Scinovex

Research article · 2023 · Full text

International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry

Hemorrhagic septicemia vaccination induced changed immunoglobulin G in Bali Cattle

I Nyoman SulabdaSiswanto

Volume 8(1) · Pages 84–86 · DOI: 10.22271/veterinary.2023.v8.i1b.472 ↗

Research areasMicrobial infections and disease researchLivestock Farming and Management

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Hemorrhagic septicemia is a fatal bacterial disease in cattle with high morbidity and mortality and causes economic losses. This study aims to measure the Immunoglobulin G titer in Bali cattle after Hemorrhagic septicemia vaccination. A total of 35 calves were divided into two groups. The treatment group was vaccinated with the Hemorrhagic septicemia vaccine, and the control group consist of non-vaccinated animals. The experiment animal was observed for 21 days. Blood samples were taken before and after 21 days of vaccination. The serum obtained was tested serologically using IgG ELISA Kit. The results of observation after vaccination all cattle still live without any clinical symptoms. The study showed vaccination of cattle by HS vaccine produced a significant rise of IgG titers in the serum of Bali cattle.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Hemorrhagic septicemia is a bacterial infectious disease affecting cattle and buffalo in Asia and Africa, characterized by high morbidity and mortality. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Hemorrhagic septicemia is a bacterial infectious disease affecting cattle and buffalo in Asia and Africa, characterized by high morbidity and mortality.

      In the paper's own words

      “Hemorrhagic septicemia is an infectious disease caused by bacteria that primarily affects cattle and buffalo, and occurs as an epizootic outbreak in Asian and African countries. This disease causes high mortality and morbidity in livestock”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The disease is caused by the bacterium Pasteurella multocida. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The disease is caused by the bacterium Pasteurella multocida.

      In the paper's own words

      “The disease is caused by Pasteurella multocida.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Controlling the disease requires accurate diagnosis, reporting, and the strategic application of vaccines. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Controlling the disease requires accurate diagnosis, reporting, and the strategic application of vaccines.

      In the paper's own words

      “Prevention and control of the disease can be achieved by correct reporting, accurate and rapid diagnosis, and strategic use of vaccines”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to measure the Immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers in Bali cattle following vaccination against Hemorrhagic septicemia. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to measure the Immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers in Bali cattle following vaccination against Hemorrhagic septicemia.

      In the paper's own words

      “This study aims to measure the Immunoglobulin G titer in Bali cattle after Hemorrhagic septicemia vaccination.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The study used 35 clinically healthy Bali cattle, approximately one year of age. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study used 35 clinically healthy Bali cattle, approximately one year of age.

      In the paper's own words

      “A total of 35 clinically healthy Bali cattle were used in this study. The animal is around one year old.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Materials and Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The cattle were administered the SE vaccine via intramuscular injection and monitored for 21 days. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The cattle were administered the SE vaccine via intramuscular injection and monitored for 21 days.

      In the paper's own words

      “All samples were vaccinated by intramuscular (IM) with SE vaccine (Pusvetma, Surabaya) and observed for 21 days.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Sample Collection

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Blood samples were collected from the animals both before vaccination and 21 days after the procedure. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Blood samples were collected from the animals both before vaccination and 21 days after the procedure.

      In the paper's own words

      “Blood samples were collected before vaccination and 21 days after vaccination.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Sample Collection

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • IgG levels were analyzed immediately after collection using an IgG ELISA kit. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      IgG levels were analyzed immediately after collection using an IgG ELISA kit.

      In the paper's own words

      “Samples were analyzed immediately after collection by IgG ELISA KIT according to the manufacturer's protocol.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Detection of Immunoglobulin G

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The researchers used a Student T-test and SPSS version 25 to analyze the effects of vaccination on IgG expression. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers used a Student T-test and SPSS version 25 to analyze the effects of vaccination on IgG expression.

      In the paper's own words

      “The effects of vaccination on expression IgG were analyzed using Student T-test (Heath, 2000) [10]. Data analyses were carried out using SPSS for Windows version 25.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Statistical analysis

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Following vaccination, all cattle remained alive and showed no clinical symptoms. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Following vaccination, all cattle remained alive and showed no clinical symptoms.

      In the paper's own words

      “The results of observation after vaccination all cattle still live without any clinical symptoms.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Before vaccination, the average IgG titer was 0.485±0.085 µg/ml, with values ranging from 0.246 µg/ml to 0.598 µg/ml. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Before vaccination, the average IgG titer was 0.485±0.085 µg/ml, with values ranging from 0.246 µg/ml to 0.598 µg/ml.

      In the paper's own words

      “the titer of IgG before vaccination, the lowest was 0.246 µg / ml and the highest was 0.598 µg / ml with an average of 0.485±0.085 µg / ml”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • At 21 days post-vaccination, the average IgG titer increased to 0.842±0.095 µg/ml, with values ranging from 0.553 µg/ml to 0.972 µg/ml. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      At 21 days post-vaccination, the average IgG titer increased to 0.842±0.095 µg/ml, with values ranging from 0.553 µg/ml to 0.972 µg/ml.

      In the paper's own words

      “and in 21 days after vaccination, the lowest was 0.553 µg / ml and the highest is 0.972 µg / ml with an average of 0.842±0.095 µg / ml”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The increase in IgG titers following Hemorrhagic septicemia (HS) vaccination was statistically significant (p<0.01). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The increase in IgG titers following Hemorrhagic septicemia (HS) vaccination was statistically significant (p<0.01).

      In the paper's own words

      “After being tested by Student T- test, it was found that titers of IgG in Bali cattle showed that vaccinated with HS were affect significantly IgG titers (p<0.01).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Immunized animals exhibited higher levels of IgG antibodies compared to the non-vaccinated control group. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Immunized animals exhibited higher levels of IgG antibodies compared to the non-vaccinated control group.

      In the paper's own words

      “The animals immunized with HS vaccine had a high level of IgG antibodies as compared to the control group consisting of non-vaccinated animals.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors concluded that vaccination with the HS vaccine leads to a significantly higher rise in Immunoglobulin G in Bali cattle compared to non-vaccinated animals. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors concluded that vaccination with the HS vaccine leads to a significantly higher rise in Immunoglobulin G in Bali cattle compared to non-vaccinated animals.

      In the paper's own words

      “From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the rise of Immunoglobulin G in Bali cattle vaccinated with HS vaccine is significantly higher than in non-vaccinated animals.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Bali cattle). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Vaccination and Antibody Response
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Bali cattle). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Bali cattle). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Vaccination and Antibody Response

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Bali cattle). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
IgG level before and after vaccination.Figure 1Page 2
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Hemorrhagic septicemia is an infectious disease caused by bacteria that primarily affects cattle and buffalo, and occurs as an epizootic outbreak in Asian and African countries. This disease causes high mortality and morbidity in livestock (Docksteader, 2022) [1] . Hemorrhagic septicemia is characterized by an acute disease (Kutzer et al., 2021) [2] . The disease is caused by Pasteurella multocida. Pasteurella multocida bacteria are gram-negative, non-motile and sensitive to penicillin (Karunasree, 2016) [3] . This bacterium is a normal flora in the upper respiratory tract of some animal species (Abdullah et al., 2013) [4] . The ability of these bacteria to enter and develop in the host is affected by the presence of capsules. Capsules or bacterial cell membranes are polysaccharide structures (Lipopolysaccharida / LPS) which is one of the most important factors in the malignancy of these bacteria. LPS is a surface antigen that is responsible for the pathogenesis of the disease (Furian et al., 2014) [5] . Pasteurella multocida B:2 and E:2 are serotypes that are lethal in cattle and buffalo (Shome et al., 2019) [6] that are major causes of economic losses in Asian and African countries (Almoheer et al., 2022) [7] . Haemorrhagic septicaemia is one of the most important bacterial diseases and is classified as one of the Strategic infectious Animal Diseases in Indonesia eradicated and controlled under the responsibility of the Central Government together with the local government). In Indonesia, in most Hemorrhagic septicemia endemic districts, outbreaks do occur throughout the year (Agung et al., 2020) [8] . This disease can be transmitted through direct contact with the mouth or nose secretions of infected animals either from carrier animals or animals that do not show clinical symptoms. Transmission can also occur due to animals ingesting or inhaling organisms in contaminated food or water. Prevention and control of the disease can be achieved by correct reporting, accurate and rapid diagnosis, and strategic use of vaccines (Dartini and Narcana, 2015) [9] . Vaccination has been shown to greatly reduce the incidence of HS in endemic areas. The best measure to control the disease is through vaccination programs (Almoheer et al., 2022) [7] Immunoglobulin G (IgG) level is sometimes used as an indicator to judge vaccine success, although this may not always be the best measure. Until now it is known that Immunoglobulin G is the most abundant antibody produced in the body to respond to vaccines in general. To assess the efficacy of vaccination again Hemorrhagic septicemia, we evaluated the Immunoglobulin G (IgG) expression in Balinese cattle vaccinated with Hemorrhagic septicemia vaccine.

Materials and Methods

A total of 35 clinically healthy Bali cattle were used in this study. The animal is around one year old. The cattle used were humanely handled, and this research was approved by The Animal Ethics Committee, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University.

Sample Collection

All samples were vaccinated by intramuscular (IM) with SE vaccine (Pusvetma, Surabaya) and observed for 21 days. Blood samples were collected before vaccination and 21 days after vaccination. Blood samples are taken from the Jugolaris vein into plain Vacutainers (Becton Dickinson, Meylan, France).

Detection of Immunoglobulin G

Samples were analyzed immediately after collection by IgG ELISA KIT according to the manufacturer's protocol. Analysis IgG was carried out in the Balai Besar Veterinar, Denpasar.

Statistical analysis

The effects of vaccination on expression IgG were analyzed using Student T-test (Heath, 2000) [10] . Data analyses were carried out using SPSS for Windows version 25.

Results and Discussion

The results of observation after vaccination all cattle still live without any clinical symptoms. The IgG titer on 35 Bali cattle measured by ELISA technique showed that the titer of IgG before vaccination, the lowest was 0.246 µg / ml and the highest was 0.598 µg / ml with an average of 0.485±0.085 µg / ml and in 21 days after vaccination, the lowest was 0.553 µg / ml and the highest is 0.972 µg / ml with an average of 0.842±0.095 µg / ml as seen in Figure1. This result indicates that vaccination can stimulate antibody formation against the SE vaccine. After being tested by Student T-test, it was found that titers of IgG in Bali cattle showed that vaccinated with HS were affect significantly IgG titers (p<0.01). The immune system can recognize the difference between the part of the body's systems and its foreign bodies entering the body. In general, immunity systems can be divided into humoral immunity and cellular immunity (Herliani et al., 2020) [11] . The humoral immunity system consists of antibodies and fluid that are secreted from body organs. HS vaccine antigens that are foreign to the body are first responded to by APC cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells, and B cells. B cells that express BCR can bind antigens such as LPS (lipopolysaccharide) from bacterial walls. Once inside the cell, the antigen is broken down into smaller peptides and this peptide enters through a peptide bond gap from MHC II and allows MHC II to present the surface of the APC (antigen-presenting cell) cell membrane. By APC cells, the peptide antigen is presented to CD4 + T cells. The interaction between APC cells and T cells is mediated by MHC II molecules in APC and TCR and CD4 molecules in Th cells. In addition, involved various co-stimulators between APC cells and Th cells that can strengthen or suppress the Th cell response to antigens. APC cells can produce IL-1 which triggers B cell proliferation, whereas Th cells produce various cytokines that play a role in the proliferation and differentiation of naive B cells into plasma cells or memory cells (Hong et al., 2018) [12] . In the production of antibodies, the most important cytokines are IL2, IL4, IL6, and INFγ produced by Th cells and function to trigger the differentiation of naive B cells into plasma cells to produce antibodies. The animals immunized with HS vaccine had a high level of IgG antibodies as compared to the control group consisting of non-vaccinated animals. According to Cantona et al. (2020), [13] the average value of cattle antibody titer after the HS vaccination was able to trigger a protective antibody response. This result was supported by the result of Gowrakkal et al. (2014), [14] the vaccine can stimulate high antibody titer in the vaccinated animal. There has been an increase in serum IgG concentrations after vaccination, in contrast to the observation of Hodgson et al. 2005, [15] who reported that an increase in IgG titers occurred gradually in serum throughout 6 to 10 weeks after vaccination. The reasons for this in the present study may have been that the vaccine was used rapidly to have stimulated a clear humoral response to the primary vaccination.

Figure 1. IgG level before and after vaccination.
IgG level before and after vaccination.↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
IgG level before and after vaccination.

IgG level before and after vaccination.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Conclusion

From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the rise of Immunoglobulin G in Bali cattle vaccinated with HS vaccine is significantly higher than in non-vaccinated animals.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Udayana University for funding through the PUPS (Research Study Program). The authors would like to thank all farmers for their participation.

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Docksteader D. Haemorrhagic Septicaemia. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine and Veterinary Science. 2022;6(3):78-83. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.85313
  2. Kutzer P, Szentiks CA, Bock S, Fritsch G, Magyar T, Schulze C, Semmler T, et al. Re-Emergence and Spread of Haemorrhagic Septicaemia in Germany: The Wolf as a Vector? Microorganisms. 2021;9(9):1999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ microorganisms9091999.
  3. Karunasree P. A Brief Study on Hemorrhagic Septicemia. Research and Reviews. Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2016;2(2):30-37.
  4. Abdullah FF, Adamu LH, Osman AY, Zakaria Z, Abdullah R, Saad MZ, et al. Clinico-pathological Responses of Calves Associated with Infection of Pasteurella multocida Type B and the Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide and Outer Membrane Protein Immunogens. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2013;5(5):190-198. https://doi.org/10.19026/IJAVA.5.5596.
  5. Furian TQ, Borges KA, Pilatti RM, Almeida C, DoNascimento VP, Salle CTP, et al. Identification of the capsule type of Pasteurellamultocida isolates from cases of fowl cholera by multiplex PCR and comparison with phenotypicmethods. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola. 2014;16(2):31-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-635x160231-36.
  6. Shome R, Deka RP, Sahay S, Grace D, Lindahl JF. Seroprevalence of hemorrhagic septicemia in dairy cows in Assam, India, Infection Ecology & Epidemiology, 2019;9(1):1604064. DOI: 10.1080/20008686.2019.1604064
  7. Almoheer R, Abd Wahid ME, Zakaria HA, Jonet MAB, Al-shaibani MM, Al-Gheethi A, et al. Spatial, Temporal, and Demographic Patterns in the Prevalence of Hemorrhagic Septicemia in 41 Countries in 2005-2019: A Systematic Analysis with Special Focus on the Potential Development of a New-Generation Vaccine. Vaccines 2022;10(2):315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ vaccines10020315
  8. Agung SP, Lumbantobing, Sigalingging R, Purba P, Theresia AN, Danang MMS. Septicemia epizootica vaccination as the initial step of prevention of se diseases in buffalo in BPTUHPT Siborongborong. Buletin Sinur. 2020;I(01):37-43.
  9. Dartini NL, Narcana IK. Surveillance Haemorrhagic Septicaemia (HS): an evaluation of HS eradication program at nusa penida. Buletin Veteriner, BB Vet Denpasar, 2015, XXVII, No. 87.
  10. Herliani H, Sulaiman A, Hidayat MI. Potency of Cell Wall Protein of Pasteurella multocida as Hemorrhagic Septicemia Vaccine on Swamp Buffaloes. Journal of Wetlands Environmental Management. 2020;8(1):33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/10.20527/jwem.v8i1.200.
  11. Hong S, Zhang Z, Liu H, Tian M, Zhu X, Zhang Z, et al. Cells Are the Dominant Antigen-Presenting Cells that Activate Naive CD4+ T Cells upon Immunization with a Virus-Derived Nanoparticle Antigen. Immunity. 2018;49(4):695-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.012.
  12. Cantona HM, Sanam M, Utami T, Tophianong T, Widi A. Evaluasi titer antibodi pasca vaksinasi septicaemia epizootica pada sapi bali di kota kupang. Jurnal Kajian Veteriner, 2020;8(1):69-80. https://doi.org/10.35508/jkv.v8i1.2292.
  13. Gowrakkal M, Chandrashekar M, Bhajantri S, Satav J, Chandakala G, Mayanna A, et al. Evaluation of immuno efficiency of hemorrhagic septicemia vaccine strain (Vaccine seed). Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4(Suppl 1):S263-7. Doi:10.12980/APJTB.4.2014C554.
  14. Hodgson JC, Finucane A, Dagleish MP, Ataei S, Parton R, Coote JG, et al. Efficacy of vaccination of calves against hemorrhagic septicemia with a live aroA derivative of Pasteurella multocida B:2 by two different routes of administration. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73(3):1475-81. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.3.14751481.2005