Scinovex

Research article · 2023 · Full text

International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research

Quantitative determination of heavy metals in water using ICP-MS

Osama I. AbdallahMuhammad Khalid Bashir

Volume 5(1) · Pages 115–116 · DOI: 10.33545/26646781.2023.v5.i1b.192 ↗

Research areasAnalytical chemistry methods development

↓ Read full-text PDF7 citations

Abstract

Author-written

This research article investigates the application of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the quantitative determination of heavy metals in water samples. The study focuses on optimizing sample preparation techniques, assessing the analytical performance of ICP-MS, and evaluating its effectiveness in detecting trace levels of heavy metals such as lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (As). Our results demonstrate the high sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of ICP-MS, making it a reliable tool for environmental monitoring and ensuring water quality.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Heavy metals are persistent pollutants in the environment that can seriously threaten ecosystems and human health. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Heavy metals are persistent pollutants in the environment that can seriously threaten ecosystems and human health.

      In the paper's own words

      “Heavy metals are persistent environmental pollutants that pose serious risks to human health and ecosystems.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Common analysis methods like AAS and ICP-OES are limited by their sensitivity and their ability to detect multiple elements simultaneously. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Common analysis methods like AAS and ICP-OES are limited by their sensitivity and their ability to detect multiple elements simultaneously.

      In the paper's own words

      “Traditional methods for heavy metal analysis, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), have limitations in sensitivity and multi-element detection capabilities.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • ICP-MS is considered an ideal technique for water analysis because it provides lower detection limits, a broader dynamic range, and the ability to analyze multiple elements at once. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      ICP-MS is considered an ideal technique for water analysis because it provides lower detection limits, a broader dynamic range, and the ability to analyze multiple elements at once.

      In the paper's own words

      “Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) offers several advantages, including lower detection limits, broader dynamic range, and simultaneous multi-element analysis, making it an ideal technique for this purpose.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to optimize ICP-MS to ensure the accurate and reliable measurement of heavy metals in water. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to optimize ICP-MS to ensure the accurate and reliable measurement of heavy metals in water.

      In the paper's own words

      “This study aims to optimize the use of ICP-MS for the accurate and reliable determination of heavy metals in water samples.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers collected water samples from tap water, lakes, and rivers. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers collected water samples from tap water, lakes, and rivers.

      In the paper's own words

      “Water samples were collected from various sources, including rivers, lakes, and tap water.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Materials And Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Sample preparation involved filtering through 0.45 µm membranes and using a microwave digestion system with nitric and hydrochloric acids to dissolve metal species. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Sample preparation involved filtering through 0.45 µm membranes and using a microwave digestion system with nitric and hydrochloric acids to dissolve metal species.

      In the paper's own words

      “Samples were filtered through 0.45 µm membrane filters to remove particulate matter. Acid digestion was performed using a mixture of nitric acid (HNO₃) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) in a microwave digestion system to ensure complete dissolution of the metal species.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Materials And Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The study used certified stock solutions diluted with 1% HNO₃ to create calibration standards for arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study used certified stock solutions diluted with 1% HNO₃ to create calibration standards for arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb).

      In the paper's own words

      “Calibration standards for Pb, Hg, Cd, and as were prepared from certified stock solutions by serial dilution with 1% HNO₃.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Materials And Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The detection limits were in the low parts per trillion (ppt) range: 1 ppt for Cd, 2 ppt for Hg, 3 ppt for As, and 5 ppt for Pb. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The detection limits were in the low parts per trillion (ppt) range: 1 ppt for Cd, 2 ppt for Hg, 3 ppt for As, and 5 ppt for Pb.

      In the paper's own words

      “Element | Detection Limit (ppt) Pb | 5 Hg | 2 Cd | 1 As | 3”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 1

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Calibration curves for all tested elements demonstrated excellent linearity (R² > 0.999) across a concentration range from 0.1 to 100 µg/L. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Calibration curves for all tested elements demonstrated excellent linearity (R² > 0.999) across a concentration range from 0.1 to 100 µg/L.

      In the paper's own words

      “The calibration curves for all elements showed excellent linearity (R² > 0.999) over the concentration range of 0.1 to 100 µg/L.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results And Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The method showed high precision with RSD values between 1.8% (Hg) and 2.5% (Cd), and high accuracy with recoveries ranging from 97% (Cd) to 102% (Hg). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The method showed high precision with RSD values between 1.8% (Hg) and 2.5% (Cd), and high accuracy with recoveries ranging from 97% (Cd) to 102% (Hg).

      In the paper's own words

      “Element | RSD (%) | Recovery (%) Pb | 2.1 | 98 Hg | 1.8 | 102 Cd | 2.5 | 97 As | 2.3 | 99”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 2

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Environmental samples showed the highest metal concentrations in River A (Pb: 1.5 µg/L, Hg: 0.3 µg/L, Cd: 0.1 µg/L, As: 2.0 µg/L) and the lowest in Tap Water C (Pb: 0.5 µg/L, Hg: 0.1 µg/L, Cd: 0.02 µg/L, As: 1.0 µg/L). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Environmental samples showed the highest metal concentrations in River A (Pb: 1.5 µg/L, Hg: 0.3 µg/L, Cd: 0.1 µg/L, As: 2.0 µg/L) and the lowest in Tap Water C (Pb: 0.5 µg/L, Hg: 0.1 µg/L, Cd: 0.02 µg/L, As: 1.0 µg/L).

      In the paper's own words

      “Sample Source | Pb (µg/L) | Hg (µg/L) | Cd (µg/L) | As (µg/L) River A | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 2.0 Lake B | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 1.5 Tap Water C | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 1.0”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 3

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that ICP-MS is a highly effective tool for the quantitative determination of heavy metals in water. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that ICP-MS is a highly effective tool for the quantitative determination of heavy metals in water.

      In the paper's own words

      “Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is a highly effective technique for the quantitative determination of heavy metals in water.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The authors suggest that future work should address matrix interferences and improve sample introduction techniques to expand the use of ICP-MS. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors suggest that future work should address matrix interferences and improve sample introduction techniques to expand the use of ICP-MS.

      In the paper's own words

      “Future research should focus on further improving sample introduction techniques and addressing challenges related to matrix interferences to enhance the applicability of ICP-MS in various environmental contexts.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Detection limits for heavy metals using ICP-MSTable 1Page 2Precision and accuracy of ICP-MS for heavy metalTable 2Page 2Concentrations of heavy metals in environmental waterTable 3Page 2
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Heavy metals are persistent environmental pollutants that pose serious risks to human health and ecosystems. Monitoring their concentrations in water is essential for environmental protection and public health safety. Traditional methods for heavy metal analysis, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), have limitations in sensitivity and multi-element detection capabilities. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) offers several advantages, including lower detection limits, broader dynamic range, and simultaneous multi-element analysis, making it an ideal technique for this purpose.

This study aims to optimize the use of ICP-MS for the accurate and reliable determination of heavy metals in water samples. Objective of paper The objective of this paper is to investigate the application and optimization of ICP-MS for the accurate and reliable quantitative determination of heavy metals in water samples.

Materials And Methods

Sample collection and preparation Water samples were collected from various sources, including rivers, lakes, and tap water. Samples were filtered through 0.45 µm membrane filters to remove particulate matter. Acid digestion was performed using a mixture of nitric acid (HNO₃) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) in a microwave digestion system to ensure complete dissolution of the metal species. Reagents and standards High-purity reagents and deionized water were used for all preparations.

Calibration standards for Pb, Hg, Cd, and as were prepared from certified stock solutions by serial dilution with 1% HNO₃. Internal standards (e.g., yttrium) were used to correct for matrix effects and instrumental drift. ICP-MS instrumentation An Agilent 7700x ICP-MS equipped with a Quadrupole mass spectrometer and a collision/reaction cell was used for the analysis. The instrument parameters were optimized for maximum sensitivity and minimal interference, including: IJACR 2023; 5(1): 115-116 Dr.

Osama Abdallah Department of Environmental Chemistry, University of Khartoum, Sudan Khalid Bashir Department of Environmental Chemistry, University of Khartoum, Sudan Dr. Osama Abdallah Department of Environmental Chemistry, University of Khartoum, Sudan https://www.chemistryjournals.net metals, with some samples exceeding the permissible limits set by environmental regulations.

Conclusion

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is a highly effective technique for the quantitative determination of heavy metals in water. The method offers superior sensitivity, precision, and accuracy, making it suitable for environmental monitoring and ensuring water quality. The optimization of sample preparation techniques and the analytical performance evaluation confirm the reliability of ICP-MS for detecting trace levels of heavy metals. Future research should focus on further improving sample introduction techniques and addressing challenges related to matrix interferences to enhance the applicability of ICP-MS in various environmental contexts.

Results And Discussion

Detection limits and sensitivity The detection limits for Pb, Hg, Cd, and as were found to be in the low parts per trillion (ppt) range, demonstrating the high sensitivity of ICP-MS. Table 1 summarizes the detection limits for each element. Table 1: Detection limits for heavy metals using ICP-MS Element Detection Limit (ppt) Pb 5 Hg 2 Cd 1 As 3 Linearity and calibration The calibration curves for all elements showed excellent linearity (R² > 0.999) over the concentration range of 0.1 to 100 µg/L. Figure 1 illustrates the calibration curves for Pb and As representative examples.

Table 1. Detection limits for heavy metals using ICP-MS
ElementDetection Limit (ppt)
Pb5
Hg2
Cd1
As3

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Detection limits for heavy metals using ICP-MS↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Detection limits for heavy metals using ICP-MS

Detection limits for heavy metals using ICP-MS

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Precision and accuracy The precision of ICP-MS, expressed as RSD, was better than 3% for all elements. Accuracy was confirmed by analyzing certified reference materials, with recoveries ranging from 95% to 105%, indicating the reliability of the method. Table 2 presents the precision and accuracy data for each element. Table 2: Precision and accuracy of ICP-MS for heavy metal analysis Element RSD (%) Recovery (%) Pb 2.1 98 Hg 1.8 102 Cd 2.5 97 As 2.3 99 Table 3: Concentrations of heavy metals in environmental water samples Sample Source Pb (µg/L) Hg (µg/L) Cd (µg/L) As (µg/L) River A 1.5 0.3 0.1 2.0 Lake B 0.8 0.2 0.05 1.5 Tap Water C 0.5 0.1 0.02 1.0 Application to environmental samples ICP-MS was applied to the analysis of water samples from various sources.

Table 3. Concentrations of heavy metals in environmental water
Sample SourcePb (µg/L)Hg (µg/L)Cd (µg/L)As (µg/L)
River A1.50.30.12.0
Lake B0.80.20.051.5
Tap Water C0.50.10.021.0

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Concentrations of heavy metals in environmental water↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Concentrations of heavy metals in environmental water

Concentrations of heavy metals in environmental water

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. Precision and accuracy of ICP-MS for heavy metal
ElementRSD (%)Recovery (%)
Pb2.198
Hg1.8102
Cd2.597
As2.399

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Precision and accuracy of ICP-MS for heavy metal↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Precision and accuracy of ICP-MS for heavy metal

Precision and accuracy of ICP-MS for heavy metal

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

The concentrations of heavy metals detected in these samples are summarized in Table 3. The

Results

highlight the presence of trace levels of heavy

References

8 in the original paper
  1. Feldmann J, Salaün P. Trace metal analysis with ICP- MS. Compr Anal Chem. 2012;59:285-302.
  2. Becker JS. Inorganic Mass Spectrometry: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons; c2007.
  3. Thomas R. Practical Guide to ICP-MS: A Tutorial for Beginners. CRC Press; c2013.
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 200.8: Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. EPA; c1994.
  5. May TW, Wiedmeyer RH. A Table of Polyatomic Interferences in ICP-MS. At Spectrosc. 1998;19(5):150- 5.
  6. Hieftje GM, Vickers TJ. Fundamental aspects of plasma-based spectrochemical techniques. Spectrochim Acta B AT Spectrosc. 2008;63(6):478-96.
  7. Larsen EH, Hansen M, Gammelgaard B. Speciation analysis of arsenic and selenium compounds by coupling of HPLC to ICP-MS. Trends Anal Chem. 1997;16(9):466-79.
  8. Montaser A, Editor. Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Wiley-VCH; c1998.  RF power: 1550 W  Nebulizer gas flow rate: 1.05 L/min  Collision gas (He) flow rate: 4.5 mL/min  Integration time: 0.1 s per isotope Analytical performance evaluation The analytical performance of ICP-MS was assessed in terms of detection limits, linearity, precision, and accuracy. Detection limits were determined as three times the standard deviation of the blank signal. Linearity was evaluated using calibration curves over a concentration range of 0.1 to 100 µg/L. Precision was expressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) of replicate measurements, and accuracy was verified using certified reference materials.

Cited by 7

From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex