Value added pizza base formulation with incorporation of millets, flaxseed and peanut
Abstract
Pizza is a popular baked product due to its easy preparation method and palatability. This particular dish is being favoured among youngsters in India. The current study was conducted to evaluate the proximate composition and acceptability of prepared pizza made with whole wheat flour, finger millet flour, little millet flour, flaxseed and peanut. Pizza base made from whole wheat flour (100%) only served as control. Other four formulations of pizza base were prepared by combining whole wheat flour (WWF), finger millet flour (FMF) and little millet flour (LMF) in different proportions such as (T1) 80:10:10, (T2) 70:15:15, (T3) 60:20:20 and (T4) 50:25:25, respectively. The amount of peanuts and flax seed remained constant for all the treatments except the control. All the treatments were subjected to organoleptic evaluation, proximate and mineral analysis by using standard analytical procedures. The products were evaluated for their organoleptic scores for colour, texture, flavour, taste and overall acceptability by using nine-point hedonic scale and significant difference was observed in organoleptic parameters of all the treatments. The T2 pizza base was observed to show highest scores for organoleptic parameters the developed product and possessed higher amount of protein, fat, fibre, calcium, phosphorous and iron as compared to the control one.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
The term pizza was first introduced in 10 th century in a manuscript from the town of Gaeta in Southern Italy. Modern pizza evolved from flatbread dish in Naples, Italy in 18 th or early 19 th century. Despite being a traditional Italian product, the consumption of pizza is widespread almost all over the world. Increasing adoption of Western dietary habits contributes majorly to growing popularity of pizza. It has universal preference among all age groups with dominant consumers being from the age group of 10-30 years. Baking is a process characterized by many fundamental physical processes such as evaporation of water, volume expansion, gelatinization of starch, denaturation of protein and crust formation etc. As soon as the dough is properly baked into a product, superior sensory features are developed. Fresh bakery products like bread, pizza usually present an appealing brownish and crunchy crust, a pleasant aroma, fine slicing characteristics, a soft and elastic crumb texture and mouthfeel (Giannou et al., 2003) [4] . Despite all its desirable characteristics, all bakery products being prepared from refined wheat flour pose a risk of high glycaemic index and an increased chance of health issues for normal as well as diabetic persons. Thus, this aspect needs to be focused by nutrition researchers to develop more nutrient enriched protective food items having no risk of any diseases. Now a days, millets are on the central point of value addition and nutrient enrichment of various processed foods like biscuits, cookies and extruded products. Due to its valuable benefits for human health, people are shifting their preference towards the millet based foods (Poojitha et al., 2022) [9] . Finger millet (Eleusine coracana), commonly called as ragi is an annual herbaceous hardy crop of family poaceae. Owing to its low glycaemic index and high fibre content, ragi can help in management of diabetes, obesity and other cardiovascular diseases (Bhatt et al., 2003) [3] . Little millet (Panicum sumatrense) is a minor cereal which is recognized for several health benefits due to the presence of bio-active nutraceuticals such as tocopherols, carotenoids and its lower glycaemic index makes it beneficial for diabetic people. Flaxseed (Linium usitatissimum) is obtained from a flowering plant of family Lineaceae. It is rich in fibre, protein, polyunsaturated fatty acids such linoleic and linolenic acids, thiamine, magnesium and phosphorus. Flaxseeds are good source of several plant compounds, including p-Coumaric acid, ferulic acid, phytosterols and lignans. Besides being anti-carcinogenic, lignans decrease risk of heart disease and metabolic syndrome. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) are packed with monounsaturated i.e. oleic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acids and protein. Peanuts are low in carbohydrates which makes them a good choice for people with diabetes. Thus, the present study was planned to formulate millet based pizza base by using whole wheat flour, finger millet, little millet, flax seed and peanuts.
Materials and Methods
Procurement of raw ingredients
The raw ingredients such as whole wheat flour (WWF), finger millet (FM), little millet (LM), flaxseed and peanut were purchased from local market, Bhubaneswar, Odisha.
Preparation of millet flour
The finger millet and little millet grains and were cleaned washed properly under tap water to remove unwanted debris and soaked overnight followed by sun drying for 8-10hours. The dried grains were ground with the help of a pulveriser and sieved to obtain finely ground flour and stored in air tight container for further research work.
Nutrient analysis of developed pizza base
The sensory evaluation, proximate composition and mineral analysis were conducted by following the standard procedures (A.O.A.C, 2000) [2] for the all treatments with three replications.
Sensory Evaluation
A total of five variations of pizza base were prepared and presented for evaluation including four formulations of millet based and the control one. Ten semi-trained judges, selected from faculty, students and staff assessed the organoleptic characteristics of the pizza bases. The judges were given samples and separate score cards with a ninepoint Hedonic scale system in which 1 being the dislike extremely and 9 being the like extremely to evaluate the pizza base for colour, texture, flavour, taste and overall acceptability (Peryam and Girardot, 1952) [8] .
Statistical Analysis
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique was used to statistically analyse the data related to the proximate composition and mineral analysis.
Results and Discussion
Functional properties of formulated flours
Water absorption capacity (WAC) was noticed to be the highest in whole wheat flour i.e., 132.33 ml/100 g and the lowest in T 4 formulation i.e., 122.24 ml/100 g while preparing the dough. Dough raising capacity (DRC) was found to be highest in control than the millet incorporated variations. Likewise, both wet and dry gluten content were found to be highest in whole wheat flour i.e. 34.98% and 8.92%, respectively and lowest in T 4 variation i.e., 20.56% and 4.90%, respectively. All the functional properties decreased with increasing proportions of both finger millet and little millet. [13] in his research on bread prepared from composite flour incorporating wheat flour, barnyard millet, proso millet and finger millet flour. All the proximate values were higher than the control sample except the carbohydrate content which decreased significantly (p<0.05). Increased fibre content was due to good crude fibre ratio in finger millet, little millet and flaxseed (Khattab et al., 2007) [7] . Except protein, carbohydrate and phosphorus all the other values increased significantly (p<0.05) as the millet proportion increased from 10% (T 1 ) to 40% (T 4 ). In the pizza bases the range of values of developed formulations were calcium (91.10-115.89 mg/100 g), iron (4.98-6.12 mg/100 g) and phosphorous (348.09-369.90 mg/100 g). All the millet based formulations were found to contain higher amount of calcium, iron and phosphorous. Similar results were reported during development of multigrain pizza base by Agrawal and Verma (2016) [1] .
Sensory evaluation of developed pizza bases
In the pizza base increasing proportion of little millet and finger millet significantly affected the sensory score of colour (7.4-6.1), texture (7.6-6.5), flavour (7.6-6.6), taste (7.4-6.2) and overall acceptability (7.7-6.5) depicted in Table 4.4. The difference in score for colour may be the increment of finger millet proportion which darkened the pizza base. The score for texture decreased as millet concentration increased may be due to breads or bakery items formulated with gluten free flour are denser and harder than regular gluten containing flour bread (Rajiv et al., 2011) [10] . Formulations T 2 (20%) and T 3 (30%) were considered more accepted than the other two formulations as per the overall acceptability score.
Conclusion
The study concluded that by incorporation of finger millet, little millet, flaxseed and peanuts with whole wheat flour in different proportions, the overall nutritive value increased in terms of both proximate and mineral composition. The finger millet and little millet flour incorporated pizza base contained higher amount of protein, fibre, fat, calcium, phosphorous and iron. From the above study five different formulations of pizza bases were prepared. Functional, proximate, sensory aspects of the developed pizza bases were evaluated. From the analysis it was observed that with addition of finger millet, little millet, flaxseed and peanut, significant changes in the quality of formulated pizza bases have been observed. The finger millet and little millet flours can be added up to 15-20 percent to obtain the optimum nutritional benefits without the organoleptic scores being affected. It can be a better alternative for people suffering from diabetes mellitus, obesity and cardiovascular diseases because of its low carbohydrate and high fibre content. Also, being rich in calcium, iron and phosphorous, the millet based pizza can ensure good nutrition for all age group particularly for growing children, adolescents, pregnant and lactating women as well as the older people by fulfilling their micronutrient needs.
Acknowledgement
AcknowledgementThe authors express their sincere gratitude towards the authority of Central Instrumentation Facility (CIF), OUAT, Bhubaneswar for their assistance in nutrient analysis.
References
- Agarwal A, Verma A. Development of multigrain flour pizza base for value addition. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2016;4(8):1115-1120.
- Giannou V, Kessoglou V, Tzia C. Quality and safety characteristics of bread made from frozen dough. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2003;14(3):99108.
- Hamidah MZZS. Substitution of millet flour on bread pizza dough as an effort to reduce the use of wheat flour. Prosiding Pendidikan Teknik Boga Busana. 2019;14(1).
- Ibrahim A, Bashir M, Idi A, Buhari HH. Proximate analysis, sensory evaluation and production of bread from finger millet and wheat flour. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2021;14(2):101-107.
- Khattab RY, Zeitoun AA. Nutritional and sensorial quality of cookies fortified with defatted flaxseed and sesame seed meals. Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences. 2007;32(1):519-532.
- Peryam DR, Girradot NF. Advanced taste test method. Food Engineering. 1957;24:58-61.
- Poojitha P, Sathanya PS, Divyadharshini S, Ishwarya K, Gowrishankar L, Abishek M, Sureshkumar J. Optimization of process parameters for tray dried broccoli powder for the development of protein rich pizza base. Journal of Algebraic Statistics. 2022;13(2):1101-1112.
- Rajiv J, Soumya C, Indrani D, Venkateswara Rao G. Effect of replacement of wheat flour with finger millet flour (Eleusine coracana) on the batter microscopy, rheology and quality characteristics of muffins. Journal of Texture Studies. 2011;42(6):478-489.
- Reddy PM, Jabeen NM, Reddy KJ. Development of omega 3 enriched pizza base and evaluation of its quality characteristics. International Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences. 2017;6(3):22.
- Sabha A, Devaki CS, Suma F, Urooj A. Development of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) pizza base using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Process Technology. 2021;12:899.
- Singh KP, Mishra A, Mishra HN. Fuzzy analysis of sensory attributes of bread from millet-based composite flours. LWT -Food Science and Technology. 2012;48(2):276-282.
- Sood S, Komar A, Babu BK, Gaur VS, Pandey D, Kant L, Pattnayak A. Gene discovery and advances in finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn): Genomics: An important nutri-cereal of the future. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7(4):1634.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
