Scinovex

Research article · 2018 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

Strong equitable and inverse strong equitable domination number of some special classes of graphs

K. Ameenal BibiMT amizharasiP Rajakumari

Volume 3(2) · Pages 645–651

Research areasAdvanced Graph Theory Research

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Let G = (V, E) be a simple, finite, undirected and connected graph. A non-empty subset D of V(G) is called a strong equitable dominating set of G if for every v V-D, there exists atleast one u D such that u and v are adjacent, also deg (u) ≥ deg (v) and if for every v V-D, there exists a vertex u D such that uv E(G) and ≤1. The minimum cardinality of such a minimal strong equitable dominating set is called a strong equitable domination number and it is denoted by se(G).If is a strong equitable dominating set, then is called an inverse strong equitable dominating set. The minimum cardinality of a minimal inverse strong equitable dominating set is called an inverse strong equitable domination number and it is denoted by

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • The study of domination in graphs is a rapidly growing area of graph theory with practical applications in social network modeling, coding theory, radio stations, and nuclear power plant problems. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The study of domination in graphs is a rapidly growing area of graph theory with practical applications in social network modeling, coding theory, radio stations, and nuclear power plant problems.

      In the paper's own words

      “Domination has a wide range of applications in radio stations, modeling social networks, coding theory, nuclear power plants problems [10].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The authors aim to determine the strong equitable domination number for several specific classes of graphs. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The authors aim to determine the strong equitable domination number for several specific classes of graphs.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this paper, we investigated some results on the strong equitable domination number of some special classes of graphs.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The research analyzes six specific graph types: Clebsch (16 vertices, 40 edges), Soifer (9 vertices, 20 edges), Chvatal (12 vertices, 24 edges), Herschel (11 vertices, 18 edges), Fritsch (9 vertices, 21 edges), and Franklin (12 vertices, 18 edges). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The research analyzes six specific graph types: Clebsch (16 vertices, 40 edges), Soifer (9 vertices, 20 edges), Chvatal (12 vertices, 24 edges), Herschel (11 vertices, 18 edges), Fritsch (9 vertices, 21 edges), and Franklin (12 vertices, 18 edges).

      In the paper's own words

      “The Clebsch graph is a strongly regular quintic graph on 16 vertices and 40 edges.”

      Page 2

      “The Soifer graph is a planar graph on 9 vertices and 20 edges.”

      Page 2

      “The Chvatal graph is a 4-regular graph on 12 vertices and 24 edges.”

      Page 2

      “The Herschel graph is a bipartite undirected graph with 11 vertices and 18 edges.”

      Page 2

      “The Fritsch graph is the planar graph on 9 vertices and 21 edges.”

      Page 2

      “The Franklin graph is a 3- regular graph on 12 vertices and 18 edges.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study also includes the Moser spindle graph, which consists of 7 vertices and 11 edges. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study also includes the Moser spindle graph, which consists of 7 vertices and 11 edges.

      In the paper's own words

      “The Moser graph (also called the Moser Spindle graph) is an undirected graph on 7 vertices and 11 edges”

      Page 2

      Found in: Definition 2.6

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The authors evaluate the inverse strong equitable domination number, which is the minimum cardinality of a strong equitable dominating set found within the complement of the minimum strong equitable dominating set. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors evaluate the inverse strong equitable domination number, which is the minimum cardinality of a strong equitable dominating set found within the complement of the minimum strong equitable dominating set.

      In the paper's own words

      “Let D be the minimum strong equitable dominating set of G. If V-D contains a strong equitable dominating set D, then Dis called the inverse strong equitable dominating set of G with respect to D.”

      Page 6

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 6 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The inverse strong equitable domination number does not exist for the Soifer, Moser spindle, and Herschel graphs. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The inverse strong equitable domination number does not exist for the Soifer, Moser spindle, and Herschel graphs.

      In the paper's own words

      “The Inverse strong equitable domination number does not exist for the following graphs: i) Soifer graph ii) Moser spindle graph iii) Herschel graph”

      Page 7

      Found in: Observation: 4.6

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that they have successfully determined the strong and inverse strong equitable domination numbers, as well as the eccentricity, radius, and diameter, for the selected special classes of graphs. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that they have successfully determined the strong and inverse strong equitable domination numbers, as well as the eccentricity, radius, and diameter, for the selected special classes of graphs.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this paper, we have investigated the strong equitable domination number and the inverse strong equitable domination number of some special classes of graphs. We have also attained the eccentricity, radius and diameter of those graphs.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Mathematical graph structures (Clebsch, Soifer, Chvatal, Herschel, Fritsch, and Franklin graphs)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Study overview
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Mathematical graph structures (Clebsch, Soifer, Chvatal, Herschel, Fritsch, and Franklin graphs)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Mathematical graph structures (Clebsch, Soifer, Chvatal, Herschel, Fritsch, and Franklin graphs)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Study overview

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Mathematical graph structures (Clebsch, Soifer, Chvatal, Herschel, Fritsch, and Franklin graphs)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

In 1962, Ore used the name "dominating set" and "domination number". In 1977, Cockayne and Hedetniemi made an interesting and extensive survey of the results known at that time about dominating sets in graphs. The survey paper of Cockayne and Hedetniemi has generated a lot of interest in the study of domination in graphs. Domination has a wide range of applications in radio stations, modeling social networks, coding theory, nuclear power plants problems [10] . One of the fastest growing areas in graph theory is the study of domination and related subset problems such as independence, covering, matching and inverse domination. A non-empty subset D of V (G) in a graph G is a dominating set if every vertex in V-D is adjacent to atleast one vertex in D. The domination number ) (G  is the minimum cardinality of a minimal dominating set of G.

The concept of inverse domination was introduced by V.R. Kulli [8] . If a non-empty subset D is called the minimum dominating set, then if V-D contains a dominating set D , then D is called the inverse dominating set of G and   (G) is the inverse domination number.

Sampath Kumar and Pushpalatha introduced the concepts of strong and weak domination in graphs [11] . Let u, v V then u strongly dominates v if i) uv E and ii) deg (u) ≥ deg(v). A non-empty subset D  V is a strong dominating set of G if every vertex in V-D is strongly dominated by atleast one vertex in D.

Swaminathan et al. [12] introduced the concept of equitable domination in graphs. A non-empty subset D of V(G) is called an equitable dominating set if for every vV-D, there exists a vertex uD such that uvE(G) and In this paper, we investigated some results on the strong equitable domination number of some special classes of graphs.

Preliminaries

Definition 2.1 [3] The Clebsch graph is a strongly regular quintic graph on 16 vertices and 40 edges. It is also known as the Greenwood-Gleason graph.

Definition 2.2

The Soifer graph is a planar graph on 9 vertices and 20 edges.

Definition 2.3

The Chvatal graph is a 4-regular graph on 12 vertices and 24 edges. It is a Hamiltonian graph. Definition 2.4 [5] The Herschel graph is a bipartite undirected graph with 11 vertices and 18 edges.

Definition 2.5

The Fritsch graph is the planar graph on 9 vertices and 21 edges.

Definition 2.6

The Franklin graph is a 3-regular graph on 12 vertices and 18 edges. It is a 3-vertex connected and 3 edge connected perfect graph.

Definition 2.7 [9] The Moser graph (also called the Moser Spindle graph) is an undirected graph on 7 vertices and 11 edges named after Mathematician Leo Moser and his brother William.

Results

Strong equitable domination number of some special graphs Definition 3.1 [1,2] A non-empty subset D of V(G) is called a Strong equitable dominating set of a graph G if for every v  V-D, there exists a vertex u  D such that uv  E(G) and

The minimum cardinality of the Strong equitable dominating set is the strong equitable domination number and it is denoted by se  (G).

In this section, we obtained the strong equitable domination number of some special classes of graphs.

Proof

By the theorem 3.6, the strong equitable domination number of Chvatal graph is se

The necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of atleast one inverse strong equitable dominating set of G is that G contains no isolated vertices. Let D be the minimum strong equitable dominating set of G and there exists an inverse strong equitable dominating set D of G which has three vertices. Clearly u in D strongly dominates v in V-D and ) deg(

Then D is the inverse strong equitable dominating set.

Observation: 4.6

The Inverse strong equitable domination number does not exist for the following graphs: i) Soifer graph ii) Moser spindle graph iii) Herschel graph

Conclusion

In this paper, we have investigated the strong equitable domination number and the inverse strong equitable domination number of some special classes of graphs. We have also attained the eccentricity, radius and diameter of those graphs.

References

12 in the original paper
  1. Ameenal Bibi K, Rajakumari P. The Split domination, Inverse domination and equitable domination in the middle and the central graphs of the path and the cycle graphs, IJMTT. 2017; 49(3).
  2. Ameenal Bibi K, Rajakumari P. Strong and Weak domination of middle graphs of path and cycle, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer science. 2017; 8(6):186-189.
  3. Arockia Arul Doss J, Prabhavathi S. The Domatic number of Clebsch Graph, International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology, Science & Engineering, 2015, 1(3). ISSN: 2395-5619
  4. Douglas B, West, Introduction to graph theory Second edition, 2015.
  5. Ganesan V, Dr. Balamurugan K. On Prime labeling of Herschel Graph, IJERME, 2016, I(II). ISSN: 2455-4200,
  6. Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slates PJ. Fundamentals of domination in graphs Marcel Dekker Inc. New York, U.S.A, 1998.
  7. Jayasree TG, Radha R Iyer. Results on the inverse domination number of some class of graphs, IJMET. 2018; 9(1):995-1004 Article ID: IJMET_09_01_106.
  8. Kulli VR, Sigarkanti SC. Inverse domination in graphs, Nat. Acad. Sci. Lect. 1991; 14:473-475.
  9. Mahadevan G, Selvam Avadayappan N, Ramesh T. Subramanian, Triple connected complementary tree domination number of a graph, International Mathematical Forum. 2013; 8(14)659-670.
  10. Preethi Gupta. Domination in graphs with application, Indian Journal of Research, 2013, 2(3). ISSN: 2250-1991.
  11. Sampath kumar E, Pushpalatha L. Strong Weak domination and domination balance in a graph, Discrete Math. 1996; 161:235-241.
  12. Swaminathan V, Dharmalingam KM. Degree equitable domination on graphs, Kragujevak Journal of Mathematics. 2011; 85(1):191-197.