Scinovex

Research article · 2022 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

New Homeomorphism in topological spaces

Bhaskar A Munewadi

Volume 7(6) · Pages 139–142 · DOI: 10.22271/maths.2022.v7.i6b.909 ↗

Research areasFuzzy and Soft Set TheoryFixed Point Theorems Analysis

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

In this paper a new class of homeomorphism called minimal Regular weakly homeomorphism and maximal Regular weakly homeomorphism are introduced and investigated and during this process some properties of the new concepts have been studied.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Research in topological spaces has previously established the study of minimal open and minimal closed sets as subclasses of open and closed sets. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Research in topological spaces has previously established the study of minimal open and minimal closed sets as subclasses of open and closed sets.

      In the paper's own words

      “In the year 2001 and 2003, F.Nakaoka and N.oda [1, 2, 3] introduced and studied minimal open [resp. minimal closed] sets which are subclass of open [resp.closed sets].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The concept of weakly homeomorphism in topological spaces was introduced in the year 2000. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The concept of weakly homeomorphism in topological spaces was introduced in the year 2000.

      In the paper's own words

      “In the year 2000, M.Sheik john [4] introduced and studied weakly homeomorphism in topological spaces”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Minimal and maximal homeomorphisms, along with minimal open sets and maps, were studied in 2008. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Minimal and maximal homeomorphisms, along with minimal open sets and maps, were studied in 2008.

      In the paper's own words

      “In the year 2008 B.M.Ittanagi [5] introduced and studied minimal open sets and maps in topological spaces and minimal homeomorphism and maximal homeomorphism in topological spaces.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The paper aims to introduce and investigate a new class of homeomorphisms termed minimal Regular weakly homeomorphism and maximal Regular weakly homeomorphism. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The paper aims to introduce and investigate a new class of homeomorphisms termed minimal Regular weakly homeomorphism and maximal Regular weakly homeomorphism.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this paper a new class of homeomorphism called minimal Regular weakly homeomorphism and maximal Regular weakly homeomorphism are introduced and investigated”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • A minimal regular weakly homeomorphism is defined as a bijective function where both the function and its inverse are minimal regular weakly continuous maps. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      A minimal regular weakly homeomorphism is defined as a bijective function where both the function and its inverse are minimal regular weakly continuous maps.

      In the paper's own words

      “Definition 2.1: A bijection function f : X Y is called I) Minimal regular weakly homeomorphism if both f and f – 1 are minimal regular weaklycontinuous maps.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The author defines a min-max regular weakly homeomorphism as a bijection where both the function and its inverse are min-max regular weakly continuous maps. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The author defines a min-max regular weakly homeomorphism as a bijection where both the function and its inverse are min-max regular weakly continuous maps.

      In the paper's own words

      “Definition 2.11: A bijection f : X Y is called (i). min - max regular weakly homeomorphism if both f and f – 1 are min - max regular weakly continuous maps.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 2.11:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Every homeomorphism is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism, although the reverse is not necessarily true. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Every homeomorphism is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism, although the reverse is not necessarily true.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 2.2: Every homeomorphism is minimal regular weakly homeomorphism but not conversely.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Theorem 2.2:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Every homeomorphism is a maximal regular weakly homeomorphism, but not every maximal regular weakly homeomorphism is a homeomorphism. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Every homeomorphism is a maximal regular weakly homeomorphism, but not every maximal regular weakly homeomorphism is a homeomorphism.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 2.4: Every homeomorphism is maximal regular weakly homeomorphism but not conversely.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Theorem 2.2:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Minimal regular weakly homeomorphisms and maximal regular weakly homeomorphisms are independent of one another. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Minimal regular weakly homeomorphisms and maximal regular weakly homeomorphisms are independent of one another.

      In the paper's own words

      “Remark 2.6: Minimal regular weakly homeomorphism and maximal regular weakly homeomorphism are independent of each other.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Theorem 2.2:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • For a bijective and minimal regular weakly continuous function, being a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism is equivalent to being a minimal regular weakly open map or a maximal regular weakly closed map. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      For a bijective and minimal regular weakly continuous function, being a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism is equivalent to being a minimal regular weakly open map or a maximal regular weakly closed map.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 2.8: Let f : X Y be a bijective and minimal regular weakly continuous then the following statements are equivalent. (i) f : X Y is minimal regular weakly homeomorphism. (ii) f is minimal regular weakly open map. (iii) f is maximal regular weakly closed map.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Definition 2.11:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • For a bijective and maximal regular weakly continuous function, the inverse being a maximal regular weakly homeomorphism is equivalent to the function being a maximal regular weakly open map or a minimal regular weakly closed map. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      For a bijective and maximal regular weakly continuous function, the inverse being a maximal regular weakly homeomorphism is equivalent to the function being a maximal regular weakly open map or a minimal regular weakly closed map.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 2.9: Let f : X Y be a bijective and maximal regular weakly continuous then the following statements are equivalent. (i). f -1 : X Y is maximal regular weakly homeomorphism. (ii). f is maximal regular weakly open map. (iii). f is minimal regular weakly closed map.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 2.11:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Every min-max regular weakly homeomorphism is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism, but the converse does not hold. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Every min-max regular weakly homeomorphism is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism, but the converse does not hold.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 2.12: Every min-max regular weakly homeomorphism is minimal regular weakly homeomorphism but not conversely.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 2.11:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Every max-min regular weakly homeomorphism is a maximal regular weakly homeomorphism, though the converse is not necessarily true. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Every max-min regular weakly homeomorphism is a maximal regular weakly homeomorphism, though the converse is not necessarily true.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 2.14: Every max-min regular weakly homeomorphism is maximal regular weakly homeomorphism but not conversely.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 2.11:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • For a bijective and min-max regular weakly continuous map, being a minimal-maximal regular weakly homeomorphism is equivalent to being a minimal-maximal regular weakly open map or a maximal-minimal regular weakly closed map. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      For a bijective and min-max regular weakly continuous map, being a minimal-maximal regular weakly homeomorphism is equivalent to being a minimal-maximal regular weakly open map or a maximal-minimal regular weakly closed map.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 2.15: Let f : X Y be a bijective and min-max regular weakly continuous map then the following statements are equivalent. (i). f is minimal - maximal regular weakly homeomorphism. (ii). f is minimal - maximal regular weakly open map. (iii). f is maximal - minimal regular weakly closed map.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 2.11:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The author concludes that the introduced classes of minimal and maximal Regular weakly homeomorphisms have been successfully investigated and their properties studied. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The author concludes that the introduced classes of minimal and maximal Regular weakly homeomorphisms have been successfully investigated and their properties studied.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this paper a new class of homeomorphism called minimal Regular weakly homeomorphism and maximal Regular weakly homeomorphism are introduced and investigated and during this process some properties of the new concepts have been studied.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric topological spaces). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Hierarchy of Homeomorphisms
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric topological spaces). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric topological spaces). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Hierarchy of Homeomorphisms

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric topological spaces). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

In the year 2001 and 2003, F.Nakaoka and N.oda [1,2,3] In the year 2000, M.Sheik john [4] introduced and studied weakly homeomorphism in topological spaces and in the year 2008 B.M.Ittanagi [5] introduced and studied minimal open sets and maps in topological spaces and minimal homeomorphism and maximal homeomorphism in topological spaces. In the year 2014 R.S.Wali and Vivekananda Dembre [6,7] introduced and studied minimal weakly open sets and maximal weakly closed sets and maximal weakly open sets and minimal weakly closed sets in topological spaces.In the year 2014 [8] Vivekananda Dembre, Manjunath Gowda and Jeetendra Gurjar introduced and studied minimal weakly and maximal weakly continuous functions in topological spaces. In the year 2014 [9] Vivekananda Dembre and Jeetendra Gurjar introduced and studied minimal weakly and maximal weakly open maps in topological spaces. Definition 1.1 [1] : A proper non-empty open subset U of a topological space X is said to be minimal open set if any open set which is contained in U is 𝜑 or U. Definition 1.2 [2] : A proper non-empty open subset U of a topological space X is said to be maximal open set if any open set which is contained in U is X or U. Definition 1.3 [3] : A proper non-empty closed subset F of a topological space X is said to be minimal closed set if any closed set which is contained in F is 𝜑 or F. Definition 1.4 [3] : A proper non-empty closed subset F of a topological space X is said to be maximal closed set if any closed set which is contained in F is X or F. Definition 1.5 [4] : Let X and Y be the topological spaces. A bijective function f : X Y is called weakly homeomorphism if both f and f -1 are weakly continuous. Definition 1.6 [5] : Let X and Y be the topological spaces. A bijective function f : X Y is called I) Minimal homeomorphism if both f and f -1 are minimal continuous maps. II) Maximal homeomorphism if both f and f -1 are maximal continuous maps. Definition 1.7 [5] : Let X and Y be the topological spaces

Definition 1.9 [7] : A proper non-empty weakly open subset U of X is said to be minimal weakly open set if any weakly open set which is contained in U is ∅ or U.

Definition 1.10 [8] : A proper non-empty weakly closed subset U of X is said to be maximal weakly open set if any weakly open set which is contained in U is X or U.

Definition 1.11 [9] : Let X and Y be topological spaces.

Minimal regular weakly and maximal regular weakly homeomorphism. Definition 2.1: A bijection function f : X

Y is called I) Minimal regular weakly homeomorphism if both f and f - 1 are minimal regular weaklycontinuous maps. II) Maximal regular weakly homeomorphism if both f and f - 1 are maximal regular weakly continuous maps.

Theorem 2.2:

Every homeomorphism is minimal regular weakly homeomorphism but not conversely.

Proof: Let f : X Y be a homeomorphism. Now f and f -1 are continuous maps then f and f -1 are minimal regular weakly continuous as every continuous map is minimal regular weakly continuous. Hence f is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism.

Example 2.3: Let X=Y={a,b,c} be with 𝜏 = { X, 𝜑, {a},{a,b}} and 𝜇 = { Y, 𝜑, {a},{b},{a,b} } then f : X Y be a function defined by f(a)=a, f(b)=a and f(c)=c, then f and f -1 are minimal regular weakly continuous maps then f is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism but it is not a homeomorphism. Since f is not continuous map for the open set {b} in Y ; f -1 ({b}) = b which is not open set in X.

Theorem 2.4: Every homeomorphism is maximal regular weakly homeomorphism but not conversely.

Proof: Let f : X Y be a homeomorphism. Now f and f -1 are continuous maps then f and f -1 are maximal regular weakly continuous as every continuous map is minimal regular weakly continuous. Hence f is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism.

Example 2.5: Let X = Y = {a,b,c} be with 𝜏 = { X, 𝜑, {a,b}} and 𝜇 = { Y, 𝜑, {a},{b},{a,b} } then f : X Y be a identity function then f and f -1 are maximal regular weakly continuous maps then f is a maximal regular weakly homeomorphism but it is not a homeomorphism. Since f is not a continuous map for the open set {b} in Y ; f -1 ({b}) = b which is not open set in X.

Remark 2.6: Minimal regular weakly homeomorphism and maximal regular weakly homeomorphism are independent of each other.

Example 2.7: In example 2.3 f is minimal regular weakly homeomorphism but it is not maximal regular weakly homeomorphism. In example 2.5 f is maximal regular weakly homeomorphism but it is not minimal regular weakly homeomorphism.

X is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism and similarly f is minimal regular weakly homeomorphism.

X is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism and similarly f is minimal regular weakly homeomorphism.

Definition 2.11:

A bijection f : X Y is called (i). min -max regular weakly homeomorphism if both f and f -1 are min -max regular weakly continuous maps. (ii). max-min regular weakly homeomorphism if both f and f -1 are max -min regular weakly continuous maps.

Theorem 2.12: Every min-max regular weakly homeomorphism is minimal regular weakly homeomorphism but not conversely.

Proof : : Let f : X Y be a homeomorphism. Now f and f -1 are continuous maps then f and f -1 are min-max regular weakly continuous as every continuous map is min-max regular weakly continuous. Hence f is a min-max regular weakly homeomorphism.

Example 2.13: In example 2.3 f is a minimal regular weakly homeomorphism but it is not a min-max regular weakly homeomorphism. Since f is not a min-max regular weakly continuous map for the minimal regular weakly open set {b} in Y, f -1 (b) = {b} which is not a maximal regular weakly open set in X.

Theorem 2.14: Every max-min regular weakly homeomorphism is maximal regular weakly homeomorphism but not conversely.

Proof : Let f : X Y be a homeomorphism. Now f and f -1 are continuous maps then f and f -1 are max-min regular weakly continuous as every continuous map is max-min regular weakly continuous. Hence f is a min-max regular weakly homeomorphism. (iii) (i) : Let N be any minimal regular weakly open set in X ; then X-N is a maximal regular weakly closed set in X ; by assumption f (X-N) is a minimal regular weakly closed set in Y. But f (X-N) = (f -1) (X -N) = Y -(f -1) (N) is a minimal regular weakly open set in Y ; therefore (f -1) (N) is a maximal regular weaklyopen set in Y. Hence f -1 :Y X is a minimal-maximal regular weakly homeomorphism and similarly f is min-max regular weakly homeomorphism.

References

9 in the original paper
  1. Nakaoka F, Oda F. Some Application of Maximal open sets, Int. J Math. Math. sci. 2001;27(8):471-476.
  2. Nakaoka F, Oda F. Some Properties of Maximal open sets, Int. J. Math. Math. sci. 2003;21(21):1331-1340.
  3. Nakaoka F, Oda F. on Minimal closed sets, Proceeding of topological spaces and it's application. 2003;5:19-21.
  4. Wali RS, Vivekananda Dembre. Minimal regular weakly open sets and Maximal regular weakly closed sets in topological spaces, International journal of Mathematical Archieve. 2014 Sept, 5(9).
  5. Wali RS. Vivekananda Dembre. Minimal regular weakly Closed sets and Maximal regular weakly Open Sets in Topological Spaces, Intenational Research Journal of Pure Algebra. 2014 Sept-, 4(9).
  6. Vivekananda Dembre, Manjunath Gowda, Jeetendra Gurjar. Minimal regular weakly and Maximal regular weakly continuous functions in topological spaces, International Research Journal of pure Algebra. 2014 Oct, 4(10).
  7. Vivekananda Dembre, Jeetendra Gurjar. Minimal regular weakly open map and Maximal regular weakly open maps in topological spaces, International Research Journal of pure Algebra. 2014 Oct, 4(10).
  8. Wali RS, Vivekananda Dembre. On Pre Generalızed Pre Regular Weakly Closed Sets in Topologıcal Spaces; Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences. 2015 February;6(2):113-125.
  9. Wali RS, Vivekananda Dembre. On Pre Generalized Pre Regular Weakly Open Sets and Pre Generalized Pre Regular Weakly Neighbourhoods in Topological Spaces Annals of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2015 April;10(1). 2015; Published on 12.