Research article · 2016 · Full text
International Journal of Statistics and Applied MathematicsA discussion on real number system
Volume 1(5) · Pages 27–30
Research areasNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsComputational Physics and Python Applications
Abstract
Author-writtenThe real number system is one of the most elegant mathematical systems. The structure of real number system is a concrete example for the abstract mathematical system. Real number system is the foundation of the area of mathematics known as real analysis.
Summary
Source-checkedPlain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.
Why it matters
- The real number system serves as a concrete example of an abstract mathematical system and provides the essential foundation for the field of real analysis. View evidence ↗
- Natural numbers were the first numbers invented by early humans to meet practical needs and notions. View evidence ↗
- The number zero was added to natural numbers by Hindu mathematicians a few hundred years ago, while negative numbers were introduced even later in history. View evidence ↗
The question
- The paper discusses the development of a satisfactory theory of real numbers to address the known inadequacy of rational numbers. View evidence ↗
What they did
- The discussion references three distinct theories of real number structure proposed by Karl Weierstrass, Richard Dedekind, and Georg Cantor in the late 19th century. View evidence ↗
- The set of real numbers is defined as the union of rational numbers (positive/negative integers, zero, and common fractions) and irrational numbers. View evidence ↗
What they found
- Real numbers possess algebraic properties allowing for addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division (excluding division by zero) to result in other real numbers. View evidence ↗
- Real numbers follow order properties, meaning for any two real numbers, one must be less than, equal to, or greater than the other. View evidence ↗
- The completeness property ensures that every non-empty set of real numbers bounded above has a least upper bound, and every non-empty set bounded below has a greatest lower bound. View evidence ↗
- The set of rational numbers is considered dense because there are infinitely many rational numbers between any two given rational numbers. View evidence ↗
- Rational numbers are characterized by terminating or repeating decimals, whereas irrational numbers are represented by non-repeating, non-terminating decimals. View evidence ↗
What it means
- The author concludes that rational numbers are exactly those real numbers with terminating or repeating decimal expansions, while irrational numbers do not follow this pattern. View evidence ↗
- The author notes that the observed evidence regarding decimal expansions does not constitute a formal proof that an irrational number cannot be expressed as a fraction. View evidence ↗
Visual summary
1 visualsIllustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.
Composition of the Real Number System
AI-generated conceptual illustration (A conceptual mathematical diagram of the real number system). It explains the idea and does not show study data.
View source evidence ↗Text
A. The algebraic properties say that the real number can be added, subtracted, multiplied, and divided (except by 0) to produce more real numbers under the usual rules of arithmetic. If c > 0, b then there exists n 𝒩 such that nc > b.
Rational and Irrational Numbers
Quotients of integers a b (where b 0) are called rational numbers, which is denoted by Q, contains Z as a subset. The real numbers that are not rational are called irrational. -Q stands for the set of irrational numbers.
Characteristics of Rational and Irrational Numbers
The set of natural numbers are ordered. We can easily see that the set of integers and the set of rational numbers are also ordered. The set of rational numbers have predecessors or successors but not immediate predecessor and immediate successor. In the case of fractional numbers, one cannot speak of the 'immediate next' number. Between any two rational numbers there are infinitely many rational numbers, which implies that if we are given a certain rational number we cannot speak of the next largest rational numbers. This property of rational numbers is described by saying that the set of rational number is dense. That is the rational number system has certain gaps, in spite of the fact that between any two rational numbers we can insert other rational indefinitely. A rigorous construction of the irrational numbers is rather a difficult task at this stage. Other characters are: i. If x and y are any rational numbers with x < y, then there exists a rational number r (in fact infinitely many) such that: x < r < y. [Known as Rational density Theorem] ii. If x and y are real numbers with x < y, then there exists an irrational number t such that x < t < y. [Known as irrational Density Theorem]
where t = r 2 is an irrational number.
iii. The set of rational numbers Q is not complete. iv. The set of rational number is countable. v. If n is a positive integer which is not a perfect square, then n irrational. vi. Every Transcendental number is irrational. vii. The number of the form n 1/m are irrational unless n is the m th power of an integer. viii. The number of the form lognm are irrational if m and n are integers.
ix. The number (which is the ratio of the circumferences of the circle to its diameter) is irrational.
x. The Eular's number 'e' is a famous irrational number.
The Real Number as Decimal
The set of real numbers classified into the set of rational and irrational numbers. Any rational number can be expressed as a repeating or a terminating decimal. The set of irrational numbers being the complement of the set of rational numbers in the set of real number, the irrational numbers also can be expressed in decimals. A number represented by a non-repeating, non-terminating decimal is an irrational number i.e., irrational number in decimal goes on forever without repeating. Hence, the set of real number is the set of all terminating, repeating, and non-terminating non repeating decimals.
When using our calculator to determine if a decimal number is irrational. The calculator may not be displaying enough digits to show us the repeating and non-repeating decimals. When we use calculator, we get various types of rational and irrational numbers as follows: 3 = 1.7320508075688772935274463415059…………………. = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795…………… (The popular approximation of is 22 7 but not accurate.) e = 2.7182818284590452353602874713527…………………. (Which is known as Eular's number) 2 =1.414213562373095048801688724209698078569671875376948073176679737990732478462107038850387534327641572… …. [4] Notice that there is no pattern among the digits, and there no repetition even of groups of digits. Does this mean that all rational fractions will have a period of digits? Let's inspect a few common fractions. 1 7 = 0.142857142857142857142857………, which can be written as: 0.142857 (a six-digit period)
An Interesting Rational Number in Decimal
Suppose we consider the fraction 1 109 1 109 = 0.0091743119266055045871559633027522935779816513761467889908256880733944951428440366972477064220183486…… [5] Here we have calculated its value to 100 places and no period appears. Does this mean that the fraction is irrational? This would destroy our nice definition above. We can try to calculate the value a bit more accurately, that is, say, to another 12 places.
1 109 = 0.0091743119266055045871559633027522935779816513761467889908256880733944954128440366972477064220183486238532110091 [6] Suddenly it looks as though a pattern may be appearing; the 0091 also began the period.
We carry out our calculation further to 220 places and notice that a 108-digit period emerges.
1 109 = 0.009174311926605504587155963302752293577981651376146788990825688073394495412844036697247706422018348623853211009174 311926605504587155963302752293577981651376146788990825688073394495412844036697247706422018348623853211009174 [7] If we carry out the calculation to 330 places, the pattern becomes clearer. 1 109 = 0.0091743119266055045871559633027522935779816513761467889908256880733944954128440366972477064220183486238 53211009174311926605504587155963302752293577981651376146788990825688073394495412844036697247706422018348 62385321100917431192660550458715596330275229357798165137614678899082568807339449541284403669724770642201 8348623853211009174 [8] We might be able to conclude that a common fraction results in a decimal equivalent that has a repeating period of digits. Some common ones we already are familiar with, such as:
Conclusion
The set of acts as the universal set U in respect of sets consisting of only real numbers. The properties of the real number system fall into three categories they are algebraic, order and completeness. Completeness property of the real number system is deeper and harder to define precisely roughly speaking, there are enough real numbers to complete the real number line, in the [4] Albrechit, Alfred S., "Brain storming in mathematics" -2000 (Third Revised edition) Narosa publishing House, New Delhi, (page 103 -120) [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] Albrechit, Alfred S., "Brain storming in mathematics" -2000 (Third Revised edition) Narosa publishing House, New Delhi, (page 103 -120)
sense that there are no 'holes' or 'gaps' in the real line. The rational numbers are precisely the real numbers with decimal expansions that are either terminating or repeating. The set of real numbers has all the algebraic and order properties of the real numbers but lacks the completeness properties. We saw that a common fraction will result in a repeating decimal, sometimes with a very long period and sometimes with a very short period. It would appear, from the rather unbelievable evidence so far, that a fraction results in a repeating decimal and an irrational number does not. Yet this does not prove that an irrational number cannot be expressed as a fraction. The real number system is one of the most elegant mathematical system. The structure of real number system is a concrete example for the abstract mathematical system. Real number system is the foundation of the area of mathematics known as real analysis.
References
10 in the original paper- R.M. Shrestha -Fundamentals of Mathematical Analysis "Revised edition -2068, page 66, Sukunda Pustakk Bhawan, Kathmandu.
- S.L. Gupta, Nisha Rani -"Fundamental Real Analysis", Third revised edition, 1993, page 11. Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
- Prof. SM. Maskey -"Principles of Real Analysis", Second edition -2007, page-37, Ratna Pustak Bhandar, Kathmandu.
- Maskey SM. Principles of Real Analysis, Second edition -Ratna Pustak Bhandar, Kathmandu 2007.
- Gupta SL, Nisha Rani. Fundamental Real Analysis, Third Revised edition Vikash Publishing House, New Delhi 1997.
- Alton H Smith, Walter A Albrecht JR. Fundamental Concept of Analysis, Ninth Printing Prentice -Hall of India, New Delhi 1993.
- Thomas and Finney, "Calculus" Ninth Edition Parason Education, in South Asia 2007.
- Maskey SM. Introduction to Modern Mathematics, Third Edition Ratna Pustak Bhandar, Kathmandu 1999.
- Bajracharya DR, et al, "Basic Mathematics", Sukunda Pustak Bhawan, Kathmandu 2070.
- Albrechit, Alfred S, Brain Storming in Mathematics", Third Revised edition, -2000, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, India

