Scinovex

Research article · 2020 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

Impact of NaCl on morphological, photosynthetic pigments and biochemical changes in Panicum sumatrense Roth ex-Roem and Schult

T. MythiliA. Arunprasath

Volume 2(2) · Pages 34–39 · DOI: 10.33545/2664844x.2020.v2.i2a.41 ↗

Research areasLeaf Properties and Growth MeasurementPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Millets are small seeded cereal crops which face several abiotic constraints that lead to reduction in the yield. Salinity is considered to be the most important abiotic stress that limits the crop production. The current study deals with the impact of NaCl stress on growth and development of Panicum sumatrense (Little millet). The seeds were raised at different concentration of NaCl (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 mM) for 30 days. Under saline stress, morphological changes, pigments and biochemical levels determined to analyze the physiological and biochemical characteristics. In addition, there was a progressive increase in the levels of proline, glycine betaine, MDA and H2O2 activity from 0 to 20 Mm. statistically, there was a decrease in photosynthetic pigments, amino acid and starch with reduced leaf succulence under increasing salinity. Salt stress greatly influenced a significant reduction in the leaf area, fresh weight, dry weight, number of leaves and roots. From this study, little millet crops can be sustained at 5Mm salinity condition. It was concluded that these osmolytes play a key role in generating tolerance against salt stress.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • High salinity is a widespread global issue, affecting approximately 20% of all cultivated land and 33% of irrigated agricultural lands. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      High salinity is a widespread global issue, affecting approximately 20% of all cultivated land and 33% of irrigated agricultural lands.

      In the paper's own words

      “Around the globe, 20% of total cultivated land and 33% of irrigated agricultural lands are aggravated by high salinity.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Salinity and drought are primary drivers of global crop losses, with the potential to reduce average yields by over 50%. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Salinity and drought are primary drivers of global crop losses, with the potential to reduce average yields by over 50%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Salinity and drought are among the major stresses that adversely affect plant growth and crop productivity. These constraints remain the primary causes of crop losses worldwide, reducing average yields by more than 50%”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Millets serve as a critical staple food for millions of people globally, and India is the leading producer of various millet types. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Millets serve as a critical staple food for millions of people globally, and India is the leading producer of various millet types.

      In the paper's own words

      “Millets are the most important staple food for the millions of people around the globe. India is the largest producer of many kinds of millets”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to analyze how NaCl (salt) stress affects the morphological and biochemical characteristics of Panicum sumatrense (little millet). View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to analyze how NaCl (salt) stress affects the morphological and biochemical characteristics of Panicum sumatrense (little millet).

      In the paper's own words

      “The present study is aimed to analyse the effect of NaCl on morphological and biochemical validations in Panicum sumatranse.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • Little millet seeds were grown for 30 days under five different NaCl concentrations: 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mM. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Little millet seeds were grown for 30 days under five different NaCl concentrations: 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mM.

      In the paper's own words

      “The seeds were raised at different concentration of NaCl (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 mM) for 30 days.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Plant materials and culture conditions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Plants were grown in pots containing a 1:2:1 mixture of red soil, sand, and farmyard manure. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Plants were grown in pots containing a 1:2:1 mixture of red soil, sand, and farmyard manure.

      In the paper's own words

      “The seeds of P. sumatrense were sown equally in each pot filled with homogeneous mixture of garden soil containing red soil, sand and farmyard manure (1:2:1).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Plant materials and culture conditions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The salt treatment was applied to the plants using a soil drenching method. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The salt treatment was applied to the plants using a soil drenching method.

      In the paper's own words

      “The experimental plants treated with NaCl by soil drenching method up to 20mM were maintained in the experimental plot.”

      Page 2

      Found in: International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Increasing salinity levels led to stunted growth, significantly reducing root and shoot length, leaf area, the number of leaves and roots, and both fresh and dry weights. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Increasing salinity levels led to stunted growth, significantly reducing root and shoot length, leaf area, the number of leaves and roots, and both fresh and dry weights.

      In the paper's own words

      “The plantlets grown under high salinity had stunted growth where the root and shoot length, number of leaves and roots, leaf area, fresh weight and dry weight demonstrated significant changes with constitutive increase in the salinity strata.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Morphological and Photosynthetic pigments variations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The levels of photosynthetic pigments, specifically chlorophyll and carotenoids, decreased significantly as salinity increased. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The levels of photosynthetic pigments, specifically chlorophyll and carotenoids, decreased significantly as salinity increased.

      In the paper's own words

      “The photosynthetic pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoid showed a significant decrease under increasing salinity.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Morphological and Photosynthetic pigments variations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • At 30 days after treatment (DAT), plants grown in 20 mM NaCl showed the highest levels of Malondialdehyde (1.842) and hydrogen peroxide (0.81). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      At 30 days after treatment (DAT), plants grown in 20 mM NaCl showed the highest levels of Malondialdehyde (1.842) and hydrogen peroxide (0.81).

      In the paper's own words

      “The highest recorded MDA and H2O2 content was 1.842 and 0.81 respectively in the plants grown in 20 mM concentration on 30DAT.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Severe salt stress decreased starch content, though a relatively higher value of 0.699 was observed in plants treated with 5 mM salt. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Severe salt stress decreased starch content, though a relatively higher value of 0.699 was observed in plants treated with 5 mM salt.

      In the paper's own words

      “Starch contents were decreased in the plants grown under severe salt stress. The relatively increased starch content was noted to be 0.699 in the plants grown in 5 mM salt concentration.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Amino acid levels in the leaves, stems, and roots decreased gradually as NaCl concentrations increased up to 20 mM. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Amino acid levels in the leaves, stems, and roots decreased gradually as NaCl concentrations increased up to 20 mM.

      In the paper's own words

      “At the elevated levels of NaCl there was a decrease in the contents of amino acids in leaf, stem and roots. It showed a gradual decrease in the amino acid contents upto 20 mM.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Amino acids

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Unlike amino acids, protein levels in the leaves, stems, and roots increased gradually with higher NaCl concentrations up to 20 mM. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Unlike amino acids, protein levels in the leaves, stems, and roots increased gradually with higher NaCl concentrations up to 20 mM.

      In the paper's own words

      “Protein contents were increased in the leaf, stem and root with increasing NaCl concentration. At higher concentration, salinity gradually increased the protein, even upto 20 mM NaCl concentration.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Protein

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Salt stress increased free proline content in the stem (2.673) and root (2.171) across all NaCl regimes. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Salt stress increased free proline content in the stem (2.673) and root (2.171) across all NaCl regimes.

      In the paper's own words

      “An increase in free proline content in stem and root under salt stress were recorded which increased with all regimes of NaCl stress possessing the values of 2.673 and 2.171 respectively.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Proline

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Glycine betaine accumulated significantly up to 20 mM NaCl, with recorded values of 1.623 in roots and 1.611 in shoots. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Glycine betaine accumulated significantly up to 20 mM NaCl, with recorded values of 1.623 in roots and 1.611 in shoots.

      In the paper's own words

      “There was a remarkable increase in the accumulation of glycine betaine with increasing salinity upto 20 mM. When compared the glycine betaine content in both stem and root, the increase was not as prominent as in roots where the values are recorded as 1.623 in roots and 1.611 in shoots.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Glycine betaine

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that little millet can be sustained at 5 mM salinity and that osmolytes are key to generating salt stress tolerance. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that little millet can be sustained at 5 mM salinity and that osmolytes are key to generating salt stress tolerance.

      In the paper's own words

      “From this study, little millet crops can be sustained at 5Mm salinity condition. It was concluded that these osmolytes play a key role in generating tolerance against salt stress.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Panicum sumatrense (Sumatran panic grass)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Plant Response to Salt Stress
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Panicum sumatrense (Sumatran panic grass)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Panicum sumatrense (Sumatran panic grass)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Plant Response to Salt Stress

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Panicum sumatrense (Sumatran panic grass)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on shoot and rootFigure 1Page 2Effect of different concentration of NaCl on number of leavesFigure 2Page 2Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Leaf area ofFigure 3Page 2Effect of different concentration of NaCl on total fresh and dryFigure 4Page 2Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Chlorophyll contentFigure 5Page 2Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Carotenoid contentFigure 6Page 3Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Starch contentFigure 7Page 3Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Aminoacid contentFigure 8Page 3Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Protein content (mg/g/fr.wt)Figure 9Page 3Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Proline contentFigure 10Page 4Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Glycine betaineFigure 11Page 4Effect of different concentration of NaCl on MalondialdehydeFigure 12Page 4Effect of different concentration of NaCl on HydrogenFigure 13Page 4
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Abiotic stress is defined as any environmental factor which influences the optimal functioning of an organism [29]. Around the globe, 20% of total cultivated land and 33% of irrigated agricultural lands are aggravated by high salinity. Salinity stress is one of the most significant limiting factors in agricultural crop productivity [4] . Salinity and drought are among the major stresses that adversely affect plant growth and crop productivity. These constraints remain the primary causes of crop losses worldwide, reducing average yields by more than 50% [4,31] . Salt stress alters various biochemical and physiological responses in plants, and thus affects almost all plant processes including photosynthesis, growth and development [14] . Salinity tolerance is defined as the ability of plants to continuously grow under salt stress conditions. Another major factor of salt tolerance mechanisms is the ability of plant cells to adjust osmotically and to accumulate organic solutes (proteins, sugar, amino acids, etc,). The accumulation of these compounds is not only important for cell osmoregulation but also for the protection of sub cellular structure and maintenance of protein structures [24] . Millets are the most important staple food for the millions of people around the globe. India is the largest producer of many kinds of millets, which are often referred to as coarse cereals. The nutritive value of millets is comparable to other staple cereals like wheat and rice. Some of the millets are nutritionally better than common cereals in protein, fat and mineral contents. There are several studies conducted on minor millets indicating utilization potential and variability including potential benefits in modern diets. Although little millet like any other millet is nutritionally superior to cereals, yet its utilization is limited. The major factor discouraging its cultivation and consumption is the drudgery associated with its processing. However, there is a need to restore the lost interest in millets due to its potential nutritional qualities and health benefits [20] . The effect of salinity appears to be dependent on the species and on the stage of the plant's development such as germination or vegetative growth [11] . Salinity limits the cultivation and yield of agricultural crops by reducing the ability of plant roots for uptake of water and nutrients, decreasing photosynthetic rates also [25]. Salinity enhances the production of reactive oxygen species, including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxide in cellular membranes [27] . The present study is aimed to analyse the effect of NaCl on morphological and biochemical validations in Panicum sumatranse.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods

Collection of Seeds

Seed of Panicum sumatrense (Poaceae) were collected at Kolli Hills situated about 1200m mean sea level between 78ºE and 11ºN in the Namakkal district of Tamil Nadu in South India.

Plant materials and culture conditions

The seeds of P. sumatrense were sown equally in each pot filled with homogeneous mixture of garden soil containing red soil, sand and farmyard manure (1:2:1). The pots were continuously irrigated using tap water and maintained in the Botanical garden of PSG College of Arts & Science, Coimbatore.

Salt treatment and experimental design 20 days old, mature and healthy seedlings were selected for NaCl treatment. The preliminary experiments were carried out in P.

International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

sumatrense at different concentrations of NaCl (5mM, 10mM, 15mM, 20 mM) in order to determine the viable range of salinities. The experimental plants treated with NaCl by soil drenching method up to 20mM were maintained in the experimental plot. The experimental yard was roofed with transparent polythene sheet at a height of 3m from the ground in order to protect the plants from rain. Sampling for various studies was taken on 30 days after NaCl treatment. Standard procedures were employed for the morphological studies and estimation of biochemical parameters [2,3,6,7,8,12,19,22,28,35] .

Results

The various morphological and biochemical parameters analyzed exhibited significant variations in the plants grown under salinity.

Morphological and Photosynthetic pigments variations

The plantlets grown under high salinity had stunted growth where the root and shoot length, number of leaves and roots, leaf area, fresh weight and dry weight demonstrated significant changes with constitutive increase in the salinity strata. The calculated results showed that salt stress significantly reduced morphological parameters. The photosynthetic pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoid showed a significant decrease under increasing salinity.

Amino acids

At the elevated levels of NaCl there was a decrease in the contents of amino acids in leaf, stem and roots. It showed a gradual decrease in the amino acid contents upto 20 mM. However the highest value obtained in the leaf was 1.624 less than that to the control. The similar trend was also seen in the stem and root tissues. In all treatments, the roots showed lower levels of amino acids when compared to leaf and stem.

Protein

Protein contents were increased in the leaf, stem and root with increasing NaCl concentration. At higher concentration, salinity gradually increased the protein, even upto 20 mM NaCl concentration. The leaves showed more protein than the stem and root.

Proline

In P.sumatranse, an increase in proline content was recorded in the leaf, stem and root. An increase in free proline content in stem and root under salt stress were recorded which increased with all regimes of NaCl stress possessing the values of 2.673 and 2.171 respectively. Leaf accumulated higher proline when compared to stem and root under salt stress

Glycine betaine

There was a remarkable increase in the accumulation of glycine betaine with increasing salinity upto 20 mM. When compared the glycine betaine content in both stem and root, the increase was not as prominent as in roots where the values are recorded as 1.623 in roots and 1.611 in shoots. Thus, in all treatments the leaf showed higher levels of glycine betaine content when compared to shoot and root.

Lipid peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation

Discussion

The effect of salinity is highly diverse and depends on large number of factors such as multiple biochemical and morphological parameters. In P. sumatranse, the root and shoot growth was reduced to a great extend at increased salinity levels. This results are in agreement with the studies on the salinity effect in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) where the root and shoot length of the pearl millet decreases with the increase in the salinity level [5] . As the saline concentration increased, there was a reduction in leaf area. Similar results were obtained seen in Oat (Avena sativa) where the root and leaf area were adversely affected due to NaCl treatments when compared to control [13] .

The plants treated in the salinity showed relatively low percent of fresh and dry weight in accordance with the results reported on Setaria italica [17,18] . The reduction in growth parameters with increasing salt concentrations is due to the limited supply of metabolites to the growing tissues as the metabolic productivity is significantly reduced at high salt concentration which is either due to low water uptake or toxic effect of salt [30,21] . High levels of salinization reduced the photosynthetic pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoid. The results are closely related to the results of [23] , where the reduced chlorophyll contents at higher salinity. The carotenoid content of foxtail millet was higher in control compared to the different concentration of NaCl i.e., 25 mM, 50 mM, 75 mM and 100 mM. Increasing application of NaCl decreased the starch contents in the NaCl treated plants in comparison with the control. The results of Glycine max, there was an increase in sucrose content and decrease in Starch content [26] . Corresponding results were reported in Vitis vinifera, that there was a decrease in sucrose [9] . The P. sumatranse seedlings irrigated with 20 mM concentration of NaCl showed the higher protein content compared to control and other concentration.

There was an increase in protein concentration with increasing salt concentration in Vicia faba [16] . In P. sumatranse grown under salinity stress, there was a remarkable increase in the proline content than other amino acids. In Poaceae proline accumulation is one of the common characteristics in many monocotyledons under saline conditions [15] . Proline, which occurs widely in higher plants, accumulates in larger amounts than other amino acids in salt stressed plants. Although in barley seedlings, NaCl stress did not affect proline accumulation [34] . The high salt tolerance of P. sumatranse is positively associated with accumulation of Glycinebetaine in whole plant. Glycinebetaine (GB) accumulates in response to salt stress studied in Sorghum [32] . The results obtained in Ceriops roxburghiana, the glycine betaine content was also increased significantly at all concentrations of NaCl [10] . The activity of hydrogen peroxidase increased significantly in P. sumatranse with increasing NaCl of different concentration.

The increase of H 2 O 2 activity in treated plants was accompanied by elevated lipid peroxidation as evidenced by the change in Malondialdehyde levels. Salt stress caused increase in H 2 O 2 content of Setaria italica leaves, indicating that salt stress could cause damages to the integrity of the cellular membrane and to cellular components that were sensitive to oxidative stress [1] . Salt stress in Soybean (Glycine max), the hydrogen peroxide concentration of leaf tissue was significantly increased with increasing salinity [33] . Thus there is a positive correlation between the osmolytes and salt stress.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementThe authors are grateful to acknowledge the PG & Research department of Botany, PSG college of Arts & Science, Coimbatore for providing necessary facilities during the study.

Figures and tables from the paper

Figure 1. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on shoot and root
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on shoot and root↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on shoot and root

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on shoot and root

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on number of leaves
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on number of leaves↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on number of leaves

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on number of leaves

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 3. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Leaf area of
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Leaf area of↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Leaf area of

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Leaf area of

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 4. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on total fresh and dry
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on total fresh and dry↗ Enlarge
Figure 4
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on total fresh and dry

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on total fresh and dry

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 5. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Chlorophyll content
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Chlorophyll content↗ Enlarge
Figure 5
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Chlorophyll content

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Chlorophyll content

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 6. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Carotenoid content
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Carotenoid content↗ Enlarge
Figure 6
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Carotenoid content

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Carotenoid content

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 7. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Starch content
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Starch content↗ Enlarge
Figure 7
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Starch content

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Starch content

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 8. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Aminoacid content
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Aminoacid content↗ Enlarge
Figure 8
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Aminoacid content

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Aminoacid content

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 9. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Protein content (mg/g/fr.wt)
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Protein content (mg/g/fr.wt)↗ Enlarge
Figure 9
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Protein content (mg/g/fr.wt)

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Protein content (mg/g/fr.wt)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 10. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Proline content
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Proline content↗ Enlarge
Figure 10
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Proline content

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Proline content

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 11. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Glycine betaine
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Glycine betaine↗ Enlarge
Figure 11
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Glycine betaine

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Glycine betaine

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 12. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Malondialdehyde
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Malondialdehyde↗ Enlarge
Figure 12
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Malondialdehyde

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Malondialdehyde

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 13. Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Hydrogen
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Hydrogen↗ Enlarge
Figure 13
Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Hydrogen

Effect of different concentration of NaCl on Hydrogen

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗

References

35 in the original paper
  1. Ajith Kumar P. Morphological and biochemical response to salinity stress on Setaria italica seedlings. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research. 2017; 2(4):235-248.
  2. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris.-Plant Physiology. 1949; 24:1-15.
  3. Bates IS, Waldern RP, Teare ID Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil. 1973; 39:205207.
  4. Boyer JS. Plant productivity and environment. Science. 1982; 218:443-448.
  5. Bukhari IA, Saba K, Tayyaba W, Sana A, Fakhra J, Muhammad UR, et al. Effects of NaCl on the morphological attributes of the pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), International journal of water resources and environmental sciences. 2012; 1(4):98-101.
  6. Carmak I, Horst JH. Effect of aluminium on lipid peroxidation, SOD, CAT and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean Physiology Plant. 1991; 83:463-468.
  7. Clegg KM. The application of the anthrone reagent to the estimation of starch in cereals. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1956; 7(1):40-44.
  8. Davies BH. Analysis of carotenoid pigments. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of plant pigments. (Ed. by T.W. Goodwin), Academic Press, London, New York, 1965, 489.
  9. Downton WJS. Photosynthesis in salt-stressed Grapevines. Functional Plant Biology.1977; 4(2):183-192.
  10. Elayaraj B, Selvaraju M, Dhanam S. Physiological and biochemical responses of Ceriops roxburghiana Arn seedling under salt stress conditions. Journal of Aridland Agriculture. 2015; 1:20-30.
  11. Flowers TJ. Improving crop salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2004; 55(396):307-319.
  12. Grieve CM, Grattan SR. Rapid assay for determination of water soluble quanternary ammonium compounds. Plant and Soil. 1983; 70:303-307.
  13. Halima NB, Saad RB, Slima AB, Khemakhem B, Fendri I, Abdelkafi S, et al. Effect of Salt stress on stress-associated Genes and growth of Avena sativa L. Journal of Science and Technology. 2014; 10:73-80.
  14. Iqbal M, Ashraf M, Jamil A. Seed enhancement with cytokinins: changes in growth and grain yield in salt stressed Wheat plants. Plant growth regulation. 2006; 50(1):29-39.
  15. Jones RW, Storey R. Salt stress and comparative physiology in the Gramineae. IV. Comparison of salt stress in Spartina townsendii and three barley cultivars. Functional Plant Biology. 1978; 5(6):839-850.
  16. Kapoor K, Srivastava A. Assessment of salinity tolerance of Vicia faba using ex vitro and in vitro methods. Asian. Journal of Biotechnology. 2010; 2(2):73-85.
  17. Kubsad VS, Hunshal CS, Vishwanath DP, Chimmad VP. Effects of saline water irrigation on the uptake of nutrients by Setaria grown on black soil. Journal Maharashtra Agricultural university. 1990; 15(3):318-321.
  18. Kubsad VS, Hunshal CS, Vishwanath DP, Patil SL, Gowda DSM. Dry matter accumulation in Setaria as influenced by saline water irrigation. Journal Maharashtra Agricultural university. 1995; 20(1):3-5.
  19. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chemistry. 1951; 193:265-275.
  20. Mallikarjuna MG, Thirunavukkarasu N, Hossain F, Bhat JS, Jha SK, Rathore A, et al. PloS one, 2015, 10(9).
  21. Misra N, Dwivedi UN. Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance of green gram cultivars. Plant Science. 2004; 166(5):1135-1142.
  22. Moore S, Stein WH. Photometric ninhydrin method for use in the chromatography of amino acids. Journal of biological chemistry. 1948; 176:367-388.
  23. Moradi F, Ismail AM. Responses of photosynthesis, chlorophyll, fluorescence and ROS-scavenging systems to salt stress during seedling and reproductive stages in Rice. Annals of botany. 2007; 99(6):1161-1173.
  24. Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, cell & environment. 2002; 25(2):239-250.
  25. Pérez-López U, Robredo A, Miranda-Apodaca J, Lacuesta M, Muñoz-Rueda A, Mena-Petite A, et al. Carbon dioxide enrichment moderates salinity-induced effects on nitrogen acquisition and assimilation and their impact on growth in Barley plants. Environmental and experimental Botany. 2013; 87:148-158.
  26. Rathert G. The influence of high salt stress on starch, sucrose and degradative enzymes of two glycine max varieties that differ in salt tolerance. Journal of plant nutrition. 1985; 8(3):199-209.
  27. Striker GG, Teakle NL, Colmer TD, Barrett-Lennard EG. Growth responses of Melilotus siculus accessions to combined salinity and root-zone hypoxia are correlated with differences in tissue ion concentrations and not differences in root aeration. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2015; 109:89-98.
  28. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: protective role of exogenous polyamines Plant Science. 2000; 151:59-66.
  29. Vahdati K, Leslie N. Abiotic stress tolerance in plants with emphasizing on drought and salinity stresses in walnut. Abiotic Stress-Plant Responses and Applications in Agriculture. 2013; 10:307-365.
  30. Waisel Y, Eshel A, Agami M. Salt balance of leaves of the mangrove Avicennia marina. Physiologia plantarum. 1986; 67(1):67-72.
  31. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta. 2003; 218(1):1-14.
  32. Weimberg R, Lerner HR, Poljakoff Mayber A. Changes in growth and water soluble solute concentrations in Sorghum bicolor stressed with sodium and potassium salts. Physiological plantarum. 1984); 62(3):472-480.
  33. Weisany W, Sohrabi Y, Heidari G, Siosemardeh A, Ghassemi-Golezani K. Changes in antioxidant enzymes activity and plant performance by salinity stress and zinc application in soybean (Glycine max L.) Plant Omics. 2012; 5(2):60.
  34. Yamaya T, Matsumoto H. Accumulation of asparagine in NaCl-stressed Barley seedlings. Berichte des Ohara Instituts für landwirtschaftliche Biologie, Okayama University. 1989; 19(4):181-188.
  35. Yoshida S. Physiological aspects of grain yield. Annual review of plant physiology. 1972; 23(1):437-464.