Scinovex

Research article · 2024 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development

Study of self-help group (SHG) on women empowerment in Bankura district of West Bengal, India

Jyotirmoy DeySanjay Kumar

Volume 7(5) · Pages 363–365 · DOI: 10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i5e.633 ↗

Research areasMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

This research paper explores the role of Self-Help Groups (SHGs) in empowering community members, enhancing their standard of living, and addressing the various challenges faced by both beneficiary and non-beneficiary members. Utilizing quantitative data from surveys conducted within the study area, the research analyzes factors such as financial inclusion, social empowerment, income generation, and access to healthcare. The findings indicate that SHGs significantly empower members through improved social awareness and financial access, with Likert scale scores averaging above 60 for these parameters. However, critical gaps in training, access to government schemes, and financial services are identified, underscoring areas needing strategic improvements. This study contributes to the understanding of SHGs' impacts and offers insights into targeted interventions that could enhance their effectiveness in community development and member empowerment.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Self-Help Groups (SHGs) are considered significant for empowering women and advancing socio-economic development in rural areas. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Self-Help Groups (SHGs) are considered significant for empowering women and advancing socio-economic development in rural areas.

      In the paper's own words

      “The significant role of Self-Help Groups (SHGs) in advancing socio-economic development and empowering women in rural settings forms the core of this research paper.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Prior research suggests that SHGs can democratize institutions for deprived societal sections, which improves social inclusion and empowerment for women. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Prior research suggests that SHGs can democratize institutions for deprived societal sections, which improves social inclusion and empowerment for women.

      In the paper's own words

      “For instance, research published in Management and Labour Studies notes that SHGs help democratize institutions that represent the deprived sections of society, significantly impacting women's social empowerment and inclusion (Rajagopal, 2020) [1].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • SHGs have been noted in previous studies as instruments for promoting financial inclusion and economic empowerment for rural women. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      SHGs have been noted in previous studies as instruments for promoting financial inclusion and economic empowerment for rural women.

      In the paper's own words

      “Moreover, a study highlighted by Poverty Action discusses how SHGs have been instrumental in promoting financial inclusion, thereby fostering economic empowerment among women in rural areas (Poverty Action, 2020) [2].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to investigate how SHGs impact social empowerment, financial inclusion, and the general quality of life for members in the Bankura district of West Bengal. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to investigate how SHGs impact social empowerment, financial inclusion, and the general quality of life for members in the Bankura district of West Bengal.

      In the paper's own words

      “Focusing on the district of Bankura, West Bengal, this study employs a rigorous multistage stratified random sampling method to investigate the impacts of SHGs on aspects such as financial inclusion, social empowerment, and overall improvements in the quality of life of their members.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The Bankura district in West Bengal was purposively selected for the study because of its extensive network of women's SHGs involved in livestock farming and fisheries. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The Bankura district in West Bengal was purposively selected for the study because of its extensive network of women's SHGs involved in livestock farming and fisheries.

      In the paper's own words

      “Initially, the district of Bankura in West Bengal was selected due to its extensive network of women's self-help groups actively engaged in enterprises such as fisheries and livestock farming.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Research Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The Bankura-I block was chosen from 22 available blocks due to its high density of SHGs across 137 villages. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The Bankura-I block was chosen from 22 available blocks due to its high density of SHGs across 137 villages.

      In the paper's own words

      “Bankura-I was selected from 22 available blocks for its high density of self-help groups; this block consists of 137 villages.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Research Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Approximately 5% of villages were randomly selected, including Nangalbera, Dhobagaon, Chingra, Bhikurdihi, and Baindhka, which together had 4,203 residents. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Approximately 5% of villages were randomly selected, including Nangalbera, Dhobagaon, Chingra, Bhikurdihi, and Baindhka, which together had 4,203 residents.

      In the paper's own words

      “The selection of villages was conducted by obtaining a comprehensive list from the block development office and randomly choosing approximately 5% of these villages, which included Baindhka, Bhikurdihi, Chingra, Dhobagaon, and Nangalbera, collectively housing 4203 residents.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Research Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The final sample consisted of 418 participants, selected by randomly choosing 10% of members from the selected SHGs. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The final sample consisted of 418 participants, selected by randomly choosing 10% of members from the selected SHGs.

      In the paper's own words

      “randomly selecting 10% of them, leading to a total of 418 participants.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Research Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Social empowerment was one of the highest-rated factors of empowerment, receiving a Likert scale score of 67.17. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Social empowerment was one of the highest-rated factors of empowerment, receiving a Likert scale score of 67.17.

      In the paper's own words

      “3 | Social Empowerment | 155 | 89 | 93 | 50 | 31 | 67.17”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 1

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Financial inclusion and access to credit were strongly perceived as empowering factors, with a Likert scale score of 62.50. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Financial inclusion and access to credit were strongly perceived as empowering factors, with a Likert scale score of 62.50.

      In the paper's own words

      “1 | Financial Inclusion and Access to Credit | 153 | 81 | 50 | 90 | 44 | 62.50”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 1

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Access to government schemes and services was the lowest-rated empowerment factor, scoring only 29.49 on the Likert scale. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Access to government schemes and services was the lowest-rated empowerment factor, scoring only 29.49 on the Likert scale.

      In the paper's own words

      “5 | Improved Access to Government Schemes and Services | 36 | 32 | 80 | 93 | 177 | 29.49”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 1

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Joining SHGs was associated with an increase in social awareness, which received a Likert scale score of 61.00. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Joining SHGs was associated with an increase in social awareness, which received a Likert scale score of 61.00.

      In the paper's own words

      “1 | Increase social awareness? | 120 | 100 | 90 | 60 | 48 | 61.00”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 2

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Members reported improved access to healthcare after joining SHGs, with a Likert scale score of 57.12. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Members reported improved access to healthcare after joining SHGs, with a Likert scale score of 57.12.

      In the paper's own words

      “2 | Increase access to healthcare? | 90 | 105 | 100 | 80 | 43 | 57.12”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 2

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The impact on starting new businesses using income from SHGs was low, scoring 35.35 on the Likert scale. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The impact on starting new businesses using income from SHGs was low, scoring 35.35 on the Likert scale.

      In the paper's own words

      “11 | Tried any business from income offered by SHGs? | 30 | 55 | 73 | 160 | 100 | 35.35”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 2

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The most significant problem reported by members was a lack of adequate training and education, cited by 38 participants. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The most significant problem reported by members was a lack of adequate training and education, cited by 38 participants.

      In the paper's own words

      “1 | Lack of Adequate Training and Education | 38 | I”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 3

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Insufficient access to credit was ranked as the second most pressing issue, cited by 35 participants. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Insufficient access to credit was ranked as the second most pressing issue, cited by 35 participants.

      In the paper's own words

      “2 | Insufficient Access to Credit | 35 | II”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 3

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • High interest rates on loans were ranked as the third most significant constraint, cited by 30 participants. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      High interest rates on loans were ranked as the third most significant constraint, cited by 30 participants.

      In the paper's own words

      “3 | High Interest Rates on Loans | 30 | III”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 3

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that while SHGs positively impact economic and societal empowerment, they must improve financial services, training, and access to government schemes to reach their full potential. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that while SHGs positively impact economic and societal empowerment, they must improve financial services, training, and access to government schemes to reach their full potential.

      In the paper's own words

      “These statistics collectively reveal that while SHGs contribute positively to societal and economic empowerment, they must address critical deficiencies in training, financial services, and scheme accessibility to fully realize their potential in community development.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Strongly Disagree: Financial Inclusion and... vs Income Generation and... vs Social Empowerment vs Skill Development and... vs Improved Access to...
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Strongly Disagree: Financial Inclusion and... vs Income Generation and... vs Social Empowerment vs Skill Development and... vs Improved Access to...

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Strongly Disagree: Increase social... vs Increase access to... vs Living standard change... vs Increase sellable... vs Household's average...
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Strongly Disagree: Increase social... vs Increase access to... vs Living standard change... vs Increase sellable... vs Household's average...

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Different Factors Empowering Members of SHGsTable 1Page 2Changes after joining SHGsTable 2Page 2Problems associated with the members of SHGsTable 3Page 2
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The significant role of Self-Help Groups (SHGs) in advancing socio-economic development and empowering women in rural settings forms the core of this research paper. Focusing on the district of Bankura, West Bengal, this study employs a rigorous multistage stratified random sampling method to investigate the impacts of SHGs on aspects such as financial inclusion, social empowerment, and overall improvements in the quality of life of their members. Empirical data gathered for this research suggests that SHGs have been effective in enhancing social and financial empowerment, corroborating the findings from several studies that illustrate the pivotal role these groups play in rural economies. For instance, research published in Management and Labour Studies notes that SHGs help democratize institutions that represent the deprived sections of society, significantly impacting women's social empowerment and inclusion (Rajagopal, 2020) [1] . Moreover, a study highlighted by Poverty Action discusses how SHGs have been instrumental in promoting financial inclusion, thereby fostering economic empowerment among women in rural areas (Poverty Action, 2020) [2] . Despite the successes, this research also identifies persistent challenges that limit the efficacy of SHGs, such as inadequate access to government schemes, which is also reflected in the broader literature. For example, a study on the social impact of SHGs on women's socio-economic and political opportunities discusses the need for better integration of SHGs with governmental programs to enhance their effectiveness (Sage Perspectives, 2020) [3] . The results also point to significant improvements in living standards among SHG members, including increased access to healthcare and social awareness. These findings align with global observations by the World Bank on SHGs under the NRLM program, which have notably improved financial and market access and health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic (World Bank, 2020) [4] . While SHGs have had a transformative impact on rural development and women's empowerment, the research underscores the need for targeted interventions to address the identified gaps. By integrating findings from established studies with new empirical data, this paper provides a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics and impacts of SHGs on community development.

Research Methodology

The research methodology employed a multistage stratified random sampling technique across five stages to ensure a representative and systematic selection of study participants. Initially, the district of Bankura in West Bengal was selected due to its extensive network of women's self-help groups actively engaged in enterprises such as fisheries and livestock farming. Bankura was chosen purposively from among 23 districts, with its rich presence of 190 gram panchayats and 137 villages. Subsequently, the block of www.extensionjournal.com Bankura-I was selected from 22 available blocks for its high density of self-help groups; this block consists of 137 villages. The selection of villages was conducted by obtaining a comprehensive list from the block development office and randomly choosing approximately 5% of these villages, which included Baindhka, Bhikurdihi, Chingra, Dhobagaon, and Nangalbera, collectively housing 4203 residents. Within Bankura-I, 10% of the self-help groups such as Maa Durga Mandali and Swami Vivekananda Sangh were randomly selected. Lastly, the respondents were chosen by preparing a complete list of members from these groups, with assistance from the gram Pradhan, and randomly selecting 10% of them, leading to a total of 418 participants. This structured selection process was pivotal in aligning with the research objectives, ensuring a thorough and balanced representation across the studied demographic.

Results

Results

factors empowering beneficiary members against the non-beneficiary members in the study area

factors empowering beneficiary members against the non-beneficiary members in the study area

The impact on the standard of living of beneficiary members of Self-Help Group (SHGs) in the study area

The impact on the standard of living of beneficiary members of Self-Help Group (SHGs) in the study area

The problems associated with the members (beneficiary & non-beneficiary) of SHG

The problems associated with the members (beneficiary & non-beneficiary) of SHG

Discussion

The tables provided offer insights into various aspects of Self-Help Groups (SHGs) and their impact on members' empowerment, standard of living, and challenges faced.

Conclusion

The statistical findings from the tables underscore the multifaceted impact of Self-Help Groups (SHGs) on their members, indicating both successes and areas for improvement. Notably, SHGs have significantly empowered members through social empowerment and financial inclusion, as reflected by Likert scale scores of 67.17 and 62.50 respectively. However, challenges persist, particularly in accessing government schemes and services, which received a notably lower score of 29.49, highlighting a critical gap. Furthermore, the problems table reveals pressing issues like inadequate training and limited credit access, ranked as the top challenges faced by members. These statistics collectively reveal that while SHGs contribute positively to societal and economic empowerment, they must address critical deficiencies in training, financial services, and scheme accessibility to fully realize their potential in community development.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Different Factors Empowering Members of SHGs
S. No.ParticularStrongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly DisagreeLikert Scale Score
1Financial Inclusion and Access to Credit1538150904462.50
2Income Generation and Livelihood Support5351200823250.66
3Social Empowerment1558993503167.17
4Skill Development and Training788892897150.78
5Improved Access to Government Schemes and Services3632809317729.49
6Health and Education Awareness3843215338944.50
7Market Linkages and Networking1437689733762.86
8Risk Mitigation and Emergency Support3179240353352.39
9Psychological Support and Personal Growth7392631434750.06
10Political Empowerment9144776913743.00

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Different Factors Empowering Members of SHGs↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Different Factors Empowering Members of SHGs

Different Factors Empowering Members of SHGs

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. Changes after joining SHGs
S. No.ParticularStrongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly DisagreeLikert Scale Score
1Increase social awareness?12010090604861.00
2Increase access to healthcare?90105100804357.12
3Living standard change after joining SHGs?80110105903356.82
4Increase sellable skills?7095110905352.33
5Household's average monthly income Increased?60851201005349.94
6Recognition in society?55801051106846.65
7Have savings for emergencies?5075931208043.72
8Increase mental well-being?4570881308541.63
9Increase financial stability?4065831409039.53
10Accessed formal bank loan/credit?3560781509537.44
11Tried any business from income offered by SHGs?30557316010035.35

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Changes after joining SHGs↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Changes after joining SHGs

Changes after joining SHGs

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 3. Problems associated with the members of SHGs
S. No.ConstraintsFrequencyRanking
1Lack of Adequate Training and Education38I
2Insufficient Access to Credit35II
3High Interest Rates on Loans30III
4Group Dynamics and Conflicts25IV
5Dependency Syndrome21V
6Mismanagement of Funds18VI
7Sustainability Issues14VII
8Others5VIII
9Limited Financial Literacy4IX
Total190

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Problems associated with the members of SHGs↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Problems associated with the members of SHGs

Problems associated with the members of SHGs

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

References

5 in the original paper
  1. Rajagopal N. Social impact of women SHGs: A study of NHGs of 'Kudumbashree' in Kerala. Manag Labour Stud [Internet]; c2020 [cited 2024 May 21]. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0258042X20 922116
  2. Poverty Action. Women's economic empowerment through financial inclusion [Internet]; c2020 [cited 2024 May 21]. Available from: https://povertyaction.org/sites/default/files/publications/WomensEconomic-Empowerment-Through-Financial-InclusionWeb.pdf
  3. Sage Perspectives. The social impact of self-help groups widen women's socio-economic and political opportunities [Internet]; c2020 [cited 2024 May 21]. Available from: https://perspectivesblog.sagepub.com/blog/research/thesocial-impact-of-self-help-groups-widen-womenssocio-economic-and-political-opportunities
  4. World Bank. Unleashing the power of women's collectives for rural development in the Indian state of Bihar [Internet]; c2020 [cited 2024 May 21]. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/12/10 /unleashing-the-power-of-womens-collectives-for-ruraldevelopment-in-the-indian-state-of-bihar
  5. Mondal T, Sarkhel J. An analysis of the problems faced by poor tribal women members in Self Help Groups (SHGs): A study of tribal inhabited rural areas from the district of Bankura, West-Bengal. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews. 2015 Mar1;5(3):179.