Scinovex

Research article · 2024 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development

Adoption of improved French bean cultivation practices by the farmers of Bishnupur district of Manipur

Ripujit LairikyengbamSyed H. Mazhar

Volume 7(8) · Pages 254–258 · DOI: 10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i8d.921 ↗

Research areasAgricultural Economics and PracticesAgricultural Science and FertilizationAgricultural pest management studies

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The main purpose of the study was to ascertain the extent of adoption of improved French bean cultivation practices by the farmers of Bishnupur District of Manipur. The research took place in Bishnupur block of Bishnupur District during the period 2023-2024. This study utilized a descriptive research design. The main information was gathered from 120 participants through face-to-face interviews utilizing a predetermined interview schedule. Farmer adoption was assessed through a series of 16 questions related to the cultivation of French beans. The results indicated that 40.00 percent of the participants exhibit a low level of adopting French bean cultivation, with 39.17 percent displaying a medium level of adoption and 20.83 percent showing a high level of adoption in French bean cultivation. All eleven independent variables, such as age, education, occupation, annual income, land holding, farming experience, mass media exposure, source of agriculture information, risk bearing capacity, economic motivation, and innovativeness, were found to have a positive and significant correlation with farmers' adoption of improved French bean cultivation practices.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • French bean is a traditional and profitable vegetable crop in the North-Eastern region of India. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      French bean is a traditional and profitable vegetable crop in the North-Eastern region of India.

      In the paper's own words

      “French bean is a traditional vegetable crop of the North-Eastern region, and its cultivation is profitable in crop farming.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The crop is advantageous because it is relatively less susceptible to diseases and pests. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The crop is advantageous because it is relatively less susceptible to diseases and pests.

      In the paper's own words

      “Additionally, this crop is relatively less prone to pest and disease problems, which is an added advantage.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • French bean cultivation is considered a climate-smart practice due to its water efficiency and ability to improve soil productivity and health. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      French bean cultivation is considered a climate-smart practice due to its water efficiency and ability to improve soil productivity and health.

      In the paper's own words

      “French beans are a water-efficient crop that enhances soil health and productivity, thereby constituting a climate-smart practice”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to determine how much farmers in the Bishnupur District of Manipur have adopted improved French bean cultivation practices. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to determine how much farmers in the Bishnupur District of Manipur have adopted improved French bean cultivation practices.

      In the paper's own words

      “The main purpose of the study was to ascertain the extent of adoption of improved French bean cultivation practices by the farmers of Bishnupur District of Manipur.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Justification of the study

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers used a descriptive research design for the study conducted in the Bishnupur block of Bishnupur District between 2023 and 2024. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers used a descriptive research design for the study conducted in the Bishnupur block of Bishnupur District between 2023 and 2024.

      In the paper's own words

      “The research took place in Bishnupur block of Bishnupur District during the period 2023-2024. This study utilized a descriptive research design.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Research Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Data was collected from 120 participants using face-to-face interviews and a predetermined schedule. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Data was collected from 120 participants using face-to-face interviews and a predetermined schedule.

      In the paper's own words

      “The main information was gathered from 120 participants through face-to-face interviews utilizing a predetermined interview schedule.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods used for Data Collection

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The level of adoption was measured using a set of 16 questions focused on French bean cultivation. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The level of adoption was measured using a set of 16 questions focused on French bean cultivation.

      In the paper's own words

      “Farmer adoption was assessed through a series of 16 questions related to the cultivation of French beans.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Analysis involved transforming data into a three-point Likert scale and using mean, frequency, percentage, and correlation to evaluate variables. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Analysis involved transforming data into a three-point Likert scale and using mean, frequency, percentage, and correlation to evaluate variables.

      In the paper's own words

      “The data obtained from the respondents was transformed into a three-point Likert scale and subsequently tabulated. The data was evaluated and the relationship between the independent and dependent variables was determined using mean, frequency, percentage and correlation.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Statistical Analysis of Data

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The majority of farmers showed low (40.00%) or medium (39.17%) adoption levels, while only 20.83% showed a high level of adoption. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The majority of farmers showed low (40.00%) or medium (39.17%) adoption levels, while only 20.83% showed a high level of adoption.

      In the paper's own words

      “The results indicated that 40.00 percent of the participants exhibit a low level of adopting French bean cultivation, with 39.17 percent displaying a medium level of adoption and 20.83 percent showing a high level of adoption in French bean cultivation.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Justification of the study

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Seed treatment before sowing had very low adoption, with 62.59% of respondents not adopting the practice and only 8.33% fully adopting it. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Seed treatment before sowing had very low adoption, with 62.59% of respondents not adopting the practice and only 8.33% fully adopting it.

      In the paper's own words

      “It indicated that majority (62.59%) of the respondents did not adopt treatment of French bean seeds before sowing, 29.17 per cent partially adopt and only 8.33 per cent of the respondents fully adopt.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Statistical Analysis of Data

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Post-harvest management was largely ignored, with 65.83% of farmers not adopting it and only 11.67% fully adopting it. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Post-harvest management was largely ignored, with 65.83% of farmers not adopting it and only 11.67% fully adopting it.

      In the paper's own words

      “It also recorded that majority (65.83%) of the respondents did not adopt post-harvest management, 22.50 per cent of the respondents partially adopted and 11.67 per cent of the respondents fully adopted the post-harvest management of French bean.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Statistical Analysis of Data

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The use of suitable soil was one of the more adopted practices, with 42.50% of respondents fully adopting it. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The use of suitable soil was one of the more adopted practices, with 42.50% of respondents fully adopting it.

      In the paper's own words

      “It was observed that majority (42.50%) of the respondents fully adopt suitable soil for French bean cultivation, 40.00 per cent of the respondents partially adopt and 17.50 per cent of the respondents did not adopt.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Statistical Analysis of Data

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Eleven factors, including education, income, and innovativeness, were all positively and significantly correlated with the adoption of improved practices. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Eleven factors, including education, income, and innovativeness, were all positively and significantly correlated with the adoption of improved practices.

      In the paper's own words

      “All eleven independent variables, such as age, education, occupation, annual income, land holding, farming experience, mass media exposure, source of agriculture information, risk bearing capacity, economic motivation, and innovativeness, were found to have a positive and significant correlation with farmers' adoption of improved French bean cultivation practices.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Fig 1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors recommend implementing extension strategies and awareness programs focused on pest and disease control to increase the adoption of improved practices. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend implementing extension strategies and awareness programs focused on pest and disease control to increase the adoption of improved practices.

      In the paper's own words

      “Proper training and awareness programs related to pest and diseases control and extension strategies to be followed for maximum adoption of improved French bean in the research area.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Justification of the study

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (French bean plants in a field). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Factors Influencing Adoption
AI-generated conceptual illustration (French bean plants in a field). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (French bean plants in a field). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Factors Influencing Adoption

AI-generated conceptual illustration (French bean plants in a field). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
% and % and more: Seed treatment before... vs Utilize any disease... vs Practice any...
Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

% and % and more: Seed treatment before... vs Utilize any disease... vs Practice any...

Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 3 (page 4) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Percentage: Low (16-32) vs Medium (33-38) vs High (39-42)
Replotted from Table 3 (page 4) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 3 (page 4) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Percentage: Low (16-32) vs Medium (33-38) vs High (39-42)

Replotted from Table 3 (page 4) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Characteristics of the respondents. (N=120)Table 1Page 2Distribution of respondents based on adoption level towards improved French bean cultivation practices. (N=120)Table 2Page 3Overall adoption level of the respondents towardsTable 3Page 4Association between selected independent variables andTable 4Page 4Overall distribution of respondents based on the adoption level of improved French bean cultivation practices.Figure 1Page 4
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the most popular and widely cultivated vegetables in India and belongs to the family Leguminosae. It is also referred to as the common bean, green bean, dry bean, kidney bean, and navy bean (Singh et al., 2021) [4] . Globally, French beans are cultivated primarily in American and European countries, including the United States, England, Poland, Brazil, Mexico, Myanmar, China, and India. In 2016, global production of green beans reached 23.6 million tons, with China accounting for 79% of the total output. In 2016, the global production of dried beans was 26.8 million tons, with Myanmar, India, and Brazil accounting for the majority of this output. In India, over 90% of the total pulse production has been contributed by 10 states: Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Tamil Nadu and Telangana (Singh et al., 2021) [4] . French bean is a significant pulse crop, exhibiting a high degree of productivity in comparison to gram and pea. In the hilly region, French bean is cultivated during the Kharif season (June to October), while in the lower hills it is sown as a spring crop (March). In the northeast regions, it is cultivated during the rabi season, which spans from November to May. French bean is a traditional vegetable crop of the North-Eastern region, and its cultivation is profitable in crop farming. Additionally, this crop is relatively less prone to pest and disease problems, which is an added advantage. As a self-pollinated crop, French bean seed production and maintenance of its purity is much easier than that of other vegetable crops. The tender pods are used as a vegetable, while the mature seeds are consumed as dal (Tongbram et al., 2021) [5] . In India, fresh pods utilised as a vegetable are termed 'faras', whereas dried pods are known as 'rajmash'. The dried seeds of rajma have been found to contain 60.6% carbohydrates, 22.9% protein and 1.3% fat. Additionally, 100 g of seeds contains minerals, including calcium (260 mg), phosphorus (410 mg) and iron (5.8 mg) (Vidyakar et al., 2017) [6] . French beans are a highly popular foodstuff due to their favourable quality, nutritional balance and higher biological efficiency. This vegetable plays a pivotal role in the sustenance of the global population (Panchbhaiya et al., 2017) [3] . The green pods are a rich source of thiamine (vitamin B1), which is essential for the optimal functioning of brain cells (Singh et al., 2021) [4] . French beans are a water-efficient crop that enhances soil health and productivity, thereby constituting a climate-smart practice (Nasar et al., 2023) [2] .

Justification of the study

The results of the present study will assist farmers in the Bishnupur district of Manipur in the adoption of improved French bean cultivation practices. This will facilitate an investigation into the most appropriate methodology for identifying the constraints in the utilisation of recommended safe plant protection measures and knowledge for more effective crop management and enhanced productivity with www.extensionjournal.com regard to improved French bean cultivation. Objectives 1. To assess the socio-economic profile of the respondents. 2. To find the adoption level of improved French bean cultivation practices by the respondents. 3. To establish the relationship between the selected independent variables with adoption of improved French bean cultivation practices.

Research Methodology

The study was conducted in Bishnupur District, Manipur.

The present study employed a descriptive research design, which is appropriate for studies that aim to describe the characteristics of a phenomenon. A multi-stage sampling methodology was employed in order to select the requisite samples for the present study. Manipur is comprised of 16 districts, of which Bishnupur was selected for inclusion in the study. Bishnupur district is subdivided into three blocks: Bishnupur, Nambol and Moirang. Bishnupur block was selected purposively based on the rationale that it encompasses the greatest area under French bean cultivation. Toubul and Khoijuman Khullen were selected from Bishnupur block, and a total of 120 respondents were randomly selected on a proportional basis, in accordance with the extent of French bean cultivation in each area.

Methods used for Data Collection

A pre-tested structured interview schedule, designed to collect data aligned with the objectives of the study, was developed. A survey method of data collection was employed, utilising a pre-structured interview schedule. The data were then classified, tabulated and subjected to analysis in order to ascertain their relevance to the stated objectives.

Statistical Analysis of Data

The data obtained from the respondents was transformed into a three-point Likert scale and subsequently tabulated.

The data was evaluated and the relationship between the independent and dependent variables was determined using mean, frequency, percentage and correlation. The data presented in Table 2 indicated that majority (52.50%) of the respondents partially adopted the recommended field preparation for French bean cultivation, 40.00 per cent of the respondents fully adopt and only 7.50 per cent of the respondents did not adopt. It was observed that majority (42.50%) of the respondents fully adopt suitable soil for French bean cultivation, 40.00 per cent of the respondents partially adopt and 17.50 per cent of the respondents did not adopt. It shows that majority (40.83%) of the respondents partially adopt the recommended seed rate of French bean, 35.83 per cent of the respondents fully adopt and 23.33 per cent of the respondents did not adopt the seed rate of French bean cultivation. It recorded that majority (43.33%) of the respondents fully adopt the spacing between seed to seed of French bean, 38.33 per cent partially adopt and 18.33 per cent of the respondents did not adopt. It indicated that majority (62.59%) of the respondents did not adopt treatment of French bean seeds before sowing, 29.17 per cent partially adopt and only 8.33 per cent of the respondents fully adopt. It was found that majority (60.83%) of the respondents partially adopt the use of manure in French bean cultivation, 29.17 per cent of the respondents fully adopt and 10.00 per cent of the respondents did not adopt. It was observed that majority (64.17%) of the respondents partially adopted the amount of FYM used, 30.83 per cent of the respondents fully adopted and 5.00 per www.extensionjournal.com cent of the respondents did not adopt. It indicated that majority (69.17%) of the respondents partially adopted the fertilizer supplement used, 27.50 per cent of the respondents fully adopted and only 3.33 per cent did not adopt the fertilizer supplement used. It reveals that majority (62.50%) of the respondents partially adopt the dose of fertilizer for French bean cultivation, 31.67 per cent fully adopt and 5.83 per cent of the respondents did not adopt the dose of fertilizer for French bean cultivation. It showed that majority (71.67%) of the respondents partially adopt the stage when weeding for French bean cultivation is done, 20.83 per cent of the respondents fully adopt and 7.50 per cent of the respondents did not adopt. It reported that majority (70.00%) of the respondents partially adopt weeding method, 25.00 per cent fully adopt and 5.00 per cent of the respondents did not adopt weeding method. It was observed that majority (55.83%) of the respondents partially adopt disease control for French bean, 34.17 per cent did not adopt and 10.00 per cent of the respondents fully adopt disease control for French bean. It was found that majority (58.33%) of the respondents partially adopt cropping pattern, 30.83 per cent fully adopt and 10.83 per cent of the respondents did not adopt cropping pattern. It recorded that majority (54.17%) of the respondents partially adopt the harvesting time for French bean, 39.17 per cent fully adopt and 6.67 per cent of the respondents did not adopt the harvesting time for French bean. It showed that majority (53.33%) of the respondents partially adopt the recommended yield of tender pods of French bean, 31.67 per cent fully adopt and 15.00 per cent of the respondents did not adopt the recommended yield of tender pods of French bean. It also recorded that majority (65.83%) of the respondents did not adopt post-harvest management, 22.50 per cent of the respondents partially adopted and 11.67 per cent of the respondents fully adopted the post-harvest management of French bean. [1] .

Table 2. Distribution of respondents based on adoption level towards improved French bean cultivation practices. (N=120)
Sl. No.StatementResponse—————
Fully adoptedPartially adoptedNot adopted
f%f%f%
1Recommended field preparation4840.006352.5097.50
2Sown in a suitable soil5142.504840.002117.50
3Recommended seed rate4335.834940.832823.33
4Recommended spacing between seed to seed5243.334638.332218.33
5Seed treatment before sowing108.333529.177562.50
6Utilize any type of manure3529.177360.831210.00
7Recommended amount of FYM3730.837764.1765.00
8Utilize any fertilizer supplement3327.508369.1743.33
9Optimum dose of fertilizer3831.677562.5075.83
10Time of weeding performed2520.838671.6797.50
11Used any specific tools and techniques for weeding3025.008470.0065.00
12Utilize any disease control method for plant protection against diseases1210.006755.834134.17
13Practice any cropping pattern3730.837058.331310.83
14Recommended harvesting time4739.176554.1786.67
15Yield of tender pods3831.676453.331815.00
16Practice any post-harvest management1411.672722.507965.83

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Distribution of respondents based on adoption level towards improved French bean cultivation practices. (N=120)↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Distribution of respondents based on adoption level towards improved French bean cultivation practices. (N=120)

Distribution of respondents based on adoption level towards improved French bean cultivation practices. (N=120)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Results and Discussion Socio Economic Characteristics of the Respondents

Results and Discussion Socio Economic Characteristics of the Respondents

Fig 1:

Overall distribution of respondents based on the adoption level of improved French bean cultivation practices. The data presented in Table 4 revealed that all of the eleven independent variables, i.e. age, education, occupation, annual income, land holding, farming experience, mass media exposure, sources of agriculture information, risk bearing capacity, economic motivation and innovativeness are positively and significantly correlated with adoption of farmers towards improved French bean cultivation practices.

Table 4. Association between selected independent variables and
Sl. No.VariablesPearson’s Correlation coefficient
1Age0.3499*
2Education0.3085*
3Occupation0.7634
4Annual income0.3794*
5Land holding0.4960**
6Farming experience0.3499*
7Mass Media Exposure0.4266*
8Sources of Agriculture information0.5982**
9Risk bearing capacity0.2907*
10Economic motivation0.4014*
11Innovativeness0.5879**

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Association between selected independent variables and↗ Enlarge
Table 4
Association between selected independent variables and

Association between selected independent variables and

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗

Association between Selected Independent Variables with the Adoption of the Respondents towards Improved French bean Cultivation Practices

Association between Selected Independent Variables with the Adoption of the Respondents towards Improved French bean Cultivation Practices

Conclusion

It was concluded that majority of the respondents were of middle age (31-50 years), most of the respondents had attained High School, majority of the respondents were engaged in agriculture + caste business, majority of the respondents' income were 50,001 -1 lakh rupees, majority of the respondents had 0.5-1 acres of land with 6 -10 years of farming experience and majority of the respondents have medium level of mass media exposure. Majority (40.00%) of the respondents have low adoption level, followed by 39.17% of the respondents having medium level of adoption and 20.83% of the respondents with high adoption level.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Characteristics of the respondents. (N=120)
Sl. No.AttributesCharacteristicsFrequencyPercentage
1AgeYoung (Below 30 years)2924.17
Middle (31-50 years)5848.33
Old (Above 50 years)3327.50
2EducationIlliterate86.67
Can read and write1915.83
Primary School2621.67
High School3428.33
Higher Secondary School2924.17
Graduate and above43.33
3OccupationAgriculture only5142.50
Agriculture + Labor2016.67
Agriculture + Business3327.50
Agriculture + Service1613.33
4Annual IncomeUp to Rs. 50,0003327.50
Rs. 50,001 – Rs. 1,00,0005243.33
Above Rs 1,00,0003529.17
5Land holdingMarginal (Up to 0.5 acre)3227.50
Small (0.6 – 1 acre)5743.33
Medium (Above 1 acre)3129.17
6Farming ExperienceUp to 5 years2924.17
6 – 10 years5848.33
11 years and above3327.50
7Mass Media ExposureLow3327.50
Medium5344.17
High3428.33
8Sources of Agriculture informationLow3630.00
Medium5142.50
High3327.50
9Risk Bearing CapacityLow3428.33
Medium4940.83
High3730.83
10Economic motivationLow3125.83
Medium5646.67
High3327.50
11InnovativenessLow3730.83
Medium4840.00
High3529.17

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Characteristics of the respondents. (N=120)↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Characteristics of the respondents. (N=120)

Characteristics of the respondents. (N=120)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 3. Overall adoption level of the respondents towards
Sl. No.Adoption levelResponse—
FrequencyPercentage
1Low (16-32)4840.00
2Medium (33-38)4739.17
3High (39-42)2520.83
Total120100.00

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Overall adoption level of the respondents towards↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Overall adoption level of the respondents towards

Overall adoption level of the respondents towards

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 1. Overall distribution of respondents based on the adoption level of improved French bean cultivation practices.
Overall distribution of respondents based on the adoption level of improved French bean cultivation practices.↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Overall distribution of respondents based on the adoption level of improved French bean cultivation practices.

Overall distribution of respondents based on the adoption level of improved French bean cultivation practices.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗

References

6 in the original paper
  1. Kumbhani SR, Kavad SD, Patel GR. Adoption of improved Indian bean production technology. Young. 2017;9:15-00.
  2. Nasar S, Shaheen H, Murtaza G, Tinghong T, Arfan M, Idrees M. Socioeconomic evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivation in providing sustainable livelihood to the mountain populations of Kashmir Himalayas. Plants. 2023;12(1):213.
  3. Panchbhaiya A, Singh DK, Jatav V, Mallesh S, Verma P. Studies on variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield contributing characters in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm under tarai region of Uttarakhand. J Appl Nat Sci. 2017;9(4):1926-1930.
  4. Singh OK, Singh KR, Singh NG, Ram D, Singh YC, Tongbram K. An economic analysis of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in Bishnupur district of Manipur. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2021;39(8):33-39.
  5. Tongbram K, Singh YC, Singh OK. A study on production and marketing constraints of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) growers in Bishnupur district of Manipur. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2021;39(9):37-41.
  6. Vidyakar V, Lal GM, Singh MK, Kumar A. Study on genetic diversity in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;6(6S):184-187.