Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study

European Urology · 2018 · Vol. 75(4) · pp. 570–578
Marloes van der LeestErik B. CornelBas IsraëlRianne J. HendriksAnwar R. PadhaniMartijn HoogenboomPatrik ZámecnikDirk BakkerAnglita Yanti SetiastiJeroen VeltmanHuib van den HoutHans van der LelijInge M. van OortSjoerd KlaverF.M.J. DebruyneJ.P. Michiel SedelaarGerjon HanninkMaroeska M. RoversChristina Hulsbergen‐van de KaaJelle O. Barentsz

Abstract

We compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MRI-guided biopsy against standard transrectal ultrasound biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men. Our results show that patients can benefit from MRI because biopsy may be omitted in half of men, and fewer indolent cancers are detected, without compromising the detection of harmful disease. Men also need fewer needles to make a diagnosis.

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchUrologic and reproductive health conditionsMedicineBiopsyProstate cancerProstateProstate biopsyMagnetic resonance imagingMcNemar's testUrologyRadiologyProstate-specific antigen

MeSH terms

AgedHumansKallikreinsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsUp-RegulationProstate-Specific AntigenUltrasonography, Interventional
Citations
751
FWCI
59.56
field-weighted impact
References
40
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.