Comparative analysis of dairy husbandry knowledge and adoption levels among Andhra Pradesh dairy farmers through YouTube and WhatsApp

Introduction

The significance of agriculture and dairy farming in India's economic success has been well acknowledged, considering that the nation is largely agrarian. As a fact, its rural economy is inextricably linked with dairy farming, which is critical to our country's economy. Dairy industry is contributing significantly to the nation's rural economy and nutritional security. In terms of livestock, though India ranks first, with milch animals never having been considered a separate entity from agriculture but due to the restricted availability of resources to the farming community, predicted improvements in milk output per animal have yet to be achieved. The extent to which a dairy farmer's knowledge of several dairy husbandry practices such as breeding, feeding, health and animal management is latent impacts the success or failure of a dairy enterprise. The knowledge and adoption of dairy husbandry practices is influenced by the information sources. In recent years, the rise of digital communication platforms like YouTube and WhatsApp has fundamentally reshaped information dissemination strategies. Increased dissemination of contemporary technical practices is pivotal for fostering developmental strides, particularly in sectors such as agriculture and livestock. The instrumental role of digital media platforms (YouTube and WhatsApp) in facilitating the transmission of up-to-date knowledge cannot be overstated. The choice of YouTube and WhatsApp as focal points for this study stems from their widespread usage and accessibility among farmers in Andhra Pradesh. Recognizing the transformative potential of digital media in enhancing dairy husbandry practices, this research endeavors to conduct a comparative analysis of knowledge and adoption levels among dairy farmers through the utilization of YouTube and WhatsApp platforms to elucidate the potential of these digital media platforms in driving dairy development and enhancing livelihoods in Andhra Pradesh.

Methodology

A simple random sampling technique was employed to select participants for this study. Six villages were chosen at random from three districts in Andhra Pradesh: Visakhapatnam, Prakasam, and Chittoor. Within each village, a further random sample of twenty dairy farmers was selected. To assess the differential impact of information sources (YouTube vs. WhatsApp), these participants were subsequently divided into two equal-sized groups based on their primary platform for dairy-related information acquisition. One group comprised farmers who predominantly utilized WhatsApp for such purposes, while the other group consisted of those who primarily relied on YouTube. Consequently, the final sample comprised 120 participants: 60 farmers who predominantly utilized YouTube and 60 farmers who primarily relied on WhatsApp for dairy farming information. Data was collected using a standardized questionnaire, while subsequent analysis entailed the use of simple statistical methods to evaluate the collected data. Several factors may contribute to these discernible differences in knowledge acquisition levels between YouTube and WhatsApp. Firstly, YouTube's visual format allows for the presentation of instructional videos and tutorials, which may enhance comprehension and retention of information among viewers. Additionally, the extensive repository of content available on YouTube may offer a broader spectrum of animal husbandry topics and expertise, catering to diverse informational needs of farmers. Conversely, while WhatsApp facilitates real-time communication and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing, its textual nature may not always be conducive to conveying complex animal husbandry concepts effectively. Moreover, the decentralized nature of information sharing on WhatsApp may result in a lack of quality control and reliability, potentially limiting its efficacy as a knowledge dissemination tool. From Table 3 it was noticed that 13.33 per cent and 23.33 per cent of farmers had low adoption levels through YouTube and WhatsApp. Around 75 per cent and 66.67 per cent had medium adoption while 11.67 per cent and 10 per cent of farmers had high adoption levels through YouTube and WhatsApp. The mean scores of adoption through YouTube and WhatsApp as presented in Table 4 indicated that mean score of YouTube was significantly higher than that of WhatsApp. This was attributed to the fact that most of the respondents found the information disseminated through YouTube as brief, comprehendible and appealing than the content disseminated through WhatsApp. This disparity could be attributed to the richer media format on YouTube, allowing for detailed demonstrations and potentially fostering a stronger understanding of practices. Additionally, YouTube content might showcase success stories and create a sense of community around specific practices, further influencing adoption decisions. Therefore the adoption and knowledge levels of farmers regarding dairy husbandry practices through YouTube were significantly higher than that of WhatsApp.

Results and Discussion

Conclusion

In conclusion, the findings of this study underscore the significant role of digital media platforms, particularly YouTube and WhatsApp, in shaping knowledge acquisition and adoption levels among dairy farmers in Andhra Pradesh. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of considering media format and content richness in designing effective knowledge dissemination strategies for livestock extension programs. The findings of this study revealed a significant advantage for YouTube, with farmers who primarily utilized YouTube exhibiting demonstrably higher knowledge and adoption levels compared to their WhatsApp-reliant counterparts. The richer media format of YouTube, which allows for detailed demonstrations and showcases success stories, appears to have a stronger influence on farmers' adoption decisions compared to WhatsApp.

In light of these findings, policymakers, extension agencies, and other stakeholders should prioritize the development of multimedia content on platforms like YouTube to enhance the dissemination of dairy husbandry knowledge and promote the adoption of best practices among dairy farmers. Additionally, efforts should be made to leverage the strengths of WhatsApp, such as its real-time communication features, to complement existing knowledge dissemination channels and facilitate peer-to-peer learning within farming communities.

Overall, this comparative analysis provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of digital media platforms in enhancing knowledge and adoption levels among dairy farmers, ultimately contributing to the sustainability and resilience of the livestock sector in Andhra Pradesh.

References

1. Bhatt PM, Patel PP. Effect of mass media on dairy farmers regarding adoption behavior of animal husbandry practices. Gujarat Journal of Extension Education. 2011;22:73-75.
2. Cole S, Fernando AN. The value of advice: Evidence from mobile phone-based agricultural extension. Harvard Business School working paper# 13-047. 2012.
3. Divekar BS, Trivedi MM. Comparative Adoption Level of Improved Animal Husbandry Practices by Dairy Farmers of Kheda and Panchmahal Districts of Middle Gujarat, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2017;6(11):3018-3023.
4. Kinsey J. Five social media tools for the Extension toolbox. Journal of Extension. 2010;48(5):1-3.
5. Kumari S. Effectiveness of different communication media for transfer of animal husbandry technology [Doctoral dissertation]. LUVAS; 2011.
6. Jain L, Kumar H, Singla RK. Assessing Mobile Technology Usage for Knowledge Dissemination among Farmers in Punjab. Information Technology for Development. 2015;21(4):668-676. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2013.874325.
7. Mahantesha BN, Naika M, Kudari M, Maguluri SD, Sadhu DS, Sunagar S. Digital extension service: quick way to deliver agricultural information to the farmers. 2021:285-323. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-8214701.00006-9.
8. Shobha P, Sharma GRK, Sannanaik G, Triveni. Effectiveness of WhatsApp in Delivering Livestock Advisory Services in Andhra Pradesh. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology. 2023;41(6):52-56. doi: 10.9734/ajaees/2023/v41i61920.
9. Ramaraju GV, Anurag TS, Singh HK, Kumar S. ICT in Agriculture: Gaps and Way Forward. Information Technology in Developing Countries; A Newsletter. 2011;21(2).
10. Sandeep K, Singh SP, Rajender K. Effectiveness of different communication media for transfer of cotton production technology. Journal of Cotton Research and Development. 2005;19(1):120-123.
11. Thakur D, Chander M. Use of social media for livestock advisory services: The case of WhatsApp in Himachal Pradesh, India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2017;87(8).
12. Vidya P, Manivannan C, Sudeep Kumar NK. Effectiveness of an Educational Interactive Video-DVD on Dairy Health Management Practices in Terms of Knowledge Gain among Dairy Farmers. The Online Journal of Rural Research and Policy. 2010;5(7):1-17.