Research article · 2022 · Full text
International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social DevelopmentCluster-based pre-scaling of improved wheat technologies in western Oromia: A case study in western Oromia, Ethiopia
Volume 5(1) · Pages 141–143 · DOI: 10.33545/26180723.2022.v5.i1b.166 ↗
Research areasAgriculture and Biological StudiesGenetic and Environmental Crop StudiesRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Abstract
Author-writtenWheat is widely grown in Ethiopia although production levels have not met the demand and price instability. One of the production gaps is that modern varieties cover a small portion of the total area occupied by wheat. Through the use of superior wheat technologies and pre-scaling up, the project aimed to boost wheat production and productivity for small-scale farmers. Two wheat varieties, Liban and Senate, were pre-scaled up in three zones of western Oromia. 147 farmers were addressed in ten PA and six districts. The total area addressed for wheat pre-scaling up was approximately 81 hectares. Yield and disease data were collected, as well as farmers' perceptions and interests. Thus, with an average mean of 4.5 tonsha-1 and 4.9 tonsha-1, respectively, both types, Liban and Senate, performed better in terms of yield. However, compared to Senate variety, Liban variety demonstrated a lower response to numerous diseases. In order to sustainably increase wheat yield, scaling out of Liban varieties for the larger community across sites needs to be strengthened.
Summary
Source-checkedPlain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.
Why it matters
- Ethiopia is a major wheat producer in Africa, ranking third with 5.3 million tons of production across 1.8 million hectares. View evidence ↗
- Wheat productivity in western Oromia is low at 2.9 t ha-1, which is below the global average yield of 3.51 t ha-1. View evidence ↗
- Low productivity is driven by factors such as biotic and abiotic stress, limited access to improved varieties, and a lack of awareness regarding new production technologies. View evidence ↗
The question
- The study aimed to increase bread wheat production and productivity through pre-scaling up and participatory transfer, while improving farmers' technical skills. View evidence ↗
What they did
- The pre-scaling activities were conducted across six districts in three zones of Western Oromia: Horro, Guduru, Hababo Guduru, Jima Rare, Chalia, and Gidda Ayyana. View evidence ↗
- A total of 81 hectares were used for pre-scaling, distributed across the six districts with the largest area in Jimma Rare (30 ha) and the smallest in Chalia (5 ha). View evidence ↗
- Two wheat varieties were tested: Senate, which covered 65 hectares, and Liban, which covered 16 hectares. View evidence ↗
- Standardized management was applied, including a seed rate of 150kg/ha and fertilizer rates of 100kg/ha NPS and 100kg/ha UREA. View evidence ↗
- The project involved 178 participants, consisting of 147 farmers and 30 development agents or specialists. View evidence ↗
What they found
- The Liban variety achieved an overall mean grain yield of 4.5 ton ha-1, with yields ranging from 3.8 ton ha-1 in Chaliya to 5.1 ton ha-1 in Horro. View evidence ↗
- The Senate variety had a higher overall grain yield of 4.9 tons per acre compared to Liban. View evidence ↗
- Both improved varieties yielded nearly 1.5 times more than the local wheat varieties, which had an average zonal productivity of 2.2 ton ha-1. View evidence ↗
- While the Senate variety produced higher yields, it performed poorly against yellow rust and Fusarium head blight. View evidence ↗
What it means
- The authors recommend expanding the Liban wheat cultivar and its full technology package to other similar agro-ecologies due to its disease resistance. View evidence ↗
- To support the adoption of Liban, the authors suggest establishing seed producers and marketing cooperatives to ensure a viable seed multiplication and exchange system. View evidence ↗
Visual summary
2 visualsIllustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.
Variety Comparison: Yield vs. Disease Resistance
AI-generated conceptual illustration (wheat plants (Triticum aestivum)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.
View source evidence ↗Grain ha-1: Horro vs Jimma rare vs Hababo Guduru vs Chaliya
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.
View source evidence ↗Figures & tables
From the original paperIntroduction
Wheat is the most widely grown crop in the world, with an annual production of 779.33 million metric tons on 222.15 million hectares (USDA, 2022) [8] , being grown in a wide range of environments. It ranks second in global cereal production and provides a stable food source for roughly one-third of the world's population. China, India, the United States, the Russian Federation, France, Australia, Germany, Ukraine, and Canada are among the world's largest wheat producers (FAO, 2021) [9] . Ethiopia is the third-largest wheat producer in Africa, after Egypt and Morocco, with 1.8 million hectares of land and 5.3 million tons of production volume (CSA, 2021) [2,4] . However, the best areas for wheat production in Ethiopia are between 1900 and 2700 M.A.S.L. in the highlands, where rainfall distribution ranges between 600 and 2000 mm. It is one of the country's major staple crops and ranks second in terms of production after maize, accounting for 16.91% of total cereal grain production in Ethiopia (CSA, 2021) [2,4] . In terms of caloric intake, it is the country's second most important food after maize (FAO, 2014) [7] . Still, crop productivity in Ethiopia, particularly in western Oromia, is low (2.9 t ha-1) (CSA, 2021) [2,4] , compared to the global average yield (3.51tonsha -1 ) (USDA, 2022) [8] . There are several factors influencing wheat productivity in Ethiopia, including biotic and abiotic stress, a lack of access to improved wheat varieties, ineffective crop management technologies, both farmers and development agents being unaware of newly released technologies and their production systems, and a lack of financial resources to purchase inputs. The main methods for increasing crop productivity include the creation, testing, and spread of new, improved crop varieties as well as crop production and management systems (Asfaw et al., 2018) [1] . After new technologies have been tested and modified in research situations, the next stage is to do a demonstration on a small number of farmers' fields. Farmers are shown all whole technological packages in a participatory approach. Then, selected technologies are chosen for further popularization and scaling up in order to raise awareness about technologies and improve the livelihoods and food security of households in the mandated area (Asfaw et al., 2018) [1] . Thus, the goal of this study was to increase bread wheat production and productivity through participatory, popularization, transfer, and pre-scaling up; and to strengthen farmers' skills in wheat production technologies that led to its potential.
Materials and Methods
Pre-scaling up activities were carried out in three zones of Western Oromia, in six districts, via Horro, Guduru, Hababo Guduru, Jima Rare, Chalia, and Gidda Ayyana. The selected districts received consistent rainfall and were known for their extensive bread wheat production. Based on their potential for wheat production, 1-3 wheat growing potential villages were chosen from each district. The total area addressed for wheat pre-scaling up was 81 hectares, of which 30, 20, 10, 10 6, and 5 hectares were in the districts of Jimma Rare, Horo, Guduru, Gida Ayena, Hababo Guduru, and Chalia, respectively. The Liban and Senate varieties covered 16 and 65 hectares of the total area coverage (81ha), respectively. Each village had its own group of participants, which included men, women, and young farmers. The two varieties (Liben and senate) were www.extensionjournal.com planted in clusters of at least 5 hectares on selected farmers' fields. Full wheat production and management packages were applied to the varieties. The seed rate was 150kg/ha, and the fertilizer rate was 100/100 kg/ha NPS/UREA, with nitrogen applied in two stages: half at planting and half at tillering. Following the packaging and distribution of wheat technologies and other agricultural inputs, extension agents conducted regular field visits and supervision at various crop stages. Farmers, agricultural experts, development agents, and researchers worked together to evaluate crop milk. Diseases, yield data, and farmers' opinions, ideas, perceptions, interests, and points of view were all collected.
Results and Discussion
Results and Discussion
Training of farmers
Participatory training in the selected 6 districts of Western Oromia was provided by a multidisciplinary team of Agriculture researchers (Breeder, Agronomist, Economist, and Extensionists). Among the 178 participants, 147 were farmers and 30 were development agents/subject matter specialists. The training included full packages of wheat production technologies such as site selection and preparation, fertilizer application rate and methods, seed rate and method of planting, spacing and depth, weed, disease, and insect control, and building strong links among relevant stakeholders through a multistakeholder approach to mitigate problems in joint action taking immediate, short, and long-term measures.
Field day
After the varieties reached physiological maturity, a field day was planned with participation from district-level farmers, agricultural development offices at the zone and district levels, and other relevant stakeholders with the goal of learning about the importance of using improved wheat varieties and their management, agronomic, and other techniques. The field day drew a total of 150 participants (80 farmers, 15 development agents and experts, 50 researchers including higher officials of the Oromia Agriculture Research Institute (IQQO), and 10 administrators (from each district and zone). Participants discussed the condition of improved varieties with trial farmers, sharing their experiences and identifying criteria such as grain yield, early maturity, and resistance to diseases and pests. Based on the criteria, the Liban variety was chosen for further expansion in the districts.
Total production and productivity per unit area
In the 2019/2020 cropping year, improved bread wheat varieties (Liban and Senate) were pre-scaled up in six districts of Western Oromia zones. The wheat varieties were subjected to all of the recommended wheat production and management practices. The study found that the average yield from the Liban variety was 3.8 ton ha -1 , 4.6 ton ha -1 , and 5.1 ton ha -1 at Chaliya, Hababo Guduru, and Horro, with an overall mean grain yield of 4.5 ton ha -1 (Table 1). The Senate variety outperformed the tested locations in terms of grain yield. Senate yielded 5.8 tons per acre, followed by Horro (4.8 tons per acre) and Guduru (4.3 tons per acre), for an overall grain yield of 4.9 tons per acre. Despite this, the trial/participating farmers' wheat production and productivity increased in the study area when compared to local varieties due to its early maturity and high yielder. The average pre-scaled up yield of Liban and Senate varieties was nearly 1.5 times higher than the average zonal productivity of local wheat varieties, which was 2.2 tonha -1 .
| Zones | District | PA's | Variety | No of farmers addressed | Area coverage(ha) | Grain ha-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horro Guduru Wallaga | Horro | Doyyo-Bariso | Liban | 12 | 10 | 5.1 |
| Kombolcha | Senate | 13 | 10 | 4.5 | ||
| Jimma rare | Tarkanafata | Liban | 14 | 10 | 5.6 | |
| Karra Konte | Senate | 15 | 10 | 6.0 | ||
| Jawissa | 13 | 10 | 5.8 | |||
| Hababo Guduru | Liban | 9 | 6 | 5.0 | ||
| Guduru | Senate | 14 | 10 | 4.3 | ||
| East Wallaga | G.Ayyana | Gaba Jimata | Senate | 6 | 5 | 4.8 |
| Gute Gudina | Senate | 6 | 5 | 4.0 | ||
| West Shawa | Chaliya | Chobi Tulu Chori | Liban | 11 | 5 | 3.8 |
Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.
View original table image
Reaction to the Major Wheat Diseases and Quality Traits
Diseases are the other parameters used in the evaluation of varieties in the pre-scaling up of bread wheat. According to the evaluation, the Liban variety performed better against major wheat diseases such as stem and yellow rust, Septoria tritici, and Fusarium head blight (Table 2). Senate produced higher yields but performed poorly against certain diseases such as yellow rust and Fusarium head blight (Table 2).
| Zones | District | Variety | Steam Rust | Yellow Rust | Septoria Tritici | Fusarium Head Blight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horro Guduru Wallaga | Horro | Liban | MR | -MR | 32 | 2% |
| Senate | 10R | S | 32 | 25% | ||
| Jimma Rare | Senate | 5MS | 5MR-15MS | 32 | 20% | |
| H.Guduru | Liban | 10R | 5MS | 22 | 15% | |
| Guduru | Senate | 10R | 10MS | 22 | 30% | |
| East Wallaga | G.Ayyana | Senate | - | 10mr | 32 | 30% |
Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.
View original table image
References
0 in the original paperCited by 1
From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex
- Diversification & Expansion of MARDI Premium Plant Varieties at the State of Selangor: A Case Study ↗
I. Khairol, Nur Atifah K. · Mediterranean Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences · 2024
This research was written to ascertain the situation of Malaysian Agriculture Research And Development Institute (MARDI) plant variety diversity in Selangor. Several plant varieties, including MDUR 88 Durian, Melomas lime, Mutiara Wangi/Merah Rambutan, and MKL coffee, have been chosen for the project. This reward was announced on social media (via MARDI Selangor's Facebook page). The announcement contains a Google form.…
❝ 0PDF



Table 1
Table 2