Scinovex

Research article · 2018 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

Comparative analysis of a cold standby system under different arrival conditions

Jyoti NandalJyoti Anand

Volume 3(1) · Pages 182–188

Research areasReliability and Maintenance OptimizationAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

In this paper two reliability models for 2-units redundant system are analyzed stochastically by taking into consideration the concept of arrival and conditional arrival time of the server. There is a single server who takes some time to arrive at the system with the condition that he has to attend the system immediately at its complete failure. The failed server under goes for treatment and resume the jobs with full efficiency after treatment. The Semi-Markov process and regenerative point techniques are used to drive the expansions for some reliability and economic measures such as repair rate, treatment rate and arrival time of the server are statistically independent with different probability density functions. The graphical behavior of MTSF and profit function has been observed for particular values to various parameters and costs. The profit of the present model has also been compared with that of the model Nandal and Malik [2016].

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Redundancy is a proven method in reliability theory for improving the performance and reliability of repairable systems. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Redundancy is a proven method in reliability theory for improving the performance and reliability of repairable systems.

      In the paper's own words

      “In reliability theory, it is proved that performance and reliability of repairable systems can be improved of redundancy.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Many existing reliability models unrealistically assume that repair facilities do not fail, ignoring potential accidents like mishandling or electric shocks. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Many existing reliability models unrealistically assume that repair facilities do not fail, ignoring potential accidents like mishandling or electric shocks.

      In the paper's own words

      “most of these systems have been studied under a common assumption that repair facility neither fails nor deteriorates during jobs. But, this assumption seems to unrealistic when repair facility meets with an accident may because of the reasons like mishandling, electric shocks and carelessness on the part of the server.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • When a server fails, they may require a specific 'arrival time' to return to the system, though they must attend immediately if the entire system fails. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      When a server fails, they may require a specific 'arrival time' to return to the system, though they must attend immediately if the entire system fails.

      In the paper's own words

      “In such a situation server may be allowed to take some time (called arrival time) to reach at the system with the condition that he has to reach the system immediately at the failure of both units.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to analyze a cold standby system consisting of two identical units while accounting for the possibility of server failure. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to analyze a cold standby system consisting of two identical units while accounting for the possibility of server failure.

      In the paper's own words

      “the purpose of the present study is to study a cold standby system of two identical units with server failure.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The research seeks to compare system performance by simultaneously introducing the concepts of arrival time and conditional arrival time for the server. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The research seeks to compare system performance by simultaneously introducing the concepts of arrival time and conditional arrival time for the server.

      In the paper's own words

      “The purpose of the present work is to develop the concept of comparison between two identical units by introducing simultaneously idea of arrival and conditional arrival time of the server.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The model uses negative exponential distributions for unit and server failure times, while repair, treatment, and arrival rates are treated as arbitrary probability density functions. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The model uses negative exponential distributions for unit and server failure times, while repair, treatment, and arrival rates are treated as arbitrary probability density functions.

      In the paper's own words

      “The distributions for failure time of the unit and the server are taken as negative exponential while that of repair rate, treatment rate and arrival time of the server are arbitrary with different probability density functions.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The authors employed semi-Markov processes and regenerative point techniques to derive expressions for system effectiveness. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors employed semi-Markov processes and regenerative point techniques to derive expressions for system effectiveness.

      In the paper's own words

      “The semi-Markov process and regenerative point technique are adopted to derive the expressions for some measures of system effectiveness in study state.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Mean Time to System Failure (MTSF) and overall profit decrease as the failure rates of the units and the server increase. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Mean Time to System Failure (MTSF) and overall profit decrease as the failure rates of the units and the server increase.

      In the paper's own words

      “It observed that MTSF and profit keep on decreasing with the increase of failure rates of the unit and server.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Profit Analysis

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
    • MTSF and profit increase when the repair rate, server treatment rate, and server arrival rate are increased. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      MTSF and profit increase when the repair rate, server treatment rate, and server arrival rate are increased.

      In the paper's own words

      “However, they follow an upward trend with the increase of repair rate (θ), treatment rate (α) and arrival rate (β) of the server.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Profit Analysis

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
    • The Mean Time to System Failure is highly sensitive to failure rates, declining rapidly even with slight increases. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The Mean Time to System Failure is highly sensitive to failure rates, declining rapidly even with slight increases.

      In the paper's own words

      “Further, it can also be seen that MTSF declines rapidly with a slight positive change in failure rate.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Profit Analysis

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
    • The difference in profit between models decreases as unit failure, server treatment, and unit repair rates increase, but increases as the server arrival rate increases. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The difference in profit between models decreases as unit failure, server treatment, and unit repair rates increase, but increases as the server arrival rate increases.

      In the paper's own words

      “The results show that profit difference goes on decreasing with the increase of failure rate of the unit, treatment rate of the server, repair rate of the unit while it increases with the increase of arrival rate of the server.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Profit Difference Graph b) Comparative Study of the Profit of the System Models

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that system availability and profit can be improved by either ensuring the server is called immediately or by increasing the unit repair rate. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that system availability and profit can be improved by either ensuring the server is called immediately or by increasing the unit repair rate.

      In the paper's own words

      “the study reveals that a cold stand by system of two identical units can be made more available and profitable to use either by calling the sever immediately to rectify the faults or by increasing the repair rate of the failed unit in case server takes some time to arrive the system.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Profit Analysis

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
    • Calling the server immediately when no units are operational is particularly effective for increasing profit when unit failure rates are high. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      Calling the server immediately when no units are operational is particularly effective for increasing profit when unit failure rates are high.

      In the paper's own words

      “It is revealed that the idea of calling the server immediately when system has no unit to work, is useful in making the system more profitable to use, in case failure of the unit is high.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Profit Difference Graph b) Comparative Study of the Profit of the System Models

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (A modular electronic server rack with a primary active unit and a secondary standby unit). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Impact of Rates on System Performance
AI-generated conceptual illustration (A modular electronic server rack with a primary active unit and a secondary standby unit). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (A modular electronic server rack with a primary active unit and a secondary standby unit). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Impact of Rates on System Performance

AI-generated conceptual illustration (A modular electronic server rack with a primary active unit and a secondary standby unit). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

In reliability theory, it is proved that performance and reliability of repairable systems can be improved of redundancy. But there are many systems in which a unit cannot be kept as spare due to its high cost. Therefore, reliability modeling of such systems has been done by many researchers including Murari and Goel (1984) and Cao and Wu (1989) [1, 2] developed reliability models for redundant system under different repair polices. But, most of these systems have been studied under a common assumption that repair facility neither fails nor deteriorates during jobs. But, this assumption seems to unrealistic when repair facility meets with an accident may because of the reasons like mishandling, electric shocks and carelessness on the part of the server. In such a situation, treatment to the server may be given in order to resume the jobs by the server. However, the concept of server failure has already been introduced in Dhankar (2010) [3] while analyzing a huge unit system. In such a situation server may be allowed to take some time (called arrival time) to reach at the system with the condition that he has to reach the system immediately at the failure of both units. In view of the above, the purpose of the present study is to study a cold standby system of two identical units with server failure. There is a single server who is allowed to take some time to arrive at the system to carry out repair activities subject to the condition that server has to attend the system immediately at complete failure of the system. The server is subjected to failure while performing jobs and goes for treatment. And, the failed unit waits for repair till the server becomes in good condition after receiving treatment. The random variables associated with the failure rate, treatment and arrival rates are statistically independent. The distributions for failure time of the unit and the server are taken as negative exponential while that of repair rate, treatment rate and arrival time of the server are arbitrary with different probability density functions. The semi-Markov process and regenerative point technique are adopted to derive the expressions for some measures of system effectiveness in study state. The graphical behavior of some important reliability characteristic has been observed for arbitrary values of the various parameters and costs. The purpose of the present work is to develop the concept of comparison between two identical units by introducing simultaneously idea of arrival and conditional arrival time of the server.

Notations

Where 𝑇 denotes the time to system failure. mij : Contribution to mean sojourn time (i) in state Si when system transits directly to state Sj so that

Transition Probabilities and Mean Sojourn Times

Simple probabilistic considerations yield the following expressions for the non-zero elements as

Taking LST of above relation ( 4) and solving for Ф 0 * * (s), we have

The reliability of the system model can be obtained by taking Inverse Laplace transform of (5). The mean time to system failure (MTSF) is given by

Steady State Availability

Let Ai (t) be the probability that the system is in up-state at instant 't' given that the system entered regenerative state Si at t = 0.The recursive relations for () i At are given as: Bt be the probability that the server is busy in repair the unit at an instant't' given that the system entered regenerative state Si at t=0.The recursive relations for ()

Expected Number of Repairs

Expected Number of Repairs

Let ()

i Rt be the expected number of repairs by the server in (0, t] given that the system entered the regenerative state Si at t = 0.

The recursive relations for () i Rt are given as:

Expected Number of Treatments Given to the Server

Expected Number of Treatments Given to the Server

Let ()

i Tt be the expected number of treatments given to the server in (0, t] given that the system entered the regenerative state Si at t = 0. The recursive relations for () i Tt are given as:

Profit Analysis

The profit incurred to the system model in steady state can be obtained as

For the particular case ()

 , the values of some important reliability measures including mean time to system failure (MTSF), availability and profit function are obtained for arbitrary values of various parameters and. The behavior of these measures with respect to failure rate is shown respectively in figures 2 and 3. It observed that MTSF and profit keep on decreasing with the increase of failure rates of the unit and server. However, they follow an upward trend with the increase of repair rate (θ), treatment rate (α) and arrival rate (β) of the server. Further, it can also be seen that MTSF declines rapidly with a slight positive change in failure rate. Hence, the study reveals that a cold stand by system of two identical units can be made more available and profitable to use either by calling the sever immediately to rectify the faults or by increasing the repair rate of the failed unit in case server takes some time to arrive the system.

Profit Difference Graph b) Comparative Study of the Profit of the System Models

To make the study more concrete the behavior of some important reliability measures has been examined graphically for some specific values of the parameters. The mean time of system failure is same as that of the model in which server allowed to take some time to arrive (called arrival time) at the system to see the feasibility of repair. The trend of profit difference of the system models has been shown graphically in figure 4. The results show that profit difference goes on decreasing with the increase of failure rate of the unit, treatment rate of the server, repair rate of the unit while it increases with the increase of arrival rate of the server. It is revealed that the idea of calling the server immediately when system has no unit to work, is useful in making the system more profitable to use, in case failure of the unit is high.

References

6 in the original paper
  1. Murari K, Gupta V. Cost Analysis of a Two-Unit Standby System with a Regular Repairman and Patience Time, Microelectronics Reliability. 1984; 24(3):453-459.
  2. Cao, Jinhua, Wu Yan Hong. Reliability of two-unit cold standby system with replaceable repair facility, Microelectronics Reliability. 1989; 29(2):145-150.
  3. Malik SC, Dhankar. Probabilistic Analysis of a System with Server Failure during repair. Journal of Reliability and Statistics Studies. 2010; 3(2):1-10.
  4. Malik SC, Sureria. Reliability Measures of a Cold Standby System with Priority for Operation and Preventive Maintenance. International Journal of Mathematical Archive. 2013; 4(3):84-91. ISSN: 2229-5046.
  5. Malik SC. Reliability Modeling of a computer System with Preventive Maintenance and Priority Subject to Maximum Operation and Repair Times, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. 2013; 4(1):94-100.
  6. Nandal Jyoti, Malik SC. Reliability Measures of a Cold Standby System with Arrival Time of the Server Subject to Failure. International Journal of Statistics and Systam. 2016; 11(2):197-209. ISSN: 0973-2675.