article Open AccessTop 10% cited
Bias: Table 1
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · 2004 · Vol. 58(8) · pp. 635–641
Miguel Delgado‐Rodríguez✉(Universidad de Jaén)J Llorca(Universidad de Cantabria)
Abstract
The concept of bias is the lack of internal validity or incorrect assessment of the association between an exposure and an effect in the target population in which the statistic estimated has an expectation that does not equal the true value. Biases can be classified by the research stage in which they occur or by the direction of change in a estimate. The most important biases are those produced in the definition and selection of the study population, data collection, and the association between different determinants of an effect in the population. A definition of the most common biases occurring in these stages is given.
Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeReliability and Agreement in MeasurementMedicineSelection biasStatisticPopulationStatisticsSelection (genetic algorithm)EconometricsEnvironmental healthArtificial intelligenceMathematics
MeSH terms
Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsHumansTerminology as TopicResearch DesignReproducibility of ResultsBiasSelection BiasConfounding Factors, Epidemiologic
Citations
1,067
FWCI
12.60
field-weighted impact
References
83
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population
American Journal of Epidemiology · 2017 · 4,086 citations
References
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2000 · 2,251 citations
BIAS DUE TO MISCLASSIFICATION IN THE ESTIMATION OF RELATIVE RISK
American Journal of Epidemiology · 1977 · 1,016 citations
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
JAMA · 1995 · 5,583 citations
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
The Lancet · 2001 · 5,382 citations
Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2002 · 878 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
