Scinovex

Research article · 2018 · Full text

International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry

Incidence and aetiology of calf neonatal diarrhoea in Blida Algeria

Anes DaddaDjamel KhelefTarek KhenenouAit-Oudia Khatima

Research areasAnimal health and immunology

↓ Read full-text PDF1 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Neonatal calf diarrhoea is the most important disease of neonatal calves and results in the greatest economic losses due to disease in this age group in both dairy and beef calves the objectives of the present study ware to estimate the morbidity and the mortality of neonatal diarrhoea in dairy calves also to determine aetiology and risk factors were caused a diarrhoea in dairy veal under 60 days old. A total of 324 claves, housed in 30dairy breeding were followed during two velage season from January to Juan 2013. The total mortality was 5, 9% and was significantly higher in calves had less than 15 days of age. The incidence rate of diarrhoea was 31, 5% and peaked in the first two week after velage. The main causes were breeding controls, defect of passive immunity, old of calf, production season, and nutrient of pregnant cattle, veal’s housing and infectious agents. ELISA test on 22 fecal samples revealed that the 31, 82% of dairy breeding were infected, by cryptosporidium parvum in 13, 6% of study population, E. Coli F5 in 9% and Rotavirus with rate of 4, 5%.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Neonatal calf diarrhoea is considered the most significant disease for neonatal calves, causing the highest economic losses in both beef and dairy sectors. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Neonatal calf diarrhoea is considered the most significant disease for neonatal calves, causing the highest economic losses in both beef and dairy sectors.

      In the paper's own words

      “Neonatal calf diarrhoea is the most important disease of neonatal calves and results in the greatest economic losses due to disease in this age group in both dairy and beef calves”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The disease negatively impacts the immediate health, long-term herd longevity, and overall productivity of young calves. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The disease negatively impacts the immediate health, long-term herd longevity, and overall productivity of young calves.

      In the paper's own words

      “Disease incidence in young calves has Un adverse effect on their immediate health status, longevity in the herd and productivity performance and thus causes great economic loss”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to estimate the morbidity and mortality rates of neonatal diarrhoea in dairy calves under 60 days old, while also identifying the causes (aetiology) and associated risk factors. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to estimate the morbidity and mortality rates of neonatal diarrhoea in dairy calves under 60 days old, while also identifying the causes (aetiology) and associated risk factors.

      In the paper's own words

      “the objectives of the present study ware to estimate the morbidity and the mortality of neonatal diarrhoea in dairy calves also to determine aetiology and risk factors were caused a diarrhoea in dairy veal under 60 days old.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Data collection 2.1.1 Registration of Diarrhoea and Mortality Data:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers followed 324 dairy calves across 30 dairy farms during two production seasons from January to June 2013. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers followed 324 dairy calves across 30 dairy farms during two production seasons from January to June 2013.

      In the paper's own words

      “A total of 324 claves, housed in 30dairy breeding were followed during two velage season from January to Juan 2013.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Descriptive Epidemiology  The Incidence

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Fecal samples were collected from 22 calves under 60 days old showing clinical signs of diarrhoea who had not previously received antibiotics. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Fecal samples were collected from 22 calves under 60 days old showing clinical signs of diarrhoea who had not previously received antibiotics.

      In the paper's own words

      “22 fecal samples were collected from 22 dairy farms; the calves sampled were under 60 days of age with clinical signs of diarrhoea, provided they had not received prior treatment with antibiotics.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Samples

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The study used a Bio-X Diagnostics ELISA kit to test for Rotavirus, Coronavirus, E. Coli F5, and Cryptosporidium. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study used a Bio-X Diagnostics ELISA kit to test for Rotavirus, Coronavirus, E. Coli F5, and Cryptosporidium.

      In the paper's own words

      “it was carried by digestive ELISA kit antigenic provided by (Bio-X Diagnostics) for diagnosis test of Rotavirus, Coronavirus, E. Coli F5 and cryptosporidium for bovines”

      Page 1

      Found in: Laboratory Analysis:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The highest incidence (53.33%) and mortality (16.00%) rates occurred in the 8-15 day age group. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The highest incidence (53.33%) and mortality (16.00%) rates occurred in the 8-15 day age group.

      In the paper's own words

      “8-15days | 75 | 53.33% | 16.00%”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 2

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that implementing good management practices and vaccination against primary enteropathogens is necessary to limit the impact of the disease. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that implementing good management practices and vaccination against primary enteropathogens is necessary to limit the impact of the disease.

      In the paper's own words

      “it’s thus necessary to put good conduits to limit their impact and more to undergo them, such as the good practice of vaccination against principal enteropathogens.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The authors recommend vaccinating pregnant mothers to increase specific antibodies and reinforce passive immunity in calves. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend vaccinating pregnant mothers to increase specific antibodies and reinforce passive immunity in calves.

      In the paper's own words

      “It’s necessary to reinforce passive immunity in calves by the vaccination of the pregnant mothers in order to increase the rates of the antibody specific to principal enteropathogens.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
1-7days: Incidence vs Mortality
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

1-7days: Incidence vs Mortality

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
8-15days: Incidence vs Mortality
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

8-15days: Incidence vs Mortality

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.Table 2Page 2The incidence of neonatal diarrhoea in two productionTable 1Page 2Risks factors associated with calf neonatal diarrhoea.Table 3Page 2Prevalence of pathogen agents detected.Table 4Page 2Distribution of death rate and the cumulated incidence in twoFigure 1Page 2Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.Figure 2Page 2Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.Table 5Page 3Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.Table 5Page 3percentage of infectious agents detected in calves faeces.Figure 3Page 3distribution of the infectious agents according to the age.Figure 4Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Diarrhoea in young pre-weaned calves is one of the most important causes of calves morbidity and mortality [2] . Disease incidence in young calves has Un adverse effect on their immediate health status, longevity in the herd and productivity performance and thus causes great economic loss [3] . In order to increase productivity of area study livestock, it is important to identify the etiological and risk factors involved in calf diarrhoea in order to devise preventive measures and reduce losses during the initial months of life.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods

Data collection 2.1.1 Registration of Diarrhoea and Mortality Data:

A case of mortality and morbidity of calf under 60 days of age was determinate by weekly visits to 30 farms in region of Blida. The study population was randomly selected within the lists of all area dairy breeding. The study was carried out by 324 dairy calves less than 60 days of age, with the means of followed cards we recorded the new diarrhoea cases and all the predisposing factors.

Samples

Collect: 22 fecal samples were collected from 22 dairy farms; the calves sampled were under 60 days of age with clinical signs of diarrhoea, provided they had not received prior treatment with antibiotics.

Laboratory Analysis:

it was carried by digestive ELISA kit antigenic provided by (Bio-X Diagnostics) for diagnosis test of Rotavirus, Coronavirus, E. Coli F5 and cryptosporidium for bovines, it's one of direct test for faeces.

Statistical Analysis:

a Statistica06 software analysis used for descriptive analysis and to compare the different average, showed a significant relation of risk factors and diarrhoea by means the chi-square test (χ 2 ),the significance was set at P<0,05.

Results

Results

Descriptive Epidemiology  The Incidence

During the investigation period, we recorded the birth of 324 calves with 59,25% in second half of the study(April-June) and 40,75% during the season of (January-March), the presence of diarrhoea were observed during the two season and in all the breeding included, with an incidence monthly combined of 19,6% up to 44%, the mortality consecutive of o diarrhoea episode was observed in 27 breeding studied (90%) with a higher rate in May 21, 3% and the absence in April.  Mortality Overall, 324 calves of which 5, 9% died during two season of production and 31, 5% were presented the clinical symptoms of diarrhoea. The mortality rate was significantly higher in calves were 15 days of age during second study period. The diarrhoea symptoms peaked during April to June in calves had two week of age.

Risk factors

The analytical study showed that the nutrient of adult cattle, quality and quantity of colostrums, disinfection of buildings, calf's housing were the important factors associated with calf neonatal diarrhoea.

Laboratory analysis

The antigenic research reveals the presence of three infectious agents in 7 faecal samples or 31,8% of breeding were infected by cryptosporidium parvum with 13,6%, E. Coli F5 in 9% of population included and Rotavirus with 4,5%.

Discussion

Random sampling is the method of choice to obtain a representative sample of the population [4] . the survey results show that the diarrhoea remains a pathology major in dairy breeding in the region of Blida, and a crucial constraint has an important lethality (23,5%) in dairy calves. in the present study, the morbidity risk (31,5%) was higher than those is reported in France by Bendali (14,6%), Schuman (20,5%), Virtala (22%); bordering that given by Wells (24,5%) [4] , it's inferior with those shown by Sfakssi in the east of Algeria (64%) and Fassi in Morocco (60%) [5] . a case-control study was performed to examine the possible involvement of various enteropathogens in diarrhoea by comparing the presence of these agents in the faeces of scoring calves younger than 2 months of age. We have detected just three enteropathogens Rotavirus, E. ColiF5 and Cryptosporidium parvum with an important variation according the age. Other studies reported the presence of 4 enteropathogens Rotavirus, Coronavirus, E. Coli F5 and cryptosporidium parvum in different area in Algeria [6] . The laboratory analysis is in agreement with studies of Khelèf and al in centre of Algeria into 2000, 2002, 2007 and 2009, which showed that cryptosporidium parvum, E. Coli F5, Rotavirus and Coronavirus are the 4 principal infectious agents implied in the calf neonatal diarrhoea with prevalence depend with the age of sick calves [7] .

Conclusion

the diarrhoea is a very frequent diseases in diary calf, which can be caused by various infection agents affect more particularity the calves had 15 days of age, it generate losses economic considerable because of mortality raised at the newborn, it's thus necessary to put good conduits to limit their impact and more to undergo them, such as the good practice of vaccination against principal enteropathogens. It's necessary to reinforce passive immunity in calves by the vaccination of the pregnant mothers in order to increase the rates of the antibody specific to principal enteropathogens.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 2. Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.
Class of ageNumber of calfsIncidenceMortality
1-7days11136.04%7.21%
8-15days7553.33%16.00%
16-30days8447.62%2.38%
1-2 month5412.96%3.70%

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.

Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 1. The incidence of neonatal diarrhoea in two production
Study periodJan-MarchApril -JuneTotal
Number of calves132192324
Number cases of diarrhoea3864102
Number of dead calves71724
Morbidity28.8%33.3%31,48%
Mortality5.3%8.85%7,41%
lethality18.4%26.6%23,53%
Incidence21.2%27.6%31, 5%

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
The incidence of neonatal diarrhoea in two production↗ Enlarge
Table 1
The incidence of neonatal diarrhoea in two production

The incidence of neonatal diarrhoea in two production

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 3. Risks factors associated with calf neonatal diarrhoea.
VariableMethod% Dχ2 (p)
supplementation of the ration of the pregnant cattleYes8, 020,02
Non23, 46
Practical of drying upYes14, 510,01
Non16, 98
Quantity of colostrums catchsufficient7, 40,04
insufficient24, 07
Hygiene of the cattle shedgood11, 750,002
bad19, 73
systematic disinfection of velage buildingsYes13, 890,04
Non17, 59
systematic disinfection of buildings of parking of calvesYes7, 410,01
Non24, 07
Type of parkingCollective24, 380.04
individual7, 1

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Risks factors associated with calf neonatal diarrhoea.↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Risks factors associated with calf neonatal diarrhoea.

Risks factors associated with calf neonatal diarrhoea.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 4. Prevalence of pathogen agents detected.
Entomopathogens Agents detectedcalves (n = 22)—
Number%
No agent1568,18
Coronavirus00--

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Prevalence of pathogen agents detected.↗ Enlarge
Table 4
Prevalence of pathogen agents detected.

Prevalence of pathogen agents detected.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Distribution of death rate and the cumulated incidence in two
Distribution of death rate and the cumulated incidence in two↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Distribution of death rate and the cumulated incidence in two

Distribution of death rate and the cumulated incidence in two

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.
Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.

Mortality and incidence rate according to the age.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 5. Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.
Rotavirus14,54
Cryptosporidium parvum313,63
E. Coli F529,09
Rotavirus + Cryptosporidium parvum14,54

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.↗ Enlarge
Table 5
Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.

Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 5. Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.
Age classesNumber of samplesNumber of positives cases
1-5 days52 (40%)
6-15 days63 (50%)
16-21days51(20%)
22- 30 days61(16, 6%)
Total227 (31, 8%)

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.↗ Enlarge
Table 5
Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.

Distribution of the positive cases according to the age.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 3. percentage of infectious agents detected in calves faeces.
percentage of infectious agents detected in calves faeces.↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
percentage of infectious agents detected in calves faeces.

percentage of infectious agents detected in calves faeces.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 4. distribution of the infectious agents according to the age.
distribution of the infectious agents according to the age.↗ Enlarge
Figure 4
distribution of the infectious agents according to the age.

distribution of the infectious agents according to the age.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

0 in the original paper

    Cited by 1

    From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex