stability in the district.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to assess the extent to which farmers adopted improved cotton cultivation practices. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to assess the extent to which farmers adopted improved cotton cultivation practices.

      In the paper's own words

      “Objective To assess the adoption of improved cotton cultivation practices by the respondents.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Objective

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers used a descriptive research design to analyze the socio-economic traits and adoption levels of farmers in the Rayagada District. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers used a descriptive research design to analyze the socio-economic traits and adoption levels of farmers in the Rayagada District.

      In the paper's own words

      “The study employed a Descriptive Research Design to systematically describe the socio-economic characteristics of farmers and their adoption levels of improved cotton cultivation practices in Rayagada District, Odisha.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Research Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The study sample consisted of 120 respondents. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study sample consisted of 120 respondents.

      In the paper's own words

      “Total 120 100”

      Page 3

      Found in: Research Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Most participants were male (67.50%) and fell within the middle age group of 36-55 years (73.33%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Most participants were male (67.50%) and fell within the middle age group of 36-55 years (73.33%).

      In the paper's own words

      “A majority of respondents are in the middle age group (36-55 years, 73.33%) and predominantly male (67.50%).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Research Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Progressiveness showed the strongest positive correlation (0.999) with the adoption of improved practices. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Progressiveness showed the strongest positive correlation (0.999) with the adoption of improved practices.

      In the paper's own words

      “strongest positive relationship is observed with progressiveness, which has a near-perfect correlation coefficient of 0.999, indicating that those who are more progressive are highly likely to adopt improved practices.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • High adoption rates were strongly linked to mass media exposure (0.996) and access to information sources (0.994). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      High adoption rates were strongly linked to mass media exposure (0.996) and access to information sources (0.994).

      In the paper's own words

      “Mass Media Exposure and Source of Information also show very high correlations, with coefficients of 0.996 and 0.994 respectively”

      Page 3

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Age had a strong positive correlation (0.988), suggesting older farmers were more likely to adopt improved practices. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Age had a strong positive correlation (0.988), suggesting older farmers were more likely to adopt improved practices.

      In the paper's own words

      “Age exhibits a strong correlation of 0.988, suggesting that older individuals may be more inclined to adopt improved practices.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Gender (0.129) and land holding (0.01) had minimal to no significant influence on the adoption of improved practices. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Gender (0.129) and land holding (0.01) had minimal to no significant influence on the adoption of improved practices.

      In the paper's own words

      “In contrast, Gender and Land Holding show very weak or non-significant correlations, with coefficients of 0.129 and 0.01, respectively”

      Page 3

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that increasing mass media exposure and improving communication channels are key to enhancing farmer knowledge and adoption. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that increasing mass media exposure and improving communication channels are key to enhancing farmer knowledge and adoption.

      In the paper's own words

      “The findings suggest that increased exposure to mass media and effective communication channels can greatly enhance farmers' knowledge and facilitate the adoption of improved practices.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The authors recommend fostering scientific and risk-oriented attitudes and providing economic support and extension services to accelerate adoption. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend fostering scientific and risk-oriented attitudes and providing economic support and extension services to accelerate adoption.

      In the paper's own words

      “Additionally, fostering scientific and risk-oriented attitudes among farmers, along with providing robust economic support and extension services, can further accelerate the adoption process.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Socio-economic characteristics distribution ofTable 1Page 2Distribution of respondents according to level of adoptionTable 2Page 2Overall distribution of respondents according to their adoption level towards improved cotton cultivation practices.Table 3Page 3Correlation between socio-economic profiles of theTable 4Page 3Level of adoptionFigure 1Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The adoption of improved cotton cultivation practices represents a significant shift towards modernizing agricultural methods to enhance productivity, sustainability, and economic viability in cotton farming. This approach involves integrating advanced techniques and technologies to address the challenges faced by traditional farming methods, such as low yields, soil degradation, and pest management issues. Improved practices typically include the use of high-yielding and pest-resistant cotton varieties, efficient irrigation systems, and innovative soil management strategies. Additionally, these practices emphasize the importance of sustainable methods, such as integrated pest management and conservation tillage, to reduce environmental impact. The adoption of these practices is crucial for increasing crop yields, improving the quality of cotton, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of cotton farming. By incorporating these advancements, farmers can achieve greater efficiency, reduce input costs, and contribute to the overall growth and stability of the agricultural sector. Rayagada District in Odisha, India, is a key agricultural area where cotton cultivation plays a vital role in the local economy. Despite its importance, traditional cotton farming in this region is plagued by issues such as low productivity, pest problems, and environmental concerns. Adopting improved cotton cultivation practices offers a promising solution to these challenges. These modern practices include using high-yielding, pest-resistant varieties, advanced soil and water management techniques, and integrated pest management (IPM). By transitioning to these enhanced methods, cotton farmers in Rayagada can potentially boost their yields, reduce costs, and promote sustainable farming, thus addressing current constraints and supporting economic stability in the district.

Objective

To assess the adoption of improved cotton cultivation practices by the respondents.

Research Methodology

The study employed a Descriptive Research Design to systematically describe the socio-economic characteristics of farmers and their adoption levels of improved cotton cultivation practices in Rayagada District, Odisha. This design was chosen to capture detailed information about the population and provide a comprehensive analysis of the adoption patterns without influencing or altering the behavior of the subjects. www.extensionjournal.com The table 2 illustrates the distribution of respondents according to their level of adoption of various improved cotton cultivation practices. Among the practices listed, "Improved Variety" has the highest proportion of adoption (36.67%), with 41.67% not adopting this practice. "Field Preparation" and "Line Sowing" are also relatively welladopted at 23.33% and 36.67%, respectively, though a significant portion of respondents have either partially adopted or not adopted these practices. Practices like "Seed Treatment" and "Sowing Time" have lower adoption rates, with 59.17% and 57.50% not adopting them, respectively. "Plant Spacing" and "Irrigation" show considerable nonadoption rates at 41.67% and 53.33%, respectively. On the other hand, "Fertilizers" and "Weed Control" have notable adoption at 32.50%, though a substantial number of respondents have not adopted these practices either. "Harvesting" and "Yield" practices reflect a mix of partial and non-adoption, with a high percentage of non-adopters in harvesting (56.67%) and a significant percentage in yield (37.50%). Overall, while some practices are relatively welladopted, many still see a high level of partial or nonadoption. www.extensionjournal.com The table 3 & graph provides a breakdown of respondents based on a specific categorical measure, with three distinct levels. The majority of respondents fall into the "Medium" category (27-29), representing 49.16% of the total sample. This is followed by the "Low" category (24-26) with 27.5% of respondents. The "High" category (30-32) includes 23.33% of the respondents. Overall, the distribution is fairly balanced among the categories, with a clear concentration in the medium range. Extension Contacts 0.878* * Significant at 0.05 percent level of probability ** Significant at 0.01 percent level of probability NS= Non-Significant

Table 3. Overall distribution of respondents according to their adoption level towards improved cotton cultivation practices.
Sl. No.CategoriesFrequencyPercentage
1Low (24-26)3327.5
2Medium (27-29)5949.16
3High (30-32)2823.33
Total120100

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Overall distribution of respondents according to their adoption level towards improved cotton cultivation practices.↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Overall distribution of respondents according to their adoption level towards improved cotton cultivation practices.

Overall distribution of respondents according to their adoption level towards improved cotton cultivation practices.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 2. Distribution of respondents according to level of adoption
PracticesAdoptedPartially adoptedNot adopted
Field Preparation284448
(23.33%)(36.67%)(40%)
Improved Variety442650
(Tulasi, Rashi, Takat, A Wall. Bg)(36.67%)(21.67%)(41.67%)
Seed Rate272766
(22.50%)(22.50%)(55%)
Seed Treatment212871
(17.50%)(23.33%)(59.17%)
Sowing Time262569
(21.67%)(20.83%)(57.50%)
Line Sowing442155
(36.67%)(17.50%)(45.83%)
Plant Spacing224850
(18.33%)(40%)(41.67%)
Fertilizers392556
(32.50%)(20.83%)(46.67%)
Irrigation253164
(20.83%)(25.83%)(53.33%)
Weed Control392853
(32.50%)(23.33%)(44.17%)
Plant Protection Measures253956
(20.83%)(32.50%)(46.67%)
Harvesting351768
(29.17%)(14.17%)(56.67%)
Yield314445
(25.83%)(36.67%)(37.50%)

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Distribution of respondents according to level of adoption↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Distribution of respondents according to level of adoption

Distribution of respondents according to level of adoption

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Results and Discussion

The table 4 illustrates the correlation coefficients between various socio-economic profiles of respondents and their adoption of improved cotton cultivation practices. The strongest positive relationship is observed with progressiveness, which has a near-perfect correlation coefficient of 0.999, indicating that those who are more progressive are highly likely to adopt improved practices. Mass Media Exposure and Source of Information also show very high correlations, with coefficients of 0.996 and 0.994 respectively, suggesting that greater media exposure and access to better information sources are strongly linked to higher adoption rates. Scientific Orientation and Risk Orientation exhibit strong positive correlations of 0.959 and 0.979, respectively, reflecting that respondents with a scientific approach and higher risk tolerance are more inclined to adopt new practices. Economic Orientation and Extension Contacts show moderate to strong correlations, with coefficients of 0.929 and 0.878, highlighting that economic considerations and frequent extension contacts positively influence adoption. Occupation, Family Type, and Marital Status also demonstrate significant positive correlations, with coefficients ranging from 0.868 to 0.952, indicating their importance in adoption. Family Size shows a moderately strong correlation at 0.859, while House Type has a weaker positive correlation of 0.417. Age exhibits a strong correlation of 0.988, suggesting that older individuals may be more inclined to adopt improved practices. In contrast, Gender and Land Holding show very weak or nonsignificant correlations, with coefficients of 0.129 and 0.01, respectively, indicating minimal influence on adoption levels.

Table 4. Correlation between socio-economic profiles of the
Sl. No.Independent VariableCorrelation coefficient
1.Age0.988*
2.Gender0.129NS
3.Marital Status0.952*
4.Family Size0.859*
5.Family Type0.904*
6.House Type0.417NS
7.Land Holding0.01NS
8.Occupation0.868*
9Source of Information0.994**
10.Scientific Orientation0.959*
11.Risk Orientation0.979*
12.Progressiveness0.999**
13.Mass Media Exposure0.996**
14.Economic Orientation0.929*
15.Extension Contacts0.878*

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Correlation between socio-economic profiles of the↗ Enlarge
Table 4
Correlation between socio-economic profiles of the

Correlation between socio-economic profiles of the

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Conclusion

In conclusion, the investigation into the knowledge and adoption of improved cotton cultivation practices in Rayagada District of Odisha underscores the pivotal role that socio-economic factors play in shaping agricultural outcomes. The study reveals a strong correlation between www.extensionjournal.com various socio-economic profiles and the level of adoption of these advanced practices. Factors such as progressiveness, mass media exposure, and access to information sources significantly influence farmers' willingness to embrace modern techniques, highlighting the importance of targeted educational and informational interventions. The findings suggest that increased exposure to mass media and effective communication channels can greatly enhance farmers' knowledge and facilitate the adoption of improved practices. Additionally, fostering scientific and risk-oriented attitudes among farmers, along with providing robust economic support and extension services, can further accelerate the adoption process. While factors like family size and occupation also show notable correlations, the impact of less significant factors like house type, gender, and land holding are minimal, indicating that a focused approach addressing major influencers is more effective.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Socio-economic characteristics distribution of
CategoryFrequencyPercentage
Age in years
Young (18-35)2924.17
Middle (36-55)8873.33
Old (Above 56)32.50
Gender
Male8167.50
Female3932.50
Occupation
Agriculture3529.17
Agriculture + Business3932.50
Agriculture + Labour3428.33
Agriculture + Service1210.00
Family Type
Nuclear4335.83
Joint7764.17
Type of House
Semi- cemented6251.67
Cemented5848.33
Land Holding
Low (Less than 0.5)7562.50
Medium (0.5-1)3529.17
High (More than 1)108.33
Source of Information
Low (Less than 18.21)2722.50
Medium(18.21-20.62)6856.67
High (More than 20.62)2520.83
Scientific Orientation
Low (Less than 8.73)1915.83
Medium (8.73-11.84)7461.67
High (More than 11.84)2722.50
Risk Orientation
Low (Less than 8.88)108.33
Medium (8.88-12.20)9579.17
High (More than 12.20)1512.50
Progressiveness
Low (Less than 0.27)2722.50
Medium (0.27-2.14)7865.00
High (More than 2.14)1512.50
Mass Media Exposure
Low (Less than 8.41)1512.50
Medium (8.41-11.11)9780.83
High (More than 11.11)86.67
Economic Orientation
Low (Less than 5.05)2621.67
Medium (5.05-8.83)6050.00
High (More than 8.83)3428.33
Extension Contacts
Low (Less than 8.05)2722.50
Medium (8.05-10.88)5646.67
High (More than 10.88)3730.83

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Socio-economic characteristics distribution of↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Socio-economic characteristics distribution of

Socio-economic characteristics distribution of

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Level of adoption
Level of adoption↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Level of adoption

Level of adoption

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

10 in the original paper
  1. Ghosh A, Dey S. Socio-economic factors influencing the adoption of modern agricultural practices in Eastern India. Int. J Agric Manag. 2021;10(2):112-126.
  2. Jain S, Patel M. Analyzing the drivers of adoption for climate-resilient cotton varieties in South India. Clim. Smart Agric J. 2024;11(2):150-163.
  3. Kumar R, Singh V. Impact of extension services on adoption of improved cotton cultivation techniques in rural India. Agr Syst. 2020;178:102728.
  4. Mehta P, Sharma S. Assessment of adoption and impact of improved cotton varieties in Odisha. J Cotton Res. 2019;6(1):45-59.
  5. Patel R, Gupta R. Economic and environmental outcomes of adopting sustainable cotton farming practices. Environ Sci. Policy. 2023;131:123-132.
  6. Reddy KM, Rao KR. Farmers' adoption of innovative cotton cultivation techniques: A case study from Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Agric Sci. 2018;88(5):761768.
  7. Sahu S, Pradhan S. Factors affecting the adoption of modern farming techniques in tribal regions of Odisha. J Rural Stud. 2022;90:55-66.
  8. Singh A, Yadav N. The role of socio-economic characteristics in the adoption of cotton farming practices in India. J Crop Improvement. 2021;35(4):591-605.
  9. Srinivasan V, Rao M. Technological adoption in cotton farming: Insights from Odisha. Adv Agron. 2020;159:95-123.
  10. Verma S, Bhattacharya S. Influence of socio-economic factors on adoption of improved cotton cultivation practices in India. Agr Econ Res Rev. 2023;36(1):89101.