Scinovex

Research article · 2023 · Full text

International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry

Comparative study on growth performance of Giriraja and Raja–II birds in Gadag region

Dharmaraj GyShivakumar K. RadderPrasanna SBRudresh BHR. NagarajaM. M. Nekar

Volume 8(1S) · Pages 20–22 · DOI: 10.22271/veterinary.2023.v8.i1sa.510 ↗

Research areasAgricultural Economics and PracticesLivestock and Poultry ManagementAgricultural pest management studies

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Giriraja and Raja–II breeds are dual purpose type breeds and helps in improving the production. Total 90-day old chicks were distributed into two groups with 45 Giriraja chicks in T1 group and 45 Raja II chicks in T2 group. To comparative the growth performance of Giriraja and Raja–II birds in Gadag region this study was conducted for 56 days. Except for the first week of their growth which shows comparatively higher weight gain in Raja II chicks (p ≤0.05) and there was no significant difference observed in body weight, feed consumption and feed efficiency in both the groups. It is concluded that these birds are equally suitable for rearing on deep litter system as observed by similar rates of body weight gains, feed consumption and FCR.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • The poultry sector in India is the most flexible and fastest-growing livestock sector, with significant demand for native chicken and eggs. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The poultry sector in India is the most flexible and fastest-growing livestock sector, with significant demand for native chicken and eggs.

      In the paper's own words

      “In India, the poultry sector is the fastest growing and most flexible of all livestock sectors. There is more demand for native chicken and their eggs.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Native chicken products often command higher prices than commercial chicken because of their perceived taste, texture, and flavor. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Native chicken products often command higher prices than commercial chicken because of their perceived taste, texture, and flavor.

      In the paper's own words

      “When compared to commercial chicken the product from the native chicken fetches higher prices due to their flavour, taste and texture as perceived by the large population in the local region.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Improved chicken varieties are introduced to backyard poultry farming to overcome the low genetic potential and low production of native birds. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Improved chicken varieties are introduced to backyard poultry farming to overcome the low genetic potential and low production of native birds.

      In the paper's own words

      “The egg and meat production by the native birds are very low due to their low genetic potential. Therefore to improve the production performance of backyard poultry farming the improved variety of chicken were being introduced in the different region”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to assess and compare the production and growth performance of Giriraja and Raja-II chicken breeds using a deep litter system in the Gadag region. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to assess and compare the production and growth performance of Giriraja and Raja-II chicken breeds using a deep litter system in the Gadag region.

      In the paper's own words

      “Hence, the present experiment was conducted to assess the production and performance of Giriraja and Raja-II breeds under the deep litter system in the Gadag region.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The experiment used 90 day-old chicks, divided into two groups: 45 Giriraja chicks (T1) and 45 Raja II chicks (T2). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The experiment used 90 day-old chicks, divided into two groups: 45 Giriraja chicks (T1) and 45 Raja II chicks (T2).

      In the paper's own words

      “A total of 90-day old chicks were procured from Poultry Science Department, Veterinary College Hebbal, Bengaluru. T1 group consisted of 45-day old Giriraj chicks and 45-day old T2 group consisted of 45-day old Raja II chicks.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Birds were kept in a deep litter system for 56 days with ad libitum feed and water, organized into three replicates of 15 chicks per group. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Birds were kept in a deep litter system for 56 days with ad libitum feed and water, organized into three replicates of 15 chicks per group.

      In the paper's own words

      “Each group had three replicates R1, R2 and R3 and each replicate had 15 chicks. The birds were deep litter system with all the standard managemental practice by providing the ad libitum feed and water through out the experimental period of 56 days.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The researchers measured body weight, feed consumption, and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) on a weekly basis. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers measured body weight, feed consumption, and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) on a weekly basis.

      In the paper's own words

      “On weekly basis the body weight, feed consumption and feed conversion ratio was recorded and calculated.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Data were analyzed using an independent T-test in SPSS 20, with mean differences tested via Levene’s Test at a significance level of P≤0.05. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Data were analyzed using an independent T-test in SPSS 20, with mean differences tested via Levene’s Test at a significance level of P≤0.05.

      In the paper's own words

      “The obtained data were analyzed statistically by using independent T test using SPSS 20 statistical software as per standard procedure described by the Snedecoe and Cochran (1994). The differences between the means were tested using Levene’s Test at P≤0.05.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Raja II chicks showed a significantly higher weight gain during the first week (P≤0.05), but no significant differences in cumulative body weight were found in subsequent weeks. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Raja II chicks showed a significantly higher weight gain during the first week (P≤0.05), but no significant differences in cumulative body weight were found in subsequent weeks.

      In the paper's own words

      “Except for first week of their growth which shows higher weight gain in Raja II chicks (P≤0.05) compared to Giriraja chicks, there was no significant differences observed in weekly cumulative body weight.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion Cumulative Body Weight

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • By the end of the study, the mean cumulative body weight of the Giriraja group (1413.40 g) was lower than that of the Raja II group (1500.10 g). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      By the end of the study, the mean cumulative body weight of the Giriraja group (1413.40 g) was lower than that of the Raja II group (1500.10 g).

      In the paper's own words

      “At the end of the experiment the mean cumulative body weight of T1 group (1413.40 g) was lesser than T2 group (1500.10 g).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion Cumulative Body Weight

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Raja II birds had significantly higher feed consumption during the first week (92.3g vs 87.6g/d, P≤0.05), though no significant differences occurred in later weeks. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Raja II birds had significantly higher feed consumption during the first week (92.3g vs 87.6g/d, P≤0.05), though no significant differences occurred in later weeks.

      In the paper's own words

      “This results shows the significantly (P≤ 0.05) higher feed consumption (92.3g vs 87.6g/d) in Raja II birds during the first week of the experiment. But there was no significant difference observed in the remaining weeks.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Feed consumption:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • At the 8th week, the cumulative feed intake was 3738.50 g for Giriraja and 3935.60 g for Raja II. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      At the 8th week, the cumulative feed intake was 3738.50 g for Giriraja and 3935.60 g for Raja II.

      In the paper's own words

      “The cumulative feed intake by Giriraja at the age of 8th week was 3738.50 g and for raja- 2 was 3935.60 g.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Feed consumption:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • There was no statistically significant difference in the feed conversion ratio (FCR) between the Giriraja and Raja II groups. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      There was no statistically significant difference in the feed conversion ratio (FCR) between the Giriraja and Raja II groups.

      In the paper's own words

      “The results revealed that, there was no significant difference in the feed conversion ratio between the groups.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Feed conversion ratio

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors concluded that both Giriraja and Raja II birds are equally suitable for rearing in a deep litter system, based on their similar feed consumption, FCR, and body weight gains. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors concluded that both Giriraja and Raja II birds are equally suitable for rearing in a deep litter system, based on their similar feed consumption, FCR, and body weight gains.

      In the paper's own words

      “This was concluded that Giriraja and Raja -2 birds which are normally reared under backyard system under low-cost maintenance are equally suitable for rearing on deep litter system as observed by similar rates of body weight gains, feed consumption and FCR.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Giriraja and Raja-II broiler chickens). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Experimental Setup
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Giriraja and Raja-II broiler chickens). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Giriraja and Raja-II broiler chickens). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Experimental Setup

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Giriraja and Raja-II broiler chickens). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Cumulative Body Weight (g) of birdsTable 1Page 2Cumulative feed consumption (g)Table 2Page 2Cumulative Feed conversion ratioTable 3Page 2
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

In India, the poultry sector is the fastest growing and most flexible of all livestock sectors. There is more demand for native chicken and their eggs. When compared to commercial chicken the product from the native chicken fetches higher prices due to their flavour, taste and texture as perceived by the large population in the local region. Backyard poultry farming was a low input venture. The egg and meat production by the native birds are very low due to their low genetic potential. Therefore to improve the production performance of backyard poultry farming the improved variety of chicken were being introduced in the different region (Singh et al., 2002) [12] . The University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore was released the first improved coloured bird which is suitable for backyard rearing 'Giriraja' in 1989. Raja II broiler breed has been developed by Department of Poultry Science, Veterinary College, Bangalore, (KVAFSU) by the funding of ICAR. Giriraja is a popular dual-purpose chicken breed and able to improve the economy of the rural population by increasing the production of egg and meat (Reddy and Rajendiran, 2002) [10] . They are distributed in various parts of our country and promising in terms of good number of egg production and higher body weight under the backyard system of rearing. These dual purpose breeds are suitable for extensive and intensive system of rearing. Therefore, these are suitable for improving the indigenous breeds of poultry (Aryal and Neupane, 1997) [1] . Though, dual purpose breeds of chicken are lower in production compare to the exotic breeds, but they can fetch the higher price due to the close appearance and scavenging rearing pattern (Neupane et al., 2017) [7] . Due to easyily availability and improvement of dual purpose birds majority of the farmers rearing the chicken under semiintensive system and earning the premium profit. Hence, the present experiment was conducted to assess the production and performance of Giriraja and Raja-II breeds under the deep litter system in the Gadag region.

Material and Methods

The experiment was conducted at Department of Livestock Farm Complex, Veterinary College Gadag, Karnataka, to evaluate the Comparative Growth Performance of Giriraja and Raja-II Birds in Gadag Region.

A total of 90-day old chicks were procured from Poultry Science Department, Veterinary College Hebbal, Bengaluru. T1 group consisted of 45-day old Giriraj chicks and 45-day old T2 group consisted of 45-day old Raja II chicks. Each group had three replicates R 1 , R 2 and R 3 and each replicate had 15 chicks. The birds were deep litter system with all the standard managemental practice by providing the ad libitum feed and water through out the experimental period of 56 days. Birds were vaccinated by following the standard broiler vaccination schedule. On weekly basis the body weight, feed consumption and feed conversion ratio was recorded and calculated. The obtained data were analyzed statistically by using independent T test using SPSS 20 statistical software as per standard procedure described by the Snedecoe and Cochran (1994). The differences between the means were tested using Levene's Test at P≤0.05.

Results and Discussion Cumulative Body Weight

The results of cumulative body weights of the T 1 and T 2 groups are presented in the Table 1. Except for first week of their growth which shows higher weight gain in Raja II chicks (P≤0.05) compared to Giriraja chicks, there was no significant differences observed in weekly cumulative body weight. At the end of the experiment the mean cumulative body weight of T 1 group (1413.40 g) was lesser than T 2 group (1500.10 g). This finding is in agreement with the findings of the Ramappa and Lokanath (1985) [9] who observed 1.37 kg. Similar results (1329.73 g) was found by Chawke et al., (2021) [2] by feeding black cumin seed powder (BCSP). Similar results (1482.72 g) was found by Dharmaraj et al., (2017) [3] by feeding herbal immunomodulator and levamisole. But, in contrary to the findings of Neupane et al., (2014) [6] the average body weight of giriraja at the age of 8 th week was 1184.10 g. Jaishankar (2021) [5] also found that, higher body weight at the age of 6 th week (862.5-956.00 g). Tejashree et al., (2021) [13] found higher body weight of ranging 1689 to 1899 at 8 th week by feeding Neem, Ginger, Garlic powder in their experiment on Giriraja birds. Prasanna et al., (2011) [8] also found 1.6 kg at the end of 6 th week experiment in Raja -2 bird.

Table 1. Cumulative Body Weight (g) of birds
Cumulative Body Weight (g) of birds↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Cumulative Body Weight (g) of birds

Cumulative Body Weight (g) of birds

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Feed consumption:

The results of Feed consumption by the birds in the groups T1 and T2 are presented in the Table 2. This results shows the significantly (P≤ 0.05) higher feed consumption (92.3g vs 87.6g/d) in Raja II birds during the first week of the experiment. But there was no significant difference observed in the remaining weeks. The cumulative feed intake by Giriraja at the age of 8 th week was 3738.50 g and for raja-2 was 3935.60 g. This result is in agreement with Dharmaraj et al., 2017 who observed feed consumption of 3385.61g at 8 th week by feeding herbal immunomodulator and levamisole in Giriraja birds. The findings of other researchers show that at the age of six week the cumulative feed consumption was 1.8-1.9 kg (Jaishankar. 2021) [5] . But, in contrary to the findings of this results to the findings of Tejashree et al., (2021) [13] that highest feed consumption was observed in the Giriraja bird at the end of the experiment (8 th wk.) and found the consumption of up to 4494 g. similar results found by the Chawke et al., 2021 [2] , by feeding BCSP in their experiment of range 2624-2686 g. Prasanna et al. (2011) [8] found higher feed consumption (3019g) in the Raja II by feeding azolla at 6 th week.

Table 2. Cumulative feed consumption (g)
Treatment1 week2 week3 week4 week5 week6 week7 week8 week
T187.650.93b256.910.57589.520.331018.600.68315393.042243.70.7832943.200.7503738.500.35
T292.030.02a255.750.45608.170.1001084.600.351633.00.6112374.10.3603112.500.403935.600.330

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Cumulative feed consumption (g)↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Cumulative feed consumption (g)

Cumulative feed consumption (g)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Feed conversion ratio

The results of feed conversion ratio in the T1 and T2 groups are presented in the Table 3. The results revealed that, there was no significant difference in the feed conversion ratio between the groups. The found results are in agreement with the findings of Tejashree et al. (2021) [13] who found that, the FCR was in the range of 2.23 to 2.77 at 8 th week. Similar FCR values (2.44) result found by the Chawke et al. (2021) [2] at 8 th week. In contrary to Neupane et al. (2014) [6] found 2.9 and 3.3 FCR at the age of eight week in Giriraja and new Hampshire bird respectively. Aryal and Neopane (1997) [1] observed the 2.8 and 3.68 FCr at the age of eight week in Giriraja and new Hampshire bird respectively. The feed conversion efficiency in cross bred birds are higher compare to the pure breeds (Dwivedi et al. 1986) [4] .

Table 3. Cumulative Feed conversion ratio
Treatment1 week2 week3 week4 week5 week6 week7 week8 week
T10.810.021.090.001.580.001.910.042.090.032.330.032.590.032.650.07
T20.700.020.860.031.270.031.590.041.840.022.180.042.480.012.620.02

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Cumulative Feed conversion ratio↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Cumulative Feed conversion ratio

Cumulative Feed conversion ratio

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Conclusion

This was concluded that Giriraja and Raja -2 birds which are normally reared under backyard system under low-cost maintenance are equally suitable for rearing on deep litter system as observed by similar rates of body weight gains, feed consumption and FCR.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementWe are grateful to our the Dean, Veterinary college Gadag, and KVAFSU, Bidar, Karnataka for providing necessary facilities and funding to carry out this research work.

References

9 in the original paper
  1. Aryal IK, Neopane SP. Performance of Giriraja chicken in the eastern hills of Nepal. PAC technical paper, 1997, no. 179. Pakhribas Agricultural Centre, Dhnakuta; c1997. p. 14.
  2. Chawke AP, Dakhore RS, Shegokar SR. Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Black Cumin (Nigella sativa) Seed Powder on Growth Performance and Economics of Giriraja Poultry Birds. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2021;10(01):13741380. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.163
  3. Dharmaraj GY, Jayanaik, Indresh HC, Munegowda T. Effect of herbal immuneo modulator on growth performance and survivability in Giriraja birds. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2017;5(4):12171221.
  4. Jaishankar N. Role of feed additives on production performance of Giriraja chicks. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2021;10(11):134-137.
  5. Neupane DM, Karki, Shrestha SB. Intensive Management of New Hampshire and Giriraja Chickens for Generating Premium Cash Income. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology. 2014;15(2):23-28.
  6. Neupane D, Bhandari BB, Poudel S, Shrestha S, Sapkota S. Comparative performance of Giriraja chicken reared on different feeding regimes for economic production in Nepal. Bang. Journal of Animal Science. 2017;46(2):134139.
  7. Prasanna SB, Shivakumar MC, Umashankar BC, Naveen Kumar GS, Pradeep MC, Prabhu TM. Influence of feeding Azolla on the performance of Raja-II broiler birds. Indian Journal of Animal Production Management. 2011;27(3):137-141.
  8. Reddy BSV, Rajendiran AS. Paper presented at State level Seminar on Giriraja bird -A boon for rural economy. Organized by the State Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Government of Karnataka held on 8th March, 2002 at Bangalore.
  9. L, Indresh HC, Suresh BN. Effect of feeding neem, ginger and garlic powder on growth performance in Giriraja birds. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2021;10(12):1952-1957.