Scinovex

Research article · 2024 · Full text

International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Evaluation on different hybrids of chilli (Capsicum annum L.) for growth, fruit yield and quality

B KeerthanaVijay BahadurSamir E. Topno

Volume 7(7) · Pages 198–201 · DOI: 10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i7c.1018 ↗

Research areasAgricultural Practices and Plant Genetics

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

In Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology, and Sciences (SHUATS) horticulture research farms hosted a field study to assess the quality, productivity, and growth of ten hybrid cultivars of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.).Finding the variety that performed the best in terms of agronomic features was the main goal.The most promising variety to cultivate was H8 (Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 Hybrid), which showed the highest growth, yield, and quality metrics of all the types assessed.H2 (Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali), on the other hand, had the lowest performance across these metrics.These results highlight the need of choosing the right variety to maximize production and quality in chilli agriculture since they indicate considerable diversity among hybrid chilli varieties.It is advised that more research be done to determine the fundamental causes of H8 (Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 Hybrid) 's higher performance.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Chilli is a high-value crop in India, valued for its nutritional content, including ascorbic acid, vitamins, and minerals, as well as its culinary importance. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Chilli is a high-value crop in India, valued for its nutritional content, including ascorbic acid, vitamins, and minerals, as well as its culinary importance.

      In the paper's own words

      “Because of its mild flavour and agreeable taste as well as its high ascorbic acid and other vitamin and mineral content, chilli has become a high-value crop in India and holds a special place among other vegetables in Indian cuisine.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Hybrid chilli varieties are advantageous in agriculture because they can offer higher yields, better disease resistance, and increased financial returns for farmers. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Hybrid chilli varieties are advantageous in agriculture because they can offer higher yields, better disease resistance, and increased financial returns for farmers.

      In the paper's own words

      “A number of factors make hybrid chilies useful in agriculture, including higher yields, resistance to disease, consistency, improved quality, adaptability, financial advantages, and efficient use of resources.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The primary objective of the study was to identify which hybrid chilli variety performed best regarding its agronomic features. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The primary objective of the study was to identify which hybrid chilli variety performed best regarding its agronomic features.

      In the paper's own words

      “Finding the variety that performed the best in terms of agronomic features was the main goal.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The field experiment was conducted at the Horticulture Research Farm of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Sciences, and Technology in Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The field experiment was conducted at the Horticulture Research Farm of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Sciences, and Technology in Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh.

      In the paper's own words

      “The Horticulture Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Sciences, and Technology was the site of the field experiment. Uttar Pradesh's Allahabad.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study evaluated ten different hybrid cultivars of Capsicum annuum L. to assess their growth, productivity, and quality. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study evaluated ten different hybrid cultivars of Capsicum annuum L. to assess their growth, productivity, and quality.

      In the paper's own words

      “hosted a field study to assess the quality, productivity, and growth of ten hybrid cultivars of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • At 90 days after transplanting (DAT), the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid had the maximum plant height (65.66 cm), while the F1 hybrid Sonali had the minimum (26.33 cm). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      At 90 days after transplanting (DAT), the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid had the maximum plant height (65.66 cm), while the F1 hybrid Sonali had the minimum (26.33 cm).

      In the paper's own words

      “The maximum plant height at 90 DAT (65.66cm) was recorded in the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid followed by F1 hybrid VNR – 305 Chilli (65.33cm). Plant height was found in minimum (26.33 cm) in the F1 hybrid Sonali.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • At 120 DAT, the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid produced the most branches (13.22), whereas the F1 hybrid Sonali produced the fewest (9.12). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      At 120 DAT, the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid produced the most branches (13.22), whereas the F1 hybrid Sonali produced the fewest (9.12).

      In the paper's own words

      “The maximum number of branches at 120 DAT (13.22) was recorded in the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid followed by Hot pepper Hana ts14 (11.85). The Minimum number of branches found in F1 hybrid Sonali (9.12).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The Naga chilli hybrid was the earliest to flower, requiring the minimum number of days (46.33) to first flowering. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The Naga chilli hybrid was the earliest to flower, requiring the minimum number of days (46.33) to first flowering.

      In the paper's own words

      “The hybrid Naga chilli (46.33) was found significantly superior in all the hybrids. The hybrid Naga chilli gives minimum days to first flowering”

      Page 2

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Hot pepper Hana ts14 produced the highest number of fruits per plant (52.85), while the Sonali hybrid produced the lowest (37.80). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Hot pepper Hana ts14 produced the highest number of fruits per plant (52.85), while the Sonali hybrid produced the lowest (37.80).

      In the paper's own words

      “Maximum number of fruits per plant are observed in Hot pepper Hana to 14 with 52.85 fruits per plant superior over rest of the hybrids, followed by Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid with 50.33 fruits per plant, while the minimum number of fruits per plant observed in hybrid in hybrid Sonali with 37.80 fruits per plant.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Number of branches per plant

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid achieved the highest fruit yield per plant (774.50 g), significantly outperforming the Sonali hybrid, which had the lowest yield (161.91 g). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid achieved the highest fruit yield per plant (774.50 g), significantly outperforming the Sonali hybrid, which had the lowest yield (161.91 g).

      In the paper's own words

      “Maximum fruit yield per plant are observed in Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid with 774.50gm fruits yield per plant superior over rest of the hybrids, followed by hybrid Hot pepper Hana ts14 with 751.30gm fruit yield per plant, while the minimum number of fruits yield per plant observed in hybrid in hybrid Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali with 161.91gm fruit yield per plant.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Number of branches per plant

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • In terms of area productivity, the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid yielded the most at 88.60 q/ha, compared to the lowest yield of 49.07 q/ha from the Sonali hybrid. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      In terms of area productivity, the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid yielded the most at 88.60 q/ha, compared to the lowest yield of 49.07 q/ha from the Sonali hybrid.

      In the paper's own words

      “Maximum fruit yield per hectare is observed in Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid with 88.60q/ha fruits yield per hectare superior over rest of the hybrids, followed by hybrid Hot pepper Hana ts14 with 87.73q/ha fruit yield per hectare, while the minimum number of fruits yield per plant observed in hybrid in hybrid Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali with 49.07q/ha fruit yield per hectare.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Number of branches per plant

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Economically, the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid (H8) was the most profitable with a cost-benefit ratio of 2.16 and gross returns of Rs. 481,920.00, while the Sonali hybrid (H2) was the least profitable with a ratio of 1.17. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Economically, the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid (H8) was the most profitable with a cost-benefit ratio of 2.16 and gross returns of Rs. 481,920.00, while the Sonali hybrid (H2) was the least profitable with a ratio of 1.17.

      In the paper's own words

      “In terms of economics maximum Gross Return Rs. 481920.00, Net Return Rs. and Cost Benefit Ratio 2.16 was recorded in Variety 8 (H8) (Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 Hybrid Followed by H6 (HYBRID HOT PEPPER) with Gross Return Rs. 455896.00, Net Return Rs. 361386.00 And Cost Benefit Ratio 2.05 And Minimum Gross Return Rs. 282344.00, Net Return Rs. 190034.00 and Cost Benefit Ratio 1.17 was recorded in H2 (CHILLI F1 HYBRID)”

      Page 3

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid showed the lowest disease incidence (30.9%), whereas the Sonali hybrid had the highest incidence (47.5%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid showed the lowest disease incidence (30.9%), whereas the Sonali hybrid had the highest incidence (47.5%).

      In the paper's own words

      “Incidence ranged from Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid (30.9%) to Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali (47.5%). Maximum incidences are observed in Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali with 47.5% superior over rest of the hybrids, followed by Hybrid eagle hot pepper with 42.6% incidence while the minimum incidence observed in hybrid Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 with 30.9%”

      Page 3

      Found in: Number of branches per plant

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid (H8) is the superior variety due to its outstanding growth, quality, and highest yield of 88.60 q/ha. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid (H8) is the superior variety due to its outstanding growth, quality, and highest yield of 88.60 q/ha.

      In the paper's own words

      “In the experiment evaluating eight varieties of chilli, Variety8, Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid (denoted as H8) demonstrated outstanding performance. It recorded the highest yield of 88.60q/ha, displaying superior growth and quality characteristics.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The authors suggest that further research is needed to understand the underlying reasons why the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid performed better than the other varieties. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors suggest that further research is needed to understand the underlying reasons why the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid performed better than the other varieties.

      In the paper's own words

      “It is advised that more research be done to determine the fundamental causes of H8 (Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 Hybrid) 's higher performance.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (chilli plants (Capsicum annum L.)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Performance Comparison of Chilli Hybrids
AI-generated conceptual illustration (chilli plants (Capsicum annum L.)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (chilli plants (Capsicum annum L.)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Performance Comparison of Chilli Hybrids

AI-generated conceptual illustration (chilli plants (Capsicum annum L.)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Fruit yield per plant (gm) and Fruit yield per hectare (q/ha): F1 Hybrid VNR-305 Chilli vs Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali vs Kanchi F1 hybrid vs F1 hybrid Chilli NS 1101 vs Hot pepper Hana (ts14)
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Fruit yield per plant (gm) and Fruit yield per hectare (q/ha): F1 Hybrid VNR-305 Chilli vs Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali vs Kanchi F1 hybrid vs F1 hybrid Chilli NS 1101 vs Hot pepper Hana (ts14)

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Seeds per fruit: F1 Hybrid VNR-305 Chilli vs Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali vs Kanchi F1 hybrid vs F1 hybrid Chilli NS 1101 vs Hot pepper Hana (ts14)
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Seeds per fruit: F1 Hybrid VNR-305 Chilli vs Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali vs Kanchi F1 hybrid vs F1 hybrid Chilli NS 1101 vs Hot pepper Hana (ts14)

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Details of hybrids usedTable 1Page 2Growth and earliness parameters of chilli hybridTable 2Page 3Yield and Quality Parameters of Chilli HybridsTable 3Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

With chromosomal number 2n-24, the chili (Capsicum annum L.) is one of the most prominent vegetables and spice crops in the Solanaceae family. Domesticated approximately 5000 BC, chilies are native to Tropical America. Because of its mild flavour and agreeable taste as well as its high ascorbic acid and other vitamin and mineral content, chilli has become a high-value crop in India and holds a special place among other vegetables in Indian cuisine. In addition to being farmed domestically, chillies are exported. About 33% of India's total spice exports come from the spice the business world, whilst about 16% of global trade involves chilies. The genus Capsicum contains five domesticated species: C. annum, C. frutescent, C. Chinese, C. pubescents, and C. baccatum. of these, C. annum is the most frequently farmed species worldwide, with approximately 400 distinct cultivars found all over the world. The world's hottest chilli, the Naga Jolokia, was brought to Europe by Christopher Columbus and other early explorers in the fifteenth century, and pepper cultivation quickly expanded over the globe. In the Indian town of Tezpur, boot jolokia is grown in the mountainous regions near Assam. Pickles, spices, condiments, sauces, and veggies are all grown in different varieties (https://armarknet.gov.in). Chilli is an annual or perennial herbaceous plant with branches. The lone blossoms have an off-white hue. Berries make up the fruit, which can be green, yellow, orange, or red depending on maturity. A number of factors make hybrid chilies useful in agriculture, including higher yields, resistance to disease, consistency, improved quality, adaptability, financial advantages, and efficient use of resources. In general, hybrid chilies contribute significantly to increased profitability, sustainability, and productivity in the field of chili cultivation. Farmers benefit from a number of advantages provided by hybrid chili cultivars, including increased agricultural output and financial rewards. Higher yield, disease resistance, consistency, superior quality, adaptability, early maturity, and financial benefits are a few of the main benefits. All things considered, the introduction of hybrid chili types can greatly increase the production and profitability of chili farming, improving farmers' quality of life.

Materials and Methods

The Horticulture Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Sciences, and Technology was the site of the field experiment. Uttar Pradesh's Allahabad. It is located at 25.870N latitude and 81.150E longitude, which is 78 meters above sea level. This area has a subtropical climate with frigid winters, intense summer heat waves, and moderate rainfall. Growth parameters such as plant height, number of branches per plant, days to flower initiation and days to 50% flowering, number of fruits per plant, fruit diameter, length, weight, fruits per plant, fruits per plot, and seeds per fruit were examined based on observations made at various stages of the growth period. Net profit, benefit-cost ratio, and disease infestation costs associated with cultivation of Severity and Incidence. Table 1 provides information on the hybrids that were used. At 30, 60, and 90 DAT stages, the height of five randomly chosen plants from each plot was measured in centimetres using a 100 cm scale from the base of the plant to the tip of the shoot. Five randomly chosen plants were counted and their numbers of branches per plant were averaged to indicate the number of principal branches per plant. The plants were then allowed to grow to maturity. At 30, 60, and 90 days after planting, the number of branches per plant was counted. Days to first flowering is the total number of days from the date of sowing to the date on which the plants begin to bloom or the date on which the plants begin to bloom throughout the entire plot. And days to 50% flowering.

Table 1. Details of hybrids used
Sl. No.NotationName of Hybrids
1.H1F1 hybrid VNR - 305 chilli
2.H2Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali
3.H3Kanchi F1 hybrid
4.H4F1 hybrid chilli NS 1101
5.H5Hot pepper Hana ts14
6.H6Hybrid hot pepper (SVHA 3131)
7.H7Hybrid Eagle hot pepper
8.H8Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid
9.H9Naga chilli
10.H10Pusa Jwala

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Details of hybrids used↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Details of hybrids used

Details of hybrids used

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

The maximum plant height at 90 DAT (65.66cm) was recorded in the Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid followed by F1 hybrid VNR -305 Chilli (65.33cm). Plant height was found in minimum (26.33 cm) in the F1 hybrid Sonali.

Number of branches per plant

The maximum number of branches at 90 DAT (

Average fruit length ranged from Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali (6.04cm) to Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid (12.76cm) with a mean of 9.63. Maximum average fruit length was observed in hybrid Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid with 12.76cm fruits and was superior to rest of the hybrids, followed by Kanchi F1 hybrid with 11.62cm, while the minimum average fruit length was observed in hybrid Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali with 6.04cm fruits. The hybrid Chilli NS 1791 DG F1 hybrid gives maximum average fruit length due to favourable conditions, and genetic makeup of the hybrid to have wide adaptability.

Fruit diameter

Average fruit diameter ranged from Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali (0.47cm) to Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid (0.60cm) with a mean of 0.523. Maximum average fruit diameter was observed in hybrid Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid with 0.60cm and was superior to rest of the hybrids, followed by Naga Chilli with 0.59cm, while the minimum average fruit diameter was observed in hybrid Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali with 0.47cm fruits. The hybrid Chilli NS 1791 DG F1 hybrid gives maximum average fruit length due to favourable conditions, and genetic makeup of the hybrid to have wide adaptability.

Number of fruits per plot

Number of fruits per plot

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 2. Growth and earliness parameters of chilli hybrid
Variety NotationHybridsPlant height(cm)——Number of branches—Days to first floweringDays to 50% flowering
30 DAT60DAT90DAT90DAT120DAT
H1F1 Hybrid VNR-305 Chilli39.6654.3365.339.6712.1960.6775.67
H2Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali8.6621.3326.337.409.1246.6760.67
H3Kanchi F1 hybrid37.3351.3362.6610.0712.1952.6767.67
H4F1 hybrid Chilli NS 11013449.3360.669.8511.705570
H5Hot pepper Hana (ts14)26.3342.6653.669.3711.8551.3366.33
H6Hybrid hot Pepper (svha3131)14.663343.339.5911.2647.3362.33
H7Hybrid Eagle hot pepper23.6629.3341.6610.3011.7056.3371.33
H8Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid41.3356.6665.6611.7113.2257.3376.33
H9Naga Chilli18.3326.3344.6610.5911.0846.3361.33
H10Pusa Jwala9.6639.6642.338.709.4847.6762.67
F TestNSSSSSSS
S.E(d)±1.812.332.460.760.831.031.03
CD (0.05)3.804.895.171.601.742.182.18
CV (%)9.7910.6010.699.412.411.87

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Growth and earliness parameters of chilli hybrid↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Growth and earliness parameters of chilli hybrid

Growth and earliness parameters of chilli hybrid

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 3. Yield and Quality Parameters of Chilli Hybrids
Variety NotationHybridsFruit length(cm)Fruit DiameterNo. of fruits per plantNo. of Fruits per PlotFruit yield per plant (gm)Fruit yield per hectare (q/ha)Seeds per fruitIncidence (%)Severity (%)
H1F1 Hybrid VNR-305 Chilli9.500.5238.13190.65459.8352.7367.6136.722.8
H2Chilli F1 hybrid Sonali6.040.4737.80189161.9149.0742.6447.536.2
H3Kanchi F1 hybrid11.620.5841.96209.84517.5360.0061.6337.624.8
H4F1 hybrid Chilli NS 110110.320.5943.81219.05503.6065.4059.3937.524.6
H5Hot pepper Hana (ts14)10.070.5852.85264.25751.3087.7376.9230.919.6
H6Hybrid hot Pepper (svha3131)11.240.5849.81249.05233.4071.1360.9239.929.6
H7Hybrid Eagle hot pepper10.870.5848.86244.3254.2077.0762.8442.631.1
H8Chilli NS 1701 DG F1 hybrid12.760.6050.33251.65774.5088.6071.9230.919.9

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Yield and Quality Parameters of Chilli Hybrids↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Yield and Quality Parameters of Chilli Hybrids

Yield and Quality Parameters of Chilli Hybrids

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

11 in the original paper
  1. Bharadwaj DN, Singh H, Yadav RK. Genetic variability and association of component characters for yield in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). 2007;7(1/2):72-74.
  2. Datta S, Jana JC. Stability of chilli genotypes for different seasons at terai zone of West Bengal. 2012;21(1):71-75.
  3. Kameshwari PL, Padma SSV, Venkataramana KT. Evaluation of chilli (Capsicum annum L.) varieties in high altitude and tribal zone of Andhra Pradesh. 2006;34(2):103105.
  4. Karak PK, Pariari A, Karak C. Varietal evaluation of chilli in the saline belt of West Bengal. 2015;11:86-89.
  5. Katheek Bharadwaza R, Prasad VM, Adi Narayana M, Narayana GS. Evaluation of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Attributes in Allahabad Agro-Climatic Conditions. 2018;7:773-776.
  6. Krishna CU, Madalageri MB, Patil MP, Mulgae R, Kotikal YK. Variability Studies in Green Chilli (Capsicum annum L.). 2007;20(1):(102-104).
  7. Munshi AD, Kumar BK, Sureja AK, Joshi S. Genetic variability, heritability, and genetic advance for growth, yield and quality traits in chilli. 2010;67(1):114-116.
  8. Prasad PB, Usha Nandhini DH, Arumugam T, Karthikeyan M. Growth and performance of different chilli genotypes for yield and yield attributing characters. 2019;8(4):210213.
  9. Sharma IJ, Samnotra RK, Kumar V, Dhotra B. Rainfed Research Substation for Sub-tropical Fruits, Raya, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu (J. &K.). 2014;9(2):192-195.
  10. Sha K, Madhavan S. Evaluation of Growth and Yield of Chilli (Capsicum Annuum. L) for the Coastal Region of Cuddalore District. 2016;1(1):252-253.
  11. Shirshat SS, Giritammannavar VA, Patil SJ. Analysis of Genetic Variability for Quantitative Traits in Chilli. 2006;20(1):29-32.