Scinovex

Research article · 2020 · Full text

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Evaluation of the extracts of Xylopia villosa Chipp (Annonaceae) on the lipid profile of rats rendered diabetic by streptozocin

Kouamé Yao YvesOkpekon Aboua Timoth eYapi Houphou�t F lix

Volume 4(2) · Pages 28–32 · DOI: 10.33545/26174693.2020.v4.i2a.53 ↗

Research areasNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesTraditional and Medicinal Uses of AnnonaceaeDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The objective of this study was to assess the anti-lipid-lowering effect of extracts from the bark of Xylopia villosa stems in rats made diabetic by streptozocin. Daonil® 20 mg/kg body weight reduced the total cholesterol concentration in the same way (P ˃ 0.05) as the hydroethanolic extract 200 mg/kg body weight. The triglycerides concentration (1.68 ± 0.10 g/L) of diabetic rats treated with hydroethanolic extract 200 mg/kg body weight became similar (P ˃ 0.05) to that (1.34 ± 0.01 g/L) of non-diabetic control rats. Aqueous extract at a dose of 200 mg/kg body weight normalized (P ˃ 0.05) HDL cholesterol concentration while hydroethanolic extract at a dose of 200 mg/kg body weight, it strictly increased (P

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Diabetes is linked to a high risk of vascular disease, with cardiovascular disease being the primary cause of death for individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Diabetes is linked to a high risk of vascular disease, with cardiovascular disease being the primary cause of death for individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

      In the paper's own words

      “Diabetes is associated with a high risk of vascular disease. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes [1].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Managing cardiovascular risk factors, specifically dyslipidemia in diabetic patients, is an important health objective. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Managing cardiovascular risk factors, specifically dyslipidemia in diabetic patients, is an important health objective.

      In the paper's own words

      “Energetic management of all cardiovascular risk factors including dyslipidemia in diabetics [2].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to evaluate the anti-lipid-lowering effects of Xylopia villosa stem bark extracts in streptozocin-induced diabetic rats. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to evaluate the anti-lipid-lowering effects of Xylopia villosa stem bark extracts in streptozocin-induced diabetic rats.

      In the paper's own words

      “The aim of this study is to assess the anti-lipid-lowering effect of extracts from the bark of Xylopia villosa stems in rats made diabetic by streptozocin.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The researchers specifically sought to measure the effects on total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL and LDL cholesterol levels. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The researchers specifically sought to measure the effects on total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL and LDL cholesterol levels.

      In the paper's own words

      “The specific objectives are to measure total cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL and LDL cholesterols.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The experiment used 60 male Wistar albino rats, aged 11 weeks, with an average weight of 149.02 ± 0.10 grams. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The experiment used 60 male Wistar albino rats, aged 11 weeks, with an average weight of 149.02 ± 0.10 grams.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this experiment, 60 wistar albino male rats of 11 weeks old and mean weight 149.02 ± 0.10 grams were used.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Preparation of Extracts

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Diabetes was induced in the rats via an intravenous injection of streptozocin at a dose of 60 mg/kg body weight. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Diabetes was induced in the rats via an intravenous injection of streptozocin at a dose of 60 mg/kg body weight.

      In the paper's own words

      “non-diabetic rats received streptozocin intravenously at a dose of 60 mg / kg body weight.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Preparation of Extracts

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Seven days after induction, 42 diabetic rats were divided into seven groups of six and treated via gavage for six days. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Seven days after induction, 42 diabetic rats were divided into seven groups of six and treated via gavage for six days.

      In the paper's own words

      “At the 7th day after streptozocin injection, 42 diabetic rats were selected and divided into 7 groups of 6 rats according to their glycaemia. Subsequently, a treatment by gavage took place during 6 days”

      Page 2

      Found in: Preparation of Extracts

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Treatment groups included a non-diabetic control, an untreated diabetic group, and diabetic groups receiving aqueous extract (100 or 200 mg/kg), hydroethanolic extract (100 or 200 mg/kg), or Daonil® (10 or 20 mg/kg). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Treatment groups included a non-diabetic control, an untreated diabetic group, and diabetic groups receiving aqueous extract (100 or 200 mg/kg), hydroethanolic extract (100 or 200 mg/kg), or Daonil® (10 or 20 mg/kg).

      In the paper's own words

      “Non-diabetic control group → 1 mL of distilled water  Untreated diabetic group → 1 mL of distilled water  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL of aqueous extract 100 mg / kg body weight (bw)  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL of aqueous extract 200 mg / kg bw  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL of ethylic alcohol extract 100 mg / kg bw  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL of ethylic alcohol extract 200 mg / kg bw  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL Daonil® 10 mg / kg bw  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL Daonil® 20 mg / kg bw”

      Page 2

      Found in: Preparation of Extracts

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Treatment with 200 mg/kg of aqueous extract, 200 mg/kg of hydroethanolic extract, or 20 mg/kg of Daonil® normalized total cholesterol levels to be equivalent to non-diabetic controls. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Treatment with 200 mg/kg of aqueous extract, 200 mg/kg of hydroethanolic extract, or 20 mg/kg of Daonil® normalized total cholesterol levels to be equivalent to non-diabetic controls.

      In the paper's own words

      “the total cholesterol concentrations of the diabetic rats treated with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw), the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) and Daonil® (20 mg/kg bw) respectively gave 2, 86 ± 0.35; 2.68 ± 0.10 and 2.56 ± 0.25 g/L and are equivalent (P ˃ 0.05) to that of non-diabetic control rats.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Determination of the lipid profile of diabetic rats 3.1.1. Case of total cholesterol and triglycerides in diabetic rats

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The hydroethanolic extract at 200 mg/kg reduced triglyceride levels (1.68 ± 0.10 g/L) to a level similar to non-diabetic controls (1.34 ± 0.01 g/L). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The hydroethanolic extract at 200 mg/kg reduced triglyceride levels (1.68 ± 0.10 g/L) to a level similar to non-diabetic controls (1.34 ± 0.01 g/L).

      In the paper's own words

      “the triglyceride concentration (1.68 ± 0.10 g/L) of the diabetic rats treated with the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) became similar (P ˃ 0.05) to that of the control rats. non-diabetic (1.34 ± 0.01 g/L).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Determination of the lipid profile of diabetic rats 3.1.1. Case of total cholesterol and triglycerides in diabetic rats

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Aqueous extract at 200 mg/kg normalized HDL cholesterol levels (1.32 ± 0.03 g/L) compared to non-diabetic controls (1.37 ± 0.05 g/L). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Aqueous extract at 200 mg/kg normalized HDL cholesterol levels (1.32 ± 0.03 g/L) compared to non-diabetic controls (1.37 ± 0.05 g/L).

      In the paper's own words

      “treatment of diabetic rats with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) normalized (P ˃ 0.05) the HDL cholesterol concentration (1.32 ± 0.03 g/L) in comparison with that non-diabetic control rats (1.37 ± 0.05 g/L).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Case of HDL and LDL cholesterols in diabetic rats

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The hydroethanolic extract at 200 mg/kg significantly increased HDL cholesterol (1.68 ± 0.04 g/L) beyond the levels of non-diabetic controls (1.37 ± 0.05 g/L). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The hydroethanolic extract at 200 mg/kg significantly increased HDL cholesterol (1.68 ± 0.04 g/L) beyond the levels of non-diabetic controls (1.37 ± 0.05 g/L).

      In the paper's own words

      “the treatment of diabetic rats with the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw), it strictly increased (P <0.001) the concentration of HDL cholesterol (1.68 ± 0.04 g/L) compared to that of non-diabetic control rats (1.37 ± 0.05 g/L).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Case of HDL and LDL cholesterols in diabetic rats

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Aqueous extract at 200 mg/kg reduced LDL cholesterol (1.20 ± 0.02 g/L) to a level slightly lower than that of non-diabetic controls. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Aqueous extract at 200 mg/kg reduced LDL cholesterol (1.20 ± 0.02 g/L) to a level slightly lower than that of non-diabetic controls.

      In the paper's own words

      “the concentration of LDL cholesterol (1.20 ± 0.02 g/L) in diabetic rats treated with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) decreased slightly (P <0.05) compared to that non-diabetic control rats.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Case of HDL and LDL cholesterols in diabetic rats

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The hydroethanolic extract at 200 mg/kg was slightly more effective at lowering LDL cholesterol than Daonil® at 20 mg/kg. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The hydroethanolic extract at 200 mg/kg was slightly more effective at lowering LDL cholesterol than Daonil® at 20 mg/kg.

      In the paper's own words

      “the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) slightly (P <0.05) lowered the LDL cholesterol concentration compared to treatment with Daonil® (20 mg/kg bw).”

      Page 5

      Found in: Case of HDL and LDL cholesterols in diabetic rats

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors concluded that the hydroethanolic extract at 200 mg/kg acts as a lipid-lowering agent by correcting dyslipidemia and raising HDL cholesterol. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors concluded that the hydroethanolic extract at 200 mg/kg acts as a lipid-lowering agent by correcting dyslipidemia and raising HDL cholesterol.

      In the paper's own words

      “The hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) behaved as a lipid lowering agent by correcting dyslipidemia and increasing HDL cholesterol levels.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Wistar rats). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Experimental Grouping
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Wistar rats). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Wistar rats). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Experimental Grouping

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Wistar rats). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of the bark of Xylopia villosa stems on the total cholesterol andFigure 1Page 3Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Xylopia villosa stem barks on HDL and LDL cholesterolFigure 2Page 4
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Diabetes is associated with a high risk of vascular disease. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes [1] . Energetic management of all cardiovascular risk factors including dyslipidemia in diabetics [2] . The aim of this study is to assess the anti-lipid-lowering effect of extracts from the bark of Xylopia villosa stems in rats made diabetic by streptozocin. The specific objectives are to measure total cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL and LDL cholesterols.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods

Plant Material

Xylopia villosa stems bark were harvested in June 2014 at the National Floristic Center of Felix Houphouët Boigny University where can be found a sample recorded at the number 14712.

Preparation of Extracts

The stems bark of Xylopia villosa were dried for four weeks in the shade of the sun then made powder using an electric grinder IKAMAG RCT®. Hundred (100) grams of powder of Xylopia villosa were macerated for 24 hours in 1 liter of ethylic alcohol (ethylic alcohol and distilled water mixture: 70/30). The macerated obtained was then filtered twice on white cotton and once on Whatman filter paper N°4. The filtrate obtained in 70% ethanol was evaporated to dryness at reduced pressure at temperature of 40°C using a rotary evaporator type Buchi 161 Water Bath. About aqueous extract preparation, 100 grams of Xylopia villosa stem barks powder were added to 100 milliliters of boiling distilled water. Just like ethanolic preparation, the resulting mixture was filtered twice on white cotton and once on Whatman filter paper N°4. The filtrate obtained is preserved at temperature of 40°C in an oven for drying.

non-diabetic rats received streptozocin intravenously at a dose of 60 mg / kg body weight. The evolution of glycaemia of rats was followed from day D0 to D7 using strip glucose meter. At the 7th day after streptozocin injection, 42 diabetic rats were selected and divided into 7 groups of 6 rats according to their glycaemia. Subsequently, a treatment by gavage took place during 6 days with the different drugs according to the following distribution:  Non-diabetic control group → 1 mL of distilled water  Untreated diabetic group → 1 mL of distilled water  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL of aqueous extract 100 mg / kg body weight (bw)  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL of aqueous extract 200 mg / kg bw  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL of ethylic alcohol extract 100 mg / kg bw  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL of ethylic alcohol extract 200 mg / kg bw  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL Daonil ® 10 mg / kg bw  Treated diabetic group → 1 mL Daonil ® 20 mg / kg bw

Blood collection

After 6 days of treatment, blood was taken. For this study, the total volume of blood which can be taken with an animal (example of the rat or the mouse) is not enough. Thus, the number of taking away was distributed on several animals. We did not take with an animal more than 20% of its total blood volume. The volume of taken blood took into account the weight and the total volume of blood available to the animal. About 3 mL of blood was collected from puncturing the retro orbital sinus from anesthetized rats. The blood was centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min to separate serum. This serum was kept at -20°C until the analysis [3] .

Determination of lipids in diabetic rats 2.3.1. Determination of total cholesterol

In an EDTA tube containing 1000 μL of reagent preincubated at 37 ° C for 2 to 3 min, 10 μL of the sample to be assayed are added. After stirring for 1 min and automatic incubation at room temperature (16 to 25 ° C) for 10 min, the optical density is read with a spectrophotometer at 500 nm in order to determine the concentration of cholesterol according to the following expression:

Determination of triglycerides

The determination of triglycerides was carried out according to the enzymatic method of triglycerides (Glycerol phosphate oxidase) using the glycerides reagent kit REF 7D74 (USA) [4] . The triglycerides, following several coupled reactions, give a color complex whose intensity, determined with a spectrophotometer at the wavelength λ equal to 500 nm, is proportional to the amount of triglycerides present in the serum.

Determination of HDL and LDL cholesterols

The determination of HDL (HDL-C) and LDL (LDL-C) cholesterols was performed using the phosphotungustic reagent associated with magnesium chloride after precipitation of LDL cholesterol [4] . In a hemolysis tube containing the phosphotungustic reagent associated with magnesium chloride, 1 μl of the serum to be assayed was added. The tube was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min. LDL-C precipitates and HDL cholesterol is assayed in the supernatant resulting from centrifugation. The LDL-C is then assayed in the supernatant of the centrifugation of the precipitate obtained previously. The absorbance of the solutions read at the wavelength λ equal to 500 nm is directly proportional to the quantity of the parameters assayed in the serum.

Results

Results

Determination of the lipid profile of diabetic rats 3.1.1. Case of total cholesterol and triglycerides in diabetic rats

Fig. 1 represents the total cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations of diabetic rats treated with the extracts of Xylopia villosa and Daonil ® . The total cholesterol concentration in non-diabetic control rats increased from 2.45 ± 0.04 g/L to 6.87 ± 0.23 and 4.15 ± 0.03 g/L respectively in untreated diabetic rats and those treated with Daonil ® at a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight (bw); these total cholesterol concentrations are extremely increased (P <0.001) compared to the total cholesterol concentration in non-diabetic control rats. The total cholesterol concentration (3.59 ± 0.04 g/L) of the diabetic rats treated with the aqueous extract (100 mg/kg bw) remained significantly high (P <0.01) compared to that of the rats non-diabetic controls. Also, the total cholesterol concentration (3.46 ± 0.22 g/L) in diabetic rats treated with the hydroethanolic extract (100 mg/kg bw) remained slightly elevated (P <0.05) compared to that non-diabetic control rats. However, the total cholesterol concentrations of the diabetic rats treated with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw), the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) and Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw) respectively gave 2, 86 ± 0.35; 2.68 ± 0.10 and 2.56 ± 0.25 g/L and are equivalent (P ˃ 0.05) to that of non-diabetic control rats. In addition, the total cholesterol concentrations of the rats rendered diabetic and treated with the aqueous extract (100 and 200 mg/kg bw), the hydroethanolic extract (100 and 200 mg/kg bw) and Daonil ® (10 and 20 mg/kg bw) were significantly lower (P <0.001) compared to the total cholesterol concentration of the untreated diabetic rats. The effect of Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw) on the total cholesterol concentration of diabetic rats is the same (P ˃ 0.05) as that of the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) while it is significantly higher (P <0.01) than that of the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw). Regarding the triglyceride concentration, it went from 1.34 ± 0.01 g/L in non-diabetic control rats to 6.24 ± 0.26; 3.14 ± 0.08; 2.59 ± 0.10; 3.31 ± 0.09; 3.04 ± 0.09 and 3.03 ± 0.05 g/L respectively in untreated diabetic rats and those treated with aqueous extract (100 mg/kg bw), hydroethanolic extract (100 mg/kg bw), Daonil® (10 mg/kg bw), aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) and Daonil ® (20 mg / kg bw) and are strictly up (P <0.001) compared to the triglyceride concentration of non-diabetic control rats.

Figure 1. Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of the bark of Xylopia villosa stems on the total cholesterol and
Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of the bark of Xylopia villosa stems on the total cholesterol and↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of the bark of Xylopia villosa stems on the total cholesterol and

Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of the bark of Xylopia villosa stems on the total cholesterol and

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

On the other hand, the triglyceride concentration (1.68 ± 0.10 g/L) of the diabetic rats treated with the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) became similar (P ˃ 0.05) to that of the control rats. non-diabetic (1.34 ± 0.01 g/L).

In addition, the triglyceride concentrations of the rats rendered diabetic and treated with the aqueous extract (100 and 200 mg/kg bw), the hydroethanolic extract (100 and 200 mg/kg bw) and Daonil ® (10 and 20 mg/kg bw) were strictly reduced (P <0.001) compared to the triglyceride concentration of untreated diabetic rats. The impact of the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) on the triglyceride concentration of diabetic rats is extremely higher (P <0.001) than that of Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw) and of the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw).

Case of HDL and LDL cholesterols in diabetic rats

Fig. 2 represents the HDL and LDL cholesterols concentrations of diabetic rats after six days of treatment with Daonil ® and the extracts (aqueous and hydroethanolic) of Xylopia villosa. The HDL cholesterol concentration increased from 1.37 ± 0.05 g/L in non-diabetic control rats to 0.26 ± 0.07; 0.76 ± 0.03; 0.87 ± 0.06; 0.37 ± 0.03 and 0.89 g/L respectively in untreated diabetic rats and those treated with aqueous extract (100 mg/kg body weight (bw)), hydroethanolic extract (100 mg/kg bw); Daonil® (10 mg/kg bw) and Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw) and these concentrations are extremely low (P <0.001) compared to the HDL cholesterol concentration of non-diabetic control rats. Furthermore, treatment of diabetic rats with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) normalized (P ˃ 0.05) the HDL cholesterol concentration (1.32 ± 0.03 g/L) in comparison with that non-diabetic control rats (1.37 ± 0.05 g/L). As for the treatment of diabetic rats with the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw), it strictly increased (P <0.001) the concentration of HDL cholesterol (1.68 ± 0.04 g/L) compared to that of non-diabetic control rats (1.37 ± 0.05 g/L).

Figure 2. Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Xylopia villosa stem barks on HDL and LDL cholesterol
Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Xylopia villosa stem barks on HDL and LDL cholesterol↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Xylopia villosa stem barks on HDL and LDL cholesterol

Incidence of Daonil® and aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Xylopia villosa stem barks on HDL and LDL cholesterol

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗

The treatments of diabetic rats with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) and the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) strictly increased (P <0.001) the HDL cholesterol concentration compared to the treatment with Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw). Treatments of the diabetic rats with the aqueous extract (100 mg/kg bw) and the hydroethanolic extract (100 mg/kg bw) gave similar HDL cholesterol concentrations (P ˃ 0.05) to that of the treated diabetic rats. With Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw). In contrast, treatment of diabetic rats with Daonil ® (10 mg/kg bw) resulted in an extremely lower HDL cholesterol concentration than that of diabetic rats treated with Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw).

Although the aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Xylopia villosa at the dose of 200 mg/kg bw increased the HDL cholesterol concentration in diabetic rats, the effect of the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) on the cholesterol concentration HDL of diabetic rats is extremely higher (P <0.001) than that of aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw).

Regarding the LDL cholesterol concentration in untreated diabetic rats (5.64 ± 0.27 g/L), it is extremely increased (P <0.001) compared to the LDL cholesterol concentration in non-diabetic control rats. (2.20 ± 0.06 g/L). Diabetic rats treated with the aqueous extract (100 mg/kg bw) have a significantly elevated LDL cholesterol concentration (3.61 ± 0.22 g/L) (P <0.01) compared to the cholesterol concentration LDL from non-diabetic control rats. Those treated with Daonil ® (10 mg/kg bw) obtained a slightly higher LDL cholesterol concentration (3.19 ± 0.12 g/L) (P <0.05) than that of non-diabetic control rats. On the other hand, the concentration of LDL cholesterol (1.20 ± 0.02 g/L) in diabetic rats treated with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) decreased slightly (P <0.05) compared to that non-diabetic control rats. In addition, the LDL cholesterol concentrations in diabetic rats treated with the hydroethanolic extract (100 mg/kg bw), the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) and Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw) were respectively 2.49 ± 0.30; 1.53 ± 0.31 and 2.48 ± 0.13 g/L and are similar (P ˃ 0.05) to that of non-diabetic control rats.

The LDL cholesterol concentrations of the rats made diabetic and treated with the aqueous extract (100 and 200 mg/kg bw), the hydroethanolic extract (100 and 200 mg/kg bw) and Daonil ® (10 and 20 mg/kg pc) were significantly lower (P <0.001) compared to the LDL cholesterol concentration in untreated diabetic rats.

Regarding the treatment of diabetic rats with the different drugs, the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) significantly decreased (P <0.01) the LDL cholesterol concentration compared to the treatment with Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw). In addition, the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) slightly (P <0.05) lowered the LDL cholesterol concentration compared to treatment with Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw). In contrast, treatment of diabetic rats with the aqueous extract (100 mg/kg bw) obtained a slightly elevated LDL cholesterol concentration (P <0.05) than that of diabetic rats treated with Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw). However, the diabetic rats treated with the hydroethanolic extract (100 mg/kg bw) and Daonil ® (10 mg/kg bw) had identical LDL cholesterol concentrations (P ˃ 0.05) to that of the diabetic rats treated with Daonil ® (20 mg/kg bw). The effect of the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) of Xylopia villosa on the LDL cholesterol concentration of diabetic rats is similar (P ˃ 0.05) to that of the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw).

Discussion

Regarding the lipid profile of diabetic rats, dyslipidemia was observed in untreated diabetic rats. Indeed, dyslipidemia is defined as complications related to lipoprotein metabolism manifested by an increase in the plasma concentration of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and a reduction in the concentration of HDL cholesterol [5] . In diabetic rats treated with Daonil ® , the aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Xylopia villosa, several observations were made. First, treatment of the diabetic rats with the hydroethanolic extract at a dose of 200 mg/kg body weight (bw) was able to reduce the triglyceride concentration to a proportion similar to that of the non-diabetic control rats. Also, at this same dose of the hydroethanolic extract, the HDL cholesterol concentration increased compared to that of the non-diabetic control rats while the treatment of the diabetic rats with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) was able to normalize the HDL cholesterol concentration so as to have a value similar to that of non-diabetic control rats. Then, the treatments of the diabetic rats with the hydroethanolic extract (100 and 200 mg/kg bw) and Daonil (20 mg/kg bw) made it possible to normalize the concentration of LDL-cholesterol compared to that of the non-diabetic control rats. However, treatment of diabetic rats with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw) reduced the concentration of LDL-cholesterol to be lower than that of non-diabetic control rats. This result is in agreement with that of Abidov and collaborators who showed that blueberry leaves caused a decrease in LDL levels in type 2 diabetes [6] . Finally, the total cholesterol of the diabetic rats treated with the aqueous extract (200 mg/kg bw), the hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) and Daonil (20 mg/kg bw) was normalized so as to have a cholesterol level similar to that of non-diabetic control rats. This decrease in cholesterol is believed to be due to the sterols present in the aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Xylopia villosa [7] . Indeed, De-Jong and collaborators have shown that plant sterols and stanols act on total and LDL cholesterol levels by inhibiting the absorption of cholesterol [8] .

Conclusion

The hydroethanolic extract (200 mg/kg bw) behaved as a lipid lowering agent by correcting dyslipidemia and increasing HDL cholesterol levels.

Ethical Approval

The experimental procedures and protocols used in this study were approved by the Ethical Committee of Health Sciences, University Félix Houphouet-Boigny. These guidelines were in accordance with the European Council Legislation 87/607/EEC for the protection of experimental animals. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and reduce the number of animals used.

References

8 in the original paper
  1. Booth GL, Rothwell D, Fung K, Hux JE, Booth G, Laupacis A. Diabetes and cardiac disease, Diabetes in Ontario: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences 2002, 95-127.
  2. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl. J. Med 2003;348:383-393.
  3. OVF: Office Veterinaire Federal. No. 800.116-1.04 1981.
  4. Fossati P, Prencipe L, Berti G. Enzymatic Creatinine Assay: A New colorimetric Method Based on Hydrogen Peroxide Measurement. Clin Chem 1983;29(8):14941496.
  5. Kendall DM, Harmel AP. The metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Understanding the role of insulin resistance. Am J Manag Care 2002;8(20):635-653.
  6. Abidov M, Ramazanov A, Jimenez DRM, Chkhikvishvili I. Effect of Blueberin on fasting glucose, C-reactive protein and plasma aminotransferases, in female volunteers with diabetes type 2: double-blind, placebo controlled clinical study. Georgian Med News 2006;141:66-72.
  7. Kouame YY, Okpekon AT, Yapi HF, Gbassi KG, Assi YJ, Kouakou YKF. Phytochemical Screening and Acute Toxicity Study of Xylopia Villosa (Annonaceae) Barks Stems of Aqueous and Hydroethanolic Extracts. EJPMR 2016;3(6):526-531.
  8. De-Jong, Plat J, Mensink RP. Metabolic effects of plant sterols and stanols. J Nutr Biochem 2003;14:362-369.