Scinovex

Research article · 2022 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition

The perception of Information communication technologies (ICTs) and perceived organizational support among extension workers in North central Nigeria

Grace EmmanuelDalibu BakariBaraya Sunday Gideon

Volume 4(1) · Pages 56–60 · DOI: 10.33545/26646064.2022.v4.i1a.110 ↗

Research areasEducational Technology and Optimization

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The study assesses the perception of ICTs and perceived organizational support among extension workers in North central Nigeria. Data were collected through the use of a questionnaire to 291 respondents, simple random sampling method was employed. Mean, frequency, standard deviation, correlation coefficient, and Multi-linear regression were used for data analysis. Findings reveal a moderate level of ICTs training, high level of ICTs application and moderate level of Perceived organizational support. Based on result from the Bivariate correlation, the result revealed a positive and significant correlation between ICTs application (r=0.309) and job performance at P

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Information communication technologies (ICTs) consist of various tools and resources used for the creation, storage, and exchange of information. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Information communication technologies (ICTs) consist of various tools and resources used for the creation, storage, and exchange of information.

      In the paper's own words

      “ICT refers to as a diverse set of technological tools and resources used to transmit, store, create, share or exchange information.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • In agriculture, ICTs can improve the effectiveness of extension programs and help farmers access critical time-sensitive data like market prices and disease outbreaks. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      In agriculture, ICTs can improve the effectiveness of extension programs and help farmers access critical time-sensitive data like market prices and disease outbreaks.

      In the paper's own words

      “ICT has the potential to increase the capacity of farmers to meets demands through collective learning, sharing time-sensitive information such as market prices, disease outbreak, improving effectiveness of extension programs and structures”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Competent extension workers are vital for Nigerian agricultural development as they act as the primary link between farmers and government, research institutes, and policymakers. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Competent extension workers are vital for Nigerian agricultural development as they act as the primary link between farmers and government, research institutes, and policymakers.

      In the paper's own words

      “One underlying factor that keeps affecting agricultural development in Nigeria is availability and accessibility of competent extension workers. This is because they are the bridge between the farmers and research institutes, Government, policies makers and other key players in the sector.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Problem Statement

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to examine levels of ICT training, application, and organizational support, and to determine how these factors relate to and explain variances in extension workers' job performance. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to examine levels of ICT training, application, and organizational support, and to determine how these factors relate to and explain variances in extension workers' job performance.

      In the paper's own words

      “The following are the objectives of the study; 1. To examine the level of ICTs training, application and perceived organizational support 2. To determine the relationship between level of ICTs application (IVs) and job performances among the extension workers. 3. To identify the extent to which ICTs training, explain the variance in each dimension of job performance.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Problem Statement

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers used a random sampling method to select participants from a total population of 1,279 agricultural extension workers across four states in north central Nigeria. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers used a random sampling method to select participants from a total population of 1,279 agricultural extension workers across four states in north central Nigeria.

      In the paper's own words

      “For the purpose of this study, random sampling method was employed. The total population of agricultural extension workers (1,279) that was obtained in the four States of north central Nigeria will stand an equal chance to be drawn as the sample size.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Data were collected via questionnaires from a sample size of 291 respondents. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Data were collected via questionnaires from a sample size of 291 respondents.

      In the paper's own words

      “Data were collected through the use of a questionnaire to 291 respondents”

      Page 1

      “Total | 1,280 | 291”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 1

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The analysis employed mean, frequency, standard deviation, correlation coefficients, and multi-linear regression. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The analysis employed mean, frequency, standard deviation, correlation coefficients, and multi-linear regression.

      In the paper's own words

      “Mean, frequency, standard deviation, correlation coefficient, and Multi-linear regression were used for data analysis.”

      Page 1

      Found in: ICTs application profile

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The majority of respondents (66.7%) were found to have a moderate level of ICT training. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The majority of respondents (66.7%) were found to have a moderate level of ICT training.

      In the paper's own words

      “Out of the total number of 291 respondents, 1 (.3) were in low level, 194 (66.7) were in their moderate level and 96 (33.0) were in their high level. This implies that majority of the respondents were at the moderate level of ICTs training.”

      Page 2

      Found in: ICTs training Profiles

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Most respondents (61.9%) reported a high level of ICT application, with a mean score of 3.68. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Most respondents (61.9%) reported a high level of ICT application, with a mean score of 3.68.

      In the paper's own words

      “Based on the mean score of 3.68, and standard deviation of 0.88, as shown on Table 4.3, the descriptive analysis shows that, out of 291 respondents, 61.9% were of the perception that they were in their high level”

      Page 3

      Found in: ICTs application profile

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Perceived organizational support was most commonly rated as moderate (37.1%) by the respondents. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Perceived organizational support was most commonly rated as moderate (37.1%) by the respondents.

      In the paper's own words

      “The findings indicated that, 31.3% of the respondents were in their low level of perceived organizational support, 37.1% were in their moderate level while 31.6% were in their high level of perceived organizational support. This implies that most of them had moderate level of perceived organizational support at (37.1%).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Perceived organizational support profile

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • There is a significant positive correlation (r=0.309, P<0.01) between the application of ICTs and the job performance of extension workers. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      There is a significant positive correlation (r=0.309, P<0.01) between the application of ICTs and the job performance of extension workers.

      In the paper's own words

      “The result revealed that, there was a positive and significant correlation between ICTs application (r=0.309) and job performance of agricultural extension workers at P<0.01.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Relationship between ICTs application and job performances of the respondents:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Regarding the quantity of work, ICT training explained 37% of the variance, while work experience explained 58%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Regarding the quantity of work, ICT training explained 37% of the variance, while work experience explained 58%.

      In the paper's own words

      “The result revealed that, the R2 value of ICTs training was 0.37, thus implying that ICTs training explained 37% on Quantity of work of the respondents. The result also showed that the respondents characteristics in terms of work experiences was related to Quantity of work, with R2 value of 0.58, this shows that work experiences of respondents explained Quantity of work in terms of job performances with about 58%.”

      Page 3

      Found in: The ICTs explain the variances in job performance

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The quality of work was explained by perceived organizational support (48%) and ICT training (47%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The quality of work was explained by perceived organizational support (48%) and ICT training (47%).

      In the paper's own words

      “The result revealed the R2 value of ICTs training to be 0.47, this shows that ICTs training explained 47% on Quality of work of the respondents. The result also showed that perceived organizational support was related to Quality of work, with R2 value of 0.48 this shows that perceived organizational support explained Quality of work in terms of job performances with 48%.”

      Page 4

      Found in: The ICTs explain the variances in job performance

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The speed of work was explained by perceived organizational support (45%) and ICT training (43%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The speed of work was explained by perceived organizational support (45%) and ICT training (43%).

      In the paper's own words

      “The result revealed that, the R2 value of ICTs training was 0.43, thus implying that ICTs training explained 43% on speed of work. It was also indicated that perceived organizational support was related to Quality of work, with R2 value of 0.45 this shows that perceived organizational support explained Speed of work with about 45%.”

      Page 4

      Found in: The ICTs explain the variances in job performance

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that there is a clear link between ICT training, perceived organizational support, and the speed of work among agricultural extension workers. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that there is a clear link between ICT training, perceived organizational support, and the speed of work among agricultural extension workers.

      In the paper's own words

      “The results from the findings ascertained the link that existed between ICTs training, perceived organizational support and the speed of work of the agricultural extension workers.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Problem Statement

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Percentage: Low 1-2.33 vs Moderate 2.34-3.66 vs High 3.67-5.00
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Percentage: Low 1-2.33 vs Moderate 2.34-3.66 vs High 3.67-5.00

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 4 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Percentage: Low 1-2.33 vs Moderate 2.34-3.66 vs High 3.67-5.00
Replotted from Table 4 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 4 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Percentage: Low 1-2.33 vs Moderate 2.34-3.66 vs High 3.67-5.00

Replotted from Table 4 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Population and Sample Size of the RespondentsTable 1Page 2ICTs training ProfilesTable 2Page 2ICTs application profileTable 3Page 3Perceived organizational support (POS) profileTable 4Page 3The relationship between ICTs application and jobTable 5Page 3Multi-linear regression between independent variablesTable 6Page 4Multi-linear regression between independent variablesTable 7Page 4Multi-linear regression between independent variablesTable 8Page 4
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The world is said to be a global village due to the exploitation in information and communication technologies (ICT). ICT refers to as a diverse set of technological tools and resources used to transmit, store, create, share or exchange information. These technological tools and resources include computers, the internet (websites, blogs and emails), live broadcasting technologies (radio, television, Webcasting), recorded broadcasting technologies (podcasting, audio and video players and storage devices) and telephony (fixed or mobile, satellite, visio/video-conferencing, etc.) UNESCO (2017) [1] . It has become a game changer in boosting productivity and efficiency in different fields of knowledge especially Agriculture. Wolfert et al., (2017) [2] observed that technological advancement in the area of digital platforms such as e-commerce, agro-advisory apps, big data, computational power, and satellite systems like remote sensing, among others, quicken communication and information sharing among farmers in recent years. ICT has the potential to increase the capacity of farmers to meets demands through collective learning, sharing time-sensitive information such as market prices, disease outbreak, improving effectiveness of extension programs and structures, involving farmers in assessing their own needs, promoting brainstorming by multiple stakeholders, creating innovative technologies for development, promoting business and credibility (Mustapha et al., 2022) [3] . For ICT-based extension to be effective, both the general public and extension personnel have to be competent in using technology (Hamernik and Crosby, 2015) [4] . According to Vijayraghavan and Singh (2005) [5] development of requisite competencies amongst the extension workforce within extension organizations is directly linked to training of extension personnel. Furthermore, Madukwe (2006) [10] opined that the increased use of information and communication technologies in extension requires continuous training of personnel of extension service delivery in any country. Training constitutes a basic concept in human resource development. Training has to do with developing a particular skill to a desired level through instructions and practice. Therefore, in the context of this study ICT Training means the act of increasing the knowledge and skill of an extension agent about ICT.

Problem Statement

The rate at which ICT application is increasing in every sector of the world has triggered the development of variety of ICT applications in the Agriculture sector to aid effective and timely access to information by farmers, extension agents and other players within the sector. According to Anh et al., (2019) [6] , ICT Applications have the potential to identify and find solutions to some of the numerous problems faced in the field of Agriculture, which includes prolonged droughts, pest and diseases outbreaks, seasonality and spatial dispersions of farming; high transaction costs and information asymmetry. Employers-Employee' relationship is a critical factor that determines the conduciveness and harmony of a working environment. The manner employees interpret how an organization values them may be vital for determining their attitudes benefiting the organization (Baheshtifar and Zare 2012) [7] . One gauge of this relationship is expressed in Perceived Organizational Support (POS). POS is the degree to which employees perceives the organization cares about their well-being and values their contribution (Robbins et al., 2018) [8] . When workers sense support and compassion from association, they will then put forth an effort to help attain organization goals. A satisfied employee finds his/her job less stressful, regularly attends work, is committed to the organization, readily engages in prosocial behaviors, does not consider leaving his/her job, and likely to have improved job performance. One underlying factor that keeps affecting agricultural development in Nigeria is availability and accessibility of competent extension workers. This is because they are the bridge between the farmers and research institutes, Government, policies makers and other key players in the sector. In advanced food sufficient countries, agricultural extension is seen as the application of scientific research and new knowledge to agricultural practices through farmer education. The world and its environment are changing which implies that extension workers must also change in tandem with these developments by gaining requisite knowledge and skills on how to use modern ICTs. The need to train the extension workers on ICT cannot be over-stated. According to Yakubu et al., (2013) [9] , the benefits of ICT were not fully utilized due to poor training among others.

There is also the need to evaluate how the extension workers view the organization support available to them. This study intends to assess level ICT Training and Application and Perceived Organizational Support among extension workers in North Central States in Nigeria.

Methodology

For the purpose of this study, random sampling method was employed. The total population of agricultural extension workers (1,279)

Results and Discussion

Results and Discussion

ICTs training Profiles

This section presented and was able to discussed the levels of ICTs training profile. The constructs were measured on 5point Likert scale ranging from 1-5. In the study the mean level of 1 to 2.33 were considered low, 2.34 to 3.66 were regarded as moderate and whereas 3.67 to 5 were considered high. Of Agricultural extension workers in south central Nigeria had been determined using frequency and percentage. The results are presented on the Tables 2 below. The descriptive analysis on the ICTs training of agricultural extension workers on Table 4.2 showed that the total average mean score is 2.33 and average standard deviation of 0.477. Out of the total number of 291 respondents, 1 (.3) were in low level, 194 (66.7) were in their moderate level and 96 (33.0) were in their high level. This implies that majority of the respondents were at the moderate level of ICTs training. Therefore, they need more training to enable them obtained additional skills in order to achieve high level of training to efficiently carry out their duty. The result corresponds to the findings of Nyarko and Kozári, (2021).

Table 4. Perceived organizational support (POS) profile
LevelFrequencyPercentageMeanSt.D
Low 1-2.339131.33.000.83
Moderate 2.34-3.6610837.1
High 3.67-5.009231.6
Total291100

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Perceived organizational support (POS) profile↗ Enlarge
Table 4
Perceived organizational support (POS) profile

Perceived organizational support (POS) profile

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

ICTs application profile

This section presents and discussed the levels of ICTs application profile. The constructs were measured on 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1-5. In the study the mean level of 1 to 2.33 were considered low, 2.34 to 3.66 were regarded as moderate and whereas 3.67 to 5 were considered high. The respondents had been determined using frequency and percentage. The results are presented on the Tables 3 below. Based on the mean score of 3.68, and standard deviation of 0.88, as shown on Table 4.3, the descriptive analysis shows that, out of 291 respondents, 61.9% were of the perception that they were in their high level, 27.2% showed moderate level and 10.9% of the respondents reported a low level of ICTs application. This finding implies that, most of the respondents had high level of ICTs application. The findings are in line with the work of Onyemekihian (2021) [11] , which reported that majority of agricultural extension workers 72.3% used the ICT in their extension services delivery to farmers.

Perceived organizational support profile

This section captured and discussed the levels of Perceived organizational support profile. The measurement was carried out on 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5. In the study the mean level of 1 to 2.33 were considered low, 2.34 to 3.66 were regarded as moderate and whereas 3.67 to 5 were considered high. The respondents had been determined using frequency and percentage. The results are presented on the Tables 4 below. The mean score 3.0 standard deviation of 0.83 of the overall number of respondents (291) on Table 4.4 revealed their perception on level of perceived organizational support. The findings indicated that, 31.3% of the respondents were in their low level of perceived organizational support, 37.1% were in their moderate level while 31.6% were in their high level of perceived organizational support. This implies that most of them had moderate level of perceived organizational support at (37.1%). The study is in line with that of Ladebo et al., (2005) [12] , who reported that, the overall ratings showed that the respondents moderately agreed to the views that their organizations were supportive. It was also supported by Eisenberger et al. (2016) [13] who opined that it is therefore clear that employees mostly feel moderately to highly valued by their organization.

Relationship between ICTs application and job performances of the respondents:

The result on Table 5 presented and discussed the bivariate correlation between ICTs application and Job performances of agricultural extension workers. The result revealed that, there was a positive and significant correlation between ICTs application (r=0.309) and job performance of agricultural extension workers at P<0.01. This implies that, there was a moderate effect in the relationship between the two variables. The result further implies that, as ICTs application increases or decreases, job performances of extension workers tends to move in same directions. The result was significant at 99% confidences level. The r 2 0. 5476 shows about 54.8% variances between variables. The result is in consistence with that of the study of Onyema, Chiemek (2023) who found that there is a significant positive correlation between ICT usage and the level of employee performance.

Table 5. The relationship between ICTs application and job
The relationship between ICTs application and job↗ Enlarge
Table 5
The relationship between ICTs application and job

The relationship between ICTs application and job

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

The ICTs explain the variances in job performance

The findings indicated that, among all the variables used in the multi-linear regression based on the stepwise method, only ICTs training and one of the respondents demographic (experiences) was related to Quantity of work. The result revealed that, the R 2 value of ICTs training was 0.37, thus implying that ICTs training explained 37% on Quantity of work of the respondents. The result also showed that the respondents characteristics in terms of work experiences was related to Quantity of work, with R 2 value of 0.58, this shows that work experiences of respondents explained Quantity of work in terms of job performances with about 58%.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledged the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (tetfund) for funding this research. The authors also thank the Directors of Agricultural development program of Adamawa, Bauchi, Gombe and Taraba. The extension agents, agricultural officers, enumerators and editors for their contributions to this article.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Population and Sample Size of the Respondents
StateTotal Population SizeSampling
Plateau30569
Benue42797
Nasarawa28966
Abuja25959
Total1,280291

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Population and Sample Size of the Respondents↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Population and Sample Size of the Respondents

Population and Sample Size of the Respondents

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. ICTs training Profiles
LevelFrequencyPercentageMeanSt.D
Low 1-2.331.32.330.477
Moderate 2.34-3.6619466.7
High 3.67-5.009633.0
Total291100

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
ICTs training Profiles↗ Enlarge
Table 2
ICTs training Profiles

ICTs training Profiles

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 3. ICTs application profile
LevelFrequencyPercentageMeanSt.D
Low 1-2.333210.93.680.88
Moderate 2.34-3.667927.2
High 3.67-5.0018061.9
Total291100

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
ICTs application profile↗ Enlarge
Table 3
ICTs application profile

ICTs application profile

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 6. Multi-linear regression between independent variables
VariablesR2Std Err.
ICTs training0.370.06532
Experiences0.580.06498

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Multi-linear regression between independent variables↗ Enlarge
Table 6
Multi-linear regression between independent variables

Multi-linear regression between independent variables

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Table 7. Multi-linear regression between independent variables
VariablesR2Std Err.
ICTs training0.470.44298
Perceived Organizational support0.480.43707

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Multi-linear regression between independent variables↗ Enlarge
Table 7
Multi-linear regression between independent variables

Multi-linear regression between independent variables

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Table 8. Multi-linear regression between independent variables
VariablesR2Std Err.
ICTs training0.430.44333
Perceived Organizational support0.450.4371

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Multi-linear regression between independent variables↗ Enlarge
Table 8
Multi-linear regression between independent variables

Multi-linear regression between independent variables

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗

References

11 in the original paper
  1. UNESCO International Forum on ICT and Education 2030, Qingdao, China, 2017, (2).
  2. Wolfert S, Ge L, Verdouw C, Bogaardt MJ. Big Data in Smart Farming -A review. Agricultural Systems. 2017;153(69):80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023 Google Scholar.
  3. Mustapha S, Man N, Shah AJ, Kamarulzaman NH, Tafida AA. Factors influencing the adoption of ICT'S in extension service delivery among the extension agents in North-East, Nigeria. Sarbad Journal of Agriculture. 2022;38(1):149-159.
  4. Hamernik D, Crosby G. Exploring new opportunities for extension. Cooperative extension workshop. 2015. Available online from http://www.csrees.
  5. Vijayraghavan K, Singh YP. Managing human resources within extension. In improving Agricultural Extension: A Reference manual. Swanson, A, J. (Eds). Extension, Education and Communication Service, Research, Extension and Training Division, Sustainable Development Department, FAO, 2005.
  6. Anh NH, Bokelmann W, Thuan NT, Nga DT, Minh NV. Smallholders' preferences for different contract farming models: empirical evidence from sustainable certified coffee production in Vietnam. J Sust. 2019;11(14):1-26, 10.3390/su11143799
  7. Beheshtifar M, Zare E. Effect perceived organizational support on employees' attitudes toward work, Science Series Data Report. 2012;4(9):28-34.
  8. Robbins SP, Judge TA, Breward K. Essentials of organizational behavior (First Canadian Edition ed.). Pearson Education, 2018.
  9. Yakubu DH, Abubakar BZ, Atala TK, Muhammad A. Use of Information and Communication Agricultural Technologies among Extension agents in Kano State, Nigeria. Journal of Extension. 2013;17(1):256-268.
  10. Madukwe MC. Delivery of agricultural extension services to farmers in developing countries. Wagenigen. The Netherlands. CTA Publication. 2006.
  11. Onyemekihian J, Onyekwuma ES. Relationship between National Interest and Global Interest in Foreign Policy of a State. Social Science Research. 2021, 7(1).