Scinovex

Research article · 2024 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development

Assessing habitat security among handloom enterprise households in Bankura district, West Bengal: A primary income source analysis

Arunima KonarMd. Hasrat Ali

Volume 7(2) · Pages 350–355 · DOI: 10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i2e.346 ↗

Research areasUrban and Rural Development ChallengesCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Habitat security, encompassing adequate clothing and shelter, is crucial for sustaining rural livelihoods, particularly among communities reliant on traditional crafts like handloom weaving in regions such as Bankura District, West Bengal, India. This study assesses habitat security among handloom enterprise households, focusing on clothing and housing components. Data collection utilized survey methods, incorporating primary and secondary data sources. Results reveal income group-wise expenditure patterns on clothing and housing, indicating a positive correlation between income and expenditure. Housing characteristics show prevalent brick walls and concrete floors, with significant proportions having separate kitchens and sanitary toilets. Access to basic amenities varies, with notable reliance on pond water and cow dung as fuel sources. Impediments include suboptimal kitchen and toilet facilities, highlighting the need for improved sanitation infrastructure. Policy implications underscore the importance of government schemes promoting sanitation and clean water access to enhance habitat security and overall well-being in handloom communities.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Habitat security, which includes having adequate shelter and clothing, is essential for maintaining the livelihoods of rural communities, especially those dependent on traditional handloom weaving in West Bengal's Bankura District. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Habitat security, which includes having adequate shelter and clothing, is essential for maintaining the livelihoods of rural communities, especially those dependent on traditional handloom weaving in West Bengal's Bankura District.

      In the paper's own words

      “Habitat security, encompassing adequate clothing and shelter, is crucial for sustaining rural livelihoods, particularly among communities reliant on traditional crafts like handloom weaving in regions such as Bankura District, West Bengal, India.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Ensuring habitat security is considered a cornerstone of human well-being because it provides the basic resources needed for a healthy and sustainable living environment. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Ensuring habitat security is considered a cornerstone of human well-being because it provides the basic resources needed for a healthy and sustainable living environment.

      In the paper's own words

      “Habitat security stands as a cornerstone of human well-being, encompassing the fundamental provisions of adequate clothing and shelter, along with the associated resources essential for maintaining a healthy and sustainable living environment.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to assess the level of habitat security among households in handloom enterprises, specifically focusing on their housing and clothing. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to assess the level of habitat security among households in handloom enterprises, specifically focusing on their housing and clothing.

      In the paper's own words

      “This study assesses habitat security among handloom enterprise households, focusing on clothing and housing components.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • Researchers used a survey method, conducting door-to-door interviews with household heads using a pre-tested survey schedule. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Researchers used a survey method, conducting door-to-door interviews with household heads using a pre-tested survey schedule.

      In the paper's own words

      “Data have been collected following the Survey Method.”

      Page 1

      “Final data collection has been made by personally interviewing and interrogating the head of the households by visiting door to door strictly with the help of pre-tested survey schedule in the study area.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Collection of data

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The study analyzed a total sample size of 50 handloom enterprise households. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study analyzed a total sample size of 50 handloom enterprise households.

      In the paper's own words

      “Total (n= 50)”

      Page 3

      Found in: Questionnaire used for this aspects of livelihood security are given below Habitat Security

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The analysis involved assigning binary values (1 for 'Yes' and 0 for 'No') to survey questions to calculate total security values for each household. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The analysis involved assigning binary values (1 for 'Yes' and 0 for 'No') to survey questions to calculate total security values for each household.

      In the paper's own words

      “At first, in each question, for the answer “Yes =1” or “No= 0” value is put up. Secondly, for each household and for each aspect of livelihood security, total value against the set of questions (individual value for each question is equal to either one or zero) is worked out.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Questionnaire used for this aspects of livelihood security are given below Habitat Security

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • There is a positive correlation between a household's income group and their total average expenditure, as well as their specific expenditure on clothing. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      There is a positive correlation between a household's income group and their total average expenditure, as well as their specific expenditure on clothing.

      In the paper's own words

      “Positive correspondence is observed between the income group size and the total average expenditure per household. A positive correspondence is observed between the income group size and the total average expenditure on clothing per household.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Housing

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • As income increases, the annual average expenditure on clothing rises, while the deficit amount needed to meet clothing requirements decreases. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      As income increases, the annual average expenditure on clothing rises, while the deficit amount needed to meet clothing requirements decreases.

      In the paper's own words

      “it is observed that annual average expenses per household on clothing has increased with the increase in the income size and deficit amount for fulfillment of the requirement of clothing obviously decreases with the increase in the income size.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Housing

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Regarding housing materials, 58% of households have brick walls, 54% have concrete floors, and 36% have concrete roofs. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Regarding housing materials, 58% of households have brick walls, 54% have concrete floors, and 36% have concrete roofs.

      In the paper's own words

      “A major percentage (58.00 percent) of the households has brick walls followed by mud (38.00 percent). A major percentage (54.00 percent) of the households has concrete floor followed by mud (46.00 percent). 36 percent of the households have concrete roof”

      Page 2

      Found in: Housing

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • While 68% of households have a separate kitchen and all (100%) have a toilet on the premises, only 62% of those toilets are sanitary, with 38% being local 'Kaccha' toilets. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      While 68% of households have a separate kitchen and all (100%) have a toilet on the premises, only 62% of those toilets are sanitary, with 38% being local 'Kaccha' toilets.

      In the paper's own words

      “It is seen that 68 percent of the households have a separate kitchen and 100 percent of the households have a toilet within its premises, out of which 62 percent is sanitary and 38 percent is local Kaccha.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Housing

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Drinking water is primarily sourced from tube wells (46%), taps (38%), and wells (18%), but the most common source for bathing and other activities is pond water (48%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Drinking water is primarily sourced from tube wells (46%), taps (38%), and wells (18%), but the most common source for bathing and other activities is pond water (48%).

      In the paper's own words

      “on an average, the source of drinking water for 46 percent of the households is tube well water, 38 percent from tap and 18 percent from well. As a whole, the sample households have the highest usage of water for bathing and other activities from pond water (48.00 percent)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Housing

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The primary fuel source for 44% of households is cow dung cake, followed by LPG at 36%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The primary fuel source for 44% of households is cow dung cake, followed by LPG at 36%.

      In the paper's own words

      “The nature of fuel for 44 percent of the households is cow dung cake, 36 percent from LPG, 14 percent from coal dust, 4 percent woods and 2 percent from leaves.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Housing

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Electricity is the sole source of power for all households in the sample. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Electricity is the sole source of power for all households in the sample.

      In the paper's own words

      “it is clearly understood that the main source of power in the households is electricity. None of the households have any other source of power.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Housing

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that policy interventions are necessary to improve clean water access, sanitation infrastructure, and general living conditions for handloom communities. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that policy interventions are necessary to improve clean water access, sanitation infrastructure, and general living conditions for handloom communities.

      In the paper's own words

      “It emphasizes the imperative for policy interventions to improve sanitation infrastructure, promote clean water access, and enhance living conditions in handloom communities.”

      Page 6

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 6 ↗
    • The authors recommend the larger-scale implementation of government schemes such as the Swachh Bharat Mission for sanitation and the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana for LPG distribution. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend the larger-scale implementation of government schemes such as the Swachh Bharat Mission for sanitation and the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana for LPG distribution.

      In the paper's own words

      “Government schemes like Swachh Bharat Mission need to be implemented at a larger scale. ... Government schemes like Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana need to be implemented at a larger scale to distribute LPG connections.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Impediments

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Total Annual average expenditure per... and Annual average deficit amount required per...: Group-1 (n= 11) vs Group-2 (n= 20) vs Group-3 (n= 19)
Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Total Annual average expenditure per... and Annual average deficit amount required per...: Group-1 (n= 11) vs Group-2 (n= 20) vs Group-3 (n= 19)

Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Income group-wise and Gender-wise Annual Average Expenditure of the Clothing Purchased by Sample Households of EnterpriseTable 1Page 3Income group-wise Annual Average Expenditure per Household on Clothing and Deficit Amount for Fulfillment of theTable 2Page 3Income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regardingTable 3Page 3income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regarding availability of facilities in the House (Kitchen, Toilet,Table 4Page 4Frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) on the basis of distance of the house from the important land mark in Bankura DistrictTable 5Page 4Income Group-wise Frequency Distribution of Sample Households of Enterprise -- Handloom (as Primary Source of Income) Regarding Sources of water and power and Nature of Fuel inTable 6Page 5
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Habitat security stands as a cornerstone of human wellbeing, encompassing the fundamental provisions of adequate clothing and shelter, along with the associated resources essential for maintaining a healthy and sustainable living environment. In the context of rural communities, particularly those reliant on traditional crafts such as handloom weaving, ensuring habitat security becomes an imperative for fostering resilient livelihoods. This is especially true in regions like Bankura District in West Bengal, India, where handloom emerges as a primary source of income for numerous households.

Collection of data

Data have been collected following the Survey Method. At first, a primary schedule has been prepared on the basis of existing literature concerned and a pilot survey has been made randomly by personally interrogating some members of the sample size in order to examine the module of the Habitat Security of livelihood schedule. On the basis of primary investigation, addition and alteration has been made in primary schedule and in this way, preparation of schedule was finalized. Final data collection has been made by personally interviewing and interrogating the head of the households by visiting door to door strictly with the help of pre-tested survey schedule in the study area. The secondary information has been obtained both from the village development and block development board. Informal interviews were carried out with the persons from the villages, gram Panchayet Samities and block offices on the way to gain their view and knowledge on different aspects of livelihood security.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods

Questionnaire used for this aspects of livelihood security are given below Habitat Security

It contains two parts such as clothing and housing. At first, in each question, for the answer "Yes =1" or "No= 0" value is put up. Secondly, for each household and for each aspect of livelihood security, total value against the set of questions (individual value for each question is equal to either one or zero) is worked out.

Results and Discussion

Habitat Security is defined as the access of individuals to adequate clothing, shelter and its related resources to ensure that they have a healthy and sanitary environment, protection from detrimental elements to enable safe and secure livelihoods. It has two components: A) Clothing B) Housing

Clothing

Clothing

Housing

The Table 3 indicates the income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise --handloom (as primary source of income) regarding the nature of the house including the type of wall, type of floor and type of roof, in Bankura District of West Bengal of INDIA (2015-16). A major percentage (58.00 percent) of the households has brick walls followed by mud (38.00 percent). A major percentage (54.00 percent) of the households has concrete floor followed by mud (46.00 percent). 36 percent of the households have concrete roof followed by tiles (18 percent), asbestos (16 percent), thatched (16 percent) and tin (14 percent). The Table .4 shows the income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise --handloom (as primary source of income) regarding availability of facilities in the house (kitchen, toilet, rooms., etc.) in Bankura District of West Bengal of INDIA (2015-16). It is seen that 68 percent of the households have a separate kitchen and 100 percent of the households have a toilet within its premises, out of which 62 percent is sanitary and 38 percent is local Kaccha. Average number of rooms per household is 2.80. The Table .5 shows the frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise --handloom (as primary source of income) on the basis of distance of the house from the important land mark (that is metal road, market, post office, bank and educational institution) in Bankura District of West Bengal of INDIA. Among the all-size classes, the maximum number (54.00 percent) of households is situated within the distance 1 km from the metal road. In case of the distance of the house from the market, maximum number households (56.00 percent) are situated in between greater than 5 km to 10 km distance from the market. Among the all-size classes, the maximum number (48.00 percent) of households is situated within the distance between greater than1 to 5 km from the post office. The maximum number (40 percent) of households is situated both in within the distance greater 1 km to 5 km and greater 5 km to 10 km from the bank. The maximum number (50 percent) of households is situated within the distance up to 1 km from the educational institution. The Table .6 shows the income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise --handloom (as primary source of income) regarding sources of water and power and nature of fuel in Bankura District of West Bengal of INDIA (2015-16). From the table, it is noticed that on an average, the source of drinking water for 46 percent of the households is tube well water, 38 percent from tap and 18 percent from well. As a whole, the sample households have the highest usage of water for bathing and other activities from pond water (48.00 percent), followed by tube well (36.00 percent), well (14.00 percent), river (8 percent) and tap (2 percent). The nature of fuel for 44 percent of the households is cow dung cake, 36 percent from LPG, 14 percent from coal dust, 4 percent woods and 2 percent from leaves. Here, it is clearly understood that the main source of power in the households is electricity. None of the households have any other source of power.

Table 3. Income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regarding
Income GroupNature of House———————————————
Type of wallType of floorType of roof
MudBrickBambooTinTotalConcreteMudMarbleTilesTotalThatchedAsbestosTinConcreteTilesTotal
Group-1 (n= 11)5 (45.45)5 (45.45)0 (0.00)1 (9.09)11 (100.00)5 (45.45)6 (54.55)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)11 (100.00)3 (27.27)2 (18.18)2 (18.18)3 (27.27)1 (9.09)11 (100.00)
Group-2 (n= 20)6 (30.00)13 (65.00)0 (0.00)1 (5.00)20 (100.00)12 (60.00)8 (40.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)20 (100.00)2 (10.00)4 (20.00)2 (10.00)6 (30.00)6 (30.00)20 (100.00)
Group-3 (n= 19)8 (42.11)11 (57.89)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)19 (100.00)10 (52.63)9 (47.37)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)19 (100.00)3 (15.79)2 (10.53)3 (15.79)9 (52.94)2 (47.37)19 (100.00)
Group-4 (n= 0)----------------
Group-5 (n= 0)----------------
Total (n= 50)19 (38.00)29 (58.00)0 (0.00)2 (4.00)50 (100.00)27 (54.00)23 (46.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)50 (100.00)8 (16.00)8 (16.00)7 (14.00)18 (36.00)9 (18.00)50 (100.00)

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regarding↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regarding

Income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regarding

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Impediments

About 32 percent of the households use balcony, verandah and corridor as their kitchen. About 38 percent of the households from the enterprisehandloom have local kaccha toilet within its premises. Most of the households prefer pond water from their bathing and other activities. www.extensionjournal.com

Majority of the households uses cow-dung cake as the nature of fuel.

Policy Implications: The people should be educated about the government schemes with100 percent household toilet and rural sanitation coverage. Government schemes like Swachh Bharat Mission need to be implemented at a larger scale. The people should be educated about ways to reduce the use of pond water and increase the use of tube well, tap or well water for their bating and other activities. This is because of the sources of water from tube well, tap or well is safer for health than that of river or pond. Government schemes like Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana need to be implemented at a larger scale to distribute LPG connections.

Conclusion

The study underscores the critical importance of habitat security, comprising adequate clothing and shelter, for fostering resilient livelihoods among rural communities, particularly those reliant on traditional crafts like handloom weaving. Through meticulous data collection methods, including surveys and interviews, the study provides insights into the clothing and housing conditions of households in Bankura District, West Bengal, India, where handloom serves as a primary income source. The findings reveal income group-wise patterns in clothing and housing expenditure, highlighting the need for tailored interventions to address disparities. While significant proportions of households have access to basic amenities such as separate kitchens and sanitary toilets, challenges remain, including suboptimal kitchen and toilet facilities, reliance on pond water, and fuel sources like cow dung. It emphasizes the imperative for policy interventions to improve sanitation infrastructure, promote clean water access, and enhance living conditions in handloom communities. Initiatives such as the Swachh Bharat Mission and Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana hold promise in addressing these challenges, necessitating broader implementation at scale to ensure comprehensive habitat security and improved well-being for rural households. By prioritizing habitat security, policymakers can contribute to the resilience and sustainability of livelihoods in Bankura District and similar regions, thereby fostering inclusive development and prosperity.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Income group-wise and Gender-wise Annual Average Expenditure of the Clothing Purchased by Sample Households of Enterprise
Income GroupAverage number of members per household—Average expenditure on clothing per household—Total Annual average clothing expenditure per household
MaleFemaleMaleFemale
Group-1 (n= 11)1.641.27810.23943.411,753.64
Group-2 (n= 20)2.151.60948.47928.331,876.80
Group-3 (n= 19)2.472.161,541.151,315.852,857.21
Group-4 (n= 0)-----
Group-5 (n= 0)-----
Total (n= 50)2.161.741,099.951,062.602,162.55

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Income group-wise and Gender-wise Annual Average Expenditure of the Clothing Purchased by Sample Households of Enterprise↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Income group-wise and Gender-wise Annual Average Expenditure of the Clothing Purchased by Sample Households of Enterprise

Income group-wise and Gender-wise Annual Average Expenditure of the Clothing Purchased by Sample Households of Enterprise

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 2. Income group-wise Annual Average Expenditure per Household on Clothing and Deficit Amount for Fulfillment of the
Income GroupTotal Annual average expenditure per household on clothingAnnual average deficit amount required per household
Group-1 (n= 11)1,753.641,590.22
Group-2 (n= 20)1,876.801,056.67
Group-3 (n= 19)2,857.21920.56
Group-4 (n= 0)--
Group-5 (n= 0)--
Total (n= 50)2,162.551,189.15

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Income group-wise Annual Average Expenditure per Household on Clothing and Deficit Amount for Fulfillment of the↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Income group-wise Annual Average Expenditure per Household on Clothing and Deficit Amount for Fulfillment of the

Income group-wise Annual Average Expenditure per Household on Clothing and Deficit Amount for Fulfillment of the

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 4. income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regarding availability of facilities in the House (Kitchen, Toilet,
Income GroupDoes the house have a separate kitchen——Does the house have a toilet within its premises———Number of rooms (Avg.)
YesNoTotalSanitaryLocal KacchaNoTotal
Group-1 (n= 11)5 (45.45)6 (54.55)11 (100.00)6 (54.55)5 (45.45)0 (0.00)11 (100.00)2.18
Group-2 (n= 20)15 (75.00)5 (25.00)20 (100.00)11 (55.00)9 (45.00)0 (0.00)20 (100.00)2.70
Group-3 (n= 19)14 (73.68)5 (26.32)19 (100.00)14 (73.68)5 (26.32)0 (0.00)19 (100.00)3.26
Group-4 (n= 0)--------
Group-5 (n= 0)--------
Total (n= 50)34 (68.00)16 (32.00)50 (100.00)31 (62.00)19 (38.00)0 (0.00)50 (100.00)2.80

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regarding availability of facilities in the House (Kitchen, Toilet,↗ Enlarge
Table 4
income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regarding availability of facilities in the House (Kitchen, Toilet,

income group-wise frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) regarding availability of facilities in the House (Kitchen, Toilet,

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Table 5. Frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) on the basis of distance of the house from the important land mark in Bankura District
Frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) on the basis of distance of the house from the important land mark in Bankura District↗ Enlarge
Table 5
Frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) on the basis of distance of the house from the important land mark in Bankura District

Frequency distribution of sample households of enterprise -- handloom (as primary source of income) on the basis of distance of the house from the important land mark in Bankura District

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Table 6. Income Group-wise Frequency Distribution of Sample Households of Enterprise -- Handloom (as Primary Source of Income) Regarding Sources of water and power and Nature of Fuel in
Income GroupSource of water———————————Nature of Fuel————————Source of Power—
DrinkingBathing and other activitieswoodleavesstrawCow-dung cakeCoal dustkeroseneelectricityLPGelectricityothers
TapTube wellWellRiverPondOthersTapTube wellWellRiverPondOthers
Group-1 (n= 11)4 (36.36)5 (45.45)2 (18.18)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)3 (27.27)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)8 (72.72)0 (0.00)2 (18.18)1 (9.09)0 (0.00)4 (36.36)2 (18.18)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)2 (18.18)11 (100.00)0 (0.00)
Group-2 (n= 20)8 (40.00)9 (45.00)3 (15.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)1 (5.00)6 (30.00)5 (25.00)0 (0.00)8 (40.33)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)10 (50.00)2 (10.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)8 (40.00)20 (100.00)0 (0.00)
Group-3 (n= 19)7 (36.84)9 (47.37)3 (15.78)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)9 (46.37)2 (10.53)0 (0.00)8 (42.11)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)8 (42.11)3 (15.79)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)8 (42.11)19 (100.00)0 (0.00)
Group-4 (n= 0)----------------------
Group-5 (n= 0)----------------------
Total (n= 50)19 (38.00)23 (46.00)8 (16.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)1 (2.00)18 (36.00)7 (14.00)4 (8.00)24 (48.00)0 (0.00)2 (4.00)1 (2.00)0 (0.00)22 (44.00)7 (14.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)18 (36.00)50 (100.00)0 (0.00)

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Income Group-wise Frequency Distribution of Sample Households of Enterprise -- Handloom (as Primary Source of Income) Regarding Sources of water and power and Nature of Fuel in↗ Enlarge
Table 6
Income Group-wise Frequency Distribution of Sample Households of Enterprise -- Handloom (as Primary Source of Income) Regarding Sources of water and power and Nature of Fuel in

Income Group-wise Frequency Distribution of Sample Households of Enterprise -- Handloom (as Primary Source of Income) Regarding Sources of water and power and Nature of Fuel in

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 5 ↗

References

10 in the original paper
  1. Dickie VA. Qualitative research: households, multiple livelihoods, and the informal economy: a study of American crafters. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1998;5(3):109-118.
  2. Directory of District, Sub division, Panchayat Samiti/ Block and Gram Panchayats in West Bengal, 2016
  3. Directorate of Census Operations West Bengal. District Census Handbook Bankura, 1991, Village and Town Directory, Census of India; c1991.
  4. Directorate of Census Operations West Bengal. District Census Handbook Bankura, 2001, Village and Town Directory, Census of India; c2001.
  5. Directorate of Census Operations West Bengal. District Census Handbook Bankura, 2016, Village and Town Directory, Census of India; 2016.
  6. Diwaker N, Ahamad T. Problems and challenges faced by unorganised sectors: an Indian perspective. New Man International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 2014;12(1):31-39.
  7. Mitra T. Socio-economic assessment and marketing constraints of the handloom units -a case study of Bishnupur Municipal Town, Bankura District (West Bengal). International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science Society and Culture. 2016;2(1):191-200.
  8. Murray C. Livelihoods research: some conceptual and methodological issues. In: Chronic Poverty Research Centre. Working paper no. 5; 2001.
  9. Nadh RR, Rao PV, Harsha Vardhan BM. Handloom market (need for market assessment, problems and marketing strategy). International Journal of Emerging Research in Management & Technology. 2013;2(5):611.
  10. National Statistical Commission (NSC), Govt. of India. Report of the committee on unorganised sector statistics; 2012.