Scinovex

Research article · 2021 · Full text

International Journal of Horticulture and Food Science

Fertilizer scheduling through drip fertigation on growth and yield of onion variety Bhima Shakti

Shashidar TRD. JeevithaUmesh BC

Volume 3(2) · Pages 54–56 · DOI: 10.33545/26631067.2021.v3.i2a.102 ↗

Research areasIrrigation Practices and Water Management

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

An investigation was conducted at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to know the influence of fertilizer scheduling through drip fertigation on growth & yield of onion (variety: Bhima Shakti) during rabi season of 2017-18 and 2018-19. The experiment included four treatments (T1: Surface irrigation and soil application of RDF, T2: 100% RDF through drip irrigation, T3: 80% RDF through drip irrigation and T4: 60 % RDF through drip irrigation) replicated five times. The fertilizers used were Urea, MOP & 19:19:19 & were completely water soluble. The fertigation was initiated fifteen days after transplanting and was given till fifteen days before harvesting. There were eleven split applications of fertilizers through fertigation at seven days interval. The results of the two years (2017-18, 2018-19 and pooled) revealed that the fertigation at 100 % RDF (T2) was most effective for the growth parameters studied but was on par with 80% RDF (T3). At 75 DAT, the treatment 100% RDF (T2) recorded the highest plant height of 43.34, 51.70 & 47.52 cm, number of leaves 8.0, 7.60 & 7.80 and leaf width of 1.03, 0.81 & 0.92, respectively during 2017-18, 2018-19 & over the years and was on par with 80% RDF (T3) which recorded the height of 41.68, 52.60 & 47.14 cm, number of leaves 7.7, 7.1 & 7.4 and leaf width of 0.83, 0.99 & 0.91 cm, respectively during 2017-18, 2018-19 & over the years. The control treatment (T1) showed lower values for these parameters. Similar trend was observed for yield parameters wherein 100% RDF(T2) recorded the highest equatorial diameter (5.44, 5.49 & 5.47 cm), polar diameter (4.98, 5.34 & 5.16 cm), marketable yield (34.68, 30.31 and 32.50 t/ha) and total yield (37.72, 33.48 and 35.60 t/ha ) and was on par with 80% RDF (T3) with equatorial diameter (5.25, 5.25 & 5.25 cm), polar diameter (4.78, 4.97 & 4.88 cm), marketable yield (32.20, 29.15 & 30.68 t/ha) and total yield (39.30, 30.92 & 35.11 t/ha), respectively during 2017-18, 2018-19 & over the years. The bulbs produced with 100 % RDF (T2) were found better storer with minimum loss in weight of bulbs (4.60 4.88 and 4.74) and rotten bulbs (4.80, 5.00 and 4.90) and was on par with 80% RDF (T3). The control (T1) recorded lower values for all the yield parameters.From this investigation it can be concluded that since 100 per cent RDF & 80 per cent RDF treatments were on par with each other for all the parameters the 80% RDF (T3) treatment can effectively be adopted which helps in saving fertilizer cost nearly 20 per cent with out compromising the parameters studied.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Onion is a significant vegetable and spice crop that generates approximately 4000 crores in annual foreign exchange. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Onion is a significant vegetable and spice crop that generates approximately 4000 crores in annual foreign exchange.

      In the paper's own words

      “Onion is an important spice cum vegetable crop which earns nearly 4000 crores foreign exchange annually.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Fertigation is a technology that improves fertilizer efficiency through uniform water distribution and reduced nitrogen loss from the soil surface. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Fertigation is a technology that improves fertilizer efficiency through uniform water distribution and reduced nitrogen loss from the soil surface.

      In the paper's own words

      “Fertigation also ensures high efficiency of fertilizers application by uniform and proper distribution of irrigation water into the soil, flexibility of nutrient ratios also avoids nitrogen volatilization from soil surface.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Using fertigation can lower production costs and reduce groundwater pollution by decreasing the total amount of fertilizer required. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Using fertigation can lower production costs and reduce groundwater pollution by decreasing the total amount of fertilizer required.

      In the paper's own words

      “Fertigation not only increase the efficiency in the application of fertilizers and water it is also reducing the amount of fertilizers applied. This in turn reduces the cost of production and also ground water pollution”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to determine how different fertilizer schedules delivered via drip fertigation affected the growth and yield of the Bhima Shakti onion variety. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to determine how different fertilizer schedules delivered via drip fertigation affected the growth and yield of the Bhima Shakti onion variety.

      In the paper's own words

      “An investigation was conducted at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to know the influence of fertilizer scheduling through drip fertigation on growth & yield of onion (variety: Bhima Shakti) during rabi season of 2017-18 and 2018-19.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Material and methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The experiment used a randomized block design with four treatments and five replications at the Main Agricultural Research Station, UAS, Dharwad. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The experiment used a randomized block design with four treatments and five replications at the Main Agricultural Research Station, UAS, Dharwad.

      In the paper's own words

      “An investigation on fertilizer scheduling through drip fertigation on growth and yield parameters of onion variety Bhima Shakti was conducted at Main Agricultural Research Station, UAS, Dharwad with four treatments and five replications in randomized block design.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material and methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The four treatments compared surface irrigation with soil-applied recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) against drip fertigation at 100%, 80%, and 60% of the RDF. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The four treatments compared surface irrigation with soil-applied recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) against drip fertigation at 100%, 80%, and 60% of the RDF.

      In the paper's own words

      “The experiment included four treatments (T1: Surface irrigation and soil application of RDF, T2: 100% RDF through drip irrigation, T3: 80% RDF through drip irrigation and T4: 60 % RDF through drip irrigation)”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Growth parameters were measured 75 days after transplanting, while bulb size and yield were recorded after harvesting and curing. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Growth parameters were measured 75 days after transplanting, while bulb size and yield were recorded after harvesting and curing.

      In the paper's own words

      “Observations on growth parameters like plant height, number of leaves and leaf width were recorded 75 days after transplanting. Yield parameters like bulb size & yield were recorded after harvesting and curing.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material and methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • At 75 days after transplanting, 100% RDF (T2) produced the highest pooled plant height (47.52 cm), leaf number (7.80), and leaf width (0.92 cm), though results were statistically similar to 80% RDF (T3). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      At 75 days after transplanting, 100% RDF (T2) produced the highest pooled plant height (47.52 cm), leaf number (7.80), and leaf width (0.92 cm), though results were statistically similar to 80% RDF (T3).

      In the paper's own words

      “at 75 days after transplanting, the fertigation treatment T2 (100% RDF) had great influence on the plant height (43.34, 51.70 and 47.52 cm), number of leaves (8.00, 7.60 and 7.80) and leaf width (1.03, 0.81 and 0.92 cm) and was on par with T3 (80% RDF)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Bulbs from the 100% RDF treatment (T2) showed the best storage quality, with the lowest pooled weight loss (4.74%) and lowest percentage of rotten bulbs (4.90%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Bulbs from the 100% RDF treatment (T2) showed the best storage quality, with the lowest pooled weight loss (4.74%) and lowest percentage of rotten bulbs (4.90%).

      In the paper's own words

      “During storage, least loss in weight of bulbs (4.60 4.88 and 4.74%) and number of rotten bulbs (4.80, 5.00 and 4.90%) were noticed in T2 (100% RDF) followed by 80 percent fertigation level (T3)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material and methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The control treatment (T1) resulted in the lowest pooled marketable yield (22.40 t/ha) and total yield (26.81 t/ha). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The control treatment (T1) resulted in the lowest pooled marketable yield (22.40 t/ha) and total yield (26.81 t/ha).

      In the paper's own words

      “Yield parameters showed lowest values in control treatment (T1) with Equatorial bulb diameter 4.20, 4.44 and 4.32 cm), Polar bulb diameter (3.66, 4.29 and 3.98 cm), marketable yield (23.22, 21.58 and 22.40 t/ha), total yield (28.72, 24.90 and 26.81 t/ha)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material and methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that 80% RDF fertigation is the most effective option because it maintains growth and yield parameters while reducing fertilizer costs by approximately 20%. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that 80% RDF fertigation is the most effective option because it maintains growth and yield parameters while reducing fertilizer costs by approximately 20%.

      In the paper's own words

      “since 100 per cent RDF & 80 per cent RDF treatments were on par with each other for all the parameters the 80% RDF (T3) treatment can effectively be adopted which helps in saving fertilizer cost nearly 20 per cent with out compromising the parameters studied.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (onion plants (variety Bhima Shakti) in a field with drip irrigation lines). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Fertilizer Efficiency Comparison
AI-generated conceptual illustration (onion plants (variety Bhima Shakti) in a field with drip irrigation lines). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (onion plants (variety Bhima Shakti) in a field with drip irrigation lines). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Fertilizer Efficiency Comparison

AI-generated conceptual illustration (onion plants (variety Bhima Shakti) in a field with drip irrigation lines). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Pooled 2017 and Pooled: T1 vs T2 vs T3 vs T4
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Pooled 2017 and Pooled: T1 vs T2 vs T3 vs T4

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 4 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Pooled and Pooled: T1 vs T2 vs T3 vs T4
Replotted from Table 4 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 4 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Pooled and Pooled: T1 vs T2 vs T3 vs T4

Replotted from Table 4 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Effect of fertigation on growth parameters at 75 days after transplanting of onion variety: Bhima ShaktiTable 1Page 3Equatorial and polar diameter of onion bulbs as influenced by different levels of FertigationTable 2Page 3Influence of fertigation levels on yield parameters of onionTable 3Page 3Influence of fertigation levels on storage of onionTable 4Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Onion is an important spice cum vegetable crop which earns nearly 4000 crores foreign exchange annually. It is extensively used in processing industry now a days for the preparation of dehydrated onion flakes and powder. Onion is used in homeopathic, unani and ayurvedic medicines. Besides, the more pungent onions manifest strong anti-platelet and blood thinning activities in human blood, potentially adding protection against arteriosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, osteoporosis and heart attack. It is extensively used in Indian kitchen in one or the other form hence, it is regarded as "Queen of Kitchen". Central Asia is the primary centre of origin and the area near East and Mediterranean region is the secondary centre of origin for onion. Many virtues have been attributed in Charaka-Samhita and the references of onion have also been found in Quran and Bible (Jones and Mann, 1963) [3] . Fertigation is a new technology that is being adopted in several horticultural crops. Inorganic fertilizers were probably the first chemicals to be injected into drip system. Fertigation also ensures high efficiency of fertilizers application by uniform and proper distribution of irrigation water into the soil, flexibility of nutrient ratios also avoids nitrogen volatilization from soil surface.

Fertigation not only increase the efficiency in the application of fertilizers and water it is also reducing the amount of fertilizers applied. This in turn reduces the cost of production and also ground water pollution which causes ecological disturbances and health risk by fertilizers leaching and accumulation of nitrates. As such, use of fertigation could really prove as blessing for Indian farming and may pave the way for another green revolution and provide coveted support to boost horticulture and agricultural production. Adoption of advanced and efficient method of application of water and fertilizes through drip irrigation system would go a long way in economizing the scares inputs thus realizing increased productivity. In This regard an investigation was conducted on fertilizer scheduling through drip irrigation in onion variety Bhima Shakti. The details of the experiment and outcome is discussed below.

Material and methods

An investigation on fertilizer scheduling through drip fertigation on growth and yield parameters of onion variety Bhima Shakti was conducted at Main Agricultural Research Station, UAS, Dharwad with four treatments and five replications in randomized block design. The plot size followed was 44 m x 1.2 m on raised beds with spacing of 15 cm x 10 cm. The seeds were sown in the nursery bed during November 2017 and 2018 (rabi) and transplanting was done during December month and all the cultural practices were carried out during the course of investigation according to Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research recommendations. The fertigation was carried out at weekly interval, fifteen days after transplanting and it was stopped fifteen days before harvest of the crop. Observations on growth parameters like plant height, number of leaves and leaf width were recorded 75 days after transplanting. Yield parameters like bulb size & yield were recorded after harvesting and curing. Equatorial and polar bulb diameter were recorded from 5 randomly selected bulbs using vernier calipers and expressed in centimeter. Marketable bulb yield was recorded by separating rotted, sprouted and very small bulbs (<2.5 cm diameter) and weight was recorded. For storage studies, initially 5 kg bulbs in each treatment are kept for storage and loss in weight was recorded 3 months after storage and number of rotten bulbs were recorded.

Treatment details

T1. Surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE: RDF: 110:40:60:30 kg NPKS/ha+5 t compost /ha: 30% N, full of PKS and organic manure as a basal before transplanting: 70% N in two equal splits at 30 and 45 days after transplanting as a top dressing T2. Drip irrigation at 100% PE through drip system-Irrigation at alternate day: 100% RDF (110:40:60:30 kg NPKS/ha) + 5 t compost /ha at 6 days interval: Full dose of organic manure should be applied as a basal before transplanting T3. Drip irrigation at 100% PE through drip system-Irrigation at alternate day: 80% RDF (88:32:48:24 kg NPKS/ha) + 5 t compost /ha at 6 days interval: Full dose of organic manure should be applied as a basal before transplanting T4. Drip irrigation at 100% PE through drip system-Irrigation at alternate day: 60% RDF (66:24:36:18 kg NPKS/ha) + 5 t compost /ha at 6 days interval.

Results and Discussion

The data on fertigation studies revealed that at 75 days after transplanting, the fertigation treatment T2 (100% RDF) had great influence on the plant height (43.34, 51.70 and 47.52 cm), number of leaves (8.00, 7.60 and 7.80) and leaf width (1.03, 0.81 and 0.92 cm) and was on par with T3 (80% RDF) with plant height (41.68, 52.60 and 47.14 cm), number of leaves (7.70, 7.10 and 7.40) and leaf width (0.83, 0.99 and 0.91 cm), respectively during 2017-18, 2018-19 and over the years. The lowest values were obtained in control (T1) with plant height (33.18, 36.66 and 34.92 cm), number of leaves (6.00, 5.00 and 5.50) and leaf width (0.78, 0.48 and 0.63 cm), respectively (Table - The highest values with respect to all the parameters like plant height, number of leaves and yield parameters was observed in onion variety Bhima Shakti in the treatment T2:100 per cent RDF through fertigation followed by T3:80 per cent RDF through fertigation and this might be due to the effective utilization of the fertilizers by the onion crop and response of plants to added nutrients. The increased values for these parameters might be due to increased uptake of primary nutrients and more production of dry matter (Kumar et al., 2001, Khan et al., 2002 [1] and Savitha et al., 2010 [6] and Jeevitha et al., 2018) [2] . This might also attributed to the fact that there is a better utilization of the nutrients by the crop due to less leaching effect and through drip irrigation the water requirement by the plants will be met out from time to time which helps in better growth. The vigorous growth in onion was observed due to production of more leaves, with broader size which helped in the synthesis of more photosynthates and thus resulting in increased accumulation of carbohydrates and other metabolites, which ultimately determined the size and weight of bulbs. Similar findings are also obtained by Kahsay et al. (2010) [4] , Savitha et al. (2010) [6] , Sankar et al. (2008) [5] , Tripathi et al. (2010) [9] and Yadav et al. (2010) [10] in onion.

per cent RDF & 80 per cent RDF treatments were on par with each other for all the parameters the 80% RDF (T3) treatment can effectively be adopted which helps in saving fertilizer cost nearly 20 per cent with out compromising the parameters studied.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Effect of fertigation on growth parameters at 75 days after transplanting of onion variety: Bhima Shakti
TreatmentsPlant height (cm)—PooledNo. of leaves—PooledLeaf width (cm)—Pooled
201720182017201820172018
T133.1836.6634.926.005.005.500.780.480.63
T243.3451.7047.528.007.607.801.030.810.92
T341.6852.6047.147.707.107.400.830.990.91
T439.5842.6441.116.545.546.040.700.500.60
SE±m1.371.281.910.290.390.150.050.050.10
CD @ 5%4.223.958.610.891.200.680.150.160.46

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Effect of fertigation on growth parameters at 75 days after transplanting of onion variety: Bhima Shakti↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Effect of fertigation on growth parameters at 75 days after transplanting of onion variety: Bhima Shakti

Effect of fertigation on growth parameters at 75 days after transplanting of onion variety: Bhima Shakti

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 2. Equatorial and polar diameter of onion bulbs as influenced by different levels of Fertigation
TreatmentsEquatorial Diameter (cm) of the bulb—PooledPolar diameter (cm) of the bulb—Pooled
2017201820172018
T14.204.444.323.664.293.98
T25.445.495.474.985.345.16
T35.255.255.254.784.974.88
T44.064.524.293.804.103.95
SE±m0.140.300.100.070.120.09
CD @ 5%0.430.920.470.220.360.42

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Equatorial and polar diameter of onion bulbs as influenced by different levels of Fertigation↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Equatorial and polar diameter of onion bulbs as influenced by different levels of Fertigation

Equatorial and polar diameter of onion bulbs as influenced by different levels of Fertigation

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 3. Influence of fertigation levels on yield parameters of onion
TreatmentsMarketable yield (t/ha)—Pooled 2017Total yield (t/ha)—Pooled
2017201820182018
T123.2221.5822.4028.7224.9026.81
T234.6830.3132.5037.7233.4835.60
T332.2029.1530.6839.3030.9235.11
T425.7022.2023.9527.7026.3427.02
SE±m0.711.800.570.761.461.46
CD @ 5%2.915.542.572.334.496.55

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Influence of fertigation levels on yield parameters of onion↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Influence of fertigation levels on yield parameters of onion

Influence of fertigation levels on yield parameters of onion

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 4. Influence of fertigation levels on storage of onion
TreatmentsTotal weight loss (%)—PooledNumber of rotten bulbs—Pooled
2017-182018-192017-182017-18
T18.6010.129.367.407.807.60
T24.604.884.744.805.004.90
T35.205.405.305.606.406.00
T46.006.006.006.807.207.00
SE±m0.410.210.350.430.350.13
CD @ 5%1.250.641.151.331.090.57

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Influence of fertigation levels on storage of onion↗ Enlarge
Table 4
Influence of fertigation levels on storage of onion

Influence of fertigation levels on storage of onion

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

10 in the original paper
  1. Khan H, Iqbal M, Abdulghaffor, Waseem K. Various plant spacing and different Nitrogen levels on the growth and yield of onion. (Allium cepa L.). J. Biol. Sci. 2002;2(8):545-547.
  2. Jeevitha D, Manohar KR, Chimmalagi U. Effect of different spacing and different levels of fertigation on quality parameters and cost economics of onion (Allium cepa L.) hybrid Arka Lalima. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2018;26(6):445-448.
  3. Jones HA, Mann LK. Onion botany, cultivation and utilization, world crops onion Books, Leonard Hill Ltd, London, 1963.
  4. Kahsa YY, Belew D, Abay F. Effect of intra row spacing on plant growth and yield of onion varieties. Afric. J. Agric. Res. 2010;9(10):931-940.
  5. Sankar V, Lawande KE, Tripathi PC. Effect of micro irrigation practices on growth and yield of garlic (Allium sativum L.) var. G. 41. J. Spi. Aromatic crops. 2008;17(3):230-234.
  6. Savitha Paramaguru B, Pugalendhi L. Effect of drip fertigation on growth yield of onion. Indian J Hort. 2010;67:334-336.
  7. Shafeek MR, Nagwa MK, Hassan SM, Singer, Nadia HM. Effect of potassium fertilizer and foliar spraying with etherel on plant development, yield and bulb quality of onion plants (Allium cepa L.). J Appl. Sci. Res. 2013;9(2):1140-1146.
  8. Singh SP, Verma AB. Response of onion (Allium cepa L.) to potassium application. Indian J Agron. 2001;46(1):182-185.
  9. Tripathi C, Sankar V, Lawande KE. Influence of microirrigation methods on growth, yield and storage of rabi onion. Indian J. Hort. 2010;67(1):61-65.
  10. Yadav GB, Khodke UM, Jadhav SB. Response of onion (Allium cepa L.) to irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels under micro-irrigation system. Int J. Agril. Engg. 2010;3(1):59-61.