Scinovex

Research article · 2018 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

On contra βwg-continuous functions in topological spaces

Govindappa NavalagiKantappa. M. Bhavikatti

Volume 3(3) · Pages 139–145

Research areasFuzzy and Soft Set Theory

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The main aim of this paper is to define and study the notions of contra βwg-continuous, almost contra βwg-continuous functions and discussed the relationship with other contra continuous functions and obtained their characteristics. Further we introduce the concepts of contra βwg-irresolute, contra βwg-closed functions and obtain some of their properties.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • The study of contra continuous functions began in 1996, establishing a foundation for exploring various types of continuity in topological spaces. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The study of contra continuous functions began in 1996, establishing a foundation for exploring various types of continuity in topological spaces.

      In the paper's own words

      “In 1996, Dontchev. [4], introduced the notion of contra continuous functions.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The concept of βwg-continuous functions was recently introduced, providing a new basis for defining further specialized continuous functions. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The concept of βwg-continuous functions was recently introduced, providing a new basis for defining further specialized continuous functions.

      In the paper's own words

      “Recently, Govindappa. Navalagi and Kantappa. M. Bhavikatti [15] introduced βwg-continuous functions.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The authors aim to define and analyze contra βwg-continuous and almost contra βwg-continuous functions, including their characteristics and relationships with other contra continuous functions. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The authors aim to define and analyze contra βwg-continuous and almost contra βwg-continuous functions, including their characteristics and relationships with other contra continuous functions.

      In the paper's own words

      “The main aim of this paper is to define and study the notions of contra βwg-continuous, almost contra βwg-continuous functions and discussed the relationship with other contra continuous functions and obtained their characteristics.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The research is conducted using non-empty topological spaces (X, τ), (Y, σ), and (Z, η) without assuming any separation axioms unless specified. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The research is conducted using non-empty topological spaces (X, τ), (Y, σ), and (Z, η) without assuming any separation axioms unless specified.

      In the paper's own words

      “Throughout this paper (X, τ), (Y, σ) and (Z, η) (or simply X, Y, and Z) represent the non-empty topological spaces on which no separation axioms are assumed, unless otherwise mentioned.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The authors define a function as contra βwg-continuous if the inverse image of every open set in the codomain is a βwg-closed set in the domain. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors define a function as contra βwg-continuous if the inverse image of every open set in the codomain is a βwg-closed set in the domain.

      In the paper's own words

      “Definition 3.1: A function f: X→ Y is called contra beta weakly generalised (briefly, βwg-continuous) continuous if f -1(V) is βwg-closed set in X for every open set V in Y.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Definition 2.2:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • All contra continuous and contra pre-continuous functions are contra βwg-continuous, although the reverse is not necessarily true. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      All contra continuous and contra pre-continuous functions are contra βwg-continuous, although the reverse is not necessarily true.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 3.3: Every contra continuous (resp. contra pre-continuous) function is contra βwg -continuous but not conversely.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 3.1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Contra Ag*-continuous and contra gp*-continuous functions are always contra βwg-continuous, but not all contra βwg-continuous functions meet these criteria. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Contra Ag*-continuous and contra gp*-continuous functions are always contra βwg-continuous, but not all contra βwg-continuous functions meet these criteria.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 3.6: Every contra Ag*-continuous (resp. contra gp*-continuous) function is contra βwg -continuous but not conversely.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 3.1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Every contra βwg-continuous function is also contra pre-semi-continuous, but the converse does not hold. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Every contra βwg-continuous function is also contra pre-semi-continuous, but the converse does not hold.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 3.8: Every contra βwg-continuous function is contra pre-semi-continuous but not conversely.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 3.1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Contra βwg-continuous functions are shown to be contra gp-continuous, contra gpr-continuous, contra g-continuous, contra g*p-continuous, contra αg-continuous, gs-continuous, and gsp-continuous. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Contra βwg-continuous functions are shown to be contra gp-continuous, contra gpr-continuous, contra g-continuous, contra g*p-continuous, contra αg-continuous, gs-continuous, and gsp-continuous.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 3.10: (i) Every contra βwg-continuous function is contra gp-continuous. 1. Every contra βwg-continuous function is contra gpr-continuous. 2. Every contra βwg -continuous function is contra g-continuous. 3. Every contra βwg-continuous function is contra g*p-continuous. 4. Every contra βwg-continuous function is contra αg-continuous (resp.gs-continuous, gsp-continuous).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 3.1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Contra βwg-continuous functions are always contra rg-continuous, but not all contra rg-continuous functions are contra βwg-continuous. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Contra βwg-continuous functions are always contra rg-continuous, but not all contra rg-continuous functions are contra βwg-continuous.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 3.16: Every contra βwg-continuous function is contra rg-continuous but not conversely.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition 3.1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • If a function is βwg-continuous and the domain is a βwg-locally indiscrete space, then the function is contra continuous. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      If a function is βwg-continuous and the domain is a βwg-locally indiscrete space, then the function is contra continuous.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 3.20: (i) If a function f: X → Y is βwg-continuous and (X, τ) is βwg-locally indiscrete then f is contra continuous.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Definition 3.1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The composition of two contra βwg-continuous maps is not guaranteed to be a contra βwg-continuous map. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The composition of two contra βwg-continuous maps is not guaranteed to be a contra βwg-continuous map.

      In the paper's own words

      “Remark 3.24: The Composition of two contra βwg-continuous maps need not be contra Βwg-continuous map”

      Page 4

      Found in: Remark 3.24:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The composition of a contra βwg-continuous function and a continuous function results in a contra βwg-continuous function. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The composition of a contra βwg-continuous function and a continuous function results in a contra βwg-continuous function.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 3.29: If f: X → Y is a contra βwg -continuous function and g: Y → Z is a continuous function then g o f: X → Z is contra βwg-continuous.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Definition 3.1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗
    • All contra βwg-continuous functions are almost contra βwg-continuous, but the reverse is not always true. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      All contra βwg-continuous functions are almost contra βwg-continuous, but the reverse is not always true.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 4.14: Every contra βwg-continuous function is almost contra βwg-continuous but not conversely.”

      Page 6

      Found in: Definition 3.1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 6 ↗
    • A function that is both almost contra βwg-continuous and almost continuous is classified as regular set connected. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      A function that is both almost contra βwg-continuous and almost continuous is classified as regular set connected.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 4.19: If a function f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ) is almost contra βwg-continuous and almost continuous then f is regular set connected.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Definition 3.1:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that they have successfully defined and studied the characteristics of contra βwg-continuity, contra βwg-irresolute, almost contra βwg-continuous, and contra βwg-closed functions in topological spaces. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that they have successfully defined and studied the characteristics of contra βwg-continuity, contra βwg-irresolute, almost contra βwg-continuous, and contra βwg-closed functions in topological spaces.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this research article, we have focused on contra βwg-continuity and its characteristics and contra βwg-irresolute in topological spaces. Further with help these functions almost contra βwg-continuous functions, contra βwg-closed functions were studied.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical topological spaces represented as nested geometric spheres). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Hierarchy of Contra Continuity
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical topological spaces represented as nested geometric spheres). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical topological spaces represented as nested geometric spheres). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Hierarchy of Contra Continuity

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical topological spaces represented as nested geometric spheres). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

In 1996, Dontchev. [4] , introduced the notion of contra continuous functions. Jafari and Noiri [9] introduced contra precontinuous functions. Ekici. E [6] introduced almost contra precontinuous functions in 2004. Dontchev and Noiri [5] , introduced and investigated contra semi-continuous functions and RC-continuous functions between topological spaces. Veerakumar [26] also introduced contra pre-semi-continuous functions. S.Sekar and P. Jayakumar [21] introduced contra gp*-continuous functions. Recently, Govindappa. Navalagi and Kantappa. M. Bhavikatti [15] introduced βwg-continuous functions. In this paper we introduce and study the new class of functions called contra βwg-continuous and almost contra βwg-continuous functions in topological spaces. Also we define the notions of contra βwg-irresolute, contra βwg-closed functions, βwg-locally indiscrete space and study some of their properties. Throughout this paper (X, τ), (Y, σ) and (Z, η) (or simply X, Y, and Z) represent the nonempty topological spaces on which no separation axioms are assumed, unless otherwise mentioned. For a subset A of X, the closure of A and interior of A will be denoted by Cl (A) and Int (A) respectively. The union of all βwg-open sets of X contained in A is called βwginterior of A and it is denoted by βwgInt (A). The intersection of all βwg-closed sets of X containing A is called βwg-closure of A and it is denoted by βwg Cl (A). Also the collection of all βwg-open subsets of X containing a fixed point x is denoted by βwg O (X, x).

Preliminaries

We recall the following definitions which are useful in the sequel.

Definition 2.1

A subset A of a topological space (X, τ) is called (i) Semi-open [11] if A  cl (int (A)) and semi-closed if int (cl (A))  A. (ii) Preopen [13] if A  int (cl (A)) and preclosed if cl (int (A))  A. (iii) α-open [16] if A  int (cl (int (A))) and α-closed if cl (int (cl (A)))  A. (iv) semi-preopen [1]

(vi) Regular open [23] if A = int (cl (A)) and regular closed if A = cl (int (A)).

Definition 2.2:

A subset A of a topological space (X, τ) is called (i) Generalized preclosed (briefly, gp-closed) [12] if pcl (A)  U whenever A  U and U is open in X. (ii) Generalized semi-preclosed (briefly, gsp-closed) [3] if spcl (A)  U whenever A  U and U is open in X. (iii) Generalized pre regularclosed (briefly, gpr-closed) [7] if pcl (A)  U whenever A  U and U is regular open in X. (iv) Generalized star preclosed (briefly, g*p-closed set) [23] if pcl (A)  U whenever A  U and U is g-open in X. (v) Generalized pre star closed (briefly, gp*-closed set) [10] if cl (A)  U whenever A  U and U is gp-open in X. (vi) Βwg-closed [14] if βcl (A)  U whenever A  U and U is αg-open in X. (vii) Pre semi-closed [25] if spcl (A)  U whenever A  U and U is g-open in X. Definition 2.3: [15] A function f: (X, τ → (Y, σ) is called βwg-continuous if f -1 (V) is βwg-closed set in (X, τ) for every closed set 2. The set ∩ {F  X/A  F, F is β-closed} is called the β-closure of A and is denoted by βc1 (A).

Lemma 2.8:

The following properties hold for subsets A, B of a space X:

1. X  ker (A) if and only if U ∩ A ≠ φ for any F∈C(X, x).

A  ker (A) and A = ker (

Lemma 2.9: [15] For xX, x Cl (A) if and only if U ∩ A ≠ φ for every βwg-open set U containing x. Proof: Necessary part: Suppose there exists βwg -open set U containing x such that U ∩ A ≠ φ. Since A  X -U, βwg Cl (A)  X-U. This implies xβwg Cl (A). This is a contradiction. Sufficiency part: Suppose that x  βwg-cl -closed subset F containing A such that x  F. Then x  X-F is ßwg-open, (X -F) ∩A = φ. This is contradiction.

Contra βwg-Continuous Functions

In this section, we introduce and study new class of continuous functions called contra βwg-continuous functions and investigate some of their properties in the following.

Definition 3.1:

Theorem 3.16: Every contra βwg-continuous function is contra rg-continuous but not conversely.

Proof: Let U be an open set in Y then f -1 (U) is βwg-closed set in X. Since every βwg-closed set is rg-closed set then f -1 (U) is rgclosed in X. Therefore f is contra rg-continuous.

Example 3.17: Let X = Y = {a, b, c}, τ = {φ, {a}, X} and σ = {φ, {c}, {a, c}, Y}. Now RGC(X) =P(X) and βwgC (X) = {X, φ, {b}, {c}, {b, c}}. Define f: X → Y by f (a) = c, f (b) = b and f(c) = a. Then f is contra rg-continuous but not contra βwgcontinuous, since {a,c} is an open set in Y, f -1 ({a, c}) = {a, c} is rg-closed but not βwg-closed in X.

Theorem 3.17: If f: X → Y contra (gsp)*-continuous then f is contra βwg-continuous function but not conversely. Proof: Let G be an open set in Y. Since f is contra (gsp)*-continuous, then f -1 (G) is (gsp)*-closed set in X. Since every contra (gsp)*-closed set is βwg -closed set then f -1 (U) is βwg-closed in X. Therefore f is contra βwg-continuous. Proof:

Hence f is contra continuous. (iii) Let G be open in (Y, σ). By assumption, f -1 (G) is βwg-closed in X. Since by definition, X is βwg T 1/2 space, f -1 (V) is pre-closed in X. Hence f is contra pre-continuous.

Theorem 3.21: If a function f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ) is contra βwg-continuous and (X, τ) is ßwg T d -space then f is contra g-continuous.

Theorem 3.22: If a function f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ) is contra βwg-continuous and (X, τ) is βwg T α -space then f is contra α-continuous.

Proof:

Let V be open in (Y, σ). By assumption, f -1 (V) is βwg-closed in X. Since X is βwg T α -space, f -1 (V) is α-closed in X. Hence f is contra α-continuous.

Theorem 3.23:

The following are equivalent for a function f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ): F is contra βwg-continuous;

1. For every closed subset F of Y, f -1 (F)  βwgO (X); 2. F (βwgC1 (A))  ker (f (A)) for every subset A of X ; 3. βwgC1 (f -1 (B))  f -1 (ker (B)) for every subset of B of Y.

Proof:

The implications (i)  (ii) is obvious.

(ii)  (III):

Let A be any subset of X. Suppose that y ker (f (A)). Then by Lemma 2.10, there exists FC(X,y) such that f (A) ∩ F ≠ φ. Thus A ∩ f -1 (F) = φ and βwg-cl (A) ∩ f -1 (F) = φ .Therefore, we obtain f (βwg-cl(A)) ∩ f -1 (F) = φ and y f(βwgC1(A)). This implies that f(βwgC1(A))  ker ( f (A)). Then by Lemma 2.10, we have βwgC1 (f -1 (V))  f -1 (ker (V)) = f -1 (V) and βwg-c1 (f -1 (V)) = f -1 (V). This shows that f -1 (V) is βwg-closed in X.

Remark 3.24:

The Composition of two contra βwg-continuous maps need not be contra Βwg-continuous map and this can be shown by the following example.

References

25 in the original paper
  1. Andrijevic D. Semi-preopen sets, Mat. Vesnik. 1986; 38(1):24-32.
  2. Dontchev J. On generalizing semi-preopen sets, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi. Univ. Ser. A. Math. 1995; 16:35-48.
  3. Dontchev J. Contra continuous functions and strongly S-closed spaces, Int. Math. Sci. 1996; 19(2):303-310.
  4. Dontchev J, Noiri T. Contra semi-continuous functions, Math. Pannon. 1999; 10(2); 159-168.
  5. Ekici E. Almost contra pre-continuous functions, Bull. Malaysian Math. Sci. Soc. 2004; 27:53-65.
  6. Gnanambal Y. On generalized preregular closed sets in topological spaces, Indian J Pure. Appl. Math. 1997; 28(3):351-360.
  7. Jafari S, Noiri T. Contra α-continuous functions between topological spaces, Iran. Int. J Sci. 2001; 2(2):153-167.
  8. Jafari S, Noiri T. On contra pre-continuous functions, Bull. Malays. Math Sci. Soc. 2002; 25(2):115-128.
  9. Jayakumar P, Mariappa K, Sekar S. On generalized gp*-closed set in topological spaces, Int. Journal of Math. Analysis. 2013; 33(7):1635-1645.
  10. Levine N. Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces, Amer. Math. Monthly. 1963; 70:36-41.
  11. Maki H, Umehara J, Noiri T. Every topological space is pre-T 1/2 space, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi Univ. Ser. A. Math. 1996; 17:33-42.
  12. Mashhour AS, Abd El-Monsef ME, El-Deeb SN. On pre-continuous and weak pre-continuous mapings, Proc. Math. and Phys. Soc. Egypt. 1982; 53:47-53.
  13. Navalagi GB, Bhavikatti KM. Beta Weakly Generalized Closed sets in Topology, Journal Of Computer And Mathematical Sciences, May (Accepted), 2018, 9(5).
  14. Govinappa Navalagi, Kantappa Bhavikatti M. On βwg-Continuous and βwg-Irresolute Functions in Topological Spaces, IJMTT, (May). 2018; 57(1):9-20.
  15. Njastad O. On some classes of nearly open sets, Pacific J Math. 1965; 15:961-970.
  16. Noiri T. Super-continuity and some strong forms of continuity, Indian J Pure Appl. Math. 1984; 15:241-250.
  17. Patil PG, Rayanagoudar TD, Mahesh Bhat K. On some new functions of g*p-continuity, Int. J Contemp. Math. Sciences. 2011; 6:991-998.
  18. Pauline Mary Helen M, Kulandhai Therese, (gsp) * -Closed Sets In Topological Spaces, Int. Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology. 2014; 6:75-86.
  19. Rajakumari J, Sekar C. ContraAlpha generalised Star pre-Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces, Journal of Global Research in Mathematical Archive. 2016; 3(8):1-7.
  20. Sekar S, Jayakumar P. Contra gp*-continuous Functions, IOSR Journal of 23. Mathematics. 2014; 10(4):55-60.
  21. Singal MK, Singal AR. Almost continuous mappings, Yokohama. Math. 1968; 3:63-73.
  22. Stone M. Application of the theory of Boolean rings to general topology. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1937; 41:374-381.
  23. Veera kumar MKRS. G*-preclosed sets, Indian J Math. 2002; 44(2):51-60.
  24. Veera kumar MKRS. Pre-semi closed sets, Acta ciencia Indica (Maths) Meerut, (M). 2002; XXVIII(1):165-181.
  25. Veerakumar MKRS. Contra pre-semicontinuous functions, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2005; 28 (2):67-71.