Research article · 2020 · Full text
International Journal of Statistics and Applied MathematicsCombined multiple forecasting model using regression
Volume 5(6) · Pages 147–150
Research areasForecasting Techniques and Applications
Abstract
Author-writtenAccuracy in the forecasting techniques is most challenging in many areas of research. In order to encounter the inaccuracy of the forecast of a single model, weight combination forecasting models are increased accuracies in forecasting models. In the present paper, an attempt has been made by proposing some forecasting models with the estimation of their parameters besides the choice of weights in the combination of forecasts in the forecasting model. A method of multiple combining forecasts has been proposed by choosing optimum values for the weights for the forecasts and combined forecasting technique based on regression method has been developed.
Summary
Source-checkedPlain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.
Why it matters
- Achieving high accuracy in forecasting techniques is a significant challenge across various research fields. View evidence ↗
- Weight combination forecasting models are used to address the inaccuracies often found when relying on a single forecasting model. View evidence ↗
- Collecting information from diverse forecasting techniques avoids the risk of relying entirely on one chosen method. View evidence ↗
The question
- The authors aim to propose forecasting models that include parameter estimation and a method for choosing weights for combined forecasts. View evidence ↗
- The research seeks to develop a combined forecasting technique based on a regression method by determining optimum weight values. View evidence ↗
What they did
- The combining weight 'w' is a parameter between 0 and 1 that can vary at each time period. View evidence ↗
What they found
- The authors find that in the regression-based combined multiple forecast, the sum of weights is not restricted to one, which may allow for biased forecasts. View evidence ↗
What it means
- The authors conclude that their procedures relate weights to the reciprocals of sums of squared errors rather than using an estimated covariance matrix. View evidence ↗
- The authors state that weights used in weighted averaging for forecast combinations should remain stable over time. View evidence ↗
- A limitation of the proposed regression-based model is that the sum of weights is not restricted to one, potentially leading to biased forecasts. View evidence ↗
Introduction
The conventional approach to forecasting involves choosing the forecasting method evaluated most suitable of the available methods and applying it to some precise situations. The preferences of a method depend upon the attributes of the time series and the type of application. The selection to the conventional approach is to collective information from diverse forecasting techniques by collective forecasts. This avoids the problem of having to choose a single method and rely completely on its forecasts. There are lot of studies have been proposed on combination of forecasts has with considerable success. Different techniques for combining forecasts with respect to weighted averages were proposed by Bates and Granger (1969) [1] , Nelson (1972), New bold and Granger (1974 and 1977) [5] , Bhattacharyya (1980) [2] , Winkler (1982) [15] , Urich (1983), Makridakis and Figlewski (1983) [8] , Mahmoud (1984) [5] , Zarnowitz (1984) [16] . In the combination it is assumed that the weights are stable over time. The weights are unstable in practice. The fundamental techniques for different forecasts are known, we can get either combined forecast or a composite forecast. According to the classification, outcomes of wide range of forecasts are associated to arrive at a combined forecast, and the techniques itself are combined to come up with a composite model from which a composite forecast is acquired. The potentials of the composite forecasts are suggested by some discussants of Bates and Granger's article (1969) [1] .
Method of combining two forecasts
Suppose there are two models A & B and
F F be the Forecast for the period 't' from the two forecasting models, then the combined forecast for the time period 't' can be expressed as
Where 'w' is the combing parameter (or) weights that lies between 0 and 1 and varied at each time period.
Let the variance of
which are known the combined variance 2
C
F are independent we obtain the value of 'w' by minimizing 2 c with respect to w.
The first order condition for minimization gives
By subtitling w* in 2.1 we get
Combined multiple forecast
Combined multiple forecast
Consider
F F F be the forecast for the time period 't' from the 'm' forecasting methods respectively. Then the combined multiple forecast for the time period 't' which is a linear combination can be defined as
Where the weights are non-negative and 12 .............
Let X t be the actual data from the time period 't' the forecast error or residual for the time period 't' is defined as
For the i th forecasting method, the mean percentage forecast error (MPFE) is
Similarly the covariance matrix of the MPFE from the 'm' forecasting method is
If the elements of covariance matrix are known then the optimal choice weights are given by When the elements of covariance matrix are unknown, and if the forecast from 1 to m are unbiased, then the properties of MPFE's are same to the OLS residuals in the regression analysis. By using maximum likelihood method, the elements of Φ are given by
Now the estimates of weights are given by In matrix notation (4.3) can be written as
Here The OLS estimator of 'w' is given by
Also the OLS estimator of w 0 is given by
It is clear that with respect to the combined multiple forecast given in 4.1, the sum of weights are not restricted one and it allows for the possibility of biased forecasts.
Observations
1. By applying the restricted least square method, we can obtain the estimates for the weights.
2. If we define weights by OLS residuals, the other different residuals like BLUES, studentized and recursive residuals can be used in the place of OLS residuals.
Conclusion
In this paper we have investigated the accuracy of combined forecasts consisting of weighted averages of forecasts from individual methods. These procedures relate the weights to reciprocals of sums of squared errors as opposed to basing the weights directly on an estimated covariance matrix of forecast errors. In the combination of forecasts the weights in the weighted averaging should remain stable over time.
References
16 in the original paper- Bates JM, Granger CWJ. The Combination of Forecasts, Oper. Res. Quart 1969;20:451-468.
- Bhattacharyya MN. Comparison of Box-Jenkins and Bonn Monetary Model Prediction Performance, Springer-Verlag, New York 1980.
- C Diebold FX. A Note on Bayesian Forecast Combination Procedures. In Westlund A, Hackl P. (eds.) Economic Structural Change: Analysis and Forecasting, Springer-Verlag 1991, 225-232.
- Figlewski Stephen. Optimal Price Forecasting Using Survey Data, Rev. Economics and Statist 1983;65:13-21.
- Granger CWJ, Newbold P. Forecasting Economic Time Series, Academic Press, New York, Mahmoud, Essam, Accuracy in Forecasting: A Survey, J. Forecasting 1977, 1984;3:139-159.
- Gupta S, Wilton PC. Combination of forecasts: An extension. Management Science 1987;33:356-372.
- Hsiao C, Wan S. Is there an Optimal Forecast Combination? Journal of Econometrics 2014;178:294-309.
- Makridakis Spyros, Robert L Winkler. Averages of Forecasts: Some Empirical Results, Management Sci 1983;29:987-996.
- Newbold P, Granger CWJ. Experience with Forecasting Univariate Time Series and the Combination of Forecasts, J Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 1974;137(2):131-164.
- Palm FC, Zellner A. To combine or not to combine? Issues of combining forecasts. Journal of Forecasting 1992;11:687-701.
- Stock JH, Watson M. A comparison of linear and nonlinear univariate models for forecasting macroeconomic time series. In: Engle RF, White H. (Eds.), Festschrift in Honour of Clive Granger. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001, 1-44.
- Timmermann A. Forecast Combinations, Handbook of Economic Forecasting 2006;1:135-196.
- West KD, Edison HJ, Cho D. A Utility-Based Comparison of Some Models of Exchange Rate Volatility, Journal of International Economics 1993;35:23-45.
- Timmermann, Allan G. Forecast Combinations. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5361, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=878546
- Winkler Robert L. Combining Forecasts, in Major Time Series Methods and Their Relative Accuracy, Spyros Makridakis et al. (Eds.), John Wiley, New York 1982.
- Zarnowitz Victor. The Accuracy of Individual and Group Forecasts from Business Outlook Surveys, J Forecasting 1984;3:1126.
Cited by 1
From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex
- Prediction of rainfall by using extreme gradient boost (XG boost) in Vishakapattanam area, Andhra Pradesh
Kesavulu Poola, P Hema Sekhar · International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics · 2021
Now-a-days the prophecy of rainfall in a particular time periods is scientifically challenging and tough jobs because, we found anomalous changes in climatic conditions. In the contemporary fast moving world, forecasting of Rainfall, it is very helpful for planning and satisfying Agricultural needs. There are many research institutes are rigorously trying to find the rainfall predictions by using different techniques. This paper describes, how XG Boost Analysis predicts the rainfall in Monthly Scales. In the paper we recommend that XG-Boost Model is best fit to forecast the rainfall up to 3 to
