Scinovex

Research article · 2019 · Full text

International Journal of Biology Sciences

Life cycle of oil palm bunch moth, Tirathabamundella walker Lepidoptera: Pyralidae Reared Under laboratory conditions on artificial diet

Su MingPatricia Jie Hung KingCalvin Tan Zhe KhaiKwan Yee MingZakri Fitri Bin Ab AzizJoseph Bong Choon FahKian Huat Ong

Volume 1(1) · Pages 09–10 · DOI: 10.33545/26649926.2019.v1.i1a.3 ↗

Research areasOil Palm Production and SustainabilityDate Palm Research StudiesInsect Pest Control Strategies

↓ Read full-text PDF1 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Tirathaba mundella Walker is an important pest in many oil palm plantations especially those established on peatland. The life cycle of T. mundella has not been described in detail despite its economic importance. This study aimed to describe the bionomic characteristics of T. mundella, rearing on an artificial diet, at 25 oC. The duration of a complete metamorphosis cycle of T. mundella was about 51.63 ± 3.80 days. The incubation period was the shortest (3.33 ± 0.80 days.), The most detrimental stage of the pest to oil palm is at larval stage, which took 33.90 ± 2.60 days before pupating. The pupal period took about 5 to 11 days with a mean ± SD period of 8.53 ± 1.48 days. The average of the adult’s longevity was about 6.05 ± 1.81 days. There is no statistical difference between the duration of male and female longevity. Adult male and female moths reared in captivity feeded with 10% sucrose solution would mate readily and produce fertile eggs. The mean preoviposition period were 4 days. Successful of rearing T. mundella using artificial diet under laboratory conditions promises laboratory assessment for pesticide development which is less tedious and time consuming than conventional field experiments.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Tirathaba mundella Walker is a significant pest for oil palm plantations, particularly those located on peatland. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Tirathaba mundella Walker is a significant pest for oil palm plantations, particularly those located on peatland.

      In the paper's own words

      “Tirathaba mundella Walker is an important pest in many oil palm plantations especially those established on peatland.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Severe attacks by this pest on female inflorescences can lead to early bunch abortion, causing economic damage. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Severe attacks by this pest on female inflorescences can lead to early bunch abortion, causing economic damage.

      In the paper's own words

      “In the cases of severe attack on female inflorescences, early bunch abortion can be resulted”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Despite the economic impact of the pest, detailed descriptions of its life cycle have been lacking. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Despite the economic impact of the pest, detailed descriptions of its life cycle have been lacking.

      In the paper's own words

      “The life cycle of T. mundella has not been described in detail despite its economic importance.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to describe the bionomic characteristics of T. mundella when reared on an artificial diet at 25°C. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to describe the bionomic characteristics of T. mundella when reared on an artificial diet at 25°C.

      In the paper's own words

      “This study aimed to describe the bionomic characteristics of T. mundella, rearing on an artificial diet, at 25 OC.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • Adult moths were collected from oil palm estates in Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Adult moths were collected from oil palm estates in Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia.

      In the paper's own words

      “The adult moth of Tirathaba mundella were captured from oil palm estates situated between latitudes (4.01625) and longitudes (114.22799) in Miri Sarawak, Malaysia.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Insect source

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The insects were reared at room temperature using an artificial diet developed by the Laboratory of Plant Health and Management at Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The insects were reared at room temperature using an artificial diet developed by the Laboratory of Plant Health and Management at Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus.

      In the paper's own words

      “An artificial diet developed in Laboratory of Plant Health and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus and was used to rear Tirathaba mundella at room temperature.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Insect Rearing

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Adult moths were provided with a 10% sucrose solution in moistened cotton to support mating and egg production. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Adult moths were provided with a 10% sucrose solution in moistened cotton to support mating and egg production.

      In the paper's own words

      “Moths were provided with 10% sucrose solution in moistened cotton.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Insect source

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The complete metamorphosis cycle of T. mundella on the artificial diet averaged 51.63 ± 3.80 days. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The complete metamorphosis cycle of T. mundella on the artificial diet averaged 51.63 ± 3.80 days.

      In the paper's own words

      “The duration of a complete metamorphosis cycle of T. mundella was about 51.63 ± 3.80 days.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results and Discussions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The shortest stage of the life cycle was the incubation period, which lasted 3.33 ± 0.80 days. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The shortest stage of the life cycle was the incubation period, which lasted 3.33 ± 0.80 days.

      In the paper's own words

      “The incubation period was the shortest (3.33 ± 0.80 days.)”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results and Discussions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The larval stage, which is the most damaging to oil palms, lasted 33.90 ± 2.60 days. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The larval stage, which is the most damaging to oil palms, lasted 33.90 ± 2.60 days.

      In the paper's own words

      “the most detrimental stage of the pest to oil palm is at larval stage, which took 33.90 ± 2.60 days before pupating.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The study identified a total of seven larval instars when the pest was fed on the artificial diet. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The study identified a total of seven larval instars when the pest was fed on the artificial diet.

      In the paper's own words

      “There were a total of seven larvae instars identified (Table 1).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The pupal period ranged from 5 to 11 days, with a mean duration of 8.53 ± 1.48 days. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The pupal period ranged from 5 to 11 days, with a mean duration of 8.53 ± 1.48 days.

      In the paper's own words

      “The pupal period took about 5 to 11 days with a mean ± SD period of 8.53 ± 1.48 days.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results and Discussions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Adult longevity averaged 6.05 ± 1.81 days, with no statistical difference between males and females. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Adult longevity averaged 6.05 ± 1.81 days, with no statistical difference between males and females.

      In the paper's own words

      “The average of the adult’s longevity was about 6.05 ± 1.81 days. There is no statistical difference between the duration of male and female longevity.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results and Discussions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Male moths had a slightly smaller wingspan (9.96 ± 0.57 mm) compared to female moths (12.48 ± 0.46 mm). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Male moths had a slightly smaller wingspan (9.96 ± 0.57 mm) compared to female moths (12.48 ± 0.46 mm).

      In the paper's own words

      “The wingspan of the males (Figure 1) were slightly smaller (9.96 ± 0.57 mm) than the female moth (Figure 2) (12.48 ± 0.46 mm).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The preoviposition period averaged 4 days, ranging from 3 to 5 days. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The preoviposition period averaged 4 days, ranging from 3 to 5 days.

      In the paper's own words

      “The preoviposition period ranged from 3 to 5 days with an average of 4 days.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The eggs were oval, measuring 0.40 ± 0.06 mm by 0.27 ± 0.04 mm. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The eggs were oval, measuring 0.40 ± 0.06 mm by 0.27 ± 0.04 mm.

      In the paper's own words

      “Eggs were oval in shape and with 0.40 ± 0.06 mm x 0.27 ± 0.04 mm in dimensions (Table 3).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results and Discussions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that the artificial diet extends the larval period, making it a useful tool for pesticide development research targeting the pest's most damaging stage. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that the artificial diet extends the larval period, making it a useful tool for pesticide development research targeting the pest's most damaging stage.

      In the paper's own words

      “The artificial diet used in this study extended the larval period as compared to the pest fed on natural diets. This could be a useful tool to study the most detrimental stage of Tirathaba mundella in pesticide development research”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The ability to rear T. mundella on an artificial diet allows for laboratory assessments of pesticides, which are less time-consuming than field experiments. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The ability to rear T. mundella on an artificial diet allows for laboratory assessments of pesticides, which are less time-consuming than field experiments.

      In the paper's own words

      “Successful of rearing T. mundella using artificial diet under laboratory conditions promises laboratory assessment for pesticide development which is less tedious and time consuming than conventional field experiments.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results and Discussions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Tirathabamundella walker moth). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Life Cycle Timeline
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Tirathabamundella walker moth). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Tirathabamundella walker moth). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Life Cycle Timeline

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Tirathabamundella walker moth). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 4 (page 4) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Breadth/wingspan (mm): Adult Moth (Male) vs Adult Moth (Female)
Replotted from Table 4 (page 4) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 4 (page 4) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Breadth/wingspan (mm): Adult Moth (Male) vs Adult Moth (Female)

Replotted from Table 4 (page 4) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditionsTable 1Page 3Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditionsTable 2Page 3Morphometrics (mm) for different larvae instars of T. mundella walker fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditionsTable 3Page 3Morphometrics (mm) for Egg, pupa and adult moth ofTable 4Page 4Male adult moth of Tirathaba mundella WalkerFigure 1Page 4Female adult moth of Tirathaba mundella WalkerFigure 2Page 4Fertile egg of Tirathaba mundella Walker (reddish yellow inFigure 3Page 4Cluster of infertile eggs of Tirathaba mundella WalkerFigure 4Page 4Cluster of fertile eggs with readily seen black head capsule ofFigure 5Page 4Head capsule for 1st Instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 6Page 4Head capsule for 2nd instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 7Page 41st Instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 8Page 42nd Instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 9Page 4Head capsule for 3rd Instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 10Page 53rd Instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 11Page 5Head capsule for 4th instar of T. mundella WalkerFigure 12Page 5Head capsule for 5th instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 13Page 5Head capsule for 6th instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 14Page 5Head capsule for 7th instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 15Page 54th instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 16Page 55th instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 17Page 56th instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 18Page 57th instar larvae of T. mundella WalkerFigure 19Page 5Ovoid and reddish brown colour cocoon of T. mundellaFigure 20Page 6
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The oil palm bunch moth species, Tirathaba, is classified under Pyralidae family. It was first recorded by Malaysian Agricultural Department in 1934 and has been mistakenly referred to as Tirathaba fructivora Megr. and Melissoblaptes fructivora Megr (Wood & Ng, 1974) [9] . There are only two recorded species from this family in Malaysia, namely Tirathaba mundella and Tirathaba rufivena, former is referring to oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) and latter is related to coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). Tirathaba mundella infestation in oil palm estate can be identified with the presence of moist reddish and dark brown faces over the surface of infested fruit bunches (Su, 2016; Calvin et. al., 2018) [7,1] . Possible of areca fruit, Areca cathechu and inflorescences of nipah, Nipah fruticans as alternate host for this pest has been proposed by Wood & Ng, 1974 [9] . In initial years, the level of infestation of Tirathaba mundella in Malaysia was mild and little damage was noticed, but of late, it becomes serious. Plantations with more than 30% trees infested has been reported and the severity could rise to 50% if no proper control programs are being implemented (Yaakop & Manaf, 2015) [10] . Moderate to severe pest infestations for oil palm estate with palms approaching maturity which include young mature palms of 3 to 6 years old (Chan, 1973; Su, 2016) [2,7] . Indeed, major outbreaks concentrate to oil palm estates with huge areas of young mature palms and established on peat (Lim et al., 2012; Lim, 2012; Su, 2016; Su & Bong, 2017) [4,5,7,8] . The conditions of such estates provide favorable conditions for the pest's regular multiplication and spreading. Moreover, often than not, potential natural predators and parasites are absence (Chan, 1973; Su, 2016) [2,7] . Economic damage initiated at the inflorescence stage. The larvae of Tirathaba mundella can attack both male and female inflorescences at any stage of the inflorescence (Wood & Ng, 1974; Ng, 1977; Chan, 1973; Yaakop & Manaf, 2015; Su, 2016) [9,6,2,10,7] . In the cases of severe attack on female inflorescences, early bunch abortion can be resulted (Wood & Ng, 1974; Ng, 1977; Khoo et. al., 1991; Su, 2016) [9,6,3,7] . Despite the economic importance of this pest, not many detailed descriptions regard the life cycle aspect of Tirathaba mundella has been published. This study aimed to describe the bionomic characteristics of T. mundella, rearing under laboratory condition on an artificial diet.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods

Insect source

The adult moth of Tirathaba mundella were captured from oil palm estates situated between latitudes (4.01625) and longitudes (114.22799) in Miri Sarawak, Malaysia. The captured male moths were separated from the female before oviposition. For oviposition, the male and female were kept in a container measuring 14.5 cm (height) × 26 cm (length) × 26 cm (breadth) and covered with a white cloth. The male: female ratio was at 4: 6 for oviposition. Moths were provided with 10% sucrose solution in moistened cotton. Non-woven gauze was placed at the bottom of the container for oviposition purpose. The non-woven gauze was changed daily. The mating period was recorded, and the moths were kept until death. The laid eggs were kept in a separate plastic DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/26649926.2019.v1.i1a.3 container that was maintained at room temperature. Mesocarp fibre was added on top of the artificial diet (Figure A) to provide hiding space for the newly hatched larvae while maintaining easy access to feed on the diet for their successful development. Hatched neonatal larvae were used for subsequent experiments.

Insect Rearing

An artificial diet developed in Laboratory of Plant Health and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus and was used to rear Tirathaba mundella at room temperature. About 7.5 mL of diet were poured into a 6.0 cm (height) × 5.5 cm (diameter) cup. Two active neonate larvae upon hatching were transferred to each plastic cup with diet. The diets were changed weekly. All the larvae were reared at room temperature. Larval survival and development progress were monitored daily until pupation and adult emergence. Daily examination under a stereoscopic binocular microscope were carried out to detect moulting of larvae by observing present of old capsule, take measurements of head capsules at its broadest points, measurements of larvae length, and detect pupation, followed by taking measurements for the length and breadth of the pupae. During pupation period, each individual insect was kept in a bigger plastic cup at 13 cm (height) × 9 cm (diameter), monitored every alternate day until adult emergence. When the adult insect emerged, similar procedures were repeated for the next generation of insect rearing.

Results and Discussions

The life cycle of oil palm bunch moth, Tirathaba mundella Walker has been studied by Wood and Ng as early as 1974 using natural oil palm loose fruits as food source. And it is the only general description published on T. mundella life cycle. In order to give a complete picture on the bionomic characteristics of T. mundella with regards to its life cycle, T. mundella were reared under laboratory condition on an artificial diet in this study. T. mundella Walker fed on artificial diet developed by UPMKB, two successive generations were recorded. The duration of a complete metamorphosis cycle of T. mundella was about 51.63 ± 3.80 days as shown in Table 1. The incubation period was the shortest (3.33 ± 0.80 days.), the larval stage was also the longest, 33.90 ± 2.60 days. There were a total of seven larvae instars identified (Table 1). Instars changed to their successive instar in less than 6 days. Instar 1 to instar 2 took 3.88 ± 0.56 days, instar 2 to instar 3 took 4.18 ± 0.78 days, instar 3 to instar 4 took 5.20 ± 1.11 days, instar 4 to instar 5 took 4.45 ± 1.18 days, instar 5 to instar 6 took 5.17 ± 0.75 days, instar 6 to instar 7 took 5.07 ± 0.74 and instar 7 took 5.93 ± 1.05 days before turning into pupae. This is different from Wood & Ng (1974) [9] . They only reported five instars with mean duration of larvae range from 14 to 17 days and the pupa duration range from 9 to 12 days (Wood & Ng, 1974) [9] . Our study shows larval stage was around 33.90 ± 2.60 days and there are seven instars. The differences could be due to different diet used and methods to detect metamorphosis. Ng (1977) [6] had noted the duration of larvae period varied among larvae reared on different food sources. He noted the larval stage lasted 21.3 days, 25 days, 27 days and 28.9 days for larvae fed on male inflorescence, ripe fruitlets, young fruitlets and immature fruitlets respectively, longer than he first reported in Wood & Ng (1974) [9] . However, the fate of nutritional spectra in Tirathaba mundella during its life cycle phases is still poorly understood. Worth noting, pupal stage for Tirathaba mundella generally ranged from 7 to 12 days. Our observation has shown that pupal stage took average 8.53 ± 1.48 day (Table 1). Our study has shown that the average of Tirathaba mundella adult's longevity was about 6.05 ± 1.81 days. There is no statistical difference between the duration of male and female longevity. T. mundella larvae were able to complete their life cycle with the nutrition provided by the artificial diet developed by UPMKB and reared under laboratory conditions. The characteristics of adult moths has been recorded and shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. Adult moths had silvery-grey forewings with a slight greenish tinge and row of black spots separates the yellowish-brown outer wing fringe. The hindwings and abdomen were light yellowish brown in colour while the ventral abdomen and the legs were silvery-grey. The wingspan of the males (Figure 1) were slightly smaller (9.96 ± 0.57 mm) than the female moth (Figure 2) (12.48 ± 0.46 mm). The preoviposition period ranged from 3 to 5 days with an average of 4 days. Both male and female adult moth live for about the same duration ranging from 5 to 9 days with mean ± SD of 6.05 ± 1.81 days. The adult reared in captivity with 10% sucrose solution would mate readily and produce fertile eggs. Ratio male: female adult moth at 4: 6 offered good mating outcomes. The mating period was noticed around two to three days after mixing the correct ratio of male and female moth in a container. Both male and female moth live for a period of 5 to 9 days counted from the day emerged from pupa and eggs started to be seen from third day onwards. The eggs of T. mundella were laid in masses and placed side by side to each other. Eggs were oval in shape and with 0.40 ± 0.06 mm x 0.27 ± 0.04 mm in dimensions (Table 3). Fertile eggs were orange-red in colour (Figure 3), while infertile eggs were pale yellow in colour (Figure 4). A day before hatching, a black head capsule of the larva could be readily seen in the egg (Figure 5). The incubation period ranged from 3 to 5 days with a mean duration of 4 days. The larvae of T. mundella were light brown in colour at younger stage. The anterior were darker than posterior. Generally the colour grow darker upon maturity. There were 7 instars identified for larvae feed on artificial diet keep in captivity under laboratory conditions. The body length, head capsule measurements and period of days for each larva instar were shown in Table 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The mean ± SD larva period for instar 1 and 2 were 3.88 ± 0.56 and 4.18 ± 0.78 days respectively and carried a mean ± SD head capsule measurement of 0.18±0.01mm (Figure 6) and 0.25 ± 0.02 mm (Figure 7); the mean ± SD body length measurement were 0.95 ± 0.10 mm (Figure 8) and 2.00 ± 0.43 mm (Figure 9). Larvae instar 3 had 0.35 ± 0.04 mm of head capsule (Figure 10) with a body length of 3.66 ± 0.42 mm (Figure 10) and the mean larva period for 3rd instar was 5.20 days. From 4th instar onwards and until 7th instar, the growth rate of the larvae accentuate, almost double the initial growth rate within a mean larva period of about 5 to 6 days. The mean ± SD head capsule measurement obtained from 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th instar were 0.54 ± 0.07 mm (Figure 12), 0.75 ± 0.06 mm (Figure 13), 0.95 ± 0.07 mm (Figure 14) and 1.25 ± 0.14 mm (Figure 15) respectively. On the other hand, the mean ± SD body length obtained from 4th, 5th 6th and 7th instar were 4.80 ± 0.50 mm (Figure 16), 7.44 ± 0.96 mm (Figure 17), 9.52±0.58 mm (Figure 18) and 13.67 ± 2.20 mm (Figure 19) respectively. The total period of all the 7 instars larva ended in about 33.90 ± 2.60 days and it was longer than the larval period for larvae fed on male inflorescence, ripe fruitlets, young fruitlets and immature fruitlets as reported in Ng (1977) [6] . This indicates the diet source influences the length of larval period. The artificial diet developed by UPMKB used in this study extended the larval period and this would allow detailed study of potential pesticides against the most detrimental stage of Tirathaba mundella. Pupation normally take place in a cocoon that consist of tough fibrous membrane and incorporated with faecel matter and plant fibres. The cocoon was ovoid and reddish in colour with a mean ± SD body length of 11.90 ± 0.94 mm and a mean ± SD breadth of 3.21 ± 0.26 mm (Figure 20). Pupa period ranged from 6 to 11 days with a mean period of 8.53 ± 1.48 days before the emergence of the adult moth (Table 1). This is however in agreement with Ng (1977) [6] and indicates that diets used in rearing Tirathaba mundella in both Ng (1977) [6] and this study have little impact on the pupa period.

Figure 20. Ovoid and reddish brown colour cocoon of T. mundella
Ovoid and reddish brown colour cocoon of T. mundella↗ Enlarge
Figure 20
Ovoid and reddish brown colour cocoon of T. mundella

Ovoid and reddish brown colour cocoon of T. mundella

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 6 ↗
Figure 19. 7th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
7th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 19
7th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

7th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 18. 6th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
6th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 18
6th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

6th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 17. 5th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
5th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 17
5th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

5th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 16. 4th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
4th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 16
4th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

4th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 15. Head capsule for 7th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
Head capsule for 7th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 15
Head capsule for 7th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Head capsule for 7th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 14. Head capsule for 6th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
Head capsule for 6th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 14
Head capsule for 6th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Head capsule for 6th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 13. Head capsule for 5th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
Head capsule for 5th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 13
Head capsule for 5th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Head capsule for 5th instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 12. Head capsule for 4th instar of T. mundella Walker
Head capsule for 4th instar of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 12
Head capsule for 4th instar of T. mundella Walker

Head capsule for 4th instar of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 10. Head capsule for 3rd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
Head capsule for 3rd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 10
Head capsule for 3rd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Head capsule for 3rd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 9. 2nd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
2nd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 9
2nd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

2nd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 8. 1st Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
1st Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 8
1st Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

1st Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 7. Head capsule for 2nd instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
Head capsule for 2nd instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 7
Head capsule for 2nd instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Head capsule for 2nd instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 6. Head capsule for 1st Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
Head capsule for 1st Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 6
Head capsule for 1st Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Head capsule for 1st Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 5. Cluster of fertile eggs with readily seen black head capsule of
Cluster of fertile eggs with readily seen black head capsule of↗ Enlarge
Figure 5
Cluster of fertile eggs with readily seen black head capsule of

Cluster of fertile eggs with readily seen black head capsule of

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 4. Cluster of infertile eggs of Tirathaba mundella Walker
Cluster of infertile eggs of Tirathaba mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 4
Cluster of infertile eggs of Tirathaba mundella Walker

Cluster of infertile eggs of Tirathaba mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 3. Fertile egg of Tirathaba mundella Walker (reddish yellow in
Fertile egg of Tirathaba mundella Walker (reddish yellow in↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
Fertile egg of Tirathaba mundella Walker (reddish yellow in

Fertile egg of Tirathaba mundella Walker (reddish yellow in

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 2. Female adult moth of Tirathaba mundella Walker
Female adult moth of Tirathaba mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Female adult moth of Tirathaba mundella Walker

Female adult moth of Tirathaba mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 1. Male adult moth of Tirathaba mundella Walker
Male adult moth of Tirathaba mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Male adult moth of Tirathaba mundella Walker

Male adult moth of Tirathaba mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Table 3. Morphometrics (mm) for different larvae instars of T. mundella walker fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions
Morphometrics measurement (mm)Larvae Instars of Tirathaba mundella Walker——————
1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th
Mean Body Length0.95 ± 0.102.00 ± 0.433.66 ± 0.424.80 ± 0.507.44 ± 0.969.52 ± 0.5813.67 ± 2.20
Mean Head Capsule0.18 ± 0.010.25 ± 0.020.35 ± 0.040.54 ± 0.070.75 ± 0.060.95 ± 0.071.25 ± 0.14

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Morphometrics (mm) for different larvae instars of T. mundella walker fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Morphometrics (mm) for different larvae instars of T. mundella walker fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions

Morphometrics (mm) for different larvae instars of T. mundella walker fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 1. Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions
Food sourceLarvae instars duration (Mean ± standard deviation in days)——————Total larvae period (Mean in days)Pupa duration mean (Range)Adult moth period duration mean (Range)Total life cycle period duration mean (Range)
1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th
Artificial Diet3.88 ± 0.564.18 ± 0.785.20 ± 1.114.45 ± 1.185.17 ± 0.755.07 ± 0.745.93 ± 1.0533.90 ± 2.608.53 ± 1.486.05 ± 1.8151.63 ± 3.80

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions

Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggested that full life cycles could be obtained by rearing the oil palm bunch moth T. mundella Walker on artificial diet developed by UPMKB. The mean ± SD duration of the life cycle of oil palm bunch moth, Tirathaba mundella Walker from egg stage until adult moth took about 51.63 ± 3.80 days, which is approximately one and a half month. The artificial diet used in this study extended the larval period as compared to the pest fed on natural diets. This could be a useful tool to study the most detrimental stage of Tirathaba mundella in pesticide development research without affecting the duration of pupa stage and production of fertile eggs. The use of this artificial diet was able to produce successive generations and provides the detail description of the life cycle of Tirathaba mundella for in depth understanding of the bionomic characteristics of this pest.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Sarawak Oil Palms Berhad, Miri for support in the field work, and to University Putra Malaysia Bintulu Campus for the use of their facilities and technical supports. This research is funded by Grant Putra IPS GP-IPS/2017/9541400.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 2. Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions
Food sourceLarvae instars duration (Mean ± Standard deviation in days)——————Total larvae period (Mean in days)Pupa duration mean (Range)Adult moth period duration mean (Range)Total life cycle period duration mean (Range)
1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th
Artificial Diet3.88 ± 0.564.18 ± 0.785.20 ± 1.114.45 ± 1.185.17 ± 0.755.07 ± 0.745.93 ± 1.0533.90 ± 2.608.53 ± 1.486.05 ± 1.8151.63 ± 3.80

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions

Life cycle period of Tirathaba mundella fed on artificial diet under laboratory conditions

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 4. Morphometrics (mm) for Egg, pupa and adult moth of
Different life stageMorphometrics measurement (mean ± SD)—
Length (mm)Breadth/wingspan (mm)
Egg0.40 ± 0.060.27 ± 0.04
Pupa11.90 ± 0.943.21 ± 0.26
Adult Moth (Male)10.28 ± 0.299.96 ± 0.57
Adult Moth (Female)11.85 ± 0.2312.48 ± 0.46

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Morphometrics (mm) for Egg, pupa and adult moth of↗ Enlarge
Table 4
Morphometrics (mm) for Egg, pupa and adult moth of

Morphometrics (mm) for Egg, pupa and adult moth of

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 11. 3rd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker
3rd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker↗ Enlarge
Figure 11
3rd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

3rd Instar larvae of T. mundella Walker

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗

References

10 in the original paper
  1. Calvin TZK, Su CM, King JH. They Are Different: Molecular Approach on Tirathaba Pest Infesting Oil Palm and Coconut Tree. Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research, 2018.
  2. Chan CO. Some notes on the oil palm bunch moth (Tirathaba mundella Walk.) and its control. In: Advances in oil palm cultivation. Wastie RL and Earp DA (eds), Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur, 1973, 396-401.
  3. Khoo KC, Ooi AC, Ho CT. Crop Pests and Their Management in Malaysia. Tropical Press Sdn. Bhd. Kuala Lumpur, 1991, 153-154.
  4. Lim KH. Integrated Pest Management of Tirathaba Bunch Moth on Oil Palm Planted On Peat. The Planter, Kuala Lumpur. 2012; 88(1031):97-104.
  5. Lim KH, Lim SS, Parish F, Suharto R. RSPO Manual On Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Existing Oil Palm Cultivation On Peat. RSPO, Kuala Lumpur, 2012.
  6. Ng KY. Bionomics of Tirathaba mundella, A Pest of Oil Palm. Master of Agricultural Science Thesis, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 1977, 100.
  7. Su CM. Management of Oil Palm Bunch Moth (Tirathaba mundella Walker) In Young Mature Oil Palm Plantation on Peat Soil In Sarawak, Malaysia.M Sc. Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 2016.
  8. Su CM, Bong CF. Effect of Different Insecticides on the Survival of the Oil Palm Pollinator, Elaeidobius kamerunicus (Coleoptera: Curculionodae). The Planterm, Kuala Lumpur. 2017; 93(1100):777-788.
  9. Wood BJ, Ng KY. Studies on the biology and control of oil palm bunch moth, Tirathaba mundella Walk. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Malay. Agric. J. 1974; 49(3):310-331.
  10. Yaakop S, Manaf SMA. The Bunch Moth of the Tirathaba Species as a Hidden Pest on the Peat Soil of Oil Palm Plantations: Implications of Biological Life Cycles, the DNA Barcoding Approach and Infestation Pattern Detection. In 3 rd International Conference on Chemical, Agricultural and Medical Sciences, Singapore. 2015.

Cited by 1

From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex

  • Efficacy of Chromafenozide Insecticide to Control Tirathaba rufivena and Its Impacts on Oil Palm Pollinator E. kamerunicus ↗

    R Happy Nur’afni, Apit Saepuloh · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2024

    Abstract Newly marketed insecticide known with active ingredient Chromafenozide claimed to be potent against various lepidopterous insects, but at the same time almost non-toxic to non-lepidopterous species, including pollinators, predators and parasitoids. This trial aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Chromafenozide insecticides to control population of Tirathaba rufivena in oil palm planted on peat soil and its impact on pollinator…

    ❝ 0PDF