Scinovex

Research article · 2020 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

Numerical investigation for viscoelastic fluid flow past a vertical porous plate with variable suction under the impact of Soret Dufour effects, second-order chemical reaction and radiation

AK ShuklaS. K. Dube

Volume 5(4) · Pages 01–11

Research areasNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferHeat Transfer MechanismsFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The object of this article is to monitor the change of second order chemical reaction and variable suction in MHD (magnetohydrodynamics) flow of viscoelastic fluid over a vertical porous plate immersed in a porous medium with radiation and Soret Dufour effects. The momentum, heat transfer, and mass transfer are set of nonlinear sets of partial differential equations impressed by boundary conditions, these equations are solved using finite difference method namely Crank-Nicolson. Obtained results of these physical variables are discussed by plotting graphs and numerical values of skin friction, Nusselt number and Sherwood number are studied by displaying the table.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Viscoelastic fluids are non-Newtonian fluids, such as honey, polymers, and certain biological fluids, which do not follow Newton's law of viscosity. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Viscoelastic fluids are non-Newtonian fluids, such as honey, polymers, and certain biological fluids, which do not follow Newton's law of viscosity.

      In the paper's own words

      “The fluid which follows the Newton law of viscosity like water, turpentine, solvents are viscous fluid and which does not follow Newton law i.e non-Newtonian like honey, toothpaste, polymer, paints, DNA suspension, some biological fluids are viscoelastic fluid.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Research into viscoelastic fluids is currently significant because of their applications in manufacturing and engineering rheology. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Research into viscoelastic fluids is currently significant because of their applications in manufacturing and engineering rheology.

      In the paper's own words

      “Nowadays, most of the research workers in this field are attracting research on viscoelastic fluids due to rheological applications in engineering and manufacturing processes.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to investigate the effects of Soret-Dufour effects and second-order chemical reactions on the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow of Walter's B viscoelastic fluid over a porous plate with radiation and variable suction velocity. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to investigate the effects of Soret-Dufour effects and second-order chemical reactions on the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow of Walter's B viscoelastic fluid over a porous plate with radiation and variable suction velocity.

      In the paper's own words

      “this paper is focused on Soret-Dufour effects and second order chemical reaction on MHD flow of Walter’s B viscoelastic fluid past over a porous plate with variable suction velocity and radiation.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers converted the nonlinear partial differential equations governing the flow into a dimensionless system and solved them using the Crank-Nicolson implicit finite difference method. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers converted the nonlinear partial differential equations governing the flow into a dimensionless system and solved them using the Crank-Nicolson implicit finite difference method.

      In the paper's own words

      “The flow governing nonlinear partial differential equations is restored into a dimensionless system of PDEs with the help of appropriate boundary conditions and then solved by using Crank-Nicolson implicit finite difference method.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study measured velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles, as well as the friction factor and heat and mass transfer coefficients. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study measured velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles, as well as the friction factor and heat and mass transfer coefficients.

      In the paper's own words

      “The graphs have pictured the fields of velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles to the flow of relevant physical and chemical parameters. Further friction factor and coefficient of heat and mass transfer rates are tabled for these physical and chemical parameters.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Increasing the Dufour number leads to an increase in both velocity and temperature profiles. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Increasing the Dufour number leads to an increase in both velocity and temperature profiles.

      In the paper's own words

      “Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 depict that an increase in Dufour number results an increase in velocity profiles and an increase in temperature profiles respectively.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Velocity profiles increase rapidly as the Soret number increases. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Velocity profiles increase rapidly as the Soret number increases.

      In the paper's own words

      “It is analyzed when soret number increases velocity profiles increases rapidly in Fig. 7.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Increasing the Prandtl number (Pr) results in a decrease in velocity profiles and a rapid decrease in temperature profiles. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Increasing the Prandtl number (Pr) results in a decrease in velocity profiles and a rapid decrease in temperature profiles.

      In the paper's own words

      “Velocity profiles decreases in Fig. 11, temperature profiles decreases very fast in Fig. 12 when prandtl number Pr increases.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The momentum, thermal, and species boundary layers all increase in thickness as radiation increases. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The momentum, thermal, and species boundary layers all increase in thickness as radiation increases.

      In the paper's own words

      “It is noticed that boundary layer of momentum, thermal and species all increase as radiation increase in Fig. 14-16.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Increasing the Schmidt number (Sc) decreases velocity profiles and rapidly increases concentration profiles, while temperature profiles first increase and then decrease. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Increasing the Schmidt number (Sc) decreases velocity profiles and rapidly increases concentration profiles, while temperature profiles first increase and then decrease.

      In the paper's own words

      “It shows that velocity profiles decreases and concentration profiles increases very fast when Sc increases while temperature profiles first increases after then decreases as increases Sc.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles all increase as time (t) increases. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles all increase as time (t) increases.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rapid changes has been noticed in Fig. 21-23 that velocity profiles, temperature profiles and concentration profiles increase when time t increases.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The skin friction coefficient increases with the Dufour number, Soret number, Schmidt number, radiation, viscoelastic parameter, and time, but decreases with the chemical reaction parameter, magnetic parameter, and Prandtl number. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The skin friction coefficient increases with the Dufour number, Soret number, Schmidt number, radiation, viscoelastic parameter, and time, but decreases with the chemical reaction parameter, magnetic parameter, and Prandtl number.

      In the paper's own words

      “It is analyzed that skin friction coefficient increases when Dufour number, Soret number, Schmidt number, radiation parameter, viscoelastic parameter, and time increase whereas it decreases as chemical reaction parameter, magnetic parameter, and prandtl number increase.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Results and Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that chemical reactions decrease the momentum boundary layer thickness while increasing the species boundary layer thickness. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that chemical reactions decrease the momentum boundary layer thickness while increasing the species boundary layer thickness.

      In the paper's own words

      “The effect of chemical reaction on viscoelastic fluid is to decrease boundary layer thickness of momentum and increases boundary layer thickness of species.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (viscoelastic fluid flowing past a vertical porous plate). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
System Configuration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (viscoelastic fluid flowing past a vertical porous plate). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (viscoelastic fluid flowing past a vertical porous plate). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

System Configuration

AI-generated conceptual illustration (viscoelastic fluid flowing past a vertical porous plate). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 10) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
𝐶 𝑓: 0.13 vs 0.9 vs 1.75
Replotted from Table 1 (page 10) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 10) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

𝐶 𝑓: 0.13 vs 0.9 vs 1.75

Replotted from Table 1 (page 10) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Velocity profiles Vs Dufour numberFigure 1Page 5Temperature profiles Vs Dufour numberFigure 2Page 5Concentration profiles Vs Dufour numberFigure 3Page 5Velocity profiles Vs 𝐶ℎFigure 4Page 5Temperature profiles Vs 𝐶ℎFigure 5Page 6Concentration profiles Vs 𝑪𝒉Figure 6Page 6Velocity profiles Vs Soret numberFigure 7Page 6Temperature profiles Vs Soret numberFigure 8Page 6Concentration profiles Vs Soret numberFigure 9Page 7Velocity profiles Vs magnetic parameterFigure 10Page 7Velocity profiles Vs Prandtl numberFigure 11Page 7Temperature profiles Vs Prandtl numberFigure 12Page 7Concentration profiles Vs Prandtl numberFigure 13Page 8Velocity profiles Vs radiationFigure 14Page 8Temperature profiles Vs radiationFigure 15Page 8Concentration profiles Vs radiationFigure 16Page 8Velocity profiles Vs Schmidt numberFigure 17Page 9Temperature profiles Vs Schmidt numberFigure 18Page 9Concentration profiles Vs Schmidt numberFigure 19Page 9Velocity profiles Vs viscoelastic parameterFigure 20Page 9Skin Friction, Nusselt number, Sherwood number for various physical parameterTable 1Page 10Velocity profiles Vs timeFigure 21Page 10Temperature profiles Vs timeFigure 22Page 10Concentration profiles Vs timeFigure 23Page 10
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The fluid which follows the Newton law of viscosity like water, turpentine, solvents are viscous fluid and which does not follow Newton law i.e non-Newtonian like honey, toothpaste, polymer, paints, DNA suspension, some biological fluids are viscoelastic fluid. Nowadays, most of the research workers in this field are attracting research on viscoelastic fluids due to rheological applications in engineering and manufacturing processes. Alsaedi et al. [1] examined MHD viscoelastic fluid flow with binary chemical reaction and Arrhenius activation energy using a numerical method. Gizachew and Shankar [2] discussed MHD flow and energy transfer in viscoelastic fluid expanded on a horizontal plate is considered. Alsulami et al. [3] inquired entropy generation in stratified Walters' B nanofluid with swimming gyrotactic microorganisms. Idowu and Falodun [4] investigated Soret-Dufour effects on MHD energy and species transfer of Walter's-B viscoelastic fluid over an infinite vertical plate. Malik and Rehman [5] explored the characteristics of second-order chemical reaction on steady MHD flow of viscous incompressible electrically conducting fluid in a porous media with heat and mass transfer. Singh et al. [6] given a survey for mixed convection hydromagnetic flow of an incompressible, electrically, and thermally conducting and chemically reacting viscoelastic fluid over a vertical porous channel immersed in a porous medium. Megahed and Reddy [7] examined numerical and theoretical of the viscous dissipation phenomenon on the viscoelastic fluid flow which is passing over a stretching sheet. Rajakumar et al. [8] analyzed the influence of Dufour and thermal radiation on unsteady MHD Walter's liquid model-B flow past an impulsively started infinite vertical plate embedded in a porous medium with chemical reaction, Hall and ion-slip current. Sandeep et al. [9] examined the effects of radiation and variable heat source/sink on the boundary-layer flow of MHD fluid across a curved surface. Ramadevi et al. [10] delivered a numerical examination of 2D magnetohydrodynamic nonlinear micropolar fluid flow with radiation and stretching surface. Induced by the above literature, this paper is focused on Soret-Dufour effects and second order chemical reaction on MHD flow of Walter's B viscoelastic fluid past over a porous plate with variable suction velocity and radiation.

The flow governing nonlinear partial differential equations is restored into a dimensionless system of PDEs with the help of appropriate boundary conditions and then solved by using Crank-Nicolson implicit finite difference method. The graphs have pictured the fields of velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles to the flow of relevant physical and chemical parameters. Further friction factor and coefficient of heat and mass transfer rates are tabled for these physical and chemical parameters.

Mathematical Model

Consider an unsteady magnetohydrodynamics flow of Walter's B viscoelastic fluid past over a porous plate imbedded in porous medium with variable heat and mass transfer under influence of Soret-Dufour effects, radiation effect and second-order chemical reaction. We considered a time dependent suction velocity normal to plate. 𝑥̅ -axis is considered along the plate and 𝑦 ̅-axis is normal to it. Further, due to the semi-infinite plate, the flow variables are functions of normal distance 𝑦 ̅ and 𝑡 ̅ only. A uniform strength magnetic field 𝐵 0 is applied in direction of normal to the plate and the magnetic Reynolds number is assumed to be small so that stimulated magnetic field is negligible. The temperature and concentration of the plate surface are 𝑇 𝑝 and 𝐶 𝑝 respectively. Also, the free stream temperature and concentration are denoted by 𝑇 ∞ and 𝐶 ∞ respectively. With the above model, the governing equations of the flow under usual Boussinesq approximation are as follows:

together with boundary conditions for this model are as follows

Integrating equation of continuity [1], we have constant or time dependent suction velocity. Since we have considered in this model already that there exists a variable suction velocity so we have time dependent suction velocity as

here 𝐵 denotes the suction parameter and 𝜖𝐵 ≪ 1. Here 𝑈 0 is average constant suction velocity and the minus sign indicated that suction is outside the plate.

Using the Roseland approximation [11], we have the radiative heat flux 𝑅 𝑑 as

We have considered that the temperature difference in the flow is very very small and 𝑇 4 can be written in a linear function of the temperature 𝑇. It is seen by expanding 𝑇 4 using a Taylor series about 𝑇 ∞ , as follows

Neglecting higher order terms of 𝑇 ∞ in expansion, we have

Equation ( 3) is written in new form using equation ( 7) and ( 9)

Introduction following non dimensional quantities

Using non dimensional quantities defined in equation (11) in equations ( 2), ( 4), (10), and (5) we have dimensionless form of governing equations and boundary conditions of flow as follows

The skin friction coefficient because of viscous drag in the vicinage of the walls is written in non dimensional form as

Non dimensional form of Nusselt number because of the energy transfer between the fluid and wall is given as

Non dimensional form of Sherwood number because of the mass transfer between the fluid and wall is given as

Mathematical Solution

In this part of article, the Crank-Nicolson implicit finite difference method is applied on non dimensional governing partial differential equations ( 12)-( 14) subject to conditions in equation (15) and we get transformed equations as follows

with subject to conditions as given in transformed form 𝑢 𝑙,0 = 0, 𝜃 𝑙,0 = 0, Φ 𝑙,0 = 0, ∀𝑙 𝑢 0,𝑚 = 1, 𝜃 0,𝑚 = 1 + 𝜖𝑒 -𝑁𝑚∆𝑡 , Φ 0,𝑚 = 1 + 𝜖𝑒 -𝑁𝑚∆𝑡 𝑢 𝑋,𝑚 = 0, 𝜃 𝑋,𝑚 → 0, Φ 𝑋,𝑚 → 0.

We divide 𝑦-axis using mess 𝑦 𝑙 , and ∆𝑦 = 𝑦 𝑙+1 -𝑦 𝑙 and 𝑡 𝑚 denotes partition of time

Results and Discussion

In order to the discussion and demonstration, we obtained numerical results of governing non linear partial differential equations using Crank-Nicolson implicit finite difference method. The physical nature of the viscoelastic fluid flow are governed by the changing values of thermal Grashof number 𝐺𝑟, Solutal grashof number 𝐺𝑚, magnetic parameter 𝑀, Dufour number 𝐷𝑓, Soret number 𝑆𝑜, chemical reaction parameter 𝐶ℎ, Schmidt number 𝑆𝑐, prandtl number 𝑃𝑟, permeability of porous medium 𝐾, viscoelastic parameter Ϙ, radiation parameter 𝑅, small reference parameter 𝜖, suction parameter 𝐵, constant 𝑁, and time 𝑡. The results for the changing of these physical parameters are given as functions of the non dimensional velocity 𝑢, the non dimensional temperature 𝜃 and non dimensional concentration Φ. Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 depict that an increase in Dufour number results an increase in velocity profiles and an increase in temperature profiles respectively. While in Fig. 3 near to plate concentration decreases after that mid of boundary layer of concentration it increase slowly as Dufour number increases. Fig. 4, Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 show the change of chemical reaction parameter 𝐶ℎ in velocity, temperature and concentration profiles respectively. It is analyzed that velocity profiles decrease and temperature profiles increase near to plate whereas concentration profiles increases very fast in compare to velocity or temperature profiles.

Figure 6. Concentration profiles Vs 𝑪𝒉
Concentration profiles Vs 𝑪𝒉↗ Enlarge
Figure 6
Concentration profiles Vs 𝑪𝒉

Concentration profiles Vs 𝑪𝒉

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 6 ↗
Figure 5. Temperature profiles Vs 𝐶ℎ
Temperature profiles Vs 𝐶ℎ↗ Enlarge
Figure 5
Temperature profiles Vs 𝐶ℎ

Temperature profiles Vs 𝐶ℎ

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 6 ↗
Figure 4. Velocity profiles Vs 𝐶ℎ
Velocity profiles Vs 𝐶ℎ↗ Enlarge
Figure 4
Velocity profiles Vs 𝐶ℎ

Velocity profiles Vs 𝐶ℎ

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 3. Concentration profiles Vs Dufour number
Concentration profiles Vs Dufour number↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
Concentration profiles Vs Dufour number

Concentration profiles Vs Dufour number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 2. Temperature profiles Vs Dufour number
Temperature profiles Vs Dufour number↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Temperature profiles Vs Dufour number

Temperature profiles Vs Dufour number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 1. Velocity profiles Vs Dufour number
Velocity profiles Vs Dufour number↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Velocity profiles Vs Dufour number

Velocity profiles Vs Dufour number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗

The effect of Soret number on velocity, temperature and concentration profiles display in Fig. 7, Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 respectively. It is analyzed when soret number increases velocity profiles increases rapidly in Fig. 7. In Fig. 8, Temperature profiles near to plate decrease, and after mid of thermal boundary layer it increases when soret number increases. Fig. 9 demonstrates that concentration profiles increases very fast as soret number changes. Fig. 10 shows the effects of change in magnetic parameter 𝑀 that velocity profiles increases rapidly as 𝑀 increases. Velocity profiles decreases in Fig. 11, temperature profiles decreases very fast in Fig. 12 when prandtl number 𝑃𝑟 increases. In Fig. 13, concentration profiles first near to plate increases after that decreases as 𝑃𝑟 increases. It is noticed that boundary layer of momentum, thermal and species all increase as radiation increase in Fig. 14 1 shows that Nusselt number 𝑁 𝜃 decreases as Dufour number, chemical reaction parameter, Schmidt number, radiation parameter, and time increase while 𝑁 𝜃 increases when prandtl number and soret number increase. Table 1 illustrates that increase of Dufour number, chemical reaction parameter, Schmidt number, and radiation parameter result as Sherwood number 𝑆 Φ increases while 𝑆 Φ increases on increment of prandtl number, soret number, and time.

Table 1. Skin Friction, Nusselt number, Sherwood number for various physical parameter
𝐷𝑓𝑀𝑆𝑜𝐶ℎ𝑆𝑐𝑅𝑃𝑟Γ𝑡𝐶 𝑓𝑁 𝜃𝑆 Φ
0.133.51.31.20.651.40.60.0040.20.02515910.7041671.40807
0.93.51.31.20.651.40.60.0040.20.04317310.5244671.50942
1.753.51.31.20.651.40.60.0040.20.06298460.2789151.65414
0.570.81.31.20.651.40.60.0040.20.8852690.6055571.46318
0.572.91.31.20.651.40.60.0040.20.2088420.6055571.46318
0.575.951.31.20.651.40.60.0040.2-0.5968680.6055571.46318
0.577.751.31.20.651.40.60.0040.2-0.9961560.6055571.46318
0.573.50.61.20.651.40.60.0040.2-0.04349610.5972821.54551
0.573.53.61.20.651.40.60.0040.20.3087050.6363991.16483
0.573.56.61.20.651.40.60.0040.20.7098970.6904030.665942
0.573.59.51.20.651.40.60.0040.21.182430.778584-0.113747
0.573.51.31.250.651.40.60.0040.20.03292020.6044771.4733
0.573.51.33.750.651.40.60.0040.2-0.07606360.5581941.9024
0.573.51.36.90.651.40.60.0040.2-0.1791850.5146632.29933
0.573.51.311.70.651.40.60.0040.2-0.2936720.4659372.73716

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Skin Friction, Nusselt number, Sherwood number for various physical parameter↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Skin Friction, Nusselt number, Sherwood number for various physical parameter

Skin Friction, Nusselt number, Sherwood number for various physical parameter

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 10 ↗
Figure 14. Velocity profiles Vs radiation
Velocity profiles Vs radiation↗ Enlarge
Figure 14
Velocity profiles Vs radiation

Velocity profiles Vs radiation

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 8 ↗
Figure 13. Concentration profiles Vs Prandtl number
Concentration profiles Vs Prandtl number↗ Enlarge
Figure 13
Concentration profiles Vs Prandtl number

Concentration profiles Vs Prandtl number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 8 ↗
Figure 12. Temperature profiles Vs Prandtl number
Temperature profiles Vs Prandtl number↗ Enlarge
Figure 12
Temperature profiles Vs Prandtl number

Temperature profiles Vs Prandtl number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 7 ↗
Figure 11. Velocity profiles Vs Prandtl number
Velocity profiles Vs Prandtl number↗ Enlarge
Figure 11
Velocity profiles Vs Prandtl number

Velocity profiles Vs Prandtl number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 7 ↗
Figure 10. Velocity profiles Vs magnetic parameter
Velocity profiles Vs magnetic parameter↗ Enlarge
Figure 10
Velocity profiles Vs magnetic parameter

Velocity profiles Vs magnetic parameter

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 7 ↗
Figure 9. Concentration profiles Vs Soret number
Concentration profiles Vs Soret number↗ Enlarge
Figure 9
Concentration profiles Vs Soret number

Concentration profiles Vs Soret number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 7 ↗
Figure 8. Temperature profiles Vs Soret number
Temperature profiles Vs Soret number↗ Enlarge
Figure 8
Temperature profiles Vs Soret number

Temperature profiles Vs Soret number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 6 ↗
Figure 7. Velocity profiles Vs Soret number
Velocity profiles Vs Soret number↗ Enlarge
Figure 7
Velocity profiles Vs Soret number

Velocity profiles Vs Soret number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 6 ↗

Conclusion

The investigation of Soret-Dufour, radiation, and second order chemical reaction effects on an unsteady MHD viscoelastic fluid flow past over a infinite vertical porous plate immersed in porous medium in presence of variable temperature, concentration, and variable suction velocity. The impact of some valuable flow governing physical parameters on these flow variables have been utterly dissertated in the previous section. The pre-dominant results are as follows 1. The effect of chemical reaction on viscoelastic fluid is to decrease boundary layer thickness of momentum and increases boundary layer thickness of species. 2. There is interesting change has been seen for viscoelastic parameter in momentum of fluid i.e. fluid velocity near to plate first increase and after that it decreases, 3. Thermal and species boundary layer thickness increase at increase of Dufour number. 4. Speices and thermal boundary layer thickness increase at increase of Soret number.

Acknowledgement

I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my principal Dr. Vishnu Chandra Tripathi, vice-principal Dr. Mayanand Upadhyay, and our proctor of science faculty Dr. A.K. Dwivedi who encourage us to complete this research work.

Figures and tables from the paper

Figure 15. Temperature profiles Vs radiation
Temperature profiles Vs radiation↗ Enlarge
Figure 15
Temperature profiles Vs radiation

Temperature profiles Vs radiation

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 8 ↗
Figure 16. Concentration profiles Vs radiation
Concentration profiles Vs radiation↗ Enlarge
Figure 16
Concentration profiles Vs radiation

Concentration profiles Vs radiation

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 8 ↗
Figure 17. Velocity profiles Vs Schmidt number
Velocity profiles Vs Schmidt number↗ Enlarge
Figure 17
Velocity profiles Vs Schmidt number

Velocity profiles Vs Schmidt number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 9 ↗
Figure 18. Temperature profiles Vs Schmidt number
Temperature profiles Vs Schmidt number↗ Enlarge
Figure 18
Temperature profiles Vs Schmidt number

Temperature profiles Vs Schmidt number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 9 ↗
Figure 19. Concentration profiles Vs Schmidt number
Concentration profiles Vs Schmidt number↗ Enlarge
Figure 19
Concentration profiles Vs Schmidt number

Concentration profiles Vs Schmidt number

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 9 ↗
Figure 20. Velocity profiles Vs viscoelastic parameter
Velocity profiles Vs viscoelastic parameter↗ Enlarge
Figure 20
Velocity profiles Vs viscoelastic parameter

Velocity profiles Vs viscoelastic parameter

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 9 ↗
Figure 21. Velocity profiles Vs time
Velocity profiles Vs time↗ Enlarge
Figure 21
Velocity profiles Vs time

Velocity profiles Vs time

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 10 ↗
Figure 22. Temperature profiles Vs time
Temperature profiles Vs time↗ Enlarge
Figure 22
Temperature profiles Vs time

Temperature profiles Vs time

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 10 ↗
Figure 23. Concentration profiles Vs time
Concentration profiles Vs time↗ Enlarge
Figure 23
Concentration profiles Vs time

Concentration profiles Vs time

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 10 ↗

References

12 in the original paper
  1. Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Mustafa M, Mushtaq A. Numerical Study of MHD Viscoelastic Fluid Flow with Binary Chemical Reaction and Arrhenius Activation Energy. Int. J Chem. React. Eng. 2016; 15(1):1-9.
  2. Gizachew Adamu, Shankar Bandari. MHD Flow of Non-Newtonian Viscoelastic Fluid on Stretching Sheet with The Effect of Slip Velocity. International Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing Science. 2018; 8(1):1-14.
  3. Alsulami Hamed, Tariq Sana, Naz Rahila. Inquiry of entropy generation in stratified Walters' B nanofluid with swimming gyrotactic microorganisms. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2020; 59:247-261.
  4. Idowu AS, Falodun BO. Soret-Dufour effects on MHD heat and mass transfer of Walter's-B viscoelastic fluid over a semiinfinite vertical plate: spectral relaxation analysis. Journal of Taibah University for Science. 2019; 13(1):49-62.
  5. Malik MY, Rehman Khalil-ur. Effects of Second Order Chemical Reaction on MHD Free Convection Dissipative Fluid Flow past an Inclined Porous Surface by way of Heat Generation: A Lie Group Analysis. Inf. Sci. Lett. 2016; 5(2):35-45.
  6. Singh JK, Seth GS, Joshi Naveen, Srinivasa CT. Mixed convection flow of a viscoelastic fluid through a vertical porous channel influenced by a moving magnetic field with Hall and ion-slip currents, rotation, heat radiation and chemical reaction. Bulgarian Chemical Communications. 2020; 52(1):147-158.
  7. Ahmed M, Megahed M, Gnaneswara Reddy. Numerical treatment for MHD viscoelastic fluid flow with variable fluid properties and viscous dissipation. Indian J Phys. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-020-01717-3.
  8. Rajakumar KVB, Govinda Rao T, Reddy Umasankara M, Balamurugan KS. Influence of Dufour and thermal radiation on unsteady MHD Walter's liquid model-B flow past an impulsively started infinite vertical plate embedded in a porous medium with chemical reaction, Hall and ion slip current. SN Appl. Sci. 2020; 2:742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2484-y.
  9. Sandeep N, Reddy JVR, Anantha K Kumar, Sugunamma V. Simultaneous solutions for MHD flow of Williamson fluid over a curved sheet with non-uniform heat source/sink. Heat Transf Res. 2019; 50(6):581-603.
  10. Ramadevi B, Anantha Kumar K, Sugunamma V, Ramana Reddy JV, Sandeep N. Magnetohydrodynamic mixed convective flow of micropolar fluid past a stretching surface using modified Fourier's heat flux model. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08477-1.
  11. Siegel R, Howell JR. Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. Taylor & Francis, London, 1992.
  12. Wilkes JO, Luther HA, Carnahan B. Applied Numerical Methods. Krieger Pub Co, Florida, 1990.