Scinovex

Research article Β· 2018 Β· Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

Path and cycle related families of E-Cordial graph

Mukund V. Bapat

Volume 3(1) Β· Pages 263–265

Research areasGraph Labeling and Dimension ProblemsGraph theory and applicationsAdvanced Graph Theory Research

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The two copies of graph G(p, q) are joined by t paths on n-points each We represent the family by G(tPn). The paths are attached at the same fixed point on G. We discuss E-cordiality of C3(Pn), K4(Pn), S4(Pn) (shel graph S4 ) We show that under certain conditions these graphs are E-cordial.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • E-cordial labeling was introduced by Yilmaz and Cahit in 1997 as a weaker version of edge graceful labeling. View evidence β†—

      Why it matters

      E-cordial labeling was introduced by Yilmaz and Cahit in 1997 as a weaker version of edge graceful labeling.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œIn 1997 Yilmaz and Cahit introduced weaker version of edge graceful labeling E-cordial labeling.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 β†—
    • A labeling is considered E-cordial if the difference between the number of vertices labeled 0 and 1 is at most 1, and the difference between the number of edges labeled 0 and 1 is also at most 1. View evidence β†—

      Why it matters

      A labeling is considered E-cordial if the difference between the number of vertices labeled 0 and 1 is at most 1, and the difference between the number of edges labeled 0 and 1 is also at most 1.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œThe function f is called as E-cordial labeling if |vf(0)-vf(1)|≀1 and |ef(0)-ef(1)|≀1 where vf(i) is the number of vertices labeled with i =0, 1. And ef(i) is the number of edges labeled with i= 0, 1”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 β†—
    • It has been observed that any graph with n vertices cannot be E-cordial if n is congruent to 2 modulo 4. View evidence β†—

      Why it matters

      It has been observed that any graph with n vertices cannot be E-cordial if n is congruent to 2 modulo 4.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œYilmaz and Cahit observe that A graph on n vertices can not be E-cordial if n is congruent to 2 (mod 4).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 β†—
  2. The question

    • The study aims to determine the conditions under which the graph families C3(Pn), K4(Pn), and S4(Pn) are E-cordial. View evidence β†—

      The question

      The study aims to determine the conditions under which the graph families C3(Pn), K4(Pn), and S4(Pn) are E-cordial.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œWe discuss E-cordiality of C3(Pn), K4(Pn), S4(Pn) (shel graph S4 ) We show that under certain conditions these graphs are E-cordial.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 β†—
  3. What they did

    • The research focuses on families G(tPn) created by joining two copies of a graph G (specifically C3, S4, and K4) using a single path (t=1) of equal length attached at a fixed point. View evidence β†—

      What they did

      The research focuses on families G(tPn) created by joining two copies of a graph G (specifically C3, S4, and K4) using a single path (t=1) of equal length attached at a fixed point.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œThe families we discuss are obtained by taking two copies of graph G and join them by t paths of equal length. The paths are attached at the same fixed point on G. we represent these families by G(tPn). We take t = 1 and G = C3, S4., K4.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 β†—
    • The labeling method assigns values from {0, 1} to the edges, and the vertex labels are derived as the sum of the labels of incident edges modulo 2. View evidence β†—

      What they did

      The labeling method assigns values from {0, 1} to the edges, and the vertex labels are derived as the sum of the labels of incident edges modulo 2.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œf:Eοƒ {0, 1} Define f on V by f(v) =βˆ‘{𝑓(𝑣𝑒)(𝑣𝑒)Є𝐸(𝐺)}(π‘šπ‘œπ‘‘ 2).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 β†—
  4. What they found

    • The graph G=C3(1Pn) is E-cordial if and only if the total number of vertices n' is not congruent to 2 modulo 4. View evidence β†—

      What they found

      The graph G=C3(1Pn) is E-cordial if and only if the total number of vertices n' is not congruent to 2 modulo 4.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œG=C3(1Pn) is E-cordial iff n’ is not congruent to 2 (mod 4).where n’=|V(G)|”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 β†—
    • The shel graph family S4(Pn) is E-cordial if and only if n is not congruent to 2 modulo 4. View evidence β†—

      What they found

      The shel graph family S4(Pn) is E-cordial if and only if n is not congruent to 2 modulo 4.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œTheorem S4(Pn) is E-cordial iff n is not congruent to 2 (mod 4)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 β†—
    • The graph family K4(Pn) is found to be E-cordial. View evidence β†—

      What they found

      The graph family K4(Pn) is found to be E-cordial.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œTheorem K4(Pn) is E-cordial.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 β†—
    • For the S4(Pn) family, the graph is not E-cordial if n is divisible by 4. View evidence β†—

      What they found

      For the S4(Pn) family, the graph is not E-cordial if n is divisible by 4.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œ(n is divisible by 4 then graph is not E-cordial)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 β†—
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that while they analyzed single paths between graph copies, further evaluation is needed for cases with two or more paths. View evidence β†—

      What it means

      The authors conclude that while they analyzed single paths between graph copies, further evaluation is needed for cases with two or more paths.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œWe have discussed only for single path between two copies of graphs. It is necessary to evaluate E-cordiality if there are 2 or more paths between twocopies of graphs.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 β†—
    • The scope of the current study was limited to the analysis of a single path connecting the two copies of the graphs. View evidence β†—

      What it means

      The scope of the current study was limited to the analysis of a single path connecting the two copies of the graphs.

      In the paper's own words

      β€œWe have discussed only for single path between two copies of graphs.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusions

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 β†—

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical graph networks consisting of nodes and edges). It explains the idea and does not show study data.β†— Enlarge
Graph Family Construction
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical graph networks consisting of nodes and edges). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical graph networks consisting of nodes and edges). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image β†—

Graph Family Construction

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical graph networks consisting of nodes and edges). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence β†—
FULL TEXT Original article Β· reflowed for reading

Introduction

In 1997 Yilmaz and Cahit introduced weaker version of edge graceful labeling E-cordial labeling. Let G be a (p, q) graph. f:Eοƒ {0, 1} Define f on V by f(v) =βˆ‘{𝑓(𝑣𝑒)(𝑣𝑒)Є𝐸(𝐺)}(π‘šπ‘œπ‘‘ 2). The function f is called as E-cordial labeling if |vf(0)-vf(1)|≀1 and |ef(0)-ef(1)|≀1 where vf(i) is the number of vertices labeled with i =0, 1. And ef(i) is the number of edges labeled with i= 0, 1, We follow the convention that vf(0, 1) =(a, b) for vf(0)=a and vf(1)=b further ef(0,1)=(x, y) for ef(0)=x and ef(1)=y.

A graph that admits E-cordial labeling is called as E-cordial graph. Yilmaz and Cahit prove that trees Tn are E-cordial iff for n not congruent to 2(mod 4), Kn are E-cordial iff n not congruent to 2(mod 4), Fans Fn are E-cordial iff for n not congruent to 1(mod 4). Yilmaz and Cahit observe that A graph on n vertices can not be E-cordial if n is congruent to 2 (mod 4). One should refer Dynamic survey of graph labeling by Joe Gallian [2] for more results on E-cordial graphs.

The graphs we consider are finite, undirected, simple and connected. For terminology and definitions we refer Harary [3] and Dynamic survey of graph labeling by Joe Gallian [2]. The families we discuss are obtained by taking two copies of graph G and join them by t paths of equal length. The paths are attached at the same fixed point on G. we represent these families by G(tPn).

We take t = 1 and G = C3, S4., K4. Theorems proved G=C3(1Pn) is E-cordial iff n’ is not congruent to 2 (mod 4).where n’=|V(G)| Proof: We define Gas V(G)={u1, u2, u3, u4}U{v1, v2,.vn} E(G)={ei=(vivi+1), i=1, 2, n-1, c1=(u1u2) c2=(u2v1),c3=(u1v1), c4=(vnu3), c5=(u3u4), c6=(u4vn)} |V(G)| =n+4 and |E(G)| = n+3. Maths 2018; 3(1): 263-265 Mukund V Bapat At Post Hindale, Tal Devgad, Dist. Sindhudurg, Maharashtra, India Correspondence Mukund V Bapat At Post Hindale, Tal Devgad, Dist.

Sindhudurg, Maharashtra, India π‘›βˆ’π‘– For n>5 define a function f:V(G)οƒ {0, 1} as f(u1)=f(u2)=0 f(c4)=f(c5)=f(c6)=0,f(c1)=f(c3)=0, f(c2)=1 for i ≀2t; f(ei) =1 for I is odd number f(ei)=0 I is even number Where t =min{ π‘›βˆ’π‘– 4 /i=0,1,2,3} Theorem S4(Pn) is E-cordial iff n is not congruent to 2 (mod 4) Proof: S4(pn)is defined as V(G) = {u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6}U{v1, v2, v3.vn} and the edge set is given by E(G) = {c1=(v1u1), (u1u2), c3=(u2u3), c4=(u3u4), c4=(u4v1), c5=(v1u2)} U {ei = (vivi+1), i= 1, 2,…,n-1} For n>5 define a function f:V(G)οƒ {0,1} as f(u1)=f(u2)=0 f(c4)=f(c5)=f(c6)=0, f(c1)=f(c3)=0, f(c2)=1 for i ≀2t; f(ei) =1 for I is odd number f(ei)=0 I is even number Where t =min{ 4 /i=0, 1, 2, 3} π‘›βˆ’π‘— Define a function f : V(G)οƒ {0, 1} as f(u1)=f(u2)=0 f(c4)=f(c5)=f(c6)=0, f(c1)=f(c3)=0,f(c2)=1 take t = π‘›βˆ’1 4 /j=1, 2, 3. (n is divisible by 4 then graph is not E- cordial) For i ≀2t f(ei)=0 for i is odd number ≀2t f(ei)=1 for i is even number <2t. f(ei)=1 for i= 2t, 2t+1, 2t+k where k = p-t+1 where p = 2 for π‘›βˆ’2 n ≑1,3 (mod 4) and p = 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 2 when n ≑2(mod 4). f(ei) = 0 for 2t+k<i ≀n Note that The number distribution is 1) for n≑1(mod 4) vf(0,1)=( 2+3, 2+4), ef(0,1)=( 2+4, 2+4) 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 2) for n≑2(mod 4) vf(0,1)=( 2+4, 2+4), ef(0,1)=( 2+5, 2+4) 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 3) for n≑3(mod 4) vf(0,1)=( 2+5, 2+4), ef(0,1)=( 2+5, 2+5) 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 Note that The number distribution is 1) for n≑1(mod 4)vf(0, 1)=( 2+3, 2+4), ef(0,1)=( 2+4, 2+4) 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 2) for n≑2(mod 4)vf(0, 1)=( 2+4, 2+4), ef(0,1)=( 2+5, 2+4) 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 3) for n≑3(mod 4)vf(0, 1)=( 2+5, 2+4), ef(0,1)=( 2+5, Theorem K4(Pn) is E-cordial. Proof: The K4(Pn) is defined as V(G)={ u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6}U{v1, v2,.vn}and E(G) ={c1=(v1u1), c2=(u1u2), c3=(u2u3), c4=(u3u4), c5=(v1u2), c6=(u1u3)} U{c7=(vnu4), c8=(u4u5), c9=(u5u6), c10=(u6vn), c11=(vnu5), c12=(u5u6)} U{ei=(vivi+1) / I =1, 2…, n-1} We diagramatically show below the E-cordial labeling of K4(p2), K4(p3), K4(P5). 2+5)

Conclusions

We have discussed only for single path between two copies of graphs. It is necessary to evaluate E-cordiality if there are 2 or more paths between twocopies of graphs.

References

5 in the original paper
  1. Bapat Mukund V. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Mumbai, 2004.
  2. Joe Gallian. Dynamic survey of graph labeling, 2016.
  3. Harary, Graph Theory. Narosa publishing, New Delhi.
  4. Yilmaz Cahit. E-cordial graphs, Ars combina, 46:251- 256.
  5. Mukund Bapat V, Hindale Devgad, Sindhudurg. Maharashtra India, 416630. π‘›βˆ’π‘— Define a function f :E(G)οƒ {0,1} as f(c1)=1, f(c2)=1, f(c4)=1, f(c7)=1, f(c8)=1, f(c10)=1. take t = π‘›βˆ’1 4 /j=1,2,3. ( n is divisible by 4 then graph is not E-cordial) For i ≀2t f(ei)=0 for i is odd number ≀2t. f(ei)=1 for i is even number <2t. f(ei)=1 for i= 2t, 2t+1, 2t+k where k = p-t+1 where p = 2 for π‘›βˆ’2 n ≑1,3 (mod 4) and p = 2 when n ≑2(mod 4). f(ei) = 0 for 2t+k<i ≀n