Research article · 2024 · Full text
International Journal of Statistics and Applied MathematicsStudent’s perception on implementation of new education policy-2020: A statistical view
Volume 9(2) · Pages 108–112 · DOI: 10.22271/maths.2024.v9.i2b.1687 ↗
Research areasGlobal Educational Reforms and InequalitiesIdeological and Political EducationEducation and Learning Interventions
Abstract
Author-writtenIn this paper, we have considered a wide range of factors of New Education policy (NEP) 2020 and discussed the pros and cons of it according to the view of the students who are at present under this policy. The questionnaire is prepared to pass them proper information about the factors of NEP and to get the opinion from them. A detail statistical analysis on their view is given using SPSS software. The pictorial representations and hypothetical analysis gave a clear idea about it.
Summary
Source-checkedPlain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.
Why it matters
- The National Education Policy (NEP) is a Government of India initiative designed to promote education across all levels, from elementary school to college, in both urban and rural areas. View evidence ↗
- NEP 2020 aims to develop students' social, creative, and intellectual skills through a multidisciplinary curriculum that allows for the exploration of various subjects. View evidence ↗
- Potential drawbacks of the policy include a longer four-year requirement for graduation and higher studies, which may lead some students to leave their courses midway. View evidence ↗
The question
- The study aims to examine the pros and cons of the New Education Policy (NEP) 2020 from the perspective of students currently enrolled under the policy. View evidence ↗
What they did
- The researchers used a Google Form online survey to collect data from 205 first-year undergraduate and postgraduate students in Arts, Science, and Commerce who were part of the first batch under NEP 2020. View evidence ↗
- Data analysis was performed using SPSS software, employing descriptive statistics and Chi-Square tests. View evidence ↗
What they found
- 57.1% of students agreed that a common entrance exam like CUET would reduce the stress associated with taking multiple competitive examinations. View evidence ↗
- 70% of students expressed that they are comfortable with NEP 2020 at the first-year level of their courses. View evidence ↗
- 80% of students reported satisfaction with the teaching of Skill Enhancement Courses (SEC) and Vocational Skill Courses (VSC). View evidence ↗
- 80% of students believe that the introduction of more subjects under the new policy may lead to confusion. View evidence ↗
- 84% of students believe that a four-year honors degree will provide an advantage when seeking admission to higher education abroad. View evidence ↗
- Statistical analysis showed a significant association (p = 0.036) between a student's academic stream and their satisfaction with the teaching of Major and Minor subjects. View evidence ↗
What it means
- The authors state that many colleges lack the necessary infrastructural facilities, particularly laboratory orientation for skill-based subjects, which must be improved for the policy to be properly implemented. View evidence ↗
Visual summary
2 visualsIllustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.
Percent: Agreed vs Disagreed vs Strongly agreed vs Strongly disagreed
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.
View source evidence ↗
Percent: Arts vs Commerce vs Science
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.
View source evidence ↗Figures & tables
From the original paper
Table 2
Table 1
Table 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3Introduction
The National Education Policy (NEP) is formulated by the Government of India to promote education amongst India's people. The policy covers elementary education to colleges in both rural and urban India. The first NEP was introduced by the Government of India in 1968, the second in 1986, and the third after thirty-four long years in 2020. The new policy replaces the previous NEP, 1986. According to the policy makers, NEP 2020 emphasizes the development of student's intellectual, creative, and social skills. The multidisciplinary nature of the curriculum would encourage students to explore a range of subjects. Students will have the flexibility to pick subjects across different streams as per their interests and career goals. This would break the rigid walls of subject-stream limitations and encourage cross-disciplinary learning. NEP places a strong emphasis on vocational education and aims to integrate skill development programs within the curriculum to provide students with practical skills which would be helpful for their employment. NEP recognizes the integration of technology in education and promotes innovative teaching methods using digital platform. To cultivate a strong research culture in higher education institutions, it proposes to set up a National Research Foundation. NEP encourages collaborations with foreign institutions. This will allow students to have access to global platforms for learning, exchange programs, internships, which can immensely add to their educational experience and global outlook. There are also some drawbacks of this policy. Students willing to complete their graduation and to pursue higher studies have to study for four years while one can easily complete his/ her diploma in two years and degree in three years according to NEP 2020. This might encourage students to leave the course midway. Also, the policy may face challenges in implementation, especially in terms of funding and infrastructure. The increased use of technology in the classroom may pose technical barriers for some students and teachers, especially in rural and remote areas. The policy's emphasis on private and community participation in education may lead to a lack of quality control and standardization. Vocational Education with Traditional Academic subjects may shift the focus of the students from the core subjects. Establishing foreign universities in India may bring disparity between students according to their affordability, not according to their level of intelligence.
Literature survey: NEP 2020 focuses on education for sustainable development and global citizenship (Aithal, 2019) [1] .
The policy signifies a huge milestone for India's education system, which will certainly make India an attractive destination for higher education world-wide (Sawant and Sankpal, 2021) [5] compared the previous NEP with present. Lukose and Sharma (2023) [4] studied the role of NEP 2020 on perspectives of different stakeholders for skill enhancement. Kumar (2022) [2] investigated that there was a critical need for the Technical and Vocational Training for economic development of India. Pathak (2020) [7] discussed that the new education policy had given importance to vocational education to boost the employability skills. In this paper we have considered the perspective of undergraduate and post graduate students who are in the first batch under this new policy. The questionnaires itself was an awareness drive for the students on different factors of NEP and was given them an opportunity to present their opinions on it.
Research Methodology
An online survey was conducted by using Google form to collect the primary data for this research purpose. Target respondents were under graduate and post graduate Arts, Science and Commerce first year students who are the first batch under NEP 2020. There were 205 students participated in this survey. SPSS software is used to analyses the data. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square test has been used to analysis the data. 81% students are satisfied by teaching of major and minor subjects in their colleges. Do you feel that the Academic Bank of Credit (ABC) which will store the academic credits earned by the students of higher education within the country promotes a student centric education system? 84% students feel that academic credit earned by students in their Academic Credit Bank (ABC) in higher education will promote the student centric education.
Results and Discussion
Do you feel that ABC will lead to the dilution of the degree and ignore the quality of education as student can earn credits by any online/offline courses approved by UGC to acquire the degree? 73% students feel that academic credit earned by students in their Academic Bank of Credit (ABC) by any online / offline courses approved by UGC will dilute the quality of education in future. Do you feel that allowing foreign universities to set campuses in India will enable world class education available locally? 90% students feel that students will be able to do higher education from foreign universities if foreign universities are allowed to set campus of India. Do you feel that establishing foreign universities in India will reduce the cost for the similar courses compared to travelling and staying in foreign country? 86% students feel that establishing foreign universities in India will reduce the cost for similar courses compared to travelling and staying in foreign country. Do you feel that establishing foreign universities in India will bring disparity between students according to their affordability, not according to their level of intelligence? 86% students feel that establishing foreign universities in India will bring disparity between students according to their affordability, not according to their level of intelligence.
Chi-square tests at 5% Level of Significance to test the association between various factors Chi-square Test 1: To test the null hypothesis
𝐇 𝟎𝟏 : There is no significant association between Stream of students and their comfort with New Education Policy 2020 in higher education.
Here, 𝑝 value= 0.014 which is less than 0.05. So, null hypothesis 𝐻 01 may be rejected at 5% level of significance and conclude that there is a significant association between stream of students and their comfort with New Education Policy 2020 in higher education at 5% level of significance.
Chi-square Test 2:
To test the null hypothesis 𝐇 𝟎𝟐 : There is no significant association between Stream of students and their familiarities with various subjects / papers under New Education Policy 2020 in higher education at 5% level of significance.
Here, 𝑝 value= 0.013 which is less than 0.05, so, null hypothesis 𝐻 02 may be rejected at 5% level of significance and conclude that there is a significant association between Stream of students and their familiarness with various subjects / papers under New Education Policy 2020 in higher education at 5% level of significance.
Chi-square Test 3: To test the null hypothesis
𝐇 𝟎𝟑 : There is no significant association between Stream of students and use of laboratory to teach skilled courses like Skilled Enhancement Courses (SEC) and Vocational Skilled Courses (VSC) in their colleges under New Education Policy 2020 in higher education at 5% level of significance.
Here, 𝑝 value = 0.000003 which is less than 0.05, so, null hypothesis 𝐻 03 may be rejected at 5% level of significance and conclude that there is a significant association between Stream of students and use of laboratory to teach skilled courses like Skilled Enhancement Courses (SEC) and Vocational Skilled Courses (VSC) in their colleges under New Education Policy 2020 in higher education at 5% level of significance.
Chi-square Test 4:
To test the null hypothesis 𝐇 𝟎𝟒 : There is no significant association between Stream of students and their satisfaction level by teaching of Major and Minor subjects in their colleges under New Education Policy 2020 in higher education at 5% level of significance.
Here, 𝑝 value= 0.036 which is less than 0.05, so, null hypothesis 𝐻 04 may be rejected at 5% level of significance and conclude that there is a significant association between Stream of students and their satisfaction level by teaching of Major and Minor subjects in their colleges under New Education Policy 2020 in higher education at 5% level of significance.
Conclusion
From the above analysis we can conclude certain things as follows Vocational Skill Course (VSC) in their colleges. 5. 74% students believe that introduction of Indian Knowledge System (IKS) in higher education will develop a sense of social accountability, compassion, and ethical decision-making in students. 6. There is a significant association between Stream of students and Their comfort level with the New Education Policy 2020 in higher education. Their familiarness with various subjects / papers. Using laboratory to teach skilled courses like Skilled Enhancement Courses (SEC) and Vocational Skilled Courses (VSC) in their colleges. Their satisfaction level by teaching major and minor subjects in their colleges under the New Education Policy 2020 in higher education at 5% level of significance.
So, we can have the overall conclusion that though students welcome the new changes through NEP-2020 and consider this as a gateway of opportunities for their future, but they are little confused to have many different subjects together. Also, there is a substantial number of colleges where skilled based subjects are not laboratory oriented. So, there is a lack of infrastructural facilities in many colleges which should be improved for proper implementation of new NEP.
Figures and tables from the paper
| — | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Agreed | 117 | 57.1 |
| Disagreed | 37 | 18.0 |
| Strongly agreed | 34 | 16.6 |
| Strongly disagreed | 17 | 8.3 |
| Total | 205 | 100.0 |
Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.
View original table image
| Stream | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Arts | 7 | 3.4 |
| Commerce | 112 | 54.6 |
| Science | 86 | 42.0 |
| Total | 205 | 100.0 |
Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.
View original table image
| — | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| No | 10 | 4.9 |
| Yes | 195 | 95.1 |
| Total | 205 | 100.0 |
Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.
View original table image
References
7 in the original paper- Aithal S. Analysis of Higher Education in Indian National Education Policy Proposal 2019 and Its Implementation Challenges. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters. 2019;3(2):1-35. SSRN: 3417517.
- Kumar S. Vocational education and skill enhancement in NEP 2020. International Journal of Creative Research Thought. 2022;10:5.
- Kurien A, Chadramana S. Impact of new education policy 2020 on higher education. In: Atma Nirbhar Bharat: A roadmap to self-reliant India; c2020 Nov.
- Lukose M, Sharma P. A Study of the Role of NEP2020: Skill Development of Students. International Journal of Teachers Education. 2023;9:1.
- Sawant RG, Sankpal UB. National Education Policy 2020 and Higher Education: A Brief Review. IJCRT, 2021;9:1.
- Naidu MV. The New Education Policy 2020 is set to be a landmark in India's history of education. Times of India Blog; c2020 Aug 8.
- Dhama K, Patel SK, Sharun K, Pathak M, Tiwari R, Yatoo MI, et al. SARS-CoV-2 jumping the species barrier: Zoonotic lessons from SARS, MERS and recent advances to combat this pandemic virus. Travel medicine and infectious disease. 2020 Sep 1;37:101830.