Scinovex

Research article · 2024 · Full text

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Emerging postharvest technologies to enhance the shelf-life of horticultural crops: An overview

Rachita PaulDipa SanyalAritra MalikTanmoy Sarkar

Volume 8(4) · Pages 49–54 · DOI: 10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i4a.907 ↗

Research areasPlant tissue culture and regeneration

↓ Read full-text PDF1 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The postharvest period often sees a decline in the quality and shelf life of fresh produce due to insufficient postharvest facilities. To preserve the nutritive value and safety of fresh produce, modern postharvest treatments, including active packaging, dipping, vacuum impregnation, conventional heating, pulsed electric field, high hydrostatic pressure, and cold plasma, as well as biocontrol methods, have been implemented in recent decades. Addressing product quality loss brought on the lengthy transportation of goods to far-off markets, the implementation of these approaches after harvesting is helpful. Emerging technologies such as image analysis, electronic noses, and near-infrared spectroscopy exemplify non-destructive, contactless methods for quality monitoring. These approaches offer numerous advantages over traditional, destructive procedures and play a crucial role in preserving quality, reducing losses, and minimizing waste in fresh produce. This review article consolidates distinctive studies on advancements in postharvest technology to address these concerns. The efficiency and benefits of a few non-destructive, contactless technologies for gauging the quality of fruits and vegetables will also be described, and they will be contrasted with more conventional approaches.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Postharvest technologies are critical for meeting the food needs of a growing population by reducing waste and improving the nutritional value of low-grade raw materials. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Postharvest technologies are critical for meeting the food needs of a growing population by reducing waste and improving the nutritional value of low-grade raw materials.

      In the paper's own words

      “The significance of postharvest technologies lies in their capacity to address the food requirements of a growing population by reducing avoidable losses, transforming low-grade raw commodities into more nutritional food items through proper processing and fortification, and converting a portion of food material intended for cattle feed into nutritive animal feed by processing and fortifying low-grade food, organic waste, and by-products.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Fresh produce is highly perishable and loses quality after harvest due to metabolic processes like ripening and senescence, as well as bacterial spoilage. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Fresh produce is highly perishable and loses quality after harvest due to metabolic processes like ripening and senescence, as well as bacterial spoilage.

      In the paper's own words

      “Harvested products, being highly perishable and metabolically active, undergo quality deterioration due to ripening and senescence processes often associated with the proliferation of spoilage bacteria and other undesirable occurrences.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The FAO estimates that 33% of total food produced for humans is lost to postharvest spoilage, with losses of 44% in developed countries and 40% in developing countries. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The FAO estimates that 33% of total food produced for humans is lost to postharvest spoilage, with losses of 44% in developed countries and 40% in developing countries.

      In the paper's own words

      “According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), an estimated 33% of the total food produced for human consumption is lost due to postharvest spoilage, with 44% occurring in industrialized (Developed) countries and 40% in developing countries (Gustavsson et al. 2022) [7].”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Fruits and vegetables experience approximately 22% loss and waste, the second-highest rate among food groups, trailing only roots, tubers, and oil-bearing crops. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Fruits and vegetables experience approximately 22% loss and waste, the second-highest rate among food groups, trailing only roots, tubers, and oil-bearing crops.

      In the paper's own words

      “Fruits and vegetables, ranked as the food group with the second-highest level of losses and waste (Approximately 22%), come second only to roots, tubers, and oil-bearing crops across all stages of the food supply chain”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  2. The question

    • The authors aim to consolidate research on advanced postharvest technologies and evaluate the efficiency of non-destructive, contactless quality monitoring methods compared to conventional ones. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The authors aim to consolidate research on advanced postharvest technologies and evaluate the efficiency of non-destructive, contactless quality monitoring methods compared to conventional ones.

      In the paper's own words

      “This review article consolidates distinctive studies on advancements in postharvest technology to address these concerns. The efficiency and benefits of a few non-destructive, contactless technologies for gauging the quality of fruits and vegetables will also be described, and they will be contrasted with more conventional approaches.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The review examines several modern treatments, including active packaging, dipping, vacuum impregnation, pulsed electric fields, high hydrostatic pressure, cold plasma, and biocontrol. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The review examines several modern treatments, including active packaging, dipping, vacuum impregnation, pulsed electric fields, high hydrostatic pressure, cold plasma, and biocontrol.

      In the paper's own words

      “modern postharvest treatments, including active packaging, dipping, vacuum impregnation, conventional heating, pulsed electric field, high hydrostatic pressure, and cold plasma, as well as biocontrol methods, have been implemented in recent decades.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Non-destructive quality monitoring is achieved through emerging technologies like near-infrared spectroscopy, electronic noses, and image analysis. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Non-destructive quality monitoring is achieved through emerging technologies like near-infrared spectroscopy, electronic noses, and image analysis.

      In the paper's own words

      “Emerging technologies such as image analysis, electronic noses, and near-infrared spectroscopy exemplify non-destructive, contactless methods for quality monitoring.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Pulsed electric field (PEF) technology is noted for producing safe food with minimal heat generation using high-intensity pulses lasting from seconds to milliseconds. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Pulsed electric field (PEF) technology is noted for producing safe food with minimal heat generation using high-intensity pulses lasting from seconds to milliseconds.

      In the paper's own words

      “Due to its potential to produce safe food with little heat generation through the use of s to ms-pulses of a high electric field of high intensity, pulsed electric field (PEF) technology has recently gained the most attention”

      Page 3

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) is primarily used to inactivate microbes and denature enzymes in horticultural products. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) is primarily used to inactivate microbes and denature enzymes in horticultural products.

      In the paper's own words

      “The primary applications of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) technology involve enzyme denaturation and the reduction or inactivation of microbes.”

      Page 3

      Found in: High hydrostatic pressure

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Non-thermal cold plasma is an effective alternative to conventional sanitation that preserves the antioxidant and nutritional attributes of produce. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Non-thermal cold plasma is an effective alternative to conventional sanitation that preserves the antioxidant and nutritional attributes of produce.

      In the paper's own words

      “The objective is to replace conventional sanitation methods while preserving the nutritional and antioxidant attributes of food products. Several academic studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of non-thermal plasma on various horticultural products”

      Page 3

      Found in: Cold plasma

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Dipping treatments using calcium (Ca) salts help prevent oxidative browning and off-flavors while improving the texture and storability of fresh-cut foods. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Dipping treatments using calcium (Ca) salts help prevent oxidative browning and off-flavors while improving the texture and storability of fresh-cut foods.

      In the paper's own words

      “Ca enrichment offers various benefits, including preventing browning caused by oxidation and the development of off flavors in fresh-cut foods. It also enhances texture, acceptability, and storability.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Dipping and vacuume impregnation

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Vacuum impregnation (VI) enables the precise introduction of materials into the pores of a food matrix by manipulating pressure gradients. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Vacuum impregnation (VI) enables the precise introduction of materials into the pores of a food matrix by manipulating pressure gradients.

      In the paper's own words

      “A method known as food vacuum impregnation (VI) (see Figure 3) allows manufacturers to intricately introduce, dissolve, or suspend materials into the void fraction (i.e., pores) of a food matrix.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Dipping and vacuume impregnation

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Active packaging for fruits and vegetables utilizes ethylene absorbers such as activated carbon, potassium permanganate, and activated clays or zeolites. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Active packaging for fruits and vegetables utilizes ethylene absorbers such as activated carbon, potassium permanganate, and activated clays or zeolites.

      In the paper's own words

      “Ethylene absorbers Potassium permanganate, activated carbon and activated clays/zeolites Fruits and vegetables”

      Page 4

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Moisture absorbers, including silica gel and poly(vinyl acetate) blankets, are used in the packaging of various foods, including fruits and vegetables. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Moisture absorbers, including silica gel and poly(vinyl acetate) blankets, are used in the packaging of various foods, including fruits and vegetables.

      In the paper's own words

      “Moisture absorbers Poly(vinyl acetate) blanket, activated clays and minerals and silica gel Fish, meats, poultry, snack foods, cereals, dried foods, sandwiches, fruits and vegetables”

      Page 4

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors recommend that manufacturers use edible active packaging, vacuum impregnation, and dipping to maintain freshness and nutritional value. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend that manufacturers use edible active packaging, vacuum impregnation, and dipping to maintain freshness and nutritional value.

      In the paper's own words

      “Manufacturers aiming to preserve freshness and enhance the nutritional content of fresh fruits and vegetables are encouraged to utilize technologies like dipping, vacuum impregnation, and edible active packaging.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The practical application of these technologies is limited by the need for cost analysis and the development of portable tools for field and industrial use. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The practical application of these technologies is limited by the need for cost analysis and the development of portable tools for field and industrial use.

      In the paper's own words

      “However, a cost analysis is essential to confirm their practical applicability. Portable tools suitable for field or industrial use are crucial for the implementation of these techniques.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Causes of postharvest losses along the supply chain. (Bourne, M. Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1977.)Figure 1Page 2Food losses and waste along the supply chain (Percentage for each food group)Figure 2Page 2Schematic representation of the vacuum impregnation device, the arrows point at each system elementFigure 3Page 4
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Postharvest technologies (PHT) encompass an interdisciplinary field of science and techniques applied to agricultural commodities after harvest. The primary objectives include preservation, conservation, quality control/enhancement, processing, packaging, storage, distribution, marketing, and utilization to fulfill the food and nutritional needs of consumers. This involves all treatments or processes from the moment of harvesting until the food product reaches the end consumer. The significance of postharvest technologies lies in their capacity to address the food requirements of a growing population by reducing avoidable losses, transforming low-grade raw commodities into more nutritional food items through proper processing and fortification, and converting a portion of food material intended for cattle feed into nutritive animal feed by processing and fortifying low-grade food, organic waste, and by-products. Abundant quantities of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants are present in fresh fruits and vegetables. Growing consumer awareness regarding these products' capacity to prevent various non-communicable diseases has led to an increased inclination toward their consumption. Traceability and the enhancement of safety, encompassing chemical, toxicological, and microbiological aspects, are vital considerations for all participants in the supply chain-from the farm to the consumer (Mahajan et al. 2014) [1] . The amalgamation of diverse physical and chemical attributes, including appearance, texture, flavor, and nutritional content, collectively influencing customer acceptability, is commonly referred to as food quality. Size, shape, color, gloss, hardness, texture, and taste are among the numerous exterior and interior characteristics utilized to assess the quality of fruits and vegetables. Harvested products, being highly perishable and metabolically active, undergo quality deterioration due to ripening and senescence processes often associated with the proliferation of spoilage bacteria and other undesirable occurrences. To preserve the quality and extend shelf life during storage, it is essential to regulate these processes (Barth et al. 2009; De Corato et al. 2020) [3,4] . Additionally, the growth of pathogens can be facilitated by high water activity and the availability of nutritional components within these matrices (Berger et al., 2010; Srisamran et al. 2022) [5,6] . The superior sensory and nutritional attributes of fruits and vegetables hold significant commercial value. Consequently, inadequate preservation techniques can negatively impact the entire supply chain, affecting growers and consumers alike, leading to substantial losses in nutritional and qualitative features. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), an estimated 33% of the total food produced for human consumption is lost due to postharvest spoilage, with 44% occurring in industrialized (Developed) countries and 40% in developing countries (Gustavsson et al. 2022) [7] .

Fruits and vegetables, ranked as the food group with the second-highest level of losses and waste (Approximately 22%), come second only to roots, tubers, and oil-bearing crops across all stages of the food supply chain, as illustrated in Figure 2, according to a recent report from the FAO. This high percentage can be attributed to the inherent perishability of fruits and vegetables. To uphold the nutritional content and safety of fresh produce, contemporary post-harvest technologies such as physical and chemical treatments (Including active packaging, dipping, vacuum impregnation, conventional heating, pulsed electric field, high hydrostatic pressure, and cold plasma) can be employed. The detailed processing mechanisms of these innovative technologies are elucidated step by step below [8] . This method has been applied to a wide variety of liquid, semi-solid, and solid foods, including juices, smoothies, and fresh fruit and vegetable products. The electric field intensity, treatment time, and frequency, polarity, or pulse shape are the PEF characteristics that must be tuned to achieve microbiological and enzymatic inactivation in fresh items.

Figure 2. Food losses and waste along the supply chain (Percentage for each food group)
Food losses and waste along the supply chain (Percentage for each food group)↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Food losses and waste along the supply chain (Percentage for each food group)

Food losses and waste along the supply chain (Percentage for each food group)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

High hydrostatic pressure

The primary applications of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) technology involve enzyme denaturation and the reduction or inactivation of microbes. Nevertheless, the impact of elevated pressure on plant cells mirrors its effects on microbial cellular structures, necessitating thorough exploration for optimizing treatments across diverse fresh systems. Numerous investigations suggest that HHP significantly affects microbial load. However, owing to the extensive range of product types, it also manifests specific and diverse impacts on protein functionality, encompassing enzymes and tissue structure (Rux et al. 2020) [9] . [10,11,12] , whole produce (Paciulli et [13,15,11,17] , and juice, indicating its effectiveness in enhancing diverse aspects of food safety.

Cold plasma

Cold plasma has become a widely adopted innovative technology in the management of microbial growth within the entire fruit and vegetable industry, both whole and minimally processed (Ahmadnia et al. 2021) [18] . The objective is to replace conventional sanitation methods while preserving the nutritional and antioxidant attributes of food products. Several academic studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of non-thermal plasma on various horticultural products (Table 1). In terms of quality standards and the prevention of microbial growth, plasma treatment has been successfully applied to numerous freshcut fruit-based products. The utilization of plasma-activated water (PAW) has gained increasing attention in recent years. Employing this approach allows producers to prevent cell deterioration caused by direct exposure to cold plasma, offering an excellent alternative to the traditional washing solution during the fresh-cut processing of various products. Up to now, applications of cold plasma and PAW washing have been reported for strawberries, kumquat fruit, green leafy vegetables (Ahmadnia et [18,19,20,21] , blueberries, fresh-cut apples, pears (Zhou et al., 2020) [27] , cantaloupe melons, mushrooms, tomatoes, kiwifruits, and red currants.

Dipping and vacuume impregnation

To sanitize, mitigate enzymatic browning, enhance texture, and fortify fresh-cut fruits and vegetables with nutrients (Such as vitamins, probiotics, minerals, organic acids, phenols, etc.), researchers are exploring and adopting innovative food processing technologies, including dipping and vacuum impregnation techniques. One of the primary advantages of these dipping procedures is the elimination of cellular exudates, which can adversely affect the postharvest quality of commodities. The dipping process involves optimizing variables such as soaking time, frequency, solute composition, temperature, and solution concentration based on the specific food product. Calcium (Ca) salts have been investigated in several studies as dipping treatments to extend the shelf life of items. Ca enrichment offers various benefits, including preventing browning caused by oxidation and the development of off flavors in fresh-cut foods. It also enhances texture, acceptability, and storability. A method known as food vacuum impregnation (VI) (see Figure 3) allows manufacturers to intricately introduce, dissolve, or suspend materials into the void fraction (i.e., pores) of a food matrix. The VI process involves two main steps: (1) reducing the pressure in the system (under vacuum) until mechanical equilibrium is reached, eliminating native gases and liquids, and expanding the product pores under pressure gradients;

Figure 3. Schematic representation of the vacuum impregnation device, the arrows point at each system element
Schematic representation of the vacuum impregnation device, the arrows point at each system element↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
Schematic representation of the vacuum impregnation device, the arrows point at each system element

Schematic representation of the vacuum impregnation device, the arrows point at each system element

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗

Active packaging

Active packaging is defined as packaging in which subsidiary constituents have been deliberately included in or on either the packaging material or the package headspace to enhance the performance of the package system.

Conclusion

This article provides an overview of the impact of state-ofthe-art postharvest techniques (Including active packaging, dipping, vacuum impregnation, pulsed electric field, high hydrostatic pressure, and cold plasma) and biocontrol methods on preserving the high nutritional value and safety of fresh produce post-harvest. Both physical methods (Such as microwaving, pulsed electric fields, high hydrostatic pressure, and cold plasma) and a biocontrol approach have proven successful in enhancing product safety and extending shelf life. Manufacturers aiming to preserve freshness and enhance the nutritional content of fresh fruits and vegetables are encouraged to utilize technologies like dipping, vacuum impregnation, and edible active packaging.

The incorporation of additional approaches, beyond those mentioned, can positively impact the reliability and overall quality of these products. The adoption of these technologies represents an innovation in the fruit and vegetable industry to meet consumer demand. However, a cost analysis is essential to confirm their practical applicability. Portable tools suitable for field or industrial use are crucial for the implementation of these techniques.

Ongoing research is focusing on exploring advanced technologies that not only extend shelf life but also enable continuous quality monitoring throughout the entire supply chain.

Figures and tables from the paper

Figure 1. Causes of postharvest losses along the supply chain. (Bourne, M. Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1977.)
Causes of postharvest losses along the supply chain. (Bourne, M. Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1977.)↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Causes of postharvest losses along the supply chain. (Bourne, M. Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1977.)

Causes of postharvest losses along the supply chain. (Bourne, M. Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1977.)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

References

26 in the original paper
  1. Mahajan PV, Caleb OJ, Singh Z, Watkins CB, Geyer M. Postharvest Treatments of Fresh Produce. Philos Trans R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014;372:201303-09.
  2. Brasil IM, Siddiqui MW. Postharvest Quality of Fruits and Vegetables: An Overview. In: Preharvest Modulation of Postharvest Fruit and Vegetable Quality. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018. p. 1-40.
  3. De Corato U. Improving the Shelf-Life and Quality of Fresh and Minimally-Processed Fruits and Vegetables for a Modern Food Industry: A Comprehensive Critical Review from the Traditional Technologies into the Most Promising Advancements. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60:940-975.
  4. Berger CN, Sodha SV, Shaw RK, Griffin PM, Pink D, Hand P, et al. Fresh Fruit and Vegetables as Vehicles for the Transmission of Human Pathogens: Fresh Produce as Vehicles for Transmission of Human Pathogens. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:2385-2397.
  5. Srisamran J, Atwill ER, Chuanchuen R, Jeamsripong S. Detection and Analysis of Indicator and Pathogenic Bacteria in Conventional and Organic Fruits and Vegetables Sold in Retail Markets. Food Qual Saf. 2022;6:13.
  6. Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U. The Methodology of the FAO Study: "Global Food Losses and Food Waste-Extent, Causes and Prevention"- FAO. Available from: https://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:944159/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  7. Vanga SK, Wang J, Jayaram S, Raghavan V. Effects of Pulsed Electric Fields and Ultrasound Processing on Proteins and Enzymes: A Review. Processes. 2021;9:722.
  8. Rux G, Gelewsky R, Schlüter O, Herppich WB. High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatment Effects on Selected Tissue Properties of Fresh Horticultural Products. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2020;61:102326.
  9. Ramos-Parra PA, García-Salinas C, Rodríguez-López CE, García N, García-Rivas G, Hernández-Brenes C, et al. High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatments Trigger de Novo Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Papaya Fruit (Carica papaya Cv. Maradol). Food Chem. 2019;277:362-372.
  10. Hu X, Ma T, Ao L, Kang H, Hu X, Song Y, et al. Effect of High Hydrostatic Pressure Processing on Textural Properties and Microstructural Characterization of Fresh-cut Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo). J Food Process Eng. 2020;43:e13379.
  11. Kundukulangara P S, Kallahalli Boregowda S, Suseela S, Jaganath B. A Comparative Study on the Textural and Nutritional Profile of High Pressure and Minimally Processed Pineapple. J Food Sci Technol. 2021;58:3734-3742.
  12. Paciulli M, Rinaldi M, Rodolfi M, Ganino T, Morbarigazzi M, Chiavaro E. Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Physico-Chemical and Structural Properties of Two Pumpkin Species. Food Chem. 2019;274:281-290.
  13. Paciulli M, Medina Meza IG, Rinaldi M, Ganino T, Pugliese A, Rodolfi M, et al. Improved Physicochemical and Structural Properties of Blueberries by High Hydrostatic Pressure Processing. Foods. 2019;8:272.
  14. Paciulli M, Ganino T, Meza IGM, Rinaldi M, Rodolfi M, Morbarigazzi M, et al. High Pressure and Thermal Processing on the Quality of Zucchini Slices. Eur Food Res Technol. 2021;247:475-484.
  15. Hu X, Sun H, Yang X, Cui D, Wang Y, Zhuang J, et al. Potential Use of Atmospheric Cold Plasma for Postharvest Preservation of Blueberries. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2021;179:111564.
  16. Pokhrel PR, Boulet C, Yildiz S, Sablani S, Tang J, Barbosa-Cánovas GV. Effect of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Microbial Inactivation and Quality Changes in Carrot-Orange Juice Blends at Varying PH. LWT. 2022;159:113219.
  17. Ahmadnia M, Sadeghi M, Abbaszadeh R, Ghomi Marzdashti HR. Decontamination of Whole Strawberry via Dielectric Barrier Discharge Cold Plasma and Effects on Quality Attributes. J Food Process Preserv. 2021;45:15019.
  18. Rana S, Mehta D, Bansal V, Shivhare US, Yadav SK. Atmospheric Cold Plasma (ACP) Treatment Improved in-Package Shelf-Life of Strawberry Fruit. J Food Sci Technol. 2020;57:102-112.
  19. Giannoglou M, Stergiou P, Dimitrakellis P, Gogolides E, Stoforos NG, Katsaros G. Effect of Cold Atmospheric Plasma Processing on Quality and ShelfLife of Ready-to-Eat Rocket Leafy Salad. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2020;66:102502.
  20. Silvetti T, Pedroni M, Brasca M, Vassallo E, Cocetta G, Ferrante A, et al. Assessment of Possible Application of an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet for Shelf Life Extension of Fresh-Cut Salad. Foods. 2021;10:513.
  21. Sudarsan A, Keener K. Inactivation of Spoilage Organisms on Baby Spinach Leaves Using High Voltage Atmospheric Cold Plasma (HVACP) and Assessment of Quality. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2022;79:103023.
  22. Segura-Ponce LA, Reyes JE, Troncoso-Contreras G, Valenzuela-Tapia G. Effect of Low-Pressure Cold Plasma (LPCP) on the Wettability and the Inactivation of Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua on Fresh-Cut Apple (Granny Smith) Skin. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018;11:1075-86.
  23. Zhou R, Zhou R, Mai-Prochnow A, Zhang X, Xian Y, Cullen PJ, et al. Surface Plasma Discharges for the Preservation of Fresh-Cut Apples: Microbial Inactivation and Quality Attributes. J Phys Appl Phys. 2020;53:174003.
  24. Segura-Ponce LA, Reyes JE, Troncoso-Contreras G, Valenzuela-Tapia G. Effect of Low-Pressure Cold Plasma (LPCP) on the Wettability and the Inactivation of Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua on Fresh-Cut Apple (Granny Smith) Skin. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018;11:1075-86.
  25. Segura-Ponce LA, Reyes JE, Troncoso-Contreras G, Valenzuela-Tapia G. Effect of Low-Pressure Cold Plasma (LPCP) on the Wettability and the Inactivation of Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua on Fresh-Cut Apple (Granny Smith) Skin. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018;11:1075-86.
  26. Zhou R, Zhou R, Mai-Prochnow A, Zhang X, Xian Y, Cullen PJ, et al. Surface Plasma Discharges for the Preservation of Fresh-Cut Apples: Microbial Inactivation and Quality Attributes. J Phys Appl Phys. 2020;53:174003.

Cited by 1

From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex

  • Fresh Futures: Cutting‐Edge Eco‐Friendly Coating Techniques for Fruits ↗

    Esraa E. Ammar, Xiaobo Zou, Soumya Bikash Ghosh, Helen N. Onyeaka, Sohaila A. Elmasry, Aml M. Alkeay et al. · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation · 2025

    Rising environmental concerns have forced many industries to seek more environmentally friendly processing methods and safer material alternatives. This review explores eco‐friendly coating techniques for extending the shelf life of fruits, aiming at reducing environmental stressors and improving ecological sustainability. The paper evaluates traditional and innovative methods, including active and passive altered environments, edible coatings, 3D food printing, and nanotechnology.…

    ❝ 27PDF